Saturday, March 19, 2016

Kelley Lynch Email to IRS, FBI, & DOJ Re. Extortion, the Stalker, His Client, Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:45 PM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch's threat to "countersue for extortion"
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ADivision, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Gianelli is now harassing me over KVW's fraudulent lawsuit and my intention to file a counter-suit re. extortion.  I won't rely on this stalker's misleading legal research.  Now Gianelli is doing KVW's legal research.  He also does some of Cohen's.  The definition of "extortion" fits the Cohen default judgment to a T.

I've sent you the other harassing emails I've received from this criminal today.  Here's my email to Alan Hootnick.  Gianelli is evidently writing Alan Hootnick.  He also copies him on emails harassing me.  Very curious and strange strategy, no?

I've contacted Investigator William Frayeh, DA's office, about the situation with KVW.  I've previously communicated with him about her and Gianelli's activities.  Also, her call to Robert Kory, the situation with the Small Claims case, and other issues.  We haven't been served.  When we are, I will send you the suit.  I have writing samples of hers that will be submitted to the court if someone else wrote her lawsuit.  One of those writing samples is her fraudulent counter-claim against Paulette in the Small Claims case.  She demanded $10,000.  


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <>
Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 9:03 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch's threat to "countersue for extortion"

It is not “extortion” unless  you threaten to expose someone, to have them prosecuted, or to harm them UNLESS they pay you money.

Therefore, simply filing a lawsuit is not “extortion” – despite what Lynch says. Therefore, a “demurrer” to any such cross complaint or counter suit under California Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10 (e) [“The pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. “] would be granted and the “countersuit” dismissed based on California Supreme Court case authority. It is the conditional threat to expose or to prosecute or to do harm UNLESS money is paid that is extortion, not simply filing suit.

See Flatley v. Mauro (2006) 39 Cal.4th 299:

Extortion is the obtaining of property from another, with his consent  induced by a wrongful use of force or fear” (Pen.Code, § 518.)   Fear, for purposes of extortion “may be induced by a threat, either:  [¶]  [¶] 2. To accuse the individual threatened  of any crime;  or, [¶] 3. To expose, or impute to him  any deformity, disgrace or crime[.]”  (Pen.Code, § 519.)   “Every person who, with intent to extort any money or other property from another, sends or delivers to any person any letter or other writing, whether subscribed or not, expressing or implying, or adapted to imply, any threat such as is specified in Section 519, is punishable in the same manner as if such money or property were actually obtained by means of such threat.”   (Pen.Code, § 523.)”