Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email To Leonard Cohen's Lawyer Re. Proxy Operative Stalker, Stephen Gianelli, Who Was Not Copied On Her Email With cc's To Daniel Bergman & Michelle Rice

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:46 AM
Subject: Fwd: KELLEY LYNCH LOSES IN COURT (AGAIN), VOWS TO TAKE FIGHT TO US SUPREME COURT
To: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov, AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov


Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,

I do not appreciate the relentless harassment (that I and others continue to be subjected to) over Leonard Cohen by Bay Area lawyer Stephen Gianelli.   I believe this harassment, particularly as it relates to witnesses, is highly relevant and material.  I also believe one of you, or someone affiliated with you, advised Gianelli that I wrote IRS, FBI, and DOJ this afternoon and I did not write Gianelli.

I intend to appeal.  This is a void judgment and that means it can be appealed.  I will respond to your retaliatory Motion for Sanctions.  I am the individual being harassed.  My Motion for Terminating Sanctions addressed fraud upon the court and was NOT a motion for reconsideration.  The court seemed annoyed because I continue to state that I was not served.  I suppose Judge Hess would merely concede this point but that is not my nature.  I also will not tolerate lying lawyers and rotten tactics.  This matter will be appealed and it will go to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.  Perhaps they can address Hazel Atlas.  I understand it's Rice's position that California does not affirm Hazel-Atlas.  It clearly affirms fraud upon the court.  

I will also file a motion to vacate the fraud domestic violence order.  I'll provide the Family Court with my emails with the Chief Justice's office (California Supreme Court) and Judicial Council so you cannot argue that I'm "mad" at Michelle Rice.  The notion is positively absurd and laughable.  I also intend to address the unlawful sealing of documents - including those available on PACER; attached to Greenberg's lawsuit; and/or available through the SDNY.  I did not have attorney/client privilege with Leonard Cohen's lawyers and definitely do not with his current lawyers.  The notion is obscene.

This harassment should cease and desist.  


Kelley Lynch



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:39 AM
Subject: KELLEY LYNCH LOSES IN COURT (AGAIN), VOWS TO TAKE FIGHT TO US SUPREME COURT
To: Entire_World@gmail.com


Tuesday, June 23, 2015

KELLEY LYNCH LOSES IN COURT (AGAIN), VOWS TO TAKE FIGHT TO US SUPREME COURT

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-e3K_Q5LVrnQ/VYotcEIr8FI/AAAAAAAAEdY/7eomrjusIuU/s320/KELLEY%2BLYNCH%2BLOSES%2BIN%2BCOURT%2B%2528AGAIN%2529%252C%2BVOWS%2BTO%2BTAKE%2BFIGHT%2BTO%2BUS%2BSUPREME%2BCOURT.jpg
                                                                                                                                        Kelley Lynch:  "It's a conspiracy!"

Unsurprisingly, the SECOND of Kelley Lynch’s motions to vacate Leonard Cohen’s NINE-YEAR OLD, $7M default judgment she has filed in 14-months has, according to Lynch, been DENIED.

 Unsurprisingly, she vows to fight on.



From: Kelley  Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>  Date: Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:50 AM
Subject:
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>
Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>,
"Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>,
"Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>,
Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>,
MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>,
nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>,
fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>,
rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>,
khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>,
blourd <blourd@caa.com>,
Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>,
a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>,
wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>,
Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>,
"glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>,
Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>,
"hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>,
"stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>,
mike.feuer@lacity.org,
"mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>,
OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov,
"Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>,
whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov,
AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov


Cc: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>,
Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>


 
 IRS, FBI, and DOJ,


The judge, whose demeanor was reprehensible,
 denied the motion.
  He evidently didn't read the
documents or declarations and argued that I might

 have had a  co-occupant.  That's not what Cohen 
argued.  I intend  to appeal immediately.  I am going
 to the U.S. Supreme  Court over this if necessary.


I will now file my motion to vacate the fraud
domestic violence order; object to the seal; 

respond to the  Motion for Sanctions (left at
 Paulette's while we were  at court and handed 
to me by Robert Kory); and, the  appeal.


The court said I did not prove extrinsic fraud. 


He refused to address the fraud and perjury used to obtain
the default and his January 2014 order.  He did not address
the declarations or clarify the ambiguous judgment. 


It's my burden to prove that Cohen had him seal publicly
available documents.


The judge acknowledged that he does not have
jurisdiction over federal tax matters but he's hearing
one.  He said his seal relates to the public and not Tax
Court.  


As Paulette just noted - "Why are we here  since

 he didn't bother reading anything?" and "LA works
 beautifully for the criminal."   That's factual.


The judge said I chose to represent myself.  In
any event, the man's conduct is appalling and 

this will  be appealed.  They do not like to admit
 their own screw ups  either.  Their procedural
 problems are evidently my  issue.  When I 
mentioned that he was violating my rights to
due process, the judge said I tell everyone that
.
  How  would he know?  I don't know this man.   


-- Kelley


Posted by Blogonaut at 9:11 PM http://img2.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif