Monday, January 4, 2016

Leonard Cohen's Operative Is Interested In Kelley Lynch's Appeals; Cohen's Attorneys of Record Should Simply Respond to the Appeals

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:48 AM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I have no idea what my stalker is quoting but if Leonard Cohen's attorneys of record have any questions, they can ask or respond to my appeals.  Cohen didn't file an order with respect to the January 17, 2014 decision so there was nothing to appeal.  The proxy operative is well aware of that fact.  I suppose Cohen and his other representatives would like information about my appeals.  

My second motion addressed egregious fraud upon the court including the use of fraudulent misrepresentations, extensive use of perjured statements, and litigation misconduct.  I didn't file a motion to reconsider and Hess didn't have jurisdiction to begin with as I was not served Cohen's lawsuit and the judgment is void.  The fact that Hess is arguing Cohen's legal positions is irrelevant to me because he is blatantly wrong.  California simply mischaracterizes all motions as motions to reconsider and evidently condones the tampering with the administration of justice.  I am aware that a motion to reconsider would have to be filed within 10 days, etc.  If you read the motion for terminating sanctions, you will see that it's not a motion to reconsider.  A legal judgment does not wrongfully convert someone's property to another party because they prefer to be "unopposed."  A legal judgment does not involve theft.  A legal judgment does not include the property of suspended corporations.  The due process issues involved here are outrageous.  I will take this matter to the U.S. Supreme Court.  I have as good a shot as anyone with that Court and they do hear pro se cases.  One of the problems here is that California doesn't follow Hazel Atlas.  If they did, the waste of taxpayer dollars and tampering with the administration of justice would not be so egregious.  As it is now, the system works beautifully for criminals and there are evidently no remedies  Whoever fails to serve someone and engages in egregious fraud, perjury, misconduct, etc. will win.  That is not a justice system.  I addressed the perjury in my documents  And, I provided evidence - including Cohen's statements that I never stole from him - to support the fact that this is how Cohen obtains judgments, verdicts, and orders.  It doesn't matter if it was newly discovered or not.  

Judge Hess didn't have jurisdiction to begin with so my fraud upon the court motion didn't deprive Hess of anything.  I wasn't served.  That was the basis of my motion to vacate.  The facts have not changed.  I still haven't been served.  

Do you think this criminal runs into the bathroom to type out his harassing emails while his wife is engaged in her shopping practices on vacation?  Nasty family.  


From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 7:19 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <>

"This is a void judgment and that means it can be appealed.‎"