Sunday, May 15, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to Leonard Cohen's Lawyers Re. the Ongoing Criminal Harassment

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, May 15, 2016 at 6:44 AM
To: Robert Kory <>, Michelle Rice <>, “*irs. commissioner” <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, “: Division, Criminal” <>, “Doug.Davis” <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, “glenn.greenwald” <>, Harriet Ryan <>, “hailey.branson” <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, “mayor.garcetti” <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, “Kelly.Sopko” <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>, bruce <>
Kory & Rice,
I continue to be bombarded by harassing emails from co-conspirator Stephen Gianelli.  I have yet to meet a lawyer who spends this much time on their own clients and yet Gianelli has spent over seven years harassing me over Leonard Cohen, arguing his legal positions, and inserting extraneous issues into other matters (including DA Steve Cooley into the Tax Court case when he attempt to infiltrate the IRS Chief Trial Counsel’s Office which was and remains fascinating).  This man has also spent seven years terrorizing my sons, contacting my elderly parents, harassing and stalking witnesses who provided declarations, and has most definitely engaged in blatantly criminal conduct with many people.  I will remind you that I am now in possession of Rice’s emails urging Gianelli to continue harassing me (because it makes her “rich as fuck”) and Kory’s urging this criminal to bcc him on the harassing emails.  I intend to file state bar complaints against the three of you this week. I also intend to write the Senate Finance Committee members about Leonard Cohen’s use of a fraudulent state court complaint narrative (and possibly some version of the fabricated expense ledger) to apply for and obtain fraudulent tax refunds.  I will also strongly urge the Senate Finance Committee to audit LA Superior Court and the City Attorney with respect to the fraudulent DMV order and assignment of a fraudulent dating relationship based on a Colorado order issued without findings that was not a DMV order.
I personally do not find Donziger’s brief, which is not the court’s decision in Chevron, unimpressive.  However, should the court approve my so-called “merit” review then you should argue these issues directly with the court.  I am also not particularly interested in the 10th Circuit’s case.  My RICO suit does not attempt to attack a state court judgment.  The judgment was procured by fraud and the court should not provide it with any validity.  Furthermore, I was not served.  I believe that was the point of not communicating with me when I immediately brought the situation to Cohen’s lawyers’ attention.  Any reputable law firm would have immediately seen to it that I was served but Cohen elected to file his tax returns, amend others, and apply for/obtain fraudulent tax refunds.  I do think the IRS should seriously question why Cohen believes he has the right to conceal the fact that he borrowed/caused to be expended over $7 million in TH corporate assets.  I also would like IRS to explain what “mistake” in my ownership interest in that entity was “rectified,” why I was included as a partner, and why I paid taxes based on documents prepared by Cohen’s personal corporate and tax lawyer.  That will not resolve the fact that the assets are owned by Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. – or, according to Rice, simply “out there” or why/how the assets of suspended corporations were transferred to Cohen during their suspension.  That would of course now include the renewal of judgment and attempt to extort millions from me in financial interest.  These are just some of the issues I’ve asked IRS to address.
I personally believe the court should take into consideration the fact that the failure to serve me, attempts to argue claims preclusion, and the running of statute of limitations was knowing, willful, and part of the scheme to defraud, extort, destroy, and discredit me.
This conduct with your co-conspirator should cease and desist.
Kelley Lynch
Date: Sun, May 15, 2016 at 2:27 AM
To: blind <>
First, note that the case that Kelley Lynch relies on, Kougasian v. Tmsl Inc., is not a RICO case and therefore does not stand in opposition to any of the federal  circuit court of appeal authorities cited in Dozinger’s appeal brief for the proposition that EVERY FEDERAL CIRCUIT TO CONSIDER THE ISSUE HAS HELD THAT THE RICO STATUTE MAY NOT BE USED TO COLLATERALLY ATTACK OR TO OVERTURN A STATE-COURT JUDGMENT ALLEGEDLY PROCURED BY FRAUD. These cases do not even rely on Rooker-Feldman, they rely on principles of res judicata and the need for finality of judgments.
See attached, yellow highlighted portions of text.
Attached:  Corrected Brief for Donziger
Date: Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:02 AM
Subject: Every federal appellate court to consider issue held RICO may NOT be used to set aside state-court J based on alleged fraud
To: blind <>
See yellow highlighting.
749 F.3d 1180 (2014)
Judy KNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
PHOENIX CENTRAL, INC.; Mini Malls of America; John Doe, unknown investors in Mooring #1 thru xx; Jane Doe, unknown investors in Mooring #1 thru xx, Plaintiffs,
MOORING CAPITAL FUND, LLC; Mooring Financial Corporation; John Jacquemin, Defendants-Appellees, and
David Nalls; John Doe; Jane Doe; Counsels and Agents of Defendants, Defendants.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.