Thursday, May 30, 2013

Stephen Gianelli, Aligned With Cohen & Probably Spector Prosecutor Alan Jackson, Now Targets Paulette Brandt, Phil Spector's Former Assistant




From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:56 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>


Hello Mr. Riordan,

Fascinating that Gianelli - affiliated with Michelle Blaine - is now targeting Paulette.  Clearly, this man has motive that relates to Leonard Cohen's tax fraud and Phil Spector.  Paulette is also convinced that Phillip is innocent.  Gianelli has been in touch with my sons and family members?  This man is dangerously unstable, a bald-faced liar, and - as I've communicated to the IRS and FBI repeatedly - he belongs in prison.  Criminal harassment and witness tampering hardly begins to describe the activity Gianelli is engaged in. 

Love,
Kelley


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Steven,

For the record, I do not appreciate your lying about me.  Gianelli is now targeting Phillip's former assistant, Paulette, and using you in an attempt to slander me.  You are the person who misstated information in your book.  Cohen and I never entered into a palimony settlement.  Bullshit hardly begins to describe his offer of 50% community property to me.
I am again advising me to leave me out of your games with Cohen, Kory, Gianelli, and others.
Kelley

NOTE:  Steven Machat wrote, in his book, that Cohen and I entered into a palimony settlement.  That is a lie.  Cohen offered me 50% community property and I have been clear - all along - with Steven Machat over this issue.  My lawyers and accountant were present for that offer.  


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
CEASE AND DESIST, Gianelli.


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Paulette,

Thank you for forwarding me Gianelli's latest email.  As you can see, this man will continue to criminally harass anyone he sees fit.  My sister's lawyer advised him personally to cease and desist.  My former roommate, Eric Salter, filed a complaint with Ft. Lauderdale Police Department - as did I - regarding the ongoing harassment.  The USPS advised me that they opened a criminal investigation into certain matters related to Gianelli.  He lies to the iRS and FBI and has transmitted fraud to the IRS.  Clearly, he has motive and it relates to Leonard Cohen's tax fraud and Phillip's up.  Harassment hardly begins to describe what I've endured with respect to Leonard Cohen, who is indeed a fraud and thief - as Steve Machat understands all too well.  In fact, Machat - when demanding that I provide him with the evidence against Cohen in my possession - emailed me that Cohen and his lawyer, Robert Kory, are evil.  He advised me to sue Cohen for theft, etc. 

With respect to the Boulder restraining order - Leonard Cohen literally flew in from Europe (where he returned as he was on tour) to obtain yet another fraudulent restraining order meant to silence me and, at certain points, to prevent me from participating in his retaliatory and highly fraudulent lawsuit against me.  I've sent you a draft copy of my motion to vacate and declaration.  Let me know if anything's unclear because I plan to move to vacate that lawsuit which I was not served.  The proof of service is evidence of extrinsic fraud.  My son, Rutger, and I had no female co-occupant in August 2005.  I never said I wasn't served the Boulder order but Gianelli and my alleged prosecutor are liars.  I attended the hearing; ultimately asked that the judge make the order permanent (which I understood to mean 2-3 years as that is what it means in various jurisdictions, including Los Angeles), and then reviewed Cohen's declaration.  It was highly fraudulent, filled with perjury, and I filed a Motion to Quash.  Judges, however, do not hold anyone responsible and - in the LA trial - Cohen literally confessed to committing perjury.  He lied to the court when he fraudulently stated that we had a dating/intimate relationship.  He is insane.  Cohen's lawyers - in 2011 (when they set out to entrap me) - registered the Boulder civil harassment order as a domestic violence order.  This is unlawful.  I was not served or notified of the new California order that was thereby creative and LA Superior Court has no personal jurisdiction over me.  Their issues with fraudulent proofs of service are inconceivable. 

Leonard Cohen testified that he did not hear from me in 2009 and 2010 so Gianelli is lying, as usual.  Ultimately, my wages were garnished and - after speaking with the FTB - I contacted Cohen for information I needed to file my 2004 tax returns.  I owe no money and had huge losses in the years 2004 and 2005.  Leonard Cohen provided me with illegal partnership documents that were transmitted to the iRS and FTB.  I asked that they be withdrawn.  I requested a proper accounting - and not the fraudulent garbage ledger Cohen attached to his lawsuit which was retaliation for my reporting his tax fraud to the iRS.  I raised over pertinent legal issues - including his ongoing slander of me in the news media.  Leonard Cohen actually flew into Boulder due to the fact that Ann Diamond wrote an article for Rolling Stone.  He also threatened her with legal action. 

I never moved anywhere under an assumed name.  Gianelli - who has stalked and targeted me relentlessly since 2009 - is a bald-faced liar with motive.

Leonard Cohen owes me millions of dollars for commissions he withheld and my share of all intellectual property dating back to 1967.  He concealed corporate books, records, stock certificates, my indemnity agreement, non-revocable assignments, etc. from LA Superior Court in his retaliatory lawsuit.  The perjury and fraud is inconceivable.  My son, Rutger, would not have been working at Whole Foods had Cohen not intentionally bankrupted me.  My son, Rutger, and I are both convinced of this fact and he wanted to take the witness stand - in my Stalinesque Show Trial - to confirm this after Cohen lied and said I thought he ripped Rutger's fingers off.  Leonard Cohen would force me to read legal and business documents to him while he soaked in a bubble bath.  That is how he exposed his penis to me which is normally understood to be indecent exposure.  Yes, i invited Cooley to the gym.  He didn't accept my invitation.  Gianelli relentlessly contacted both of my sons, including Ray when he was a minor, and I have been clear - any stranger (particularly someone I view as dangerously unstable - Gianelli) who contacts my then minor son will be viewed as a potential sexual predator and possible member of NAMBLA. 

Leonard Cohen worked with a professional sound engineer re. voice mail messages i left him that are out of sequence and cannot be date or time stamped.  My friend, The Scientist - a record producer - would like to review them to determine how they were altered and tampered with re. sound, volume, and speed.  Leonard Cohen is the individual with a lifelong history (publicly documented) of psychiatric problems, drug addiction, alcoholism, etc.  I left no obscene messages and Leonard Cohen's writings themselves are obscene.  I also never threatened Leonard Cohen but was clear - I intend to take him down legally.  As Boies Schiller advised me - find a lawyer and ask them to help you take down another Hollywood fraud.  They reviewed the evidence, understood Cohen owes me millions, and felt he was attempting to engage me in criminal conduct. 

Michelle Rice - Cohen's lawyer who has made a career out of targeting me - wrote and lied to me and the IRS, FBI, Treasury, Dennis Riordan, and Ron Burkle, that the Boulder order was registered in California as of February 14, 2011.  It was not and that was a material lie.  This was confirmed at my alleged trial.   Attached to my responses to Rice was this transcript of Steven Machat and my conversation.  Machat confirmed this transcript.  It was concealed from my jurors and the lunatic prosecutor - who attempted to sabotage the IRS and was obsessed with Phil Spector, the DA, and Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson - advised the jurors that no one corroborated my version of events.  That's a bald-faced lie.



Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, and Michelle Rice took the stand and perjured themselves extensively.  Leonard Cohen testified about a tax refund that I have now challenged with the IRS. 
I did write Cutler.  After all, the DA's investigator was in the courtroom; Cohen was testifying about Phillip and one of his garbage gun stories; Cohen had emailed the prosecutor a different version of the gun story than he testified to.  This was concealed from the jurors.  It has all been addressed in my writ of habeas corpus that was approved and filed on May 3, 2013.  My lawyers told me that judges think my prosecutor is stupid.  I think she's corrupt and I know she lies and have addressed her misconduct in my writ.  I don't know Cutler, Paulette, and I did not pretend that we were old friends.  But, as you know, Phillip and I are.  I wrote Phillip from jail and advised him what was unfolding and addressed Cutler.  I then received a letter at Lynwood from Phillip.

My public defender advised me that he felt there was a prosecution plant on my jury.  One juror relied on the prosecutor's false statements regarding assets in a corporate account - Cohen borrowed millions and his level of borrowing was dangerous to a corporate structure.  The IRS could view Cohen as having engaged in self-dealing which I believe he has now proved.

Cutler did write a letter to the court.  He has also, from my perspective, betrayed Phillip.  Cutler has peace, does he?  Well, Phillip doesn't.  His life has been absolutely destroyed by gold diggers with motive. 

I saw Rutger on Mother's Day with my friends.  Rutger is clear that I have a lawyer who views Gianelli's conduct as criminal harassment and has advised me how to handle it - including by forwarding every single email he sends me (and others) to the FBI.  Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud is at issue.

I can assure you that my sister and parents didn't email Gianelli.  My sister hired an attorney to deal with him.  The only person who belongs in a mental institution is the member of my family who would eail that to Gianelli.

Gianelli promised my sons?  He doesn't know my sons and has criminally harassed me and members of my family since 2009 when he heard from Cohen's legal representatives. 

Check out my Blog, Paulette, and decide for yourself if I have posted every email you''ve sent me. 

riverdeepbook.blogspot.com

Keep in mind - Gianelli is affiliated with Michelle Blaine who targeted Phillip, stole from him, lies about him, and removed every decent person from his life, including you and Morgan.

Love,
Kelley


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com> wrote:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:00 AM
Subject:
To: paulettebrandt8@gmail.com


I realize that Kelley Lynch has told you that SHE is the one being "harassed", but please consider the following:

I am being criminally harass and that includes, but is not limited to, via emails from Susanne Walsh (Leonard Cohen's fan who copies in Cohen's lawyer, Michelle Rice - including on emails witness tampering with my son, Rutger) and Gianelli.  And now, Gianelli has targeted and is criminally harassing Paulette Brandt.  Gianelli was most definitely affiliated with Michelle Blaine and together they targeted my email accounts and blogs.  Blaine and Sprocket (the alleged mouthpiece for Clarkson's mother, per Investigator Paul Huebl) were posting on Gianelli's blog when I noted that Phil Spector was innocent and Leonard Cohen stole from me, committed tax fraud, etc.  At that point in 2009, Gianelli targeted me, members of my family, and others - together with cyber-terrorists Blaine, Sprocket, Kelly Green (on the Darwin Exception blog in 2007 that glorified Alan Jackson and demonized Phil Spector), Susanne Walsh, and others.  

1. Kelley also claimed for years that the Colorado order prohibiting her from contacting Cohen was a "fraud" issued by a "corrupt" judge who failed to understand that any dispute between her and Leonard Cohen must be litigated in "tax court" - not in a Colorado trial court - and that she was "never served" with the papers resulting in the order.

Actually, I was in court so this accusation is absurd but prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter also attempted to mislead people over this issue.  The process server perjured himself in the document which is evidence of extrinsic fraud.  I addressed this in my Motion to Quash which Streeter understood was in storage - with other evidence - in the Bay Area.  


1(a) So I obtained the Colorado hearing transcript, linked here:
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/29876970

I was astounded to read therein that Kelley not only appeared at the hearing, she REQUESTED that the taking of evidence be halted and that a restraining order against her be issued.
 I noted that Cohen and his representatives were insane.  Cohen's lawyer personally raised the IRS and Bruce Cutler as issues which I found deranged.  

The judge then explained to her that should she ever violate the order by contacting Cohen again for any reason that she could be sentenced to 18 months in jail per violation. Kelley said she understood, and the judge issued the order on the spot, Kelley signed for it and she was given a copy.

Judge Carolyn Enichen and Judge Robert Vanderet are two individuals who sit on the bench and think perjury is acceptable.  That is what I understand about these two individuals who help run the rotten justice system.


2. Kelley started violating the order almost immediately.

Bald-faced lie.  See Cohen's testimony.  

3. In late 2010 Kelley was fired from her job at IMA Yachts in FtM Lauderdale,  Fl. She immediately started emailing the IRS, the FBI, me, the press, and her former supervisor "Beverly", the owner of IMA and several clients that Beverly was a "drunk",  a "drug addict", and a tax cheat.

 Actually, Beverly - who understood the Phil Spector matter but didn't seem to understand Cohen's tax fraud - told me she placed her salary (for years) in accounts in the Cayman Islands.  She then had a melt-down after going online and, from what I could tell, and noting my emails to the IRS.  She was not the owner of IMA but did show up at Eric Salter's totally out of control and high on something.  I have no idea if she's a drug addict but did see her fall off her chair at a dinner party with many people in attendance, DRUNK.

4. Kelley then moved to Berkeley, Ca where she started living under an assumed name.

I never lived anywhere in Berkeley under an assumed name and Gianelli gets more creative as he continues to criminally harass me, others, and lie about me to people who do not want to hear from him.

5. In late 2010 Kelley started emailing Cohen again in direct violation of the Colorado order, accusing him of being responsible for her son Rutger's "fingers being ripped off", that Cohen had a small penis, was a "fraud" and a "theif", that she would "take him down" and that he needed to be "taken out and shot". (I was copied with these emails.) Kelley sent Cohen additional emails saying that she wanted to "break  (DA) Steve Cooley's jaw", accusing me of being a member of a nortorious pedaphile organization, and other emails that filled up four 3-ring binders.

 Leonard Cohen owes me millions.  Rutger had a serious accident.  This evidently annoys Leonard Cohen.  I've addressed the NAMBLA issue ad nauseum - including in my writ.

Kelley also started leaving slurred, angry, threatening and obscene voice messages on Cohen's home answering machine.

The altering of the voice mail messages (transcripts of which were incoherent and fraudulent) will be addressed in due course.  

Cohen lawyer Michelle Rice then emailed Kelley to inform her she was violating the Colorado order, and Kelley sent to Rice 70 angry  emails in 24 hours

Michelle Rice, who has made a career out of targeting me, LIED to me in her email of February 14, 2011.  The Colorado order was NOT registered in California at that time.  

Kelley was arrested in Berkeley in 2012, and taken to the LA County jail to await trial.

And, LA Superior Court had no personal jurisdiction over me.  I suppose that's why the appellate division refused to permit me to abandon my appeal.  They have to lie and say due process is irrelevant.  They do, after all, cover for the trial courts.  

5. While in jail, Kelley sent attorney Bruce Cutler a dozen long rambelling letters calling her prosecutor a "fat slug", "stupid", and corrupt, and pretending she and Cutler were old friends.

I stand by every word in those letters that have been sent to Dennis Riordan; heard from Phil Spector over this issue; and do not believe Cutler and I are old friends.  Streeter is simply a bald-faced liar.  Her prosecutorial misconduct has been addressed in my writ of habeas corpus.  I think she's corrupt.  This woman can lie about me profusely and thinks I have no right to criticize her.  Actually, I didn't call Streeter the fat slug.  That was another Deputy City Attorney who was telling yet another judge that my Stalinesque Show Trial involved a celebrity.  

6. Kelley never denied sending Cohen the emails and voice messages at her trial, but claimed that the emails about Cohen's penis, Steve Cooley and NAMBLA etc were all related to "tax issues" and therefore necessary. The jury did not believe her and found her guilty of violating the restraining order and criminal harassment.
The email about Cohen's penis related to his forcing me to read documents to him while he soaked in the bubble bath.  I viewed that as sexual harassment and indecent exposure.  Some of those documents relate to tax fraud as I have advised the IRS.  Cooley's office dragged me into Phil Spector's insane trials.  They decided not to prosecute Cohen and I do wonder if there was a quid pro quo re. Phil Spector involved.  My complaint to Cooley's Major Fraud Unit and letter to Alan Jackson (hand delivered to Cooley, Jackson, and Do) definitely addressed Cohen's theft and tax matters.

7. Bruce Cutler then wrote a letter to the court explaining that Kelley Lynch had been leaving 45 minutes of drunken, rambelling messages for him on his office voice mail system every night  for over three years, and had also harassed him with faxes, emails and letters, and that the only peace that Cutler had in three years was was when Kelley was behind bars.
Bruce Cutler is pathetic.  He never said anything about drunken messages.  Gianelli is now embellishing matters.  I've advised Gianelli to call Cutler up and propose marriage to him.

7. Three weeks ago Kelley's son Rutger emailed Kelley - copy to me - saying that she was not thinking clearly, needed mental health treatment and needed to stop emailing "these public officials and random people".

I saw Rutger on Mother's Day.  There's no random individual copied in on my emails documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Cohen's tax fraud to the IRS - and that includes the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, Dennis Riordan, Ron Burkle, and the news media.

8. Another family member informed me three days ago that "Kelley belongs in a mental institution".

Well, it's no family member that I'm involved with.  My sister's lawyer spoke to Gianelli and advised him to cease and desist.  He continues to criminally harass my sister, former landlord, and others.

9. I promised her sons I would never email her again and all emails from her (includiong sixty yesterday) will be deleted unread. I have the emails from her family, her formr roomates, her sons, and from her "friend" Steven Machat (saying three weeks ago that "at best Kelley Lynch is a pathelogical liar") if you would like to see further proof of all these things Kelley is telling you others are "lying" about.
This man's obsession with me is psychotic and I will have my attorney speak to my family, former roommates, and Steven Machat who advised my public defender that Cohen stole from him; uses corporations to evade taxes; and he would testify for me.  I also have that in writing from Steven Machat who I have advised to leave me out of his game with Cohen, Kory, and Gianelli.

I will speak to my attorney and will have him speak to my sons, members of my family, and Steven Machat who knows - Cohen's a thief who falsely accuses people of ripping him off to breach contracts.

Gianelli thinks Machat will help him and Cohen?  Laughable.

Gods, Gangsters & Honour by Steven Machat
Excerpts:

The headline wasn’t promising:  “Leonard Cohen’s Troubles May Be A Theme Come True.” But the story was outrageous.  Cohen had filed suit against his personal manager Kelley Lynch, accusing her of stealing more than $5 million while he spent five years at a Zen Buddhist retreat.

I first met Leonard Cohen in October 1970 when I was at the University of Miami and I wasn’t impressed.

I found his songs and records depressing and, worse, Cohen seemed to wallow in his morbid tales of unrequited love, loss and so on.  He always seemed to cast himself as the helpless victim.  

Leonard was desperate to get rid of his two managers, Judy Berger and Mary Martin, who he believed had stolen the rights to his songs and records early on in his career.  Even back then, Cohen was convinced that women were ripping him off.  He signed an agreement, and when he wanted to get rid of the contract, he accused everyone of ripping him off.  You could say it became repeat behaviour.  My father duly got rid of Berger and Martin, set up a new company called Stranger Music for Cohen and agreed to manage Leonard for 15% as well as 15% of Stranger.  The idea of the company was twofold:  one, to maintain ownership of the copyrights duly created; and two, to minimise Leonard’s exposure to American tax, just like any other rich individual trying to minimise their tax liabilities.  

Then I got a call from Leonard, and it was a  perfect example of how to tell when someone is lying.  He said:  “Steven, you have a best friend in me forever.  I will never harm you and I will always be there for you.”... Why would he offer not to harm me?  It suggested to me that he was thinking of harming me, and if he was thinking it, he would probably do it.  

Leonard sees truth only inside his illusions.

I met up with Leonard at a Chinese restaurant on Wilshire in LA.  Even by his standards, he was nervous.  He was drinking whiskey, which I’d never seen before, and it was only 12 PM.  He appeared terrified.  Unable to even look me in the eye, Cohen came to the point quickly:  “Your Dad ripped me off.”  Leonard told me he was convinced that my father had failed to exploit Cohen’s copyright to its full potential.  But to me it was all bullshit.  Leonard had to justify to himself why he was fucking us.

Cohen controlled his copyright, not my father.  The irony was that Cohen had total control over my father …  Do you know what happened to the $400,000 worth of bearer bonds in my father’s office?  Bearer bonds are just unregistered bonds or paper money that are used to conceal ownership and, with it, tax liabilities.  Cristini told me (who knows if this is true?) that he had found the bonds in my father’s office hours after he had died but the next day they disappeared.

I’ve no problem with people trying to avoid tax, but as the years have passed, I couldn’t help but smile at the apparent contradiction between Leonard’s public persona and his private business arrangements.  This was a supposedly devout Buddhist with no interest in material possessions, who was all the same happy to put his trust in business managers and companies he created with his knowledge and consent whose sole aim was to minimise tax liability.  

Leonard then sold Stranger Music for a small fortune and I’ve seen nothing from Cohen.

Cohen denied any knowledge of these bonds.  I was unsure if they existed or were part of my father’s schemes cooked up to conceal Leonard’s money.  

Cohen said:  “Steven, you remember the 1988 tour?  Flemming extorted $100,000 from me.  He wanted 20% managerial commission, in addition to his promoter’s fees.  He thought he was doing extra work for me and wanted me to pay him.”   Later, Flemming told me that Cohen was lying … Leonard told me he would pay me a management commission.  When I went to get the money after the tour, Leonard told me he couldn’t pay me because he owed it to the Machats.  So we settled on $100,000.  

Far from being the poet of the spirits, Leonard was a hustler using Buddhism as a facade.  

The next time I would see Leonard … We’d just seen The Hand That Rocks The Cradle where Rebecca De Mornay plays the psychopathic nanny who stalks this family.  Who should walk along but Cohen, who was holding hands with DeMornay, his girlfriend at the time.  Cohen was extremely uncomfortable because he knew he had stolen from me and it was clear he couldn’t get away quick enough.  Neither could my son, because he took one look at DeMornay and ran.  He was terrified because he thought she was the nanny in the film!

It was clear that Leonard was also wary of me because, I guess, he thought I might be planning to sue him.

Leonard told me that when he had gone off on his Buddhist retreat Kelley was left managing his business interests.  He said:  “She started believing this money was hers and she started spending it.  All of it.  When I got back from my pilgrimage, I went to withdraw money left in the account to cover the draft.  I was speechless.  I didn’t know where to look, where to turn or what to think.”   Cohen told me that with the help of  his daughter, Lorca, he managed to piece together what had happened.  

Lynch had been sending out long and bizarre emails to his friends, journalists, and the authorities denouncing Leonard for a million and one sins, which would have worried me if I was their target.

The whole scheme was so ridiculous [Leonard Cohen’s attempts to limit his liabilities on the deals] from the start.  All Leonard had to do to avoid U.S. taxes was tear up his green card, and stop living in and using the U.S. as his base.  

It’s no secret that Leonard has also made a killing on the art market by selling his paintings, plus his touring of the last two years … If that’s true, it doesn’t really tally with the clear implication from Cohen that he is a man who has been robbed of everything.

Leonard told me before I left that he had actually offered Kelley a settlement …

It’s clear that Cohen and his lawyers want to heap the blame on Kelley’s shoulders for more than just revenge.  Because Cohen’s pension assets were cashed in … ahead of schedule they are liable to tax so they need to establish that this situation is her fault.  The penalties could actually be greater than the tax itself.  

Leonard has cast himself into a hell of his own making.  

 

Meanwhile, she is posting every email from you on her blog.

I am not posting every email from Paulette Brandt on my blog.  


--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Leonard Cohen's Psychotic Allegation & Bald Faced Lie That I Bought My House With His Money; Had A $20,000/Month Prescription Med Bill; & Would Pick Up Dinner Checks For Parties Of 12 Several Times A Week - Although I Never Went Out & Cohen Will Be Able To Prove These Allegations When Hell Freezes Over


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Cohen vs Kelley Lynch (Prins Dec) | Scribd
To: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, John Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>, Ray Lindsey <raymond.c.lindsey@gmail.com>


To the DOJ,

It's laugh out loud time now.  I rarely went out.  I never picked up a check several times a week for anyone because it didn't happen.  I didn't buy $20,000 worth of prescription meds a month.  I bought my house with my IRA and commissions I made on Adam Cohen's substantial deals.  Leonard Cohen is a pathetic.  He'll never prove these lies.  GIanelli is now criminally harassing Paulette Brandt.  Everyone feels harassed by this psychopath with motive.  As someone said this morning - this demands an investigation.  The lunatic obivously has motive.  In any event, just more lies, false accusations, slander, and outright bullshit.  I'm calling my former pharmacy for my records which I will then provide to the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan.  Do you know what you'll see - heart medication and asthma medication.  PERIOD


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Cease and desist Gianelli.  Leonard Cohen will never prove this psychotic fairy tale.  I never went out and my children are well aware of that.  I picked up no checks several times a week, liar.  I had no prescription med habit of $20,000 a month and don't do drugs.  Cohen did.  It's well documented.  I bought my house with my IRA, commissions from Adam Cohen's deals, etc.

Paulette is questioning your motive and feels criminally harassed by you.  My sister's lawyer told you to cease and desist.  Ray Lawrence advised you not to contact him again and told me he advised you that your emails were harassing.

CEASE AND DESIST, lunatic.  No one wants to hear from you and everyone in my life understands this - your a liar, with motive, and this is an ongoing ad hominem attack related to Leonard Cohen.  I'm clear - it also involves Leonard Cohen.  You are dangerously unstable and your obsession with me is criminal. 

Kelley Lynch


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote

To the IRS and FBI,

Gianelli's insane.  I never went out and was not picking up the tab for anyone several times a week.  I had no prescription med tab of $20,000/month.  And no one on earth will be able to prove this.  Just more bald faced lies from the lunatic criminally harassing everyone in my life.  Please review my IRA and commissions from Adam Cohen.  Leonard Cohen is such a pathetic liar.  And then there's Gianelli.  Gianelli should absolutely be arrested.
All the best,
Kelley


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Paulette,

Gianelli doesn't seem to appreciate that you - and many others (including my former landlord, Ray Lawrence) - view his outrageous aggressive emails as criminal harassment.  I've sent you my declaration that will be attached to my motion to vacate Leonard Cohen's fraudulent and retaliatory lawsuit against me.  He heard I was going to the IRS and the rest of this story is a fictional narrative.  There is no evidence attached to Cohen's fraud lawsuit against me - just a fraudulent expense ledger that is completely undermined by illegal K-1s I received (from him) on a company I am not a partner on.  They are $0 partnership docs for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005.  This will all be addressed in my motion, declaration, etc.  And my declaration will not be the only declaration attached.  The alleged Prins declaration fails to take into consideration my ownership interest in various companies and Cohen perjured himself in his declaration when he said he was the sole beneficial owner of two companies - including the company that owns the intellectual property.  Leonard Cohen cannot stop lying.  These sums have nothing whatsoever to do with my ownership interest in all of Cohen's intellectual property dating back to 1967 and he was and is well aware that the assignments were non-revocable.  The man is a thief and he has also stolen from Marty and Steven Machat, Phil Spector, and possibly others.

I bought my house when I cashed in my retirement fund, made commissions on large deals I negotiated for Cohen's son - Adam Cohen (who I also managed), etc.  I never went out to dinner or had dinner parties several times a month and there are no prescription medications at $20,000 a month and I will get a declaration from my former pharmacy now.  Gianelli is a psychopath.  Cohen is the individual who had a prescription drug problem - meth, etc.  It's all public.  I never did drugs - prescription or otherwise and no one on earth will ever be able to prove that.  The story just gets more and more deranged.  The only medications I took were for my heart condition and asthma.  Period.  No one will ever prove that I picked up0 checks for parties of 12 several times a week.  It is psychotic.  I see Cohen thinks he can lie his way out of his tax fraud, theft, etc.  Why not?  LA Superior Court doesn't require evidence and perjury is fine, if you're a fraud celebrity liar with motive.

Why doesn't Gianelli believe me?  Because he has MOTIVE.
Thanks.  Just forward me all his criminally harassing emails.  LAPD advised me to document the emails and save them. 
Love,
Kelley


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Kelley,
Here's another one from your pal -

Doesn't sound like he's deleting e-mails unread!!  Why is any of this his concern??  Too much time on his hands.
Also, as a Personal Assistant, I know there are PLENTY of reasons why a client's checks would go into a
personal account.  I have laid out tons for Phillip, but he was in town and could write reimbursement checks to me.
Also, I doubt that there is any way an individual could go through $20,000 worth of prescription drugs in a month,
(unless they either had Aids, or Cancer), and lived to tell about it   Has he ever considered that you are telling the
truth?
Love,
P
P.S.  I have had times when I was not believed when I was telling the absolute truth - and it truly is devastating.
I have also been promised percentages of money (the Record Plant owner, Gary Kellgren, offered me 10% of
money made from any band, etc. that I would bring into the Record Plant - which is how I met Phil.  I brought in THE
BEATLES, and never got paid a dime.  My whole life would have been different had I been paid what I was
owed.  I know how it feels.  SUCKS
Love,
P

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:33 PM
Subject: Cohen vs Kelley Lynch (Prins Dec) | Scribd
To: paulettebrandt8@gmail.com


Ms. Brandt:

Linked below is a declaration prepared by a CPA in support of Leonard Cohen's default judgment. If you scroll down you will find - among other evidence - front and back copies of canceled royalty checks made payable to Leonard Cohen and deposited by Kelley Lynch into her PERSONAL checking account.

A handful of random checks are deposited.  I intend to subpoena information from Greenberg - including, for instance, Cohen's own fax advising him to provide me with $100,000 which Cohen later informed me was a gift.  In any event, his signature is on the fax and these insane lies go on and on.  Cohen might want to revisit the non-revocable assignments proving I own 15% of all intellectual property dating back to 1967.


Also attached to the Prins declaration are copies of bank statements proving that Kelley Lynch transferred funds from the bank account maintained by Cohen's family trust and from Cohen's personal checking to Kelley Lynch's accounts.

The expense ledger is frauduent.  At times - and I have no idea what any of the numbers mean since there is no back up document (royalty statements, etc.) - Cohen had his girlfriend and son's homes in my alleged column.  The ledger is evidence of fraud and Cohen's lies, concealment of evidence, etc.


These sums, taken by Kelley Lynch over many years, exceed her agreed 15% by an amount in excess of $7M.

Gianelli cannot stop lying.  Why he is writing Paulette Brandt, criminally harassing her, is another matter.  Cohen's default represents $5 million prayed for damages.  Of course, I wasn't served although someone has pointed out that this is called gutter service and the express purpose is to not serve the individual and obtain an unlawful default.  On top of this - which has nothing to do with anything (other than what I view as illegal damages disguised as interest) - Judge Ken Freeman (who required no evidence of corporate ownership interest, a trust, etc.) granted Cohen nearly $2.5 million in interest which is a legal outrage.  Of course - in keeping with LA Superior Court practices - I was not notified of or served the default judgment either.  No wonder the appellate division didn't want me to abandon my appeal - they have to prove that they do not understand due process or how a judge obtains personal jurisdiction over someone.  But, their sole job seems to be covering for the trial court (and LA County, their employers).  Nice scam.  The conflicts of interest are astounding.

So how does Cohen explaiu away the corporate books and records that he willfully concealed from LA Superior Court when he declared (fraudulently - and it is evidence of perjury) that he is the sole beneficial owner of BMT and TH.  He further lied to the court when he declared that these entities were held in trust for him.  The man cannot stop lying, stealing, etc.

Where did the money go?

Kelley Lynch had been living beyond her means for many years, including in a house with a pool in Brentwood, picking up dinner checks for parties of 12 several times a week, exorbitant purchases at Nieman Marcus and other high end stores and to fund  $20,000 a month in prescription drugs.

I did not live beyond my means and these are bald-faced lie.  I bought a house that needed to be renovated for a good price.  My father and I renovated the house.  I bought my house with an IRA account I had and commissions I made when I managed Adam Cohen and negotiated substantial deals for him.  Clearly, the IRS has this information and must know that Leonard Cohen is a bald-faced liar.  I never used $20,000/month in prescription drugs.  I had heart medication and asthma medication.  Leonard Cohen is insane and Gianelli is a bald-faced liar with motive. 

Like many embezzlers, she failed to save any of her stolen loot, and did not stop until she had waltzed through most of Cohen's savings.

\I see that Leonard Cohen is arguing - again - that he is the alter ego of these entities who engaged in self-dealing.  Leonard Cohen is the thief who has now stolen from me, Marty and Steven Machat, Phil Spector, and possibly record producer Bob Johston.  As Steven Machat and I understand - Cohen falsely accuses people of ripping him off to breach contracts.  And, LA Superior Court doesn't require evidence (ie., corporate books, records, stock certificates, non-revocable assignments) - particularly when a lying celebrity with motive rolls into their court. 

http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/29620593/html5

Or perhaps YOU can think of an innocent reason for Kelley's to deposit royalty checks payable to Cohen directly into her PERSONAL accounts?

One thing is for certain - Gianelli has no excuse for criminally harassing everyone in my life - including Paulette Brandt.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

Paulette Brandt's Take On Leonard Cohen's Guilt, Motive, & Phil Spector's Innocence


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: My take on things
To: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>


Hi Paulette,

That's all it is about.  Cohen didn't serve me and this justice system is about who can pay for justice, especially in Los Angeles with it's outrageous celebrity justice culture.  Cohen literally confessed to perjury on the stand and that was just fine with the judge, prosecutor, and jurors.  Nauseating.

The truth is apparent and Cohen has concealed the corporate books, records, etc. that prove I own 15% of all IP.  He also withheld my commissions for work I've done.  Thank you - many people believe I helped save his career but his arrogance is appalling.  Leonard Cohen does not like to pay for anything and Steven Machat advised me that he sold Phillip's masters (Death Of LP) to Sony.  Steven worked on that contract.  That's all this is about - Cohen's greed, fraud, and tax issues have caught up to him.  He testified that I only stole his peace of mind.  Leonard Cohen cares for no one and as Steven Machat said - he falsely accuses his representatives of ripping him off to breach contracts.  He's lucky he has the DA and City Attorney in his corner.  I can't tell you how sleazy it was to witness the DA's investigator hanging out with Cohen, his lawyers, and PI.  The man is so desperate.  It is pathetic.  No, I would not have found myself homeless.  Leonard Cohen intentionally bankrupted me and then took the stand in my Stalinesque Show Trial and testified about Phil Spector and a gun.  But he cannot stop lying (including to and about the IRS) so he now has three versions of his bogus gun story about Phil Spector before LA Superior Court which is psychotic.  A worm is right.  My lawyer views him as a snake. 

Phil Spector was set up and he murdered no one.  That's correct, Paulette.  Phillip is locked away for something he didn't do.  And, no one that really knows him testified for the prosecution.  My girlfriend said this - they dragged every gold digger they could find out of the gutter.  The prosecution's theory is insane - Phillip had to shoot someone to have sex? My God.  One does wonder about his jurors

Love,
Kelley


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Kelley,
Through my last 3 1/2 years of dealing with our Justice system it has become quite clear to me
that an honest average Joe, who cannot afford an attorney at the cost for one hour of their time
what an average Joe might earn in a hard week's work, will always lose out to a lying rich man  since Joe doesn't "have the resources to do anything about it".  This is a quote from the
rich auctioneer who kept about a quarter of a million dollars worth of collectibles that he had
taken from me, and who will not return them.
The truth is apparent.  Leonard Cohen made promises to you concerning payment for your services, which many consider saved his career and his ass some time ago.  Looks like Mr. Cohen doesn't like to pay for anything, and may have gotten caught not paying his share of taxes on the large sums of money he has been lucky enough to have made.  Of course, if he could blame you - then he wouldn't have to pay you - or his taxes!  What is right, ethical and moral doesn't enter into it.  He is a very lucky, very greedy man who appears to care for no one other than himself.  If you had stolen money from him - where is it?  Would you have found yourself homeless???  I think not.  I have seen what people with "fame" can get away with.  I have seen them take advantage and lie, with no second thoughts about how it will impact others.  This man should have been thanking you and showing his appreciation for you saving him - but noooo, he's a greedy worm.  Being faced with telling the truth and having no one believe you is enough to drive a person crazy!  It's the worst.
And about Philip - I have known him my entire adult life.  Is he an Angel?  No.  But he has ALWAYS  been there for me, so in some ways he has been an Angel to me.  Does he make no mistakes?  No.  But who has made no mistakes in their lives.  The one thing I can tell you is that he is no murderer.  And the jealous egos of men who can't compare to Phillip and his accomplishments have locked him away for something he didn't do.
That's my take on all of this.
Lpve,
p


--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.


Gianelli's Obsession With Phil Spector


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch has posted your contact information on her blog
To: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>


Paulette,

Please review Mick Brown's comments.  I think Mick - who works for the Telegraph (and NOT Rolling Stone) - is quite clear here.

Love,
Kelley

On 10 April 2012 09:41, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Nikhil Ramnaney,

Thank you for your letter. I'm afraid there has been a misunderstanding here. At the time I was writing my book about Phil Spector I was sent copies of material that, as I understood it, had been submitted to the Grand Jury in the Phil Spector case. Included in this material were (short) statements from Leonard Cohen.  I might well have mentioned to Ms Lynch that these statements were included in materials presented to the Grand Jury. However, I do not recall having stated that Mr Cohen himself had testified to the Grand Jury. Indeed, I
would have had no way or knowing whether he had or not.

My feeling is that these statements had not been given by Mr Cohen personally at the time, but were actually taken from one or more interviews that he had given in the past concerning his recording sessions with Mr.  Spector.

I hope this answers your question. If it's helpful, I shall try and find the original material that was sent to me. If I can be of any more help to you please don't hesitate to contact me.

Best wishes,

Mick Brown

From: Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>
Date: Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: The Rise And Fall Of Phil Spector
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Hi Kelley,

Thank you for that, and I'm glad you're finding my interviews helpful.

I've told you everything I know about the Leonard Cohen gun story and how it appeared in Grand Jury testimony. I have no knowledge, thoughts or theories beyond that.

Hope all's well with you.
Best,
Mick

[Phil Spector] Recording Leonard Cohen, he approached the singer clutching a bottle of Jewish ritual wine in one hand and a pistol in the other, which he shoved into Cohen's neck, whispering 'Leonard, I love you.'  Cohen with admirable aplomb, simply moved the barrel away, saying 'I hope you do, Phil'.

From: Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:18:50 +0000
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch Trial - Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Kelley,

I have looked for the documents I was sent in connection with the Grand
Jury and been unable to find them. They were sent to me by my friend the
journalist and author Carlton Smith, who unfortunately has since passed
away. However, I'm sure you would be able to access them from the same
source as Carlton did. My understanding is they were/are on the public
record.

I do not recall ever saying to you that Cohen himself had testified. If I
did, it was my mistake. My recollection is that the statement from Leonard
Cohen was the same  statement that had already appeared in media
interviews, pertaining to the incident in the studio during the recording
of 'Death Of A Ladies Man'. My recollection is that it was on a single
sheet of paper. I have no idea whether Leonard Cohen personally made this
statement to the DA, or whether - and I suspect this is the case - that
quote had simply been taken from previously published interviews
There was no mention of any statement attributed to Cohen in either of the
two subsequent trials.

Mick

Leonard Cohen’s statements were indeed used in prosecution motions in Phil Spector’s trials.  The following are excerpts from the prosecution’s Motion to Admit Evidence of Other Crimes in Case No. BA255233, filed on August 14, 2008 and from the prosecution’s Motion in Limine to admit evidence of other crimes filed on February 17, 2005.  

“Defendant Phillip Spector has built a history, spanning some 40 odd years,of using gun-related violence when confronted with a situation when he feels a loss of control, or a threat to his control.  On February 17, 2005, the People filed a motion in limine to admit evidence of other acts committed by Spector. Under that separate cover, the facts of the following incidents were set forth in detail and in their entirety. Thus, in an effort towards brevity, only a short recitation of such incidents will be discussed below.  Spector has a long history of resorting to gun-related violence to exert his will when he does not get his way. Int begins in 1972 and continues to the present.”

“C. The 1977 Brandishing on Leonard Cohen:  1977, Spector produced musician Leonard Cohen's record album, "Death of a Ladies man." during production of the record, Cohen and Spector, who were friends, were taking a break in the lobby of the music studio. Spector walked up to Cohen, placed on arm around Cohen's shoulders, and pointed a semi-automatic pistol at Cohen's chest with his other hand. Spector told Cohen, "I love you Leonard." Cohen looked at Spector and said, "I hope so, Phil." Spector then walked away from Cohen.”


02/17/2005:  Motion in Limine to admit evidence of other crimes:memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof.



On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Mick,

It's interesting that Gianelli is writing Paulette about you.  You have advised me that you reviewed the Grand Jury transcripts and Cohen's statements were used.  I included your emails confirming this in my Writ of Habeas Corpus that was approved and filed on May 3, 2013.  Gianelli's obsession with me is astounding.
All the best,
Kelley


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Gianelli,

Cease and desist.  Paulette is my friend and we're in regular contact.  You're lying to her face and you appear obsessed with Mick Brown.
Kelley Lynch


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Paulette,
Why is Gianelli writing you anything about what we do or do not know.  Leonard Cohen stole from Marty and Steven Machat and Steven Machat has addressed this in his book.  Cohen just testified about Phil Spector - in my alleged trial - and now has three versions of his highly embellished Spector gun stories before LA Superior Court.  Mick Brown/UK Telegraph has reviewed the Grand Jury transcripts and advised me that Cohen's statements were used.  I haven't claimed this.  Mick Brown has confirmed this numerous times in emails to me.  Cohen's statements were also used in prosecution motions that are readily available online - including at LA Superior Court
In any event, Paulette, we have spoken and email one another and you are a dear friend of mine - and Phillip's.  Why would I turn on you?  You're not criminally harassing me and members of my family, etc. 

Thanks for forwarding me this evidence against Gianelli.  I agree - he knows what he says and is a bald-faced liar with MOTIVE.
Love,
Kelley



On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Kelley,
This is what Gianelli sent me.  I just ignored it.  He knows not what he says.  Stay well.
Love,
Paulette

GIANELLI'S LIES TO PAULETTE BRANDT.  READ STEVEN MACHAT'S BOOK - COHEN STOLE FROM HIM AND HIS FATHER ALSO. 
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:38 PM
Subject: Kelley Lynch has posted your contact information on her blog
To: paulettebrandt8@gmail.com


Dear Ms. Brandt:
Kelley Lynch has posted your name and email address on her blog, and is pretending that the two of you are of a like mind respecting her “theory” that entertainer Leonard Cohen is on a “crusade” to destroy Phil Spector, and also “stole” from Marty Marchant. (She claims Mick Brown of Rolling Stone told her that Leonard Cohen testified before the Phi Spector grand jury and from this she infers that Cohen’s “perjury” is responsible for Spector’s murder conviction, even though Cohen neither testified before the grand jury nor at either one of Phil Spector’s murder trials.)
Be forewarned, Kelley Lynch is very disturbed and mistakes silence in the face of emails as a “relationship” and silence in the face of several hundred or more emails as a “dear friendship”.
And should she turn on you, you can expect 10,000 emails accusing you of every crime known to mankind, CC to the IRS, the FBI, Governors, prosecutors and the media.
See here:
Kelley Lynch also forwarded her email to you to various email recipients, including the FBI, IRS, and Franchise Tax Board and members of the media,  implying that the two you are in “conversation”; here is her distribution  list:
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: Have you seen this?
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>


Hello Mr. Riordan,

Paulette sent me a lovely link featuring Blaine on Aphrodite Jones. The system works beautifully for the criminal. Paulette worked for Phil for years and NO ONE contacted her - not the prosecutors, not the news media, etc. No one cares about the truth. They like the garbage de riguer gun stories. They sell.

Love,
Kelley
See link, above.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

Stephen Gianelli's Criminal Harassent Continues - He Now Lies To Paulette Brandt, Phil Spector's Former Assistant


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch
To: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, John Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>, Ray Lindsey <raymond.c.lindsey@gmail.com>


Rutger and Ray,

Is Gianelli in contact with you?  Ray Lawrence advised him to stop emailing him and informed him that his emails are harassing.  Gianelli continues to email him. 

Paulette is Phil Spector's former assistant.  Gianelli is actually obsessed with Phil Spector.  He is affiliated with Michelle Blaine, a woman who actually stole $900,000 from Phil Spector.  She publicly thanked Gianelli for targeting my email accounts and blogs.
As someone noted this morning - this man and his activity demands an investigation.  Another man, who is standing here with me, is saying Cohen appears to be behind Gianelli's actions.
Mother


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Paulette,
As Investigator Frayeh/DA's office concluded - Gianelli's a shady character who may have found a sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson about me.  My former landlord advised him that he views his emails as harassing.  He lies and his obsession with me is startling.  The guy cares because the guy has MOTIvE.  Ignore this dangerously unstable lunatic who is obsessed with me, my sons and family, and has been aligned with Leonard Cohen since 2009.
Let's talk soon. 
Love,
Kelley


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Gianelli,

I am advising you to cease and desist.  Ray Lawrence said no such thing and I have heard that you continue to harass him with emails.  I informed him that my sister's lawyer advised you to cease and desist and you refuse. 
Kelley Lynch


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com> wrote:
This just came in - why should this guy care?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch
To: paulettebrandt8@gmail.com


I am in correspondence with Kelley's sons Rutger and Ray who advise that Kelley is not only mentally ill but an alcoholic. Her landlord up to last week, Raymond Lawrence, emailed me two weeks ago saying the same thing.

Ray Lawrence advised me that he has asked Gianelli to stop emailing him and advised him that the emails are harassment.  He also denies emailing Gianelli these statements.

If you are truly her friend you will urge her to get help.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

Obsessed Stark Raving Lunatic, Stephen Gianelli, Contacted Paulette Brandt (Phil Spector's Former Assistant) About Me - His Role Does Not Just Involve Lying About Me & Leonard Cohen's Tax Fraud


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:38 AM
Subject: Stephen Gianelli
To: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>


Hi Paulette,

Thank you for confirming that Stephen Gianelli contacted you.  This man's actions have been unconscionable.  His obsession with me, my family, and others, is shocking and demands an investigation.  It is my personal belief that he attempts to infiltrate matters - for instance contacting the Treasury/FBI re. Cohen's tax fraud; calling Bruce Cutler; etc.  Your response to him was the correct response - ignore this stark raving lunatic with motive.  He is affiliated with Michelle Blaine, who publicly thanked him for targeting my blogs and email accounts, and I have the evidence of that fact.

Would you forward me the email he sent you?  I would like to give it to my attorney and Dennis Riordan.  I've written Phillip about Gianelli and my views that he also sets up reasonable doubt theories on the internet that can then be attacked and refuted.  Please keep in mind that Investigator William Frayeh (an investigator from the DA's office who worked on Phil Spector's case) concluded that Gianelli was a shady character who may have found sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson about me.  And then - re. my Stalinesque Show Trial - Phil Spector, DA Steve Cooley, and Alan Jackson were featured and used against me.  How convenient.  Fascinating that no one from the DA's office interviewed you since you have known Phillip for over 30 years and worked with him.  I guess they only wanted gold diggers with motive on the stand.  I heard that some of these women were caught going through his drawers and stealing from him.  What did you hear?

It's interesting that everyone who actually knows Phillip loves him.  It's also interesting that Nancy Sinatra pursued him so intensely and the prosecutors want the world to believe that Phillip had to pull guns on women.  Neither you or I have ever seen Phillip with a gun.  Janice has never seen Phillip with a gun.  Hal Blaine has never seen Phil Spector with a gun.  But then there's Leonard Cohen.  You were at Phillip's house when they were writing the songs together.  Were you also in the studio with them?  Leonard Cohen  now has three versions of his good rock and roll stories about the Phil Spector gun incident before LA Superior Court.  Did you ever see Phillip with a cross-bow?  That's another version Cohen likes to dazzle the groupie media with.


Stay in touch.

Love,
Kelley



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.

Nancy Sinatra Card To Phil Spector