Monday, May 4, 2015

Gianelli (The Criminal Stalker) Must Be On Overtime Pay & Now Has A New Client Who Is Attempting To Defraud Paulette Brandt

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: Brandt v. Watteville; "motion for a new [trial]" based on "inadvertent error" (is there any other kind?)
To: Stephen Gianelli <>, linda carol <>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, "" <>, Feedback <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Gianelli is now directly harassing Linda Carol.  She doesn't know the Criminal Stalker who thinks it's acceptable to lie about people, slander them, insult them, etc.  As Dan Meade noted, he sounds like an arrogant psychopath and his emails are deranged.  I have advised him that I do not know Von Watteville.  Her call to Robert Kory is a serious legal issue now.  If she doesn't want people referring to her in certain ways, she should stop bragging about her past lives.


On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:


Your client, Karina Von Watteville, told me personally that she was a stripper.  Linda Carol had to listen to her discuss her former life as a prostitute.  The individual whose estate she is targeting was involved with porn photography.  I said that Linda Carol's declaration did not address these issues.  That is factual.  They also didn't address the S&M and spanking magazines; failure to pay her former landlord (immediately prior to living with Paulette Brandt) $4,000; etc.  

Do NOT contact me about this woman.  I have no idea who she is and she sounds degenerate and depraved.

I threatened to kill no one.  The FBI/DOJ can personally address the email to Streeter with a card to THEM - as can CIA.  

Kelley Lynch

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:


As you are aware, Gianelli has been harassing and stalking me (my sons, Paulette, and others) for years.  He appears to be moonlighting for Phil Spector's prosecutor and definitely works as an informal member of Leonard Cohen's legal team.  I have no idea why, after receiving Paulette's rent demand letter, Karina Von Watteville would become obsessed with me, slander me, and call Cohen's lawyer (Robert Kory).  As you know, when you informed me of the things Von Watteville (who does NOT know me) was saying I advised her to cease and desist.

I did state earlier that you left out the details about Von Watteville subjecting you to discussions (with Marie Jones) about her prior life as a prostitute and stripper.  It also left out her work in S&M/spanking magazines.  Since you are being threatened over that now, it is important that you update your declaration and explain what Von Watteville personally told you and Marie Jones.  

I never threatened to kill anyone.  Gianelli worked with the City Attorney to have me falsely arrested on two occasions.  They are running an insane celebrity justice system that other residents cannot avail themselves of.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:56 PM
Subject: RE: Brandt v. Watteville; "motion for a new [trial]" based on "inadvertent error" (is there any other kind?)
To: Kelley Lynch <>

As I understand it, Ms. Lynch, Ms. Von Watteville has never even contacted you, not even once.

And if, as you say, you don’t even know her, you are on VERY thin ice publishing the “declaration” by Linda Carol (which has no legitimate litigation purpose since it is not remotely relevant to any pending legal proceeding ) on your blog and in emails and also emailing various persons to accuse her of being a prostitute.

The burden would be on you, Linda Carol, and (if Paulette Brandt was a proven participant in the libelous publications) Ms. Brandt to prove, with admissible evidence that the publications are all true.

Because they are libel per se, Ms. Von Watteville would not even need to prove special damages, she would be eligible for general damages to reputation, emotional distress, and punitive damages.

As to your harassing letters to the City Attorney, in view of your threats to kill City and County elected prosecutors, those emails are automatically forwarded to TMU.

Ms. Carol should be advised that civil judgments in California last for ten years and can be renewed in perpetuity every ten years. Nor may intentional tort liability be discharged in bankruptcy.

From: Kelley Lynch []
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 10:15 PM
To: Stephen Gianelli; *IRS.Commisioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; Harriet Ryan; stan.garnett;; Feedback;; mayor.garcetti
Subject: Re: Brandt v. Watteville; "motion for a new [trial]" based on "inadvertent error" (is there any other kind?)

Hi Mike Feuer,

The Los Angeles residents who are being criminally harassed and threatened by this Criminal are growing in numbers.  I do not know Karina Von Watteville.  The Criminal Stalker has once again been advised to cease and desist.  The same is true for Von Watteville.

Kelley Lynch

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Stephen Gianelli,

I am once again advising you to cease and desist.  You are now attempting to intimidate and threaten me, Paulette Brandt, and Linda Carol.  We do not know you.  You have relentlessly targeted me, my sons, and others for approximately six straight years now.  You definitely seem to be an informal member of Leonard Cohen's legal defense team and argue Phil Spector prosecution theories online.  You have worked in tandem targeting me with Michelle Blaine, Susanne Walsh, and others.

Both of my sons advised you to cease and desist and my younger son informed you (and others) that your outrageous and harassing emails made him physically ill.  He was quite clear about the issues he was being harassed over:  Leonard Cohen, IRS, and Phil Spector.

I do not know Karina Von Watteville, a woman you are now harassing me over.  Paulette Brandt assisted her when she was on the verge of homelessness.  I am aware that once she received Paulette Brandt's rent demand she became obsessed with me and began slandering me.  I addressed this in a handful of cease and desist letters which I have in my possession.  Linda Carol confirmed that I properly addressed the information she brought to my attention.  I am also aware that Von Watteville's response to the rent demand letter was to contact Leonard Cohen's lawyer, Robert Kory, which I find unconscionable.  She then proceeded to scream at both hearings (in the hallway in front of witnesses) about Robert Kory and Leonard Cohen.

Paulette Brandt, Linda Carol, and I do not know you.  You are engaged in criminal witness tampering, witness intimidation, stalking, slander, etc.  You definitely appear to be moonlighting for numerous parties.  

I am advising you not to contact me again.  I have been clear with IRS, FBI, and DOJ that I personally believe you belong in prison.  You should be prosecuted for your attempts to threaten and intimidate witnesses who have now submitted declarations to the Court in Case No. BC338322.  

Your role also appears to involve working as an agent provocateur/infiltrator.  

For the record, I do not know Karina Von Watteville and have reported this ongoing harassment to the appropriate authorities.

Kelley Lynch


I, LINDA CAROL, declare:
1.        I am a citizen of the United States who currently resides in Los Angeles, California.  I am Paulette Brandt’s roommate.  I am over the age of 18 years.  I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and if called upon to testify I could and would testify competently as to the truth of the facts stated herein.

2.         At some point in or around October 2013, I began an apartment search in the Los Angeles area.  Marie Jones posted an ad and I rented a room from her for the months of November and December 2013.  At that time, I met Karina Von Watteville a/k/a Karina Fimbel.  Ms. Watteville was living with Marie Jones and that is how I became acquainted with her. 

3.         Problems arose between Marie Jones and Karina Von Watteville related to monies alleged owed Ms. Jones and Ms. Watteville’s cats who were using the apartment as their kitty litter box.  Karina Von Watteville, who picks through people’s trash and brings items home, infested the apartment with bed bugs and cock roaches.  An argument arose over money allegedly due Marie Jones and the police were called.  This incident occurred in or around November/December 2013.

4.         I continued to look for a permanent and more appropriate room to rent.  Karina Von Watteville advised me that she lived with a woman by the name of Paulette Brandt who had an available guest room for rent.  Ms. Von Watteville liked Ms. Brandt very much and said she enjoyed living with her and strongly encouraged me to contact Ms. Brandt about the room.  Ms. Von Watteville also explained to me that the apartment was clean, pretty, and assured me that Paulette Brandt was an excellent roommate and friend.

5.         I contacted Ms. Brandt, visited the apartment, rented the room, and have lived here for over a year now.  We get along extremely well.  The apartment is well kept and very pretty.  I have my own room and enjoy my privacy.

6.         At some point, after I moved in, Paulette Brandt and I discussed the fact that Karina Von Watteville owes her rent for the 14 months she lived here.  I spoke to Ms. Watteville who personally informed me that she felt bad about the situation.  Both individuals advised me that Karvina Von Watteville promised to pay Ms. Brandt in full when she received her social security check.  At some point in or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville advised me that she had received her social security check.

7.         Paulette Brandt sent Ms. Watteville a rent demand letter.  At that point, Karina Von Watteville began slandering Paulette Brandt and seemed obsessed with a friend of ours, Kelley Lynch.  I have known Kelley Lynch for over a year and she is a very nice, courteous, and respectful individual.  Karina Von Watteville does not know Ms. Lynch but became increasingly upset with her over Paulette Brandt’s rent demands. 

8.         In or around November 2014, Paulette Brandt filed a Small Claims Complaint against Karina Von Watteville asking that she pay her the rental arrears due and owing.  I personally served Karina Von Watteville the Small Claims Complaint.  She was extremely angry but did confirm that she had an agreement to pay Paulette $500/month rent and $50/month utilities. 

9.         In or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville was living in a commercial space she rented under the name of Cover Girl Models.  She lived in the space with her cats.  I visited on one occasion and was shocked to note that garbage and trash was piled around the room and the cats were using the entire space as their kitty litter box.

10.       Karina Von Watteville evidently permitted her cats to use her room at Paulette Brandt’s apartment as a kitty litter box as well.  She informed me that, after receiving the formal two months notice from Ms. Brandt (re. vacating the premises), she retaliated by leaving bags of garbage and trash behind and intentionally permitting her cats to urinate and defecate in the room.  She also apparently infested Paulette Brandt’s apartment with cock roaches.

11.       I do see Karina Von Watteville from time to time but she no longer speaks to me.  I am aware that, after receiving Paulette Brandt’s paperwork, she contacted Leonard Cohen’s lawyer.  Kelley Lynch was Cohen’s personal manager, is involved with legal matters related to him, and reported allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud to Internal Revenue Service.

12.       Since I have known Kelley Lynch she has informed me that a man by the name of Stephen Gianelli has criminally harassed and stalked her, members of her family, and others.  He is now sending Kelley Lynch highly slanderous emails about me and Paulette Brandt.  I do not know this individual.  It is my understanding that he has offered Karina Von Watteville assistance with the Small Claims matter involving Paulette Brandt.  Neither Kelley Lynch nor I are parties to that matter.  I am aware that Karina Von Watteville communicated with Robert Kory (Leonard Cohen’s lawyer), and was legally assisted by Stephen Gianelli, because I have seen some of the slanderous and false emails he has sent Ms. Lynch and have had numerous discussions with people who were present at both Small Claims hearings.  At those hearings, Karina Von Watteville evidently attempted to use Kelley Lynch’s cease and desist letters to defend herself.  This is an excerpt of Stephen Gianelli’s email confirming that he provided Karina Von Watteville with advice and addressing her phone call to Cohen’s lawyer. 


Ms. Von Watteville followed my advice and never even had to get to the other two defenses I specified; she won the hearing with the first issue out of the box:  The claim is time barred under CCP § 339 as arising from the breach of an alleged oral contract. Simple and elegant. No credibility issues to resolve. The shortest distance between point “A” and point “B”.  Game, set match.

In contacting Robert Kory with advice about what to do ...

12.       I was copied in on Kelley Lynch’s cease and desist letters addressing Ms. Von Watteville’s slanderous comments I (and others) repeated to Ms. Lynch.  Karina Von Watteville does not know Kelley Lynch, as I’ve said, and simply began bad mouthing her, told me she planned to have her investigated and get her in trouble, posted a Gold Record Leonard Cohen gave Kelley Lynch (that Von Watteville photographed) on her Google Plus account, and advised me that Ms. Lynch is an alcoholic.  Kelley Lynch does not have a substance abuse problem and is most definitely not an alcoholic.  These are merely slanderous allegations meant to undermine her credibility.  The slander now appears to be retaliation over Paulette Brandt’s attempts to collect the outstanding rent she is owed.

13.       I have spent most of my adult life working as a model and actress and am now pursuing a college degree. 

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

This declaration is executed on this 18th day of April 2015 in Los Angeles, California.

                                                                        Linda Carol

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:26 AM
Subject: Brandt v. Watteville; "motion for a new [trial]" based on "inadvertent error" (is there any other kind?)

Ms. Brandt,

One  downside (of several)  to you signing on to Kelley Lynch’s vicious and malicious slander campaign against me (and many others) is that any non-lawyers who you and/or Ms. Lynch and/or Linda Carol are harassing or slandering and find yourselves opposing in litigation of any kind will have technical litigation support from a top Californian trial lawyer of 35 years’ experience who retired at the top of his game in 2013 – for free.

(I billed my time out to paying clients when I was in practice at $600/hour – although I have a lifetime of approximately 10,000 pro bono hours.)

Perhaps the three of you can match my encyclopedic knowledge of civil procedure and ability to think and plan strategically. Many fine, experienced Californian litigators could not. (See, e.g., the last case I tried before retirement or my last appeal before retirement  or this pro bono appeal, that made new law in California and has since been cited by other courts of appeal over 100 times and is cited in every family law treatise in California . Or, Talk to Sandi Schafer, a schoolteacher who entrusted he life savings to an unscrupulous contractor referred by his friend (Sandi’s mortgage broker) who took her money and walked off the job before construction of her dream home was finished – then LIENED the unfinished house for $60K, then sued her. I represented Sandi for free. Won the case – the lien was expunged, contractor paid her $40,000 in damages. Licensing board REVOKED contractor’s license. The Department of Real Estate REVOKED the mortgage broker’s license (who went from a million dollar annual income to zero).)

I have tried over 200 jury trials to verdict, conducted 400+ bench trials, scores of preliminary hearings, conducted over a thousand depositions, and have made and opposed several thousand motions in civil and criminal courts all over California.  

I am obsessive about finding out the correct, definitive procedural answer and communicating that to the court as succinctly and clearly as possible – no matter how many hours that takes, and whether I am being paid or not.

In any legal matter you and/or Ms. Lynch and/or Linda Carol may initiate or find yourselves otherwise involved in, you will find me supporting the other side at no charge.

No need to thank me. It’s the least I can do after the kindness you have showed me.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece