Wednesday, April 3, 2013

I Doubt Oral Arguments Will Be Interesting - Even If Dark Shadows Favorite Rag Covers It - The City Attorney Continues To Lie, Conceal Evidence, & Is Clearning Covering For Leonard Cohen And His Tax Fraud

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: Los Angeles Times; oral argument on April 18, 2013.
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Dennis <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, rbyucaipa <>, Robert MacMillan <>, moseszzz <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, "Hoffman, Rand" <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <>

Hi Mick,

People do think it's interesting that the City Attorney continues to conceal you and the grand jury situation - also, the other Phil Spector gun story.

Anyway, my stark raving lunatic with motive thinks I'[m interested in garbage journalism.  I don't read the LA Times.  Slander doesn't dazzle me.
What do you think this lunatic's motive is?  Do you think there's money in it for him?  Do you think he's on drugs?  Hard to know since I don't know this criminally insane lunatic.

Rush out to read Branson's coverage of my garbage appeal.  I'm sure the City Attorney will continue to lie.  I have never seen so many liars in my life.  LA Confidential is nasty up close and personal    Branson can have my stalker.

All the best,

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

I would like to speak with you about the ongoing criminal harassment with respect to me and Gianelli.  How dare this man copy me in on emails with Streeter and Cohen's fan, Walsh.  I must have received 50 emails from this dangerously unstable lunatic over the past two weeks.  Do you think he's on drugs or just a stark raving lunatic with motive?
Who cares if Branson/LA Times will be at the oral arguments.  She has already slandered me and the LA Times wouldn't understand investigative journalism if they fell over it. 

WHY is this man writing me about my appeal and the LA Times.  I don't live in LA and think their coverage is pure garbage. 
All the best,

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

I am advising you to CEASE AND DESIST.  If you like Hailey Branson, email her.  I have been clear with the IRS and FBI - you should be charged, prosecuted, and arrested for your conduct here.  I am represented and my lawyer is clear - my trial is an IRS matter that demands an IRS investigation.  Each time you email me, I will continue to forward it to the FBI.  They do, as they advised me, investigate criminal witness and evidence tampering.  Perhaps they understand why Cohen concealed all the corporate books and records. 
Do NOT contact me again lunatic.  You need serious psychiatric help.


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
To the FBI,
Stephen Gianelli refuses to cease and desist.  People believe there may be money in it for him.  Why would I care if Hailey Branson is attending oral arguments. She has already slandered me and the LA Times doesn't appear to understand investigative journalism. 
Let me reiterate this:  Stephen Gianelli should be charged, arrested, and prosecuted for criminal witness tampering, witness intimidation, harassment, an intent to obstruct justice, etc.  The man is positively dangerously unstable.
My appellate lawyer knows when oral arguments are.  Is this man on drugs?  Clearly he has motive but he is also a stark raving lunatic. 
By the way, I had a very nice visit with a Tibetan lama today - who is a very very close friend of mine - as well as his wife and some other people I have known for years. 

All the best,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM
Subject: Los Angeles Times; oral argument on April 18, 2013.
To: blind <>

I am told that Hailey Branson-Potts, Los Angeles Times will be covering the oral argument on April 18, 2013.

It should be interesting.