Friday, January 1, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to IRS Chief Trial Counsel's Office Re. Leonard Cohen & the Ambulance Chasers

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 3:17 PM
Subject: Fwd: 9th Circuit appeal
To: Fabian Paulmikell A <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, 

Hello Mr. Fabian,

Happy New Year.  My Criminal Stalker wants to discuss the situation with Tax Court.  I didn't file a motion so that seems like a moot discussion.  I asked the Court to grant leave permitting me to file a motion.  Why would I argue my motion re. fraud upon the court in a document requesting leave to file such a motion?  Tax Court didn't have jurisdiction over Cohen.  It has jurisdiction over the fraud upon the court.  I don't care what was mentioned in any order.  I didn't file the motion because I requested leave to file one.  It's an elementary concept.

Who knows what I would have cited in an actual motion because I didn't write or file one.  There's authority to vacate judgments in Tax Court based upon fraud upon the court.  I'll let the 9th Circuit speak for itself.  They can say whatever they want also.  I'm writing a book as well and will say whatever I feel like saying in that book.  Cohen can head into court over that issue as well.  I'll put it online for free.  

The criminal is going to rub my nose in the insanity of numerous courts involved in Cohen's insanity.  That's rich.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:46 AM
Subject: 9th Circuit appeal
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Your "objection" (opposition) to the Chief Trial Counsel's motion to dismiss your tax court petition for lack of jurisdiction completely ignores the grounds for the motion (no predicate notice of determination), ignores the statute that supports the argument and also ignores the cited, controlling case law.  ‎This omission on your part is explicitly mentioned in the tax court order granting the motion to dismiss. 

If you had an on-point statute or pinpoint case citation providing that a general allegation of "fraud" on the part of another taxpayer is sufficient to establish tax court jurisdiction for your filing despite the‎ lack of a predicate notice of determination, you would have cited it. 

Since there is no such authority, and since it is well established that absent a notice of determination served on you less than the number of days before the date your petition was filed that are specified in the governing statute, your 9th Circuit appeal is dead on arrival; frivolous as a matter of law. 

Remember these words well, since I intend to rub your nose in them when (not if) the 9th Circuit either dismisses the appeal or affirms the order.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.