Thursday, May 23, 2013

Stephen Gianelli - On Behalf Of Leonard Cohen & The City Attorney Of Los Angeles - Continues To Target Me (In Emails & Online) - His Obesssion Is Frightening & That Includes With Respect To Members Of My Family


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>



To the DOJ,

The investigator I spoke with is also investigating the use of LAPD's TMU and the use of perjury in targeting innocent people.  He is planning to take his findings to the Los Angeles criminal grand jury.

Gianelli's obsession with me and matters related to Leonard Cohen and Phil Spector is frightening.  I think this is his job.  He reminds me of Pellicano. 
All the best,
Kelley


25 comments to Ex-husband of ‘NCIS’ star accused of violating restraining order

  • James
    He was having dinner with his wife.
  • OhYesHeDid
    Do your homework, James. He has stalked at least three women and pretends the reverse: that he’s the victim. He is a predator and seriously delusional. It’s always someone else’s fault? There are women in NY and LA who have been victims of him.
  • Raíssa
    That’s bulsh**! I can’t believe the jury believed the lies of this psycho!
  • JH
    Once again, celebrity wins over star struck members of the jury pool… what else is new? Must feel real nice to know you’re in the same league as OJ Simpson. Congrats PP.
    • DC
      Have you ever had to call the cops when someone wouldn’t leave you alone when you asked them to? Have you ever been stalked? I have and it is an experience I never want to go through again. Maybe he follows her and maybe he knows the places she goes because he follows her. It sucks having to look over your shoulder all the time and not being able to live your life normally. Why do people always assume a celebrity doens’t go through the same stuff us regular people go through? Why do people always assume a celebrity’s status gets the law on their side all the time?
      • JH
        Showing up to eat at the same restaurant in Hollywood does not equate to stalking. That is what this guy got convicted of. Sorry, that is NOT stalking – and yes, I have been stalked by an actual stalker, so I know the difference.
        • Kat
          I believe it DOES constitute stalking when he’s done it over and over with other women…always happens to show up where they are.
  • Sadie
    This dispicable excuse for a man has threatened and stalked more women than just Ms. Perrette. Like any abuser, he was charming at first, and soon became a nightmare. This is a pattern. He used these women to stay in the country and try to further his subpar music and acting career.
    When that couldn’t happen he would take it out on them and move on to others he would use to try to get ahead. This is a pattern not only for him, but for other serial abusers, as well. Turning the tables and minimalizing what he was doing did not work, and the only ones seeing his point of view are other women-haters and groupies he managed to manipulate.
    It wouldn’t be a surprise if he was the one writing some of the posts here and elsewhere as he has made a habit of doing so for years. This has kept his name in the press, which is what he wanted, by painting himself as the victim, which he is not. Why would he continue to be in the news if he didn’t feed into this and not let go of his ex’es? Answer: He wouldn’t be.
  • Sadie
    The police don’t question, arrest or detain someone for just having dinner. This was anyting but. Before and after this occurrance there was stalking and harrassment, and now it is time that it is properly brought to light for what it is; an angry, volitile ex-husband who didn’t get the fame or notoriety he wanted and took it out on his wives for not doing enough. And when they broke free he persisted with punishment by trying to turn the tables to draw attention to himself by playing the victim. He isn’t, and now the truth is finally coming out.
  • Foreman
    The jury was opposite of star struck; they were embarrassed that she decided to unnecessarily lie on the stand and that this case took taxpayer dollars. He wasn’t convicted because he went to the restaurant, he was convicted because he decided to not walk away and instead whip out his phone and record her despite it being explicitly forbidden in his restraining order. They live in the same neighborhood and are both disturbing people. It was only a matter of time before this happened. Let’s not even get into the 600+ tweets in the last year aimed at her…
  • Hopeful for Justice
    I am familiar with the FACTS of this case and I am disgusted.
    The jury obviously was misled or missed the main point that AT NO TIME was Shivers even aware Perrette was in the restaurant. Shivers saw her BOYFRIEND and said he can’t sit there and began leaving the restaurant. As he was leaving the BOYFRIEND got up to assault Shivers who then held up his cellphone camera in self defense, capturing the BOYFRIEND on video. Shivers then asked the manager to save the security tape of the BOYFRIEND’s attempted assault, and then immediately left. Only after Shivers left did his wife (who asked him to go there) inform Shivers that she saw Perrette as well. Meaning NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED except for the BOYFRIEND’s threat/attempted assault. Once again an innocent man sent to jail.
    If Perrette was a decent human being she would shrug it off and move on, but she has been waiting for this moment for years. I can see her now, rubbing her hands together with glee. This is Perrette’s vindictive payback for Mr. Shivers refusing to take her back and filing for divorce way back in 2004.
    And let’s not even get into Perrette’s hundreds of posts about Shivers on her personal blog comparing him to Hurricane Katrina, Apartheid, and the Holocaust, in national interviews, and on her twitter account, where she has incited death threats against Shivers for years. This is a travesty of justice, and hopefully will forever become a giant black stain on her phony public image.
  • Sean
    Coyote, anyone with half a dead brain knows that you are “Hopeful for Justice.” You violated your restraining order and you’ve been cyberstalking Pauley for years. She hasn’t said ONE WORD about you.
    Get over it. Move on. Get a life.
  • Hopeful For Justice
    Actually, I am “Hopeful For Justice”, so please stop being so quick to accuse and condemn innocent people when you think you know what you are talking about. Thank you.
  • KN
    The jury was mislead or missed the point?! The prosecution presents their case. The defense presents their case. The jury makes a decision based on the evidence presented. They found him guilty based on that evidence. Man up. Do the crime; do the time.
  • Coyote is Innocent
    Pauley Perrette has been hoping this would happen. He and his wife showed up at a restaurant by accident and then left. Give me a break. Real scary.
    What is scary is how Pauley Perrette’s fame and fanatical stories actually persuade people to persecute other people. It’s a shame.
    A good and innocent man will likely go to prison now. And for those who are happy about that, you should be ashamed of yourself.
  • Odzer Chenma
    One encounter does not warrant jail time. As a taxpayer, I find this situation appalling. Perrette ought to get a life. The City Attorney has way too much time and money on their hands. Another Hollywood celebrity gets the velvet glove treatment. It’s hard to believe that we had to pay for this insane trial. I’ve followed this story – the boyfriend attempted to assault Shivers and that was recorded. Perrette seems like a highly unstable woman.
  • alisa
    There is no reason to believe Coyote Shivers is guilty from these set of facts. The fact that the Threat Management Unit and the city attorney is involved should give everyone great pause. Who was the judge? Was the restraining order allowed a collaterral attack? Pauly Perrette strikes me as a more glamourous Tig Notaro. Notaro an obscure comedian hired a law firm called Lavely and Singer and they in turn had this bogus Threat Management unit make it so she would win whatever she wanted to win. The city attorney is star struck and ready and able to convict the innocent. Trutanich is a moral free monster. I escaped a conviction by luck since I got one of the few not totally in the pockets of the filthy downtown court judges.The Kelly Lynch case too is very suspect, though I’m not completely familiar with it. I would be happy to share my experience in order to help. please contact me at alisaspitzberg@gmail.com
  • Odzer Chenma
    The City Attorney’s abuse of taxpayer dollars – on behalf of celebrities – is the actual scandal here. The City Attorney’s office is star struck. Alisa, contact me at kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com. See my blog – riverdeepbook.blogspot.com. Coyote Shivers is married to a darling and talented young woman and does not need to stalk anyone. Pauley Perrette is the individual who seems to be in dire need of psychiatric assistance. Perhaps the baby talk helps. Judges seem to fall for baby talk.
  • StephenG
    Odzer Chenma is Kelley Lynch – who has an axe to grind against every lawyer who ever sued her and every judge who has ruled against her – including the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, who secured her conviction for violating a 2009 Colorado Protective Order ordering her to have no contact with the ex-employer she embezzled $7M from, which order was later registered in California.
    There was no ambiguity about Lynch’s criminal case. She sent hundreds of threatening and abusive emails to Cohen and also left abusive and threatening, drunken voice mails on Cohen’s home answering machine. She claimed at trial she was just seeking information (in 2012) to complete her 2005 tax return, but the mention of Cohen’s penis, accusations of criminal conduct, and statements that he should be “shot” pursuaded the jury otherwise.
    HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE: If you have been prohibited from contacting another person and violate the order you will go to jail.
  • I have been reading the comments on this & agree & disagree, but the fact remains he was convicted, he had a lawyer & his day in court. So many things have crept into this that don’t belong.
  • OhYesHeDid
    coyote shivers – “vexatious litigant” – look it up. and he deletes it from his wiki every time someone puts it back.
  • Paul Edwards
    This dirtbag loser begs for money online to “free the wrongfully accused” (i.e. himself) yet posts self-worshiping photos of all his travels, courtesy of the in-laws money. This poser hasn’t sold a record in years, if ever. Look arsehole, if your latest skanky wife’s family has enough coin to pay for your gallivanting they can bloody well cough up for your mouthpiece. Better yet, since you have no talent (other than talking about yourself) just get a job and pay your own bills ya BUM!
  • http://www.swrnn.com/2013/02/25/ex-husband-of-ncis-star-accused-of-violating-restraining-order/


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
To the IRS and FBI,
Gianelli continues with the highly organized campaign of harassment, slander, defamation, etc.  I spoke to the investigator on this case.  He is investigating the Coyote Shivers/Pauley Perrette matter.  He is also investigating the City Attorney's targeting of individuals over celebrities; fraudulent restraining orders; etc.  He could not understand 1) how Cohen filed a domestic violence order agianst me when I requested a civil harassment order in Boulder; 2) how I was arrested/prosecuted over an order (California - Gianelli lies about this; as did Streeter; etc.) that I was not served or notified of; and, 3) how I was arrested 400 miles from Los Angeles.  He spent 30 years on LAPD in homicide and is a national restraining order expert.  I'[ve sent him my writ of habeas corpus and other documents.

Gianelli has been advised to cease and desist.
All the best,
Kelley


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Gianelli,

Your obsession with me - and slander with respect to me - is extraordinary.  Do you spend all ay and night targeting me and lying about me - over Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector, Rutger's Whole Foods matter, Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, Deputy City Attorney Sandra  Jo Streeter and others.

I phoned the City Attorney's office yesterday re. your email allegations that they asked you to provide them with my address; your allegation that you forwarded them my email address; the ongoing harassment that included your copying in prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter on emails to me and my sister,  (whose lawyer advised you to cease and desist), and Michelle Rice's third party restraining order violations via emails Cohen fan, Susanne Walsh, to me - with Rice copied in.
I claimed no such thing at trial, liar.  I have asked for - repeatedly tax information I require from Leonard Cohen including an IRS required 1099 for the year 2004; the withdrawal of the illegal K-1s issued by LC Investments, LLC (I am not a partner); an accounting (with corporate ownership interests addressed, Cohen's loans, transaction fees, Greenberg's commissions,etc. equity, liabilities, etc.); and so forth.

Leonard Cohen had me read to him in a bubble bath.  That would include documents related to the legal closing of Traditional Holdings, LLC which is why this was addressed with the iRS - and the incidents appear in Greenberg's lawsuit.  Leonard Cohen would have me read business and legal documents while he soaked in a bubble bath.  That is normally considered sexual harassment and indecent exposure.  You have written to me about this issue - including with respect to statutes of limitations.
Who knows what persuaded the jurors.  The fraud, perjury, concealment and lies are excessive.  One juror advised my PDs that he relied on Streeter's lies about TH assets being only $150,000 when Cohen's loans were millions.  They are assets. Streeter simply lied.  She also lied that Cohen provided me with the tax information I requested - including the IRS required 1099 for the year 2004. 
All of this, including Cohen's theft from me, has been addressed in my writ and elsewhere.  I embezzled nothing, liar. 
Kelley Lynch

StephenG Odzer Chenma is Kelley Lynch – who has an axe to grind against every lawyer who ever sued her and every judge who has ruled against her – including the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, who secured her conviction for violating a 2009 Colorado Protective Order ordering her to have no contact with the ex-employer she embezzled $7M from, which order was later registered in California.
There was no ambiguity about Lynch’s criminal case. She sent hundreds of threatening and abusive emails to Cohen and also left abusive and threatening, drunken voice mails on Cohen’s home answering machine. She claimed at trial she was just seeking information (in 2012) to complete her 2005 tax return, but the mention of Cohen’s penis, accusations of criminal conduct, and statements that he should be “shot” pursuaded the jury otherwise.
HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE: If you have been prohibited from contacting another person and violate the order you will go to jail.

http://www.swrnn.com/2013/02/25/ex-husband-of-ncis-star-accused-of-violating-restraining-order/

--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
Posted by at