From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: Your violations of the May 16, 2006 injunction by purporting to exercise your "rights" in Traditional Holdings, LLC, Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., and any other Cohen related entity in which you claim an ownership interest, membership interest, or stoc
To: "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, rwest0@gmx.com, Sherab Posel <poselaw@gmail.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>
Hi Criminal Division DOJ,
The Criminal Stalker continues to threaten me over Leonard Cohen.
This judgment was entered in May 2006. It willfully disregards all corporate books, records, stock units, agreements, and federal and state tax returns and corporation formations in foreign jurisdictions. I'm being threatened over it and Gianelli wrote that he worked with the City Attorney to have me arrested two times. So did Cohen and his lawyers including "Michelle Rice."
First of all, I wasn't served this lawsuit. Beyond that, I wasn't served this document. The way you can tell that is by looking at the address. There was no agreement to accept service by EMAIL [Corrected original email] when I wasn't served the lawsuit. This will be addressed in court. I want to hit the facts hard before heading to federal court.
This judgment says nothing about how federal tax returns should have been handled in 2004 and 2005. Nor does it address why I am [included] on them. However, this is how they think. This is the basis for their argument. I'm not going to Federal Tax Court right now. I'm headed there though. Mark my word. This is tax fraud but I have no idea what their plans are other than threatening me, stalking me, lying about me, slandering me, intimidating witnesses, and perjuring themselves. We'll see how tolerant a federal judge is. I've worked for them. I cannot imagine arguing that corporate books, records, federal tax returns, etc. are irrelevant and should be willfully disregarded. I know it works at LA Superior Court because they don't require evidence. A fabricated and fraudulent narrative and fraud accounting ledger will do. I'm very clear about that.
Kelley
