From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
Trust me - I am sitting here with an order from Judge Ricciardulli with respect to his acceptance and filing of my over-sized brief. I'm not interested in a lying lawyer with motive's comments on the matter.
I want to reiterate my concern that this dangerously unstable lunatic, ,Gianelli, continues to target Rutger. Let me know if you would like my thoughts on the federal violations here - that relate to my reporting Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud, his theft from me, etc. The IRS is in receipt of the evidence proving Cohen's fraud, perjury, and concealment and so perhaps Cohen's past drug abuse and borderline personality disorder have overcome his ability to act like a human being, tell the truth, or advise his lawyers not to permit them to be engaged in activity that involves the ongoing targeting of me - by people like Walsh and Gianelli. Leonard Cohen said I assailed his reputation but he has a long history of drug abuse. He should have been drug tested.
All the best,
Kelley
THE HUNT FOR DR. HENRY LEE - DR. MICHAEL BADEN AND BILL PAVELIC
"....After years of grabbing negative headlines for losing the O. J. Simpson double homicide case and other celebrity trials, involving the same three participants, it was inevitable and predictable that the Los Angeles criminal injustice system via Robbery Homicide Division would administer their personal vendettas against me, Dr. Henry Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden. That moment arrived in 2007 when music mogul Phil Spector was charged with the murder of Lana Clarkson. Revenge by the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division and the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office against three former members of the O. J. Simpson's "Dream Team" would be a "MF"and "MF" didn't stand for Mark Fuhrman...."
"....Exposing the truth is never in the interest of those who suppress it and eliminating three members of the O.J. Simpson's "Dream Team" would have to be executed with precision by the Los Angeles Police Robbery Homicide Division and their protectorate, the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office...."
"....The Los Angeles District Attorney's Office and the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division in the Phil Spector's (2007) murder trial embarked on a mission to intentionally frame me, Dr. Henry Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden, in a manufactured and bogus "obstruction of justice" crime. The architects of this conspiracy involved Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon and Robbery Homicide Detective Victor Pietrantoni...."
".... Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon, persuaded the judge to creatively, albeit injudiciously, grant the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division authority to "investigate" the circumstances of the missing evidence and assigned this case to Robbery Homicide Division (RHD) investigator Victor Pietrantoni, a friend of Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon and Anthony Pellicano...."
"....What a "happy coincidence" that this case would end up in the lap of Detective Victor Pietrantoni a Robbery Homicide STUD who was nicknamed "Casanova" because of his steamy relationship with a high ranking Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney. Detective Victor Pietrantoni is just one of many LAPD officers who are incestuously connected and or married to members of the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, The City Attorney's Office and or to the jurists assigned to the Los Angeles and Orange County Superior Courts. Consequently, allowing Victor Pietrantoni to conduct an impartial obstruction of justice investigation was tantamount to allowing the fox to investigate who broke into the hen house...."
"....Instead of convening the Grand Jury to investigate the false allegations manufactured by the District Attorney prosecutors, which were revolting, contemptible and based on perjurious witnesses, the Judge relied on a page from the "Spanish Inquisition" and used his black robe, minus the hood, to lunch a personal, vicious, unethical, and unrelenting televised smear campaign against Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, and Investigative Consultant Bill Pavelic. The judicial objective (payback) had one purpose in mind; to publicly humiliate and destroy the professional reputation of the "Dream Team" participants....knowing it could be accomplished with impunity while hiding behind judicial immunity...."
"....It should come as no shock to anyone in Los Angeles, especially the judiciary, that dishonesty was compulsory in much of Robbery Homicide Division (under Chief Daryl Gates) and that my old colleagues at the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office have shown an affinity of using the grotesque Robbery Homicide Division to dispense their own form of perverted justice through patently rigged and self serving investigations...."
http://www.
--
Date: Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLI
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
Hi FBI,
That is so creepy but sounds like LA Confidential from my perspective. Gianelli's a staunch supporter of Alan Jackson, Pat Dion, and Steve Cooley, so he must not like what Bill Pavelic wrote about the Phil Spector matter. And they're all incestuously connected in LA - certain elements of law enforcement, the DA's office, and the City Attorney's office. Well, Trutanich lost the election so hopefully the next CA won't be so impressed with celebrity frauds. And they're all connected to the jurists. As I said - it looks like a criminal enterprise. Pavelic, who doesn't interest me in the least (although I've received numerous private emails from him that I've copied to Phil Spector's attorneys and others) seems to think that this is also an incestuous criminal enterprise.
I have repeatedly addressed Gianelli's witness tampering -
with Rutger. Now, regardless of this lunatic's lies, the FBI has my
Writ of Habeas Corpus and Rutger is addressed in that Writ as a material
witness (as is Agent Tejeda/IRS) and was raised on the record in my
trial. I did not agree to let my PDs question Rutger over SWAT and it
was never discussed - with me or Rutger. Rutger wanted to take the
stand re. Cohen's testimony over his Whole Foods matter. And now,
Gianelli and Cohen's fan are criminally harassing him and me over this
issue. As we know, Walsh communicates with Cohen's legal team and
copies Michelle Rice in, violating the restraining order as I discussed
with LAPD's TMU and raised as an issue with the City Attorney yesterday
when I called to advise them to cease and desist their activity re.
Gianelli who wrote that they asked him for my address, etc. Streeter
was probably in touch with Gianelli - hence the NAMBLA email that didn't
relate to Cohen. I wonder why that was material in any way, shape, or
form? Oh right - because she and Cohen lie and this is how she plays
her rotten, dirty game. That is so creepy but sounds like LA Confidential from my perspective. Gianelli's a staunch supporter of Alan Jackson, Pat Dion, and Steve Cooley, so he must not like what Bill Pavelic wrote about the Phil Spector matter. And they're all incestuously connected in LA - certain elements of law enforcement, the DA's office, and the City Attorney's office. Well, Trutanich lost the election so hopefully the next CA won't be so impressed with celebrity frauds. And they're all connected to the jurists. As I said - it looks like a criminal enterprise. Pavelic, who doesn't interest me in the least (although I've received numerous private emails from him that I've copied to Phil Spector's attorneys and others) seems to think that this is also an incestuous criminal enterprise.
Trust me - I am sitting here with an order from Judge Ricciardulli with respect to his acceptance and filing of my over-sized brief. I'm not interested in a lying lawyer with motive's comments on the matter.
I want to reiterate my concern that this dangerously unstable lunatic, ,Gianelli, continues to target Rutger. Let me know if you would like my thoughts on the federal violations here - that relate to my reporting Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud, his theft from me, etc. The IRS is in receipt of the evidence proving Cohen's fraud, perjury, and concealment and so perhaps Cohen's past drug abuse and borderline personality disorder have overcome his ability to act like a human being, tell the truth, or advise his lawyers not to permit them to be engaged in activity that involves the ongoing targeting of me - by people like Walsh and Gianelli. Leonard Cohen said I assailed his reputation but he has a long history of drug abuse. He should have been drug tested.
All the best,
Kelley
THE HUNT FOR DR. HENRY LEE - DR. MICHAEL BADEN AND BILL PAVELIC
"....After years of grabbing negative headlines for losing the O. J. Simpson double homicide case and other celebrity trials, involving the same three participants, it was inevitable and predictable that the Los Angeles criminal injustice system via Robbery Homicide Division would administer their personal vendettas against me, Dr. Henry Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden. That moment arrived in 2007 when music mogul Phil Spector was charged with the murder of Lana Clarkson. Revenge by the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division and the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office against three former members of the O. J. Simpson's "Dream Team" would be a "MF"and "MF" didn't stand for Mark Fuhrman...."
"....Exposing the truth is never in the interest of those who suppress it and eliminating three members of the O.J. Simpson's "Dream Team" would have to be executed with precision by the Los Angeles Police Robbery Homicide Division and their protectorate, the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office...."
"....The Los Angeles District Attorney's Office and the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division in the Phil Spector's (2007) murder trial embarked on a mission to intentionally frame me, Dr. Henry Lee, and Dr. Michael Baden, in a manufactured and bogus "obstruction of justice" crime. The architects of this conspiracy involved Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon and Robbery Homicide Detective Victor Pietrantoni...."
".... Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon, persuaded the judge to creatively, albeit injudiciously, grant the LAPD Robbery Homicide Division authority to "investigate" the circumstances of the missing evidence and assigned this case to Robbery Homicide Division (RHD) investigator Victor Pietrantoni, a friend of Deputy District Attorney Patrick Dixon and Anthony Pellicano...."
"....What a "happy coincidence" that this case would end up in the lap of Detective Victor Pietrantoni a Robbery Homicide STUD who was nicknamed "Casanova" because of his steamy relationship with a high ranking Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney. Detective Victor Pietrantoni is just one of many LAPD officers who are incestuously connected and or married to members of the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, The City Attorney's Office and or to the jurists assigned to the Los Angeles and Orange County Superior Courts. Consequently, allowing Victor Pietrantoni to conduct an impartial obstruction of justice investigation was tantamount to allowing the fox to investigate who broke into the hen house...."
"....Instead of convening the Grand Jury to investigate the false allegations manufactured by the District Attorney prosecutors, which were revolting, contemptible and based on perjurious witnesses, the Judge relied on a page from the "Spanish Inquisition" and used his black robe, minus the hood, to lunch a personal, vicious, unethical, and unrelenting televised smear campaign against Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, and Investigative Consultant Bill Pavelic. The judicial objective (payback) had one purpose in mind; to publicly humiliate and destroy the professional reputation of the "Dream Team" participants....knowing it could be accomplished with impunity while hiding behind judicial immunity...."
"....It should come as no shock to anyone in Los Angeles, especially the judiciary, that dishonesty was compulsory in much of Robbery Homicide Division (under Chief Daryl Gates) and that my old colleagues at the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office have shown an affinity of using the grotesque Robbery Homicide Division to dispense their own form of perverted justice through patently rigged and self serving investigations...."
http://www.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Stephen Gianelli is a bald-faced liar with motive aligned with Leonard Cohen. This man is lying about my taxes. They are paid in full and I owe no taxes. Gianelli has no access to my tax returns and, as a lawyer, understands that the IRS does not reveal private tax information to anyone but the taxpayer. That's why I only discovered Leonard Cohen's fraudulent IRS refund during my trial, on April 9, 2012 when the prosecutor blind-sided my lawyers with an IRS binder containing evidence of this fraud. The judge then lied and said I was aware of these matters. That is simply outrageous. He deprived me of a defense and material witnesses - Rutger Penick and Agent Tejeda/IRS. Very convenient for LA County, I might note.
NOTE: Stephen Gianelli who has criminally harassed me over Leonard Cohen, Cohen's tax fraud, his theft from me, Steven Machat and Cohen's theft from Machat, my son's Whole Foods matter, Phil Spector, and other issues, is a positive freak who is obsessed with me. It does make one wonder if he is on someone's payroll. And, he lies to the IRS and FBI, about the IRS, falsely accuses me of owing taxes. I wasn't drunk on any voice mail message. Leonard Cohen worked with a professional sound engineer and the tapes were altered with respect to sound, volume, and speed. Here's the bottom line - there is due process in the U.S. Constitution and I was not served or notified of the 2011 California order. The prosecutor and Gianelli attempt to confuse the issue with other fraudulent and deranged orders - including the one I REQUESTED in 2008 in Boulder, Colorado. The judge gains jurisdiction over an individual by service of process. This is a very very simple concept and only someone with motive (such as the City Attorney) would argue otherwise, abusing taxpayer dollars while doing so.
Hi Mr. Riordan,
I do now wonder about Gianelli's connection to Pat Dixon. Wow - withholding evidence and concealing their dealings with Pellicano. Sounds like LA Confidential. Gianelli appears to be on someone's payroll.
Love,
Kelley
During the trial, Jones’ defense team repeatedly accused Kerlin, Deputy D.A. Patrick Dixon, and Robbery-Homicide Detectives Marcia and Gizzi of withholding evidence and concealing their dealings with Pellicano.
http://www.laweekly.com/2003-12-18/news/p-i-for-all/full/
CEASE AND DESIST Gianelli. I see you're just another rotten, shabby, lying lawyer whose into false accusations, etc. I have been clear - the Writ was filed and the over-sized brief approved by the judge on May 3rd. Rutger is addressed as a material witness in that matter.
NOW STOP CONTACTING ME. Call Pellicano or Dixon. They might be able to find you another job criminally harassing people and witness tampering.
Did you submit an application to file an over sized brief? Did you receive a written order it was granted?
Your name and address is on the writ - not Francisco's.
STEPHEN R. GIANELLI - UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL CELL (415) 846-5188. Sent from a moble device.
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:09:51 -0700To: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI<stephengianelli@gmail.com>; *irs. commissioner<*IRS. Commissioner@irs.gov>; Washington Field<washington.field@ic.fbi. gov>; ASKDOJ<ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>; Kelly.Sopko<Kelly.Sopko@tigta. treas.gov>; Doug.Davis<Doug.Davis@ftb.ca. gov>; Dennis<Dennis@riordan-horgan. com> Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLITo the IRS,
My taxes are paid and none are due and owing. Gianelli has, however, transmitted fraud to the IRS. Since he lies so frequently to the IRS, ,I would assume he has lied on all of his tax returns as well.He has been advised to cease and desist. And yes, he is witness tampering with Rutger who was raised as a witness in my alleged trial and is addressed as a material witness in the writ that was filed and accepted by Judge Ricciardulli - who approved the oversized brief as well.
Kelley
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:00 PM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:
“What's Gianelli interest in my tax returns?”I pay my taxes, and you don’t. That’s my interest, I am supporting deadbeats like you.
Stephen Gianelli is a bald-faced liar with motive aligned with Leonard Cohen. This man is lying about my taxes. They are paid in full and I owe no taxes. Gianelli has no access to my tax returns and, as a lawyer, understands that the IRS does not reveal private tax information to anyone but the taxpayer. That's why I only discovered Leonard Cohen's fraudulent IRS refund during my trial, on April 9, 2012 when the prosecutor blind-sided my lawyers with an IRS binder containing evidence of this fraud. The judge then lied and said I was aware of these matters. That is simply outrageous. He deprived me of a defense and material witnesses - Rutger Penick and Agent Tejeda/IRS. Very convenient for LA County, I might note.
NOTE: I have been clear with everyone that LAPD's TMU has been entirely professional with me and I have no issues, whatsoever, with that Unit. In fact, every single individual I have spoken with has been utterly professional and that is refreshing to note.From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:47 PM
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI; Washington Field; *irs. commissioner; ASKDOJ; Kelly.Sopko; Dennis; Francisco.A.Suarez
Subject: Re: CEASE AND DESIST GIANELLITo the IRS Commissioner's Staff,What's Gianelli's interest in my tax returns? I don't have a 1099 from Cohen for the year 2004. Also, the illegal K-1s totally undermine the fraudulent expense ledger. Cohen transmitted them (on behalf of LCI) to the IRS. They show $0 income for 2004 and 2005. The LCI K-1s transmitted to the State of Kentucky re. me and Cohen (prepared by his lawyer and filed with the return by his lawyer) in 2003 also show $0 income from LCI and name me as a 99.5% partner on LCI. I have received K-1s from TH and paid taxes on that income - including substantial cap gain partnership income in 2003 that is not addressed on the fraud expense ledgers. I can assure you that I did not make charitable contributions to the iRS and FTB on behalf of Leonard Cohen over this matter.Gianelli has transmitted the fraudulent ledger and a fraudulent form 3949(a) to the iRS about me. He should be arrested over that alone The IRS personally advised me to file fraud form 3949(a) respect to Leonard Cohen's fraudulent refund (confirmed/received in 2005) that pre-dates the fraudulent default judgment in 2006 and my meeting with Agent Sopko in 2007 and her subsequent email to me to report Cohen's tax fraud to Agent Tejeda/IRS in 2007. Streeter was in possession of the IRS binder an concealed that evidence from the jurors. What is the first question an investigator asked me the other night? Do I have confirmation from the IRS or Treasury that I reported Cohen's tax fraud? The answer is yes and that is the only document addressing Leonard Cohen's tax fraud from the IRS or Treasury. The prosecutor, however, attempted to advise jurors that I was being audited or investigated by the iRS and that's a bald-faced lie. In 2004, Dale Burgess was assisting me with filing my 2003 tax return that included a K-1 from Traditional Holdings, LLC. Why was that of interest to prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter? What is the City Attorney's interest in Leonard Cohen's IRS matters? That is the key essential question. Streeter was aware that we issued a subpoena to Agent Tejeda/IRS and advised the judge at a sidebar (which was a LIE and is on the record) that the IRS had a holding re. Cohen's default judgment. She attempted to prove (and failed miserably) that I was served Cohen's defautl judgment. I was not. In fact, the proof of service re. Cohen's summons and complaint is evidence of extrinsic fraud and the judgment is void. It is also evidence of theft, the wrongful altering of my tax returns, and Cohen's position that he is the alter ego of TH and BMT and engaged in self-dealing.
Leonard Cohen has stolen from me. He has stolen from Steven and Marty Machat and Phll Spector. He has a pattern of falsely accusing his advisers of ripping him off to breach contracts. He has concealed evidence (and has a pattern of this - see the Stranger Music sale to Sony) re. corporations in his fraudulent lawsuit.Stephen Gianelli continues to engage in criminal harassment, witness tampering, and is now targeting me and my son over Rutger's Whole Foods matter that the prosecutor and Cohen shamelessly raised in my insane Stalinesque Show Trial that featured Phil,Spector and yet another version of Cohen's highly embellished gun story about Phil Spector. There are now three before LA Superior Court. The prosecutor concealed one from my jurors.
All of this has been addressed in my Writ.Leonard Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh (copying in Michelle Rice, Cohen's lawyer - in direct violation of the restraining order), is also part of this highly coordinated campaign to target me, people close to me, and who is intent on slandering me for Leonard Cohen. This matter involves Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Michelle Rice, Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, Sandra Jo Streeter, and others. See my trial transcript, appeal, and writ. It also involves Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud. Nothing he did was negligent. It is fraud and he has tax and residence issues in Canada. This man is pathetic and evidence of his personal conduct is his perjury at my trial, the insane Victim Impact Statement (lying about the IRS), and the fact that he and his lawyers clearly condone Susanne Walsh's ongoing harassment of me with Michelle Rice copied in. Leonard Cohen's sense of entitlement is astounding. So is his greed. He feels entitled to lie, cheat, steal, perjure himself, target my sons, lie about me and Oliver Stone and others, encourage my younger son's father to take custody of him, and to obtain judgments, verdicts, and orders based on fraud, perjury, concealment, and lies. The taxpayers are now paying for this activity and yet this man is not a U.S. citizen. How did he own an S Corporation when he had abandoned his green card in 1989 and did not re-obtain one until 1993? As Steven Machat noted - Leonard Cohen has created his own hell. That includes with respect to Phil Spector.All the best,
KelleyOn Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
To the DOJ,
The investigator I spoke with is also investigating the use of LAPD's TMU and the use of perjury in targeting innocent people. He is planning to take his findings to the Los Angeles criminal grand jury.
Gianelli's obsession with me and matters related to Leonard Cohen and Phil Spector is frightening. I think this is his job. He reminds me of Pellicano.All the best,
Kelley25 comments to Ex-husband of ‘NCIS’ star accused of violating restraining order
OhYesHeDid
Do your homework, James. He has stalked at least three women and pretends the reverse: that he’s the victim. He is a predator and seriously delusional. It’s always someone else’s fault? There are women in NY and LA who have been victims of him.
Raíssa
That’s bulsh**! I can’t believe the jury believed the lies of this psycho!
JH
Once again, celebrity wins over star struck members of the jury pool… what else is new? Must feel real nice to know you’re in the same league as OJ Simpson. Congrats PP.
DC
Have you ever had to call the cops when someone wouldn’t leave you alone when you asked them to? Have you ever been stalked? I have and it is an experience I never want to go through again. Maybe he follows her and maybe he knows the places she goes because he follows her. It sucks having to look over your shoulder all the time and not being able to live your life normally. Why do people always assume a celebrity doens’t go through the same stuff us regular people go through? Why do people always assume a celebrity’s status gets the law on their side all the time?
JH
Showing up to eat at the same restaurant in Hollywood does not equate to stalking. That is what this guy got convicted of. Sorry, that is NOT stalking – and yes, I have been stalked by an actual stalker, so I know the difference.
Kat
I believe it DOES constitute stalking when he’s done it over and over with other women…always happens to show up where they are.
Sadie
This dispicable excuse for a man has threatened and stalked more women than just Ms. Perrette. Like any abuser, he was charming at first, and soon became a nightmare. This is a pattern. He used these women to stay in the country and try to further his subpar music and acting career.When that couldn’t happen he would take it out on them and move on to others he would use to try to get ahead. This is a pattern not only for him, but for other serial abusers, as well. Turning the tables and minimalizing what he was doing did not work, and the only ones seeing his point of view are other women-haters and groupies he managed to manipulate.It wouldn’t be a surprise if he was the one writing some of the posts here and elsewhere as he has made a habit of doing so for years. This has kept his name in the press, which is what he wanted, by painting himself as the victim, which he is not. Why would he continue to be in the news if he didn’t feed into this and not let go of his ex’es? Answer: He wouldn’t be.
Foreman
The jury was opposite of star struck; they were embarrassed that she decided to unnecessarily lie on the stand and that this case took taxpayer dollars. He wasn’t convicted because he went to the restaurant, he was convicted because he decided to not walk away and instead whip out his phone and record her despite it being explicitly forbidden in his restraining order. They live in the same neighborhood and are both disturbing people. It was only a matter of time before this happened. Let’s not even get into the 600+ tweets in the last year aimed at her…
Hopeful for Justice
I am familiar with the FACTS of this case and I am disgusted.The jury obviously was misled or missed the main point that AT NO TIME was Shivers even aware Perrette was in the restaurant. Shivers saw her BOYFRIEND and said he can’t sit there and began leaving the restaurant. As he was leaving the BOYFRIEND got up to assault Shivers who then held up his cellphone camera in self defense, capturing the BOYFRIEND on video. Shivers then asked the manager to save the security tape of the BOYFRIEND’s attempted assault, and then immediately left. Only after Shivers left did his wife (who asked him to go there) inform Shivers that she saw Perrette as well. Meaning NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED except for the BOYFRIEND’s threat/attempted assault. Once again an innocent man sent to jail.If Perrette was a decent human being she would shrug it off and move on, but she has been waiting for this moment for years. I can see her now, rubbing her hands together with glee. This is Perrette’s vindictive payback for Mr. Shivers refusing to take her back and filing for divorce way back in 2004.And let’s not even get into Perrette’s hundreds of posts about Shivers on her personal blog comparing him to Hurricane Katrina, Apartheid, and the Holocaust, in national interviews, and on her twitter account, where she has incited death threats against Shivers for years. This is a travesty of justice, and hopefully will forever become a giant black stain on her phony public image.
Sean
Coyote, anyone with half a dead brain knows that you are “Hopeful for Justice.” You violated your restraining order and you’ve been cyberstalking Pauley for years. She hasn’t said ONE WORD about you.Get over it. Move on. Get a life.
Hopeful For Justice
Actually, I am “Hopeful For Justice”, so please stop being so quick to accuse and condemn innocent people when you think you know what you are talking about. Thank you.
KN
The jury was mislead or missed the point?! The prosecution presents their case. The defense presents their case. The jury makes a decision based on the evidence presented. They found him guilty based on that evidence. Man up. Do the crime; do the time.
Coyote is Innocent
Pauley Perrette has been hoping this would happen. He and his wife showed up at a restaurant by accident and then left. Give me a break. Real scary.What is scary is how Pauley Perrette’s fame and fanatical stories actually persuade people to persecute other people. It’s a shame.A good and innocent man will likely go to prison now. And for those who are happy about that, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Odzer Chenma
One encounter does not warrant jail time. As a taxpayer, I find this situation appalling. Perrette ought to get a life. The City Attorney has way too much time and money on their hands. Another Hollywood celebrity gets the velvet glove treatment. It’s hard to believe that we had to pay for this insane trial. I’ve followed this story – the boyfriend attempted to assault Shivers and that was recorded. Perrette seems like a highly unstable woman.
alisa
Odzer Chemda, I think I know who you are and would like to share my similar story with you.please contact me at alisaspitzberg@gmail.com
James NOTE: Stephen Gianelli who has criminally harassed me over Leonard Cohen, Cohen's tax fraud, his theft from me, Steven Machat and Cohen's theft from Machat, my son's Whole Foods matter, Phil Spector, and other issues, is a positive freak who is obsessed with me. It does make one wonder if he is on someone's payroll. And, he lies to the IRS and FBI, about the IRS, falsely accuses me of owing taxes. I wasn't drunk on any voice mail message. Leonard Cohen worked with a professional sound engineer and the tapes were altered with respect to sound, volume, and speed. Here's the bottom line - there is due process in the U.S. Constitution and I was not served or notified of the 2011 California order. The prosecutor and Gianelli attempt to confuse the issue with other fraudulent and deranged orders - including the one I REQUESTED in 2008 in Boulder, Colorado. The judge gains jurisdiction over an individual by service of process. This is a very very simple concept and only someone with motive (such as the City Attorney) would argue otherwise, abusing taxpayer dollars while doing so.
StephenG
Odzer Chenma is Kelley Lynch – who has an axe to grind against every lawyer who ever sued her and every judge who has ruled against her – including the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, who secured her conviction for violating a 2009 Colorado Protective Order ordering her to have no contact with the ex-employer she embezzled $7M from, which order was later registered in California.There was no ambiguity about Lynch’s criminal case. She sent hundreds of threatening and abusive emails to Cohen and also left abusive and threatening, drunken voice mails on Cohen’s home answering machine. She claimed at trial she was just seeking information (in 2012) to complete her 2005 tax return, but the mention of Cohen’s penis, accusations of criminal conduct, and statements that he should be “shot” pursuaded the jury otherwise.HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE: If you have been prohibited from contacting another person and violate the order you will go to jail.I have been reading the comments on this & agree & disagree, but the fact remains he was convicted, he had a lawyer & his day in court. So many things have crept into this that don’t belong.
Paul Edwards
This dirtbag loser begs for money online to “free the wrongfully accused” (i.e. himself) yet posts self-worshiping photos of all his travels, courtesy of the in-laws money. This poser hasn’t sold a record in years, if ever. Look arsehole, if your latest skanky wife’s family has enough coin to pay for your gallivanting they can bloody well cough up for your mouthpiece. Better yet, since you have no talent (other than talking about yourself) just get a job and pay your own bills ya BUM!On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:To the IRS and FBI,Gianelli continues with the highly organized campaign of harassment, slander, defamation, etc. I spoke to the investigator on this case. He is investigating the Coyote Shivers/Pauley Perrette matter. He is also investigating the City Attorney's targeting of individuals over celebrities; fraudulent restraining orders; etc. He could not understand 1) how Cohen filed a domestic violence order agianst me when I requested a civil harassment order in Boulder; 2) how I was arrested/prosecuted over an order (California - Gianelli lies about this; as did Streeter; etc.) that I was not served or notified of; and, 3) how I was arrested 400 miles from Los Angeles. He spent 30 years on LAPD in homicide and is a national restraining order expert. I'[ve sent him my writ of habeas corpus and other documents.
Gianelli has been advised to cease and desist.All the best,
KelleyOn Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:Gianelli,
Your obsession with me - and slander with respect to me - is extraordinary. Do you spend all ay and night targeting me and lying about me - over Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector, Rutger's Whole Foods matter, Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, Deputy City Attorney Sandra Jo Streeter and others.
I phoned the City Attorney's office yesterday re. your email allegations that they asked you to provide them with my address; your allegation that you forwarded them my email address; the ongoing harassment that included your copying in prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter on emails to me and my sister, (whose lawyer advised you to cease and desist), and Michelle Rice's third party restraining order violations via emails Cohen fan, Susanne Walsh, to me - with Rice copied in.I claimed no such thing at trial, liar. I have asked for - repeatedly tax information I require from Leonard Cohen including an IRS required 1099 for the year 2004; the withdrawal of the illegal K-1s issued by LC Investments, LLC (I am not a partner); an accounting (with corporate ownership interests addressed, Cohen's loans, transaction fees, Greenberg's commissions,etc. equity, liabilities, etc.); and so forth.
Leonard Cohen had me read to him in a bubble bath. That would include documents related to the legal closing of Traditional Holdings, LLC which is why this was addressed with the iRS - and the incidents appear in Greenberg's lawsuit. Leonard Cohen would have me read business and legal documents while he soaked in a bubble bath. That is normally considered sexual harassment and indecent exposure. You have written to me about this issue - including with respect to statutes of limitations.Who knows what persuaded the jurors. The fraud, perjury, concealment and lies are excessive. One juror advised my PDs that he relied on Streeter's lies about TH assets being only $150,000 when Cohen's loans were millions. They are assets. Streeter simply lied. She also lied that Cohen provided me with the tax information I requested - including the IRS required 1099 for the year 2004.All of this, including Cohen's theft from me, has been addressed in my writ and elsewhere. I embezzled nothing, liar.Kelley LynchOdzer Chenma is Kelley Lynch – who has an axe to grind against every lawyer who ever sued her and every judge who has ruled against her – including the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, who secured her conviction for violating a 2009 Colorado Protective Order ordering her to have no contact with the ex-employer she embezzled $7M from, which order was later registered in California.
StephenG
There was no ambiguity about Lynch’s criminal case. She sent hundreds of threatening and abusive emails to Cohen and also left abusive and threatening, drunken voice mails on Cohen’s home answering machine. She claimed at trial she was just seeking information (in 2012) to complete her 2005 tax return, but the mention of Cohen’s penis, accusations of criminal conduct, and statements that he should be “shot” pursuaded the jury otherwise.
HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE: If you have been prohibited from contacting another person and violate the order you will go to jail.
--In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
--In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
--In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
--
In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.
--
In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.
