Friday, June 26, 2015

The Proxy Criminal Should Address His Questions To Leonard Cohen & His Legal Representatives

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: Your latest blog post accusing Leonard Cohen of fraud on the tax court
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,
Cc: Dan Bergman <>, Michelle Rice <>

Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,

Do you have any questions about this matter?  Well, hit reply all.  I don't respond to proxy criminals.

Kelley Lynch

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I complained to various parties about this situation.  First of all, I asked Steve Blanq (Hochman, Rettig) to review the Traditional Holdings LLC corporate documents and advise me if something was wrong.  Steve Blanq then called me and advised me that Richard Westin phoned him directly to advise him not to discuss that issue with me because I didn't have attorney/client privilege.  Steve Blanq can testify about that fact.  I also wrote the Chief Trial Counsel's office because I was alarmed.  I don't always accuse Leonard Cohen of tax fraud.  My lawyers and accountant believed he committed criminal tax fraud.  Dale Burgess, who was NOT fired, worked for IRS and believed IRS Criminal Intelligence should be involved here.  He asked me to advise IRS and Treasury that he witnessed Kory's offer of 50% community proper.  I also have that in writing from my lawyers.  Everyone is not lying.  Ken Cleveland personally advised me (and does not believe what Robert Kory testified he believes) that this situation resembles ENRON, that he cannot understand it all - let alone me, and he felt IRS would file charges against Leonard Cohen.  Ed Dean, who represented Cohen and the charitable remainder trusts, told me that the IRS Commissioner would or should come in after Leonard Cohen and his representatives.  Should I go on?  Someone at Deneuve Construction has a brother who works for Criminal Intelligence at IRS and he was phoning him about this matter and what he was witnessing.  That would include Robert Kory and Daniel Bergman contacting Phil Schull who, I might note, reviewed the emails to IRS.  He understood I asked Bergman for Ray's social security number for their forms re. life insurance.  Phil Shull got his lawyer involved.  He's an extremely intelligent man.  

I don't have any expertise. The people I just mentioned do.  Dale Burgess worked for IRS.  The Tax Court case was not settled by Westin.  I don't know if that's intentional disinformation on Gianelli's part or not.  Hochman, Rettig handled this matter and Steve Blanq later wrote and asked me if I was being blamed for Richard Westin's actions.  I've forwarded that email to IRS.  It was a good guess and Steve Blanq is the individual who advised me that Westin made the IRS agent in Ogden, Utah "nervous" with his evasiveness.

I did address this at the time.  I have a copy of my letter to the IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office from that time. 

Gianelli is on someone's payroll.  I'll submit this evidence to the Tax Court.

All the best,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:20 AM
Subject: Your latest blog post accusing Leonard Cohen of fraud on the tax court

You’re right. There was a tax court case filed by Richard Westin in 2002 that reached a stipulated decision (in other words a settlement) with the IRS.

I can’t wait to learned how exactly the IRS Chief Trial Counsel and the tax court  was “misled” by Richard Westin into agreeing that stipulated disposition, why you believe you have standing to raise the issue, and why you think that – 13-years later you believe that the issue will be re-examined civilly or investigated criminally.

Wait, I forgot, you automatically accuse Leonard Cohen of committing “fraud” in every tax matter in which he has ever been involved, even though your March, 2015 declaration admits that you have no expertise in tax matters and had no involvement in Cohen’s tax issues.

Incidentally, since this tax court case was initiated and settled by Richard Westin DURING your employ by Leonard Cohen while you held Cohen’s general power of attorney, the point being if you thought a “fraud on the tax court” was being perpetrated by Mr. Westin (the matter never went to trial, so Cohen never testified), why didn’t you speak out AT THE TIME?