Date: Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: Blog post
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>
Cc: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>
Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,
I see Gianelli's in drag now. These false allegations are going to be litigated. I didn't attach the Powers of Attorney. That's correct. And you cannot stop lying. That's a fact.
Kelley Lynch
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,I know the lawyer that was at my house frequently. She wrote Ray's school that she didn't Lindsey near her children. I see Gianelli dropped out of POA 101. This criminal has been advised to cease and desist.KelleyOn Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Mongochili/Gianelli,I have advised you to cease and desist.You are not an "in house" lawyer who visited my house. The only times Cohen, in a group of people, ever visited my house was on holidays and no strangers were present. Furthermore, if you're a friend of Lindsey's, you are no friend of mine. I don't associate with individuals who destroy children's lives, refuse to pay debts they have to the children's mother, lie in court, and pop vicodin like it's going out of style. Stay in touch with Lindsey. I have no interest in the man. He is a pathetic dead beat father and abusive man. I will now subpoena the Child Services file proving that they believed he was harassing me, called them in a rage, advised them that I was a great mother, and confirmed that my sons and I were abused by this man. I haven't seen my younger son's alleged father in over 10 years and hope I never run into him again.My declarations are legitimate and Cohen will now be forced to prove that false accusation. Cohen's lawyers will say and do anything - that's why every word in his Complaint, all declarations, and before Judge Hess now is a lie, perjured statement, or fraudulent misrepresentation. These matters are also before Tax Court. That matter involves my challenge to IRS over Cohen's fraudulent tax fraud using fraudulent financial data, a fabricated complaint, and his defense to criminal tax fraud.I see someone flunked certain classes related to Powers of Attorney in law school. Perhaps that's why you're now moonlighting as a criminal and people generally believe you belong in prison.How desperate are the LA Confidential prosecutors? They seemed fairly desperate and pathetic while lying about me in court. They can respond to my federal lawsuit.As for the September 3rd hearing, an attorney for Hochman, Rettig, Mr. Holtz (IRS Chief Trial Counsel's Office), and Agent Luis Tejeda will receive subpoenas. Cohen's now lying about my documents being his and a/c privilege.Cohen will probably get lucky. All you need, from my perspective, at LA Superior Court is a checkbook and rotten logic.Kelley Lynch---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mongo chilli <Mongochilli@gmx.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Blog post
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>Lynch,I an an "in house" lawyer working for a corporation in Clearwatrer FL. I was at your home on a couple of occasions, on one you introduced us to Leonard Cohen. Our kids were in school together. We are no longer in the area but still visit LA and have stayed in touch with Steve. I am not suprized that YOU do not recall us; you seemed uninterested in anyone who was unable to do anything for you and a bit of a bitch. That was before I learned you hand your hand in the company till. I have followed you long distance since, in the news and in the blogs.Anyone with an analytical mind and common sense knows that - based on what you now admit - that you prepared, then submitted fabricated evidence.You affixed the witnesses signatures to several declarations filed in support of your March motion to vacate. then you submitted them to the court, without informing the court that the signatures were not genuine.When cohen's attorneys noted in their opposition that several of the declaration signatures resembled your own signature, and that your son Rutger's declaration signature did not match the signaure on his 2013 declaration, you responded with a blog posted email claiming that the declarations were "prepared and sent to you" and that "the signatures are genuine". If you had powers of attorney that would have been the time to say so, but instead you lied and said the signatures were "genuine". Genuine means the witnesses affixed the signatures with their own hands.But you admitted in your reply that YOU took a pen and affixed all witnesses signatures to the declarations and that the signatures are not "genuine". You also claimed for the first time that you had "signed" powers of attorney from all witnesses who provided (unsigned) letters addressed to the judge.But you did not attach the alleged powers of attorney to your reply.Even if you did have POAs (which it is pretty clear you did not) the declarations were invalid, because they were not physically signed with the hand of the witnesses. But you tried to pass these declarations that YOU signed the witnesses signatures to off as "genuine". The three declarations recite under penalty of perjury that THE WITNESSSES SIGNED THEM. That was a false statement. The signatures were false. The declarations were fabricated, and submitted with the intent to mislead.Penal Code section 132 and 134 are felony violations of STATE law, not federal law. The FBI/IRS/DOJ has zero say about whether you will be charged based on the facts you admit that constitute violations of these penal statutes.That decision will be made by the prosecutors in the county where the offenses occurred, Los Angles.Who knows, maybe you will get lucky and not be charged. Maybe not.
