Sunday, May 10, 2015

LA Confidential's Production Of "A Nightmare On Elm Street" Featuring Criminal Stalker Stephen Gianelli As Freddie Kruger

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Brandt v. Von Watteville; Small Claims Court No. LAM 14M09452
To: Stephen Gianelli <>, Karina Von Watteville <>, Linda Carol <>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>,, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, "" <>, Feedback <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>


I have forwarded you the criminally harassing emails I've recently received; Gianelli's "jail" threat to Linda Carol; and Karina Von Watteville's threatening letter to Linda Carol stating that she could be expelled.  Linda Carol is the person who is the victim here.  Karina Von Watteville should stop lying.  As I have stated, I will subpoena the head trial counsel for ICE if Von Watteville files a fraudulent lawsuit against me and perjures herself.  The IRS, FBI, and DOJ were copied in on the handful of cease and desist letters I sent her regarding HER CONDUCT and SLANDER.  ICE can confirm that with IRS, FBI, and DOJ.  I do not know either of these individuals and they appear completely out of control.  You now have the latest draft of Linda Carol's declaration that will indeed be filed with LA Superior Court.  This is blatant witness tampering and an attempt to dissuade a witness.  Gianelli has previously, with Spector's former assistant (who stole $1 million from him), targeted my email accounts and blog and had them shut down.  Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh, who also works in tandem with Gianelli to harass people, targeted Phil Spector's Facebook page and had it shut down.  I know one thing for a fact - these three individuals are pathetic liars.  That may be why someone wrote that I am in A Nightmare On Elm Street featuring Gianelli as Freddie Kruger.  

How many times have I advised this criminal to cease and desist?  He has sent me the extradition treaty information between Greece and U.S. and seems to think he is untouchable.  He has also issued not-so-veiled threats about his alleged Mafia connections & obviously sent the "bloody stump" email that falsely accused Oliver Stone of engaging in criminal conduct and slandered us horrendously.  He harasses Oliver Stones agents at CAA but does not know Oliver Stone.  He has harassed Ron Burkle and many, many others.  

All the best,

On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Stephen Gianelli and Karina Von Watteville,

I am advising both of you - once again - to immediately stop criminally harassing me.  I am not a party to Paulette Brandt's Small Claims matter; neither of you are formally parties to the Leonard Cohen matters that i am involved with - or the upcoming hearing on June 23, 2015; and, Linda Carol's declaration will be presented to numerous judges - including Small Claims Court.

I have no idea what you are talking about with respect to a You Tube link.  If the account was suspended, which it was (and reported to You Tube) then no one could send a link from that account.  Perhaps "law enforcement" will figure that out.  They should figure out that we are the individuals being criminally harassed - including by you Gianelli.  You are a Criminal Stalker who is moonlighting, argues Spector prosecution theories online; and appear to be part of Leonard Cohen's legal defense team.  I am aware that Von Watteville (in response to Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter) became obsessed with me, began slandering me, called Robert Kory, and threatened to sue me.  And now, Gianelli, she is your client and you are personally and directly arguing with the judge in the Small Claims matter.  Who knows.  Perhaps he will realize that fact.

Neither of you know me and neither of you know where I presently live.  I don't divulge personal information to people I view as [un]savory characters and/or involved with criminal conduct.  

The conclusions drawn in this harassing email (with Von Watteville copied in) are deranged.  They are evidence of rotten legal logic and explain the joke "How do you know when a lawyer is lying?"

Cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:22 PM
Subject: FW: Brandt v. Von Watteville; Small Claims Court No. LAM 14M09452
Cc: Karina Von Watteville <>


Ms. Lynch,

What you refer to as the “meta data” for Linda Carol’s Gmail address, i.e. what you see when you hover the cursor over the link ( vs. “Mail to”) depends on the email client in which you view one of Ms. Carol’s emails. Viewed in the web based  Gmail client itself it is the former; viewed in my Outlook email program it is the latter.

There is, however, no denying that “” is Linda Carol’s email address, and has one of her old pictures (VERY OLD picture – like from 30 years ago) embedded in it.

Since Linda Carol is your housemate in a small two bedroom apartment with three occupants, why not simply ask her if she sent the video clip to me?

Of course you already know this, because you and Paulette Brandt both encouraged her to send the video clip to me to get Ms. Von Watteville to pay Ms. Brandt, which is why the three of you distributed the libelous flier and engaged in the other slander and harassment that may get you all sued. This encouragement took place at the same time the three of you discussed the fact that You Tube suspended Ms. Carol’s account, where she had no doubt earlier posted the clip (also in violation of the law).

Sending me the clip was based on the (false) assumption that I was behind the account suspension, to show me “see you cannot stop me from distributing this clip”.

It is a law enforcement matter now.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

From: Stephen Gianelli []
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 5:04 PM
To: Karina Von Watteville
Subject: Fwd: Brandt v. Von Watteville; Small Claims Court No. LAM 14M09452

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Linda Carol <>
Date: Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: Brandt v. Von Watteville; Small Claims Court No. LAM 14M09452

Linda Carolv

On May 9, 2015 8:55 AM, "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <> wrote:

Dear Ms. Lynch,

Thank you so much for confirming that Paulette Brandt received the Answer and attached Declaration in response to Ms. Brandt’s motion for a new trial by mail, which you did  by posting it on your blog.

You also emailed it to Ms. Von Watteville’s opposing counsel in a pending probate matter along with the Declaration of Linda Carol, which you reiterated you intended to file in the above referenced small claims action, even though the action has been dismissed with prejudice, the offensive and scurrilous accusations contained therein are not reasonably  calculated to aid (and are irrelevant to)  the motion, and even though you are not a party to the small claims action and have no standing to file anything.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece