Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Leonard Cohen's Attempts To Conceal & Suppress Evidence; False Allegations Re. Fabricated Declarations

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: Slander & Threatening Allegations On Gianelli's Vicious Blackmail Blog
To: Dan Bergman <dbergman@bergman-law.com>, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov

Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Desperate tactics.  They're NOT going to prove I fabricated anything.  Those declarations were prepared and sent to me.  This didn't happen.  Just another false allegation, threat, etc. from the PROXY LAWYER.  You are now in possession of the evidence (and have been) proving this is a threat.  These people have tactics.  The Canadian song-writer moved here, appears to have defrauded the taxpayers, obtained a fraudulent refund illegal using my information and a fraud narrative, and I am now being threatened by the PROXY.  The criminals have crawled out of the woodwork.  I didn't prepare the declarations either.  I suppose this is cool in LA Confidential.  It will become part of the TACTICS in my federal RICO suit.  

The evidence I provided IRS in 2005 is NOT Leonard Cohen's.  He is arguing ALTER EGO.  I had no a/c privilege.  Please speak to Hochman, Rettig and others.  That would include me.  I just spoke to someone yesterday and they agreed - NO A/C PRIVILEGE WITH WESTIN who only worked for Cohen.


134.  Every person guilty of preparing any false or ante-dated book,
paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, with
intent to produce it, or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent
or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any trial, proceeding,
or inquiry whatever, authorized by law, is guilty of felony.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,

Someone directed me to this site today.  I didn't have attorney client privilege with Richard Westin, et al.  Documents available for purchase on Pacer are not Leonard Cohen's personal documents.  That includes all exhibits attached to Greenberg's Complaint and the CAK bond litigation declaration, etc.  Do you actually believe that my emails refuting Cohen's lawyer are attorney client privileged?  The evidence before the Court is not Leonard Cohen's personal information.  I was copied on all of those documents.  Furthermore, I was explicitly excluded from attorney/client privilege and will ultimately subpoena the attorney from Hochman, Rettig Westin confirmed this for.  I was unaware of the related case until Judge Freeman's court reporter brought it to my attention.  Your client seized my property; abandoned his; and removed my business files from my office.  Leonard Cohen continues to argue that he is the alter ego of these entities.  He is NOT the corporate entities.  Westin did not represent me or the entities themselves.  These documents have all been provided to IRS - as far back as the summer of 2005.  That's why the agents from the Treasury flew into meet with me and they advised me to provide any additional evidence I had to Agent Luis Tejeda and/or IRS.  You are attempting to obstruct justice, conceal evidence, and committing fraud upon the court.  I maliciously filed my evidence?  I know - it's difficult to deal with a party that's actually involved.  I know you were able to win a default, destroy my sons' lives, because you refused to agree to move a hearing.  People have rightly concluded that you are evil.  These documents are temporarily sealed and this matter will be vigorously appealed should Judge Hess decide that corporate evidence, and evidence related to criminal tax fraud, should be permanently sealed.  He and I agreed - the federal corporate returns have mutual privilege and I will not be opposing his temporary decision until he reviews the documents.  I'm not sure what was ex parte about the matter since you waited three months.  I did receive Gianelli's email with you and Kory copied in and will present that to Judge Hess with a copy of his slanderous blog.  Calling me a drunken slut is not a legal remedy.  It would be hard to be in contempt in the related case since the Court has no jurisdiction.  Now that I am being publicly threatened, I will move to vacate that.  Greenberg asked that the Court preserve the evidence and noted that Cohen is attempting to conceal and suppress evidence.  I agree.

I didn't prepare fabricated evidence.  Do you have evidence to support that other than lies, self-serving conjecture, etc.  These Courts certainly permit liars to get away with anything.  The signatures are genuine.  That would include Paulette Brandt's.  She signed her own.  Such desperate tactics.  That's why my book is going to be called TACTICS.  

Let me know if you want me to email you my Reply to the shameless Opposition arguing an irrelevant and immaterial statute and advancing further lies.

Kelley Lynch

On Friday, May 29, 2015 Cohen’s emergency application for an order sealing the privileged and confidential attorney-client correspondence between Cohen and his lawyers that Lynch obtained as Cohen’s manager that Lynch maliciously filed as exhibits to her pending motion was GRANTED over Lynch’s opposition, per Lynch’s blog post of 5/30/2015 AND PER THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT WEBSITE (enter case# BC338322):

05/29/2015 at 08:30 am in Department 24, Robert L. Hess, Presiding Exparte proceeding (TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TOSEAL PORTIONS OF THE COURTSRECORD)  Granted

Lynch failed to turn over the correspondence and other files she wrongfully retained after Cohen fired her in 2004, in violation of a 2005 injunction obtained by Cohen. Potential penalties for criminal contempt (Penal Code § 166) is up to ONE YEAR  in jail for each violation of the order, should Lynch be found to have willfully violated it.

More to come when the court rules on the pending motion.   

6/1/2015 UPDATE:
Cohen’s opposition to Lynch’s SECOND motion to vacate (posted on-line by Lynch) and Cohen’s related request for non-monetary “sanctions” (also posted by Lynch) raise another serious issue: The allegation that the signatures one or more of Lynch’s declarations filed with the court in support of the motion are not genuine – that is actually subscribed by the witness identified as making the “declaration”. If true this could be considered a violation of Penal Code § 134(preparing fabricated evidence for submission to a court) – which is a felony offense. IF TRUE needs to be underscored here, since Lynch has not yet filed her reply brief answering these allegations. 

Stay tuned for comprehensive coverage and commentary following the hearing on Lynch’s second motion to vacate on 6/23.