Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email To United States Senate Judiciary Re. Leonard Cohen's Tactics

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:11 AM
Subject: Fwd: your threats to "move to vacate" the so called "fraud domestic violence order" registered in case no. BQ033717 using court form DV-600
To: Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>
Cc: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, tips@radaronline.com

Senate Judiciary,

I intend to print out the unconscionable harassing emails and attach them to my Motion vacating Leonard Cohen's fraud domestic violence order.  Leonard Cohen has used these as litigation tactics.  

In June of 2005, months before Cohen pursued this tactic, Greenberg filed a lawsuit against Cohen and his lawyer, Robert Kory, and were already aware that they planned to use fraudulent restraining orders to discredit me.  By the time Cohen filed his lawsuit, he and Kory understood I had reported the allegations that Cohen committed tax fraud to IRS and other authorities.  Kory has lied about this in declarations before the Court although I have emails with him proving otherwise.  They vowed to "crush" me.  The custody matter was coordinated.  At the end of the insane SWAT incident, LAPD concluded that my dog was my hostage and they were taking precautions.  My son was asked to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen/Kory while I was en route to Killer King.  The entire Killer King file is fraudulent and falsified.  

Leonard Cohen and I were not in a statutory required dating relationship.  Therefore, the registration of the foreign order is fraudulent because it transformed it into a domestic violence order.  The City Attorney prosecuted it after LAPD, noting that my requests were generally for tax information, through their Family Division.  The prosecutor lied about federal tax matters.  The judge himself lied and said I was aware of Leonard Cohen's fraudulent tax refunds when I was not.  I have now challenged them as fraudulent.  I was not served Leonard Cohen's lawsuit and he and his lawyers just come up with one fraudulent narrative after another.  There is obviously VAWA funding fraud as well.  The Criminal Stalker is alleging, on Cohen's behalf, that this is harassing to the Canadian citizen who thinks his conduct is acceptable.  I was unaware that this was a domestic violence order during my trial and until my appeal (for lack of a better word) was nearly over.  It took me until April 2014 to obtain a written confirmation from Boulder Combined Court that the order wasn't domestic violence.  I have a right to pursue legal remedies even though Leonard Cohen doesn't like this.  He doesn't like our system of justice.  He thought not serving me and slandering me should be sufficient.  

I think there should be massive investigations and prosecutions.  Please review these excerpts from Greenberg's lawsuit about Cohen and Kory's plans.  And now, Leonard Cohen is represented by Daniel Bergman who destroyed my sons' lives. 

If this order was entered into any domestic violence database, there is also wire fraud.  I will file my Motion, obtain a hearing date, and we shall see what happens.  I don't care about the "hearsay" from the Judicial Council or the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court's office although I tend to think they know what they are talking about and fortunately they - unlike LA Superior Court - were entirely professional.

Leonard Cohen made a desperate flight into Boulder, Colorado to obtain a fraud restraining order after threatening journalist Ann Diamond for writing a factual article about me.  See her declaration attached.  She knows Leonard Cohen.  She is now being slandered by the Criminal Stalker, of course.  He's a proxy and obviously moonlighting.

As for my Tax Court Petition, I didn't receive a determination that Leonard Cohen doesn't owe me IRS required form 1099, etc. for the year 2004.  The IRS continues to advise me that Leonard Cohen owes me that information.  Are there any penalties for his conduct?  He used the fraudulent and fabricated narrative, in the Complaint, to defend himself against allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud and to obtain fraudulent tax refunds.  

I also have a hearing on October 6, 2015 re. Leonard Cohen's latest attempt to extort money from me.  Leonard Cohen continues to argue that he is the alter ego of corporate entities.  So far his legal tactics involve a fraudulent default judgment and fraudulent restraining orders.  

I continue to be criminally harassed over the situation.  Please don't forget that Leonard Cohen aligned himself with former DA Steve Cooley and was on the stand, during my alleged trial, testifying about Phil Spector and a gun. The prosecutor elicited that testimony.  


145. When these tactics to draw Lynch into his extortion scheme proved futile, Cohen
and Kory – according to Lynch – turned to far more aggressive means to obtain her cooperation.
Indeed, as heard by other witnesses, Cohen and Kory vowed to "crush her," and planned to use
restraining orders and other means to prevent her from serving as a credible witness regarding
both Cohen's affairs and in regard to the scheme into which they had tried without success to
draw her.

146. Consistent with that vow and plan, and according to Lynch and other witnesses,
and on information and belief, Cohen and Kory's tactics to terrorize, silence, or disparage Lynch
have included, inter alia, the following:

a. contacting City National Bank, where Lynch, Lynch’s son, and Lynch’s
father, all had personal banking accounts, and convincing City National
Bank to put a freeze on all three of their accounts;

b. alleging that Lynch's father and mother were depositing funds for Lynch
in secret offshore bank accounts, even while, in fact, Lynch's mother was
suffering from Alzheimer's and had moved to Texas to be in the care of
her other daughter in light of Lynch's precarious financial circumstances;

c. threatening Lynch that she would go to jail if she did not cooperate, and
having her younger son's father, Steve Lindsay, who was also Cohen’s
record producer, repeat these threats in the child's presence;

d. threatening to "go to child services,” encouraging Steve Lindsay to file
legal action to remove Lynch’s younger (and his) son from her custody,
and submitting affidavits (from Kory and Superfon) supporting that effort;

e. in a coordinated fashion with Lindsay’s child custody petition,
encouraging or directing Steve Lindsay to call in a warning to the LAPD
(not related to Traditional Holdings, but on some other, unknown pretext)
that caused a police team to descend, guns drawn, on Lynch's home,
resulting in her being handcuffed and taken involuntarily, in her bathing
suit, to a hospital psychiatric ward and medicated without her consent,
before being released the next day, during which time Kory attempted to
persuade Lynch’s older son, Rutger, to sell Lynch’s house and provide $3
million; and

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: your threats to "move to vacate" the so called "fraud domestic violence order" registered in case no. BQ033717 using court form DV-600

To: Entire_World@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

From Page 2 of Judicial Council form DV-600 <http://ceb.com/jcforms/dv600.pdf>:

This form sets forth the procedure to register a foreign protection order under Family Code section 6404. No court
hearing is required to register the foreign protection order.” (Bold italics added.)

From Family Code section 6401:

’Protection order’ means an injunction or other order, issued
by a tribunal under the domestic violence, family violence, or
antistalking laws of the issuing stateto prevent an individual from
engaging in violent or threatening acts against, harassment of,
contact or communication with, or physical proximity to, another
individual. (Bold italics added.)

From Family Code section 6404:

Any foreign protection order shall, upon request of the
person in possession of the order, be registered with a court of this
state in order to be entered in the Domestic Violence Restraining
Order System established under Section 6380. The Judicial Council
shall adopt rules of court to…[s]et forth the process  whereby a
person in possession of a foreign protection order may
voluntarily register the order with a court of this state for entry into
the Domestic Violence Restraining Order System.”

Clearly, the 2008 Colorado order meets the definition of a foreign protection order set forth in section 6401, and MUST on request be registered with a California court “for entry into  the Domestic Violence Restraining Order System”. It is equally explicit from the instructions on page 2 of DV-600 that form 600 IS the proper form to register a foreign protection order in California “for entry into  the Domestic Violence Restraining Order System”.

No number of (alleged) hearsay conversations with Judicial Council staff and/or staff of the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court will alter that immutable legal fact – which is plain as day. (See Wilson v. Safeway Stores, Inc. (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 267, 271-272.)

It is little wonder that – although you have been threatening to do so since your release from jail in 2014 – you have not filed a “motion to vacate” the May 25, 2011 registration of the 2008 Colorado protection order in California pursuant to Family Code section 6404 using the Judicial Counsel prescribed form DV-600. Nor is there the slightest doubt that the procedures followed in that matter, Los Angeles County Superior Court case no. BQ033717, were proper in every respect.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece