Saturday, January 16, 2016

Leonard Cohen's Use of Fraud, Perjury & Litigation Misconduct Has LA Superior Court's Stamp of Approval

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:28 AM
Subject: Fwd: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Leonard Cohen Is Entitled to Steal, Lie, Cheat, Slander, Retaliate, Etc.
To: alan hootnick <>, Michelle Rice <>, Robert Kory <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,

Alan Hootnick,

What is your involvement with Leonard Cohen's fraudulent default judgment, theft, slander, insurance fraud, embezzlement, tax fraud, etc?  I understand that you are a supporter of Phil Spector's but I do not understand why this criminal is harassing me with you copied in.  Robert Kory and Michelle Rice are Cohen's attorneys of record.  There are presently four appeals before the Appellate Division here.  The Tax Court matter will be appealed to the 9th Circuit.  I am filing a RICO suit.  It would be hard for Cohen's operative to argue anything since I haven't filed the lawsuit.  He is clearly attempting to elicit information.  Cohen is confident that he can perjure himself, commit theft and embezzlement, fraudulently accuse me of many matters - including when he obtained fraudulent tax refunds (six months before the fraud default was entered), and do whatever he wants.  After all, he willfully bankrupted me, destroyed my reputation, and then stole from me via a fraud default judgment.  He wanted to be able to argue claims preclusion and willfully failing to serve me is one of his tactics.

I will be addressing the Tax Court case directly with the 9th Circuit.

I didn't file a second motion to vacate Cohen's fraud default  judgment.  I filed a motion addressing egregious fraud upon the court.  The court mischaracterized my motion as one of Cali's catch-all motions to reconsider.  Cohen's lawyers didn't file a signed order after obtaining the denial of my motion to vacate based on their further fraudulent misrepresentations and perjured testimony/statements.  I am now clear that LA Superior Court condones the use of fraud, perjury, and litigation misconduct to obtain judgments, verdicts, and orders.  They also fraudulently assign "dating relationships" in secret.  

Do you have any questions for me?

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:15 AM
Subject: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Leonard Cohen Is Entitled to Steal, Lie, Cheat, Slander, Retaliate, Etc.
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: alan hootnick <>

Ms. Lynch,

You write, in part:

"I don't believe all legal actions I am contemplating against Cohen are foreclosed."

Unfortunately (for you) your belief is not grounded on specific legal ‎authority consisting of a statute that you can cite by section number or on-point case law that you can cite by case name, reporter volume and page number. 

It is also unfortunate (for you) that you either lack the capacity I or refuse to - consider the statute and case citations that I have provided you with that establish to a legal certainty ‎that your threatened lawsuit against Cohen and others is barredd by the RICO statute of limitations, res judicata, the Rooker Feldman Doctrine, the litigation privledge, and other well established legal principles. 

This is unsurprising.  

You refused to believe (for example) that the lack of a notice of determination expressly addressed by the IRS to "Kelley Lynch"‎ deprived the tax court of jurisdiction to even consider your July, 2015 petition. To this day you refuse to accept this unambigious legal truth - even after the tax court dismissed your case on that very basis on December 29, 2015.

As for your second motion before judge Hess‎, in law and motion practice is is not the title of the motion or the characterization of the motion by the party filing it that governs how the law treats it. Rather it is the ORDER which is requested in the motion that governs.

In June of 2015 Judge Hess denied the SECOND motion that you filed ‎requesting orders vacating Cohen's May, 2006 judgment and dismissing the case, OR, in the alternative, giving you leave to file an answer to Cohen's 2005 complaint. 

You filed an INITIAL motion requesting those identical ‎order in 2013 and the motion was denied in January of 2014.

Therefore, from a legal standpoint you did in fact file two motions to vacate, both of which were denied. 

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.‎