Friday, June 12, 2015

Kelley Lynch Email To Leonard Cohen's Lawyer - Her Reply To His Opposition Will Be Filed In A Timely Manner

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Kelley Lynch email dated Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:10 AM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, "" <>, Feedback <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>,, "Kelly.Sopko" <>,,
Cc: Dan Bergman <>, Michelle Rice <>

Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,

Short lived.  But Gianelli has been obsessed with me, my family, and many witnesses for years now.  Who is in the DaVinci Code?  I am not the individual who claims to have been in the CIA's MKULTRA.  I am not the individual who clams to have been captured by rebels (or Castro's forces) during the Bay of Pigs.  I am not the individual who claims to have a role in the Yom Kippur War with no military training.  I am not the person that has the long history of drug, alcohol, and psychiatric problems - publicly documented by your client.  

I will file my Reply in a timely manner.  If you have any questions, please hit Reply All and ask.  Gianelli is not an attorney of record so I refuse to respond to his attempts to elicit information.

Kelley Lynch

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Kelley Lynch wrote:

Hello IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Gianelli's obsession is outrageous.  Is this his excuse for criminally harassing my sons, elderly parents, sister, friends, and others for over six straight years?  Is everything a "conspiracy?"  

Gianelli is fishing for information about my Reply.  That's why it was mentioned and this is how he attempts to elicit information.  He is a proxy; on someone's payroll; and the situation demands an investigation.  He attempts to infiltrate matters and that now extends to both the IRS and Phil Spector's case.  He threatens, slanders, insults, and intimidates witnesses.  He works in tandem with Leonard Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh, who has connections with individuals who appear to be jihad sympathizers.  Of course, that's according to an individual with a background in intelligence.  Who would want their family members targeted by these criminals?  He has also worked in tandem with Michelle Blaine and his best online posting buddy is Kelly Green of the Darwin Exception who "HATES" Bruce Cutler.  I personally think he's as transparent as the day is long and so do many others.

I don't see any "hidden" messages from Cohen.  As my legal documents have stated - I see egregious fraud upon the court; perjured statements and testimony; litigation misconduct; and an attempt to conceal evidence.


I am having a spat with no one.

The man belongs in prison.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:31 AM
Subject: FW: Kelley Lynch email dated Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:10 AM

Ms. Lynch,

I have no intention of responding to your many conspiracy theories, contentions and accusations until the pending motions in case no. BC338322 are resolved by the trial court. That is all ¶ 3 of my letter says – notwithstanding your propensity to view every simple communication as a kind of Da Vinci Code, shimmering with hidden messages from Leonard Cohen. Since your reply to the opposition in BC338322 must be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court prior to 4:30 pm on June 16, I respectfully suggest that you devote what little time you have prior to that deadline to trying to find case authority supporting a post judgment sanction of “dismissal”, distinguishing Code of Civil Procedure § 1008, and supporting your assertion that alleged perjury in the affidavits underpinning  the default judgment constitutes extrinsic fraud, because unless you do all of those things your pending motion will be denied. No amount of gibberish spewed forth in the record about your housemate Linda Carol (with whom you appear to be engaged in some kind of bizarre domestic spat), “Gianelli”, or any other third parties and their alleged harassment of poor little Kelley Lynch is going to change the legal issues upon which your pending motion will be evaluated for its objective merit and subjective good faith (or their opposites). Now, if you will excuse me, I have an airplane to catch.