Saturday, December 5, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email to Senate Judiciary Re. the City and County of Los Angeles, Fraudulent Domestic Violence Orders, VAWA Funding Fraud, & Their Lies About Federal Tax Matters, Witness Tampering & Retaliation

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:41 PM
Subject: Local Los Angeles Government Actors Have The Expectation Of Affection Re. Leonard Cohen
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>

Hi Senate Judiciary,

The Criminal Stalker/Operative has one other point he wants to harass me over.  There were no findings and I did NOT agree to the entry of any order based on fraud and/or perjury.  The Court evidently believed that was an acceptable manner in which to obtain the fraud order.  I waived no objections whatsoever.  This order will be addressed in my RICO suit.  The fraud DMV order will be addressed as well.  DOJ and Senate Judiciary should engage in an extensive audit of VAWA funds in Los Angeles and LA Superior Court's attempt to extort domestic violence fines from me.  They're used to getting away with their criminal conduct.  That is entirely clear.


From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Implausible conspiracy theories
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: alan hootnick <>

PS: No "findings" were required, because you agreed to the issuance of the Colorado order. Actually, "agreed" is not quite strong enough a word. According to the transcript, you REQUESTED the court to issue the permanent restraining order. The judge admonished you that you could not come back later and claim it was "fraudulent", that the order would be permanent, and that if you violated it by contacting Cohen for any reason you could be sentenced to 18-months in jail PER VIOLATION. At that point you reiterated your request for the issuance of the order. The judge issued the order, and you then THANKED HER! SORRY, BUT BY APPEARING AT THE HEARING AND THEN STIPULATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE ORDER, YOU LEGALLY WAIVED ANY OBJECTIONS THERETO - INCLUDING BASED ON THE LACK OF FINDINGS.  

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I was very clear with the Boulder Combined Court that I would attack the order, issued without findings, if it was based on fraud and/or perjury.  It was and I discovered Cohen's entirely perjured declaration after the trial.  It doesn't matter what the order says.  The Boulder Combined Court continuously advised me, and others, that the fraudulent "permanent" order expired on February 15, 2009.  That's inconvenient for the Operative Stalker.  I testified that I believed the order expired.  I wasn't the lawyer asking me questions so I tend to doubt I could have gotten off the stand and asked myself the questions.  Furthermore, my lawyer told me the judge refused to permit us to attack the Colorado order, etc.  The jurors wanted to hear from IRS.  One juror relied on the prosecutors lies about corporate assets.  I've explained this ad nauseum.  Actually, Paulette Brandt testified that she was told the order expired on February 15, 2009 - before LA Superior Court - approximately four months before Boulder Combined Court wrote that the order was NOT a domestic violence order and provided a copy of their database showing that an order expired on February 15, 2009.  Berkeley PD was well aware that I had no idea an order was in place.  Even they didn't understand what order was being referred to.  Berkeley PD would like FBI to contact them.  

My lawyers spoke to the jurors.  My lawyer felt there may have been a "jury plant" and that is a very serious issue.  My lawyer advised me:  City Attorney is attempting to sabotage IRS; discredit me; and DA doesn't want the Spector verdict overturned.  My appellate attorney wrote that my trial was an IRS tax fraud case (related to Cohen) and should be investigated as such by IRS. The City Attorney LIED to the jurors about federal tax matters and told the jurors I am in receipt of it.  I am not and neither is IRS or FTB.  She said the tax fraud is a ruse.  No it's not.  I have Kory's memorandum - and the tax returns - proving that Cohen and his representatives failed to report $8 million in gross income.  Cohen has embezzled approximately $6.7 million from TH alone.  That issue has not been litigated.  

Gianelli is a criminal, moonlighting for Cohen and probably the Spector prosecution, and belongs in prison.  That's a fact.  He has engaged in egregious criminal witness tampering and targeted witnesses.  That would include, but is not limited to, my sons for years.  That's evidently just fine with LA Superior Court and the powers that be in Los Angeles.  In fact, the prosecutor felt it was fine that someone who could be a sexual predator (or serial murderer) for all I know was targeting my then minor son.  Indecent exposure is cool with the powers that be in LA Confidential.  That conduct annoys the perp.

Cohen testified that I never stole from him and we were in a purely business relationship.  The City Attorney elicited the testimony about Phil Spector and a gun with the DA's investigator in the courtroom and witnessed lunching with Cohen.  Cohen testified that he was a recipient on the email to Dennis Riordan.  He lied and was not.  Leonard Cohen has used fraud and perjury to obtain verdicts, judgments, and orders.  LA Superior Court condones that conduct and local government actors are all over a federal tax matter.  

The criminal has been advised to cease and desist.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Implausible conspiracy theories
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: alan hootnick <>

1. Regardless of why Cohen arrived in Boulder or how he got there, you were given an opportunity to have a hearing on whether the permanent order should issue. You initially said yes, you wanted an evidentiary hearing. Cohen counsel called you to the stand. After a few minutes of cross-examination, you told the court that you wanted to end the hearing and simply agree to the issuance of the permanent order. The judge admonished you of the consequences and you said you understood so the judge issued the order at your request, then served it on you in open court. You signed for the order. Right on its face, the order says in 18-point bold type in a prominent box "this protection order NEVER EXPIRES".

2. You did NOT testify at your 2012 criminal trial that you phoned the Colorado court before you emailed and telephoned Cohen and were told that the order had expired. Rather, you testified that you ASSUMED that it had expired, because "permanent" orders in California have an expiration date. The jury did not believe you.

3. Apparently, AFTER your conviction and you moved in with Paulette Brandt, you and Paulette CLAIM that you called the Colorado court and were told the order expired. First, the order did not expire. Protection orders in Colorado last until the restrained person files a motion to terminate the order, and must fill out a fingerprint card so the court can obtain an FBI rap sheet to see if the restrained person has been convicted of any crime involving the protected person as a victim. At that point the restrained person loses all right to ever ask that the order be set aside.

4. Since you and Paulette claim to have been told the Colorado order expired AFTER your criminal trial, that is IRRELEVANT to your state of mind at the time you violated the order.

5. The emails you sent to Cohen "came up" at your trial because they proved that you violated the Colorado order by sending them, and for no other reason.

6. Did you speak to any of your jurors? I doubt it, you were in custody before, during and after your trial. While one or more jurors may have told your attorneys or their investigator that they would have been interested in hearing from the IRS, that evidence would not have changed the core truth that you sent emails and transmitted voice mails to Cohen while a Colorado protection order prohibited you from doing so. WHY you violated the order is not a defense. You would have been convicted anyway, as noted by the LA Superior Court Appellate Department opinion affirming your conviction on appeal.

7. YOU are the one who has called these things a "conspiracy" not me, including on December 4, 2015 in a blog post with THIS HEADING: "The Ongoing Overlapping Legal Conspiracies...".

In the body of the email, you state in part:

"You attempt to infiltrate matters, elicit information, threaten and intimidate witnesses, and are engaged in an ongoing campaign of harassment that involves overlapping legal conspiracies related to Leonard Cohen and Phil Spector."

These are not "facts". It's crazy talk.