Wednesday, December 2, 2015

A Default Judgment Does Not Give Leonard Cohen the Right to Steal; There Were No Settlement Negotiations - Lynch Felt She Was Being Asked to Engage in Criminal Conduct & Refused to Participate

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:37 PM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch email to the IRS/FBI/DOJ dated Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:33 AM
To: Robert Kory <>, Michelle Rice <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, Fabian Paulmikell A <>, alan hootnick <>

Kory & Rice,

I had no privilege with you.  I refused to participate in settlement agreements or negotiations.  I refused to meet with Cohen.  I didn't attempt to "extort" a civil settlement and have some of Cohen's offers in writing - including with respect to the 50% community property.  In any event, the memorandum confirming that Cohen and his representatives failed to report the $8 million gross from the TH sale in 2001 has been submitted to IRS, Tax Court, and others.  It is evidence of criminal conduct and an attempted cover up.  Therefore, the crime fraud exception would also apply.  There was and remains no nexus of $5 million because Cohen authorized the payment of his personal expenses - in writing to Greenberg and signed personally by him.

I know one thing:  I didn't have anything to do with IRS matters, IRS filings, corporate legal work, overseeing corporate legal work, directing Cohen's representatives, accounting, etc.  What about the phantom income shifted to me but not distributed?  Was that problem also resolved in Cohen's favor - although the evidence hasn't changed.  

A [2006] default judgment does not permit Cohen to steal.  The corporations were suspended and that has nothing to do with Judge Babcock's 2008 order.  He relied on the fraud default and there's fraud upon that court as well.

Intelligent people understand this:  Gianelli is representing Cohen's interest and this activity with IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office is criminal and illegal.  I have never seen anything like this in my life.  No wonder people are wondering if Cohen pays for his legal services.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <>
Date: Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:11 PM
Subject: Kelley Lynch email to the IRS/FBI/DOJ dated Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:33 AM

Regarding the memorandum, you should read up on privilege pertaining to statements made in connection with settlement negotiations. (See, e.g., California Evidence Code section 1152.)

You don’t even know enough to know that you don’t know anything.

It’s just ridiculous, really.