Monday, September 21, 2015

The Disinformation/Cover-Your-Ass Campaign & The Criminal Stalker's Attempt to Elicit Further Information Re. IRS Chief Trial Counsel's Office

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:40 PM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Michelle Rice <>,, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,

Michelle Rice,

I continue to be criminally harassed over matters that you are the attorney of record on. I can assure you that I am not falling for this moronic disinformation "cover your ass" operation.  Perhaps Cohen's fans will.  They might wonder about Cohen's modesty, humble abode, etc. in light of your interest in award dinners, private jets, and $2 million homes.  Are you becoming rich by targeting me and encouraging Gianelli and others to provoke me, target my children, etc.

I also don't buy the Daniel Bergman insanity.  He needed a/c privilege with Cohen, Kory & Rice (as well as Lindsey) due to the coordinated custody matter, SWAT, and Killer King issues.  I have spoken to FBI about the evidence that Cohen-Lindsey-Kory (and possibly others) conspired to have me falsely arrested.  That evidence, as well as evidence related to criminal witness tampering, is with Daniel Scheid in Colorado.  Based on my conversation with FBI, I believe a federal agency should obtain that evidence.  And, given the fact that this entire matter is an IRS matter, it should probably be IRS or DOJ.

I am convinced the Rice-Gianelli correspondence was choreographed.  

However, I see that Gianelli remains interested in eliciting information about the IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office and possibly what I have discussed with them re. the "merits" of the case.  The Tax Court will decide the jurisdiction issues.  Tax Court, as the 9th Circuit well understands, has jurisdiction to hear "fraud upon the court" cases.  Feel free to research that.  

I am advising you that this conduct should cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:55 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Ms. Lynch,

Once you identify an opposing counsel in one of your filings you then overwhelm them with hundreds of thousand word, irrelevant  emails that are never even read. 

The same is true regarding your tax court matter‎.

The Chief Counsel's Office has a procedural checklist. For example, once (as is the case in the pending matter) jurisdictional issues are identified they are immediately addressed with a motion to dismiss. Until the jurisdiction question is resolved by the court, opposing counsel will not even address the merits of your petition. Your emails are falling on deaf ears, as did your hundreds of emails sent to Jeffery Korn (who was only fronting for Michelle Rice‎). 

In the meantime you have a rare opportunity to at least have one of your claims (e.g., lack of service) heard ‎and determined on the merits without procedural roadblocks. 

But instead of developing evidence from an independent source that Judge Hess has not yet heard, you are wasting your time flogging ancient history in emails and on your blog. 

Your perception that the Rice - Gianelli correspondence was choreographed in July in order to transmit to you now  as disinformation as ridiculous as your belief that a lawyer employed by the IRS would care one way or the other.  

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.