Sunday, March 17, 2013

Kelly Green - Who Always Reminds Me Of Prosecutor Alan Jackson - Is Back! Right On Cue.



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Right On Cue - Kelly Green Is Back On Gianelli/Blogonaut's Law Group Trashing Me
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Cc: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>


Hello Mick,

Kelly Green (who also appeared on the Darwin Exception - a blog that seemed dedicated to glorifying Alan Jackson and affiliated with Sprocket's blog) always reminds me of Alan Jackson - and, right on cue, Green weighs in.  What's the topic now?  Phil Spector and Leonard Cohen's three versions of the Phil Spector gun story before LA Superior Court.  Well, the email prosecutor Streeter received from Cohen (that impeaches his testimony that Phillip held a gun to his head) continues to be concealed.  They seem to be obsessed with statements vs. testimony re. Leonard Cohen and Phil Spector's Grand Jury.  Thank you for clarifying that Cohen's statements were presented to the Grand Jury.  I hope you had the opportunity to review the prosecutors motions that address Leonard Cohen's gun story. Gianelli has said there's one version with the gun pointed at Cohen's shoulder.  Actually, the prosecutors in Phillilp's matter used the semi-automatic to the chest version.  They appear to have left out the version that involves a bottle of wine.  That's available online.

Gianelli has now filed fraudulent documents with the IRS about me.  He is aligned with Leonard Cohen and probably did find a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson about me.  After all, Mick, I am now in LA Confidential.

All the best,
Kelley  


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Mr. Riordan,

As I've repeatedly stated, Kelly Green always reminds me of Alan Jackson.  In fact, on Phawker.com, Green questioned me about Dr. Henry Lee and Dr. Michael Baden which is quite bizarre as they are Phil Spector's expert witnesses who concluded that Clarkson shot herself.  

Right on cue.

Love,
Kelley

Blogger kellygreen said...
How in hell has this thug avoided a 5150 hearing?
March 17, 2013 at 12:56 AM
Blogger Blogonaut said...
Welcome back, kelleygreen!

At page 638 of the transcript of Kelley Lynch’s sentencing hearing at line 19 the sentencing court, as a term of her 5 year probation, ordered that at the end of Lynch’s 18 month jail term she undergo a psychiatric evaluation.
I requested one, prior to my release, and this raises very serious legal issues for the County of Los Angeles.  I see Gianelli cannot explain away Cohen's criminal tax fraud, his ongoing attempts to target me, etc. and must - once again - engage in slander, defamation, and other terrorist tactics.  What would cause this man, a lawyer, to file fraudulent documents about me with the IRS; to lie to the FBI about me; to contact Agent Sopko in an attempt to determine if I was spamming her; to contact Bruce Cutler and raise Phil Spector as an issue; to contact Investigator Frayeh/DA's office to ask if Frayeh thinks Pat Dixon is good looking, etc?  What is this man's specific motive?  He relentlessly targeted my children, sister and her husband, elderly parents, and just about everyone in my life.  

http://www.scribd.com/doc/109725879/People-vs-Kelley-Lynch-Transcript-of-Keley-Lynch-s-Sentencing-Hearing-4-17-2012

This was never done, and for reasons unknown to me she has gotten away with it.
I'll let the judge who I dealt with at the probation hearing handle this.  While she advised me that I was under no obligation to return to LA for the hearing in September - and could simply pay the deranged fees (based on fraud, perjury, concealment, and lies), I think it's best to have everything on the record.  After all, I am dealing with LA Confidential and they have now attempted to sabotage the IRS and me and clearly do not want the Phil Spector verdict overturned.  That's their problem.  

In the meantime, she has done her best to convince the world that she is irrational as ever:
She appealed her conviction, then denounced the brief filed by her court appointed attorney as “incoherent” stating that she was discharging her attorney and her roommate’s brother would assist her with a pro se replacement brief + a writ of habeas corpus (she did neither). She has emailed her prosecutor, Sandra Jo Streeter directly, and called her “fat” “stupid” “a liar” and has called both her prosecutor and the trial judge “incompetent”. 
Francisco Suarez was at a disadvantage due to the fact that the Public Defender's office has refused to provide me with a complete copy of my file; the trial transcript is a mess; and the lies and perjury are excessive.  I am entitled to my personal views on Streeter. She had no problems rolling into court and lying through her teeth for a celebrity.  She even lied about the IRS and elicited perjured testimony re. Phil Spector.  She continues to conceal the email Leonard Cohen sent her that impeaches his testimony that Phil Spector held a gun to his head.  Streeter is a liar.  Make no mistake about that.  This is Streeter's conduct.  Not mine.  Judges in LA Confidential tolerate this conduct and Judge Robert Vanderet clearly does not believe that someone has to be served in order for him to obtain jurisdiction over them and permitted Leonard Cohen to testify that he perjured himself in this matter and could get away with it.  That's why Cohen gave Vanderet glowing reviews in his insane Victim Impact Statement - lying about the IRS.  I have no idea what Vanderet's problem is and could care less.  This appeal is being abandoned and these people all deserve one another.  It is interesting to note that in the Bay Area, people are discussing the lunatics and corruption in LA.  My witnesses at the probation hearing were in disbelief at what they witnessed.  I called Agent Tejeda/IRS because, as my lawyers understand, this is an IRS matter that demands an investigation.  It also involves Phil Spector.  
She is obsessed with what she calls “three versions” of Leonard Cohen’s “gun story” about Phil Spector (relating an incident from the 1970’s where Spector allegedly held a gun to, variously, Cohen’s head, neck, and shoulder)
Of course, Kelly Green weighed in and Gianelli is now going to address Cohen's highly embellished gun stories about Phil Spector.  The three versions involve Leonard Cohen having a gun held to his head by Phil Spector.  The versions include Phillip allegedly holding a gun to Cohen's head, neck, and CHEST - not shoulder.  The gun held to the CHEST version is the one the prosecutors in the Phil Spector trial used.  See the prosecutors motions and Mick Brown/UK Telegraph reviewed the Grand Jury transcripts and confirmed that Cohen's statements - not testimony per se - were presented to the Grand Jury.  I'm not really obsessed with this situation but am praying that Phil Spector nails Leonard Cohen in his perjury.  Leonard Cohen has used Phillip for years to advance his career and appears to be in a legal conspiracy with the District Attorney that may now involve a quid pro quo.  After all, prosecutor Streeter was clear - the DA elected not to file criminal charges against Leonard Cohen.  Instead, the DA had his investigator (on the taxpayer's dime) hanging out in the courtroom and lunching with Cohen while the prosecutor elicited testimony about Phil Spector and the highly embellished gun stories.  
 that at once “proves” that both Spector and Lynch were “convicted” as a result of Cohen’s “perjury” even she now admits that Cohen never testified to Spector’s grand jury and even though her trial was about 2012 not 1978 and certainly not about Phil Spector. 
I can't follow Gianelli's rotten logic at this point but I believe Leonard Cohen has helped convict Phil Spector.  Clearly, the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department showed up at Cohen's house (where I had MY LAWYER present) because they became aware of his comments re. Phil Spector and a gun.  Mick Brown/UK Telegraph has been clearly - Leonard Cohen's statements were presented to the Grand Jury.  The Grand Jury's Legal adviser has instructed me to contact Phil Spector's appellate attorney about this matter.  I contacted Dennis Riordan who is copied in on my emails although Gianelli likes to make it appear that Dennis Riordan is a moron and Phil Spector is not a dear friend of mine.  I know precisely how Phil Spector feels about this entire situation.  Judge Larry Fidler's clerk, Wendy, advised me to write the DA about this situation and,after I advised her that the DA has targeted and threatened me, told me to copy Judge Larry Fidler in on my letter.  
She also claims that Cohen had lunch with an LAPD cop during her harassment trial and that this “proves” a “conspiracy” between the LA DA and the City Attorney’s Office to wrongfully convict her in aid of keeping a lid on the Spector situation. 
I have no idea if the investigator was a cop.  I found it obscene to witness the DA's investigator - on the taxpayer's dime - hanging out with Cohen, his lawyers ane PI, and lunching with Cohen while Cohen testified about Phil Spector.  My lawyers and I believe this - the Deputy City Attorney attempted to sabotage me and the IRS; attempted to discredit me; and the DA does not want the Spector verdict overturned.  My appellate attorney was clear about this in the appeal brief he filed.  It will be hard to keep a lid on the Spector situation with the Phil Spector biopic about to premier.  It appears that David Mamet, Al Pacino, and Helen Mirren are causing a controversy and may have raised serious doubt about Phil Spector's conviction.  
She then filed a request to “abandon” or dismiss her pending appeal asserting that the request was the result of “retaliation” against her during her appeal by Sandra Jo Streeter. The Appellate Department has denied that request (as is their right after the record has been filed and the case fully briefed), and she is vowing to file a “writ” to appeal the denial of her request to dismiss the appeal!
That's correct.  We will now file a motion or writ addressing the prosecutorial misconduct, concealed evidence, and perjured testimony and again request that the appellate division abandon this appeal.  The City Attorney's office continues to lie in their reply brief and I do not believe the appellate division can force me to be victimized by this ongoing misconduct and outrageous governmental conduct.  They may simply be used to dealing with LA Confidential.  And they can have them.  We are absolutely filing a motion/writ to appeal the denial re. my request to abandon this insanity.

I believe the technical psychiatric term is bat-shit-crazy.
Really?  Is Gianelli trashing my appellate attorney again?  Well, many people understand this - Gianelli is a dangerously unstable individual and stark raving lunatic with MOTIVEl

Yet she still walks among us. 
I don't walk anywhere near these lunatics who wouldn't know me if they fell over me.  Gianelli absolutely sounds like someone who crawled out of a crypt.  
March 17, 2013 at 10:41 AM