Sunday, January 10, 2016

The Criminal Stalker Doesn't Like the Fact That I Find Dmitri Kovtun Attractive & Lies About Leonard Cohen & My Former Relationship

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 4:26 AM
Subject: Fwd: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Why I'm Madly In Love With Dmitri Kovtun; Cohen's Delusional If He Thinks We Were In A "Dating Relation"
To: fsb <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>

Good Morning FSB,

My stalker is now harassing me over Dmitri Kovtun.  I think it would be more accurate to say I have a "crush" of sorts on Mr. Kovtun.  Stephen Gianelli is a man who does not know me, lies about me relentlessly, targeted my sons for years, and represents Leonard Cohen's legal positions.  He also appears to be moonlighting for Phil Spector's prosecutors.  That would explain why, contrary to the evidence, he publicly argued that Lana Clarkson's DNA was not on the ammunition and the gun was Phil Spector's.  Neither of these statements is true but Gianelli is a bald-faced liar who appears to have motive.  

Would you refer to Litvenenko as a "prominent political figure?"  Well, that's how my Stalker views him.  He also wrote that Dmitry Kovtun was "implicated in the murder" of Litvenenko.  I personally believe the evidence proves that Andrei Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun were set up and think it's farcical to assume that two former KGB agents (with military training) would poison themselves or go to such absurd lengths to "murder" someone.  However, my Stalker is not interested in facts.  He has also written, although he doesn't know me, that Cohen and I had SEX a few times in the 1980s and lies that Cohen testified about that.  Leonard Cohen did not testify that we had sex.  He testified that we were in a statutory required "brief intimate" relationship.  Why?  Because Leonard Cohen understands what outlets like the Daily Mail are interested in.  No one is interested in the fact that Cohen committed what appears to be egregious criminal tax fraud, stole from me (Machat & Machat and Phil Spector), and has perjured himself relentlessly.  Cohen didn't testify that the relationship "ran its own course."  He testified that he didn't know when it ended.  The reason for this is because it never began.  We were not in a "brief intimate" relationship and sexual harassment, indecent exposure, etc. is not dating.  It is to LA Superior Court and the City Attorney of Los Angeles however.  I find that entirely twisted and sick.

In any event, I wouldn't date Leonard Cohen if he was the last man on earth.  He was not someone I was attracted to.  I would assume Leonard Cohen and his representatives have passed on these lies to my Criminal Stalker.  

The situation with Andrei Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun reminds me of the Phil Spector case:  a fabricated narrative with no evidence to support it.  It is however salacious and the news media knows that fabricated, salacious narratives sell.  They are also uninterested in the truth.  My case is evidence of that fact as well.

All the best,

One of the men accused of killing Alexander Litvinenko claimed today that the Russian spy's death may have been an 'accidental suicide' after he inadvertently handled polonium.

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 10:46 PM
Subject: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Why I'm Madly In Love With Dmitri Kovtun; Cohen's Delusional If He Thinks We Were In A "Dating Relation"
To: Kelley Lynch <>

You are "madly in love" with a Russian suspect implicated in the murder of a prominant political figure by poisoning? 

That figures.

BTW, no one ever said Cohen "dated you"; he testified that he had SEX with you a few times in the 1980's (but there was NO "romance" involved, and that the relationship "ran it's own course" and ended.

That does not sound like a "dating" relationship to me - let alone one that occured in this decade (let alone in THIS millinium) -so there is no "is" about it, whatever it WAS (30 years ago). 

Normally, "dating" consists more of dinner and a movie than the boss dipping into the company inkwell for a quickie now and again. 

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.