Friday, January 1, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to Senate Judiciary Re. Leonard Cohen & His Operatives Should Write 9th Circuit Directly And Lie to Them

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: 9th Circuit appeal
To: Fabian Paulmikell A <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, Michelle Rice <>, Robert Kory <>

Senate Judiciary,

The Criminal's quite blatant, no?  I'll submit his emails to the 9th Circuit and draw their attention to the fact that Cohen's operative will "rub my nose" in their opinions.  Where did Tax Court obtain jurisdiction over Leonard Cohen?  The $1 million was not his?  The Court has jurisdiction over the fraud upon the court.  Period.  This isn't a third party's legal matter.  The $1 million belongs to Traditional Holdings, LLC and Cohen argued in 2003 that it was income to him.  Why don't you review my Petition to see what I argued?  The $1 million and $7 million 1099s were "inadvertent."  Interesting vis a vis Cohen's fraudulent tax refunds, no?  That's an issue for federal court.  

If Cohen wants to go after me over a book, that will happen in court.  He prefers to be unopposed because in that way he can lie, submit fraud, perjure himself extensively, and slander me.  And because he's in bed with half the local government in LA, many LA residents have no recourse with respect to the ongoing criminal conduct that involves egregious criminal witness tampering and intimidation.  No one intelligent believes the moronic cover your ass op on the part of Cohen, Kory, Rice, Gianelli, et al.  

If Kory & Rice want to discuss this matter they should write the 9th Circuit directly and lie to them.  It works beautifully with LA Superior Court.  I'll be sure to let the 9th Circuit know.


On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Cohen's operative continues to harass me.  I didn't file a motion and I have no idea who would hire these ambulance chasers.  Kory & Rice have been once again advised that this should cease and desist.


On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Michelle Rice or Robert Kory,

If you would like to discuss the appeal before the 9th Circuit re. the Tax Court matter, hit reply all or write the court and lie to them directly.  I didn't file a motion so I didn't cite anything.  I asked the Court to permit me to file a motion.  This is a very very elementary concept.  The $1 million was not Leonard Cohen's so the Court didn't have jurisdiction.  Traditional Holdings, LLC owns the $1 million that your client stole.  The deal was closed in 2001.  Your client filed a Petition with Tax Court in 2003.  These are verifiable facts and the IRS has been provided with evidence.  Please advise the IRS that the reason suspended corporations are in a 2005 default judgment is due to Judge Babcock's 2008 order.  Perhaps they'll appreciate the logic.

This has now gone on since 2009 when Gianelli heard from you.  All the issues relate to Leonard Cohen, IRS, and Phil Spector.  One of the points of these emails, and Gianelli's blog posts, is to discredit and slander me while representing Leonard Cohen's legal positions.  My sons have been targeted.  My elderly parents were targeted.  My sister and her husband were targeted.  My friends, including the Scientist, have been targeted.  And Paulette Brandt is being targeted.  That will be addressed in my RICO suit.  You'll have 21 days to answer and come up with more lies.  We shall see if I survive a motion to dismiss.  

This conduct should cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:46 AM
Subject: 9th Circuit appeal
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Your "objection" (opposition) to the Chief Trial Counsel's motion to dismiss your tax court petition for lack of jurisdiction completely ignores the grounds for the motion (no predicate notice of determination), ignores the statute that supports the argument and also ignores the cited, controlling case law.  ‎This omission on your part is explicitly mentioned in the tax court order granting the motion to dismiss. 

If you had an on-point statute or pinpoint case citation providing that a general allegation of "fraud" on the part of another taxpayer is sufficient to establish tax court jurisdiction for your filing despite the‎ lack of a predicate notice of determination, you would have cited it. 

Since there is no such authority, and since it is well established that absent a notice of determination served on you less than the number of days before the date your petition was filed that are specified in the governing statute, your 9th Circuit appeal is dead on arrival; frivolous as a matter of law. 

Remember these words well, since I intend to rub your nose in them when (not if) the 9th Circuit either dismisses the appeal or affirms the order.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.