Friday, June 26, 2015

The Criminal Stalker's Client Now Appears To Believe She Speaks For IRS, FBI & DOJ

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 6:16 PM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>

Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Apart from Gianelli's criminally harassing emails, attempting to elicit information about Tax Court and my communications with IRS and the Chief Trial Counsel's office, Karina Von Watteville continues to post psychotic rants on her attorney's blog dedicated to slandering and lying about me, federal tax matters, and issues related to Leonard Cohen.  No one sleeps on the floor.  It sounds as thought KVW is threatening Paulette actually with respect to her apartment.  That's a very serious matter.  Does Von Watteville speak for IRS, FBI, or DOJ?  She certainly appears to be.  I find that particularly disturbing since she does not work for any of these agencies and is not authorized to speak for them.  

This woman, with Gianelli, defrauded Paulette of $6,700 in rental arrears; called Robert Kory after receiving Paulette's rent demand letter; began ranting about Cohen and Kory to Paulette and the mediators; and then set off on a campaign - with Gianelli - to slander and discredit me and others.  Linda Carol is the individual who prepared the declaration provided to Paulette Brandt for her Small Claims case and approved on May 22, 2015 - not I.  

These people are out of their minds.  KVW has decided to interfere in Leonard Cohen's tax matter.  There is a Leonard Cohen tax matter and I discussed some of the issues, including the fraud upon the Tax Court, with the IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office the other day.  I have also challenged his tax refunds as fraudulent and believe that means his 2005 tax returns, amended 2004 and 2003 returns, and carry-backs on his 2001 and 2002 returns are all fraudulent.  I am aware of no case this blatant that the IRS didn't prosecute.  I am aware, and the State of Kentucky confirmed this as well, that IRS may not disclose details of any probable prosecution or investigation prior to filing the Complaint.  The State of Kentucky would like everything I sent IRS including all emails I authorized IRS to access and use.  Those emails are all communications between me and Cohen and Cohen and his representatives.  I didn't have a/c privilege and therefore when those documents were sent to me, the sender was responsible for any a/c privilege breach.  Westin understood that I didn't have a/c privilege when he advised Steve Blanq of Hochman Rettig about this.  Furthermore, the documents relate to the corporations and many of them were purchased on PACER or are available through other courts and state websites.  Furthermore, some of the sealed documents were attached to Neal Greenberg's lawsuit and no one seemed to argue a/c privilege which is fascinating.  My emails refuting Cohen and his representatives are not privileged.  I have no idea what Judge Hess was doing but this matter, once I file the motion to unseal, will be appealed if necessary.  Judge Hess wanted to know how he should know that documents are publicly available.  One ways that Judge Hess could know would have been to review the evidence prior to sealing it.  Otherwise, he may have sealed the newspaper for all he knew.

All the best,

  1. UPDATE: Judge Hess: "Motion denied". Lynch vows appeal all the way to the US Supreme Court. Full hearing coverage in a separate post later.
  2. This should finish her.Lynch is a nobody fame junkie rag hag living on Paulette's floor still grinding out fiction emails to agencies that don't care. Soon the floor will be gone when they all have to go!