Why Is Gianelli Writing Me About The 1099 Cohen Hasn't Provided Me With For The Year 2004? Why Is Prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter Copied In? Perhaps City Attorney Carmen Trutanich Understands What His Office's Interest In Federal Tax Matters Is.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM
Subject: Fwd: 1099's may be obtained directly from the IRS also
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,

I spoke to the IRS.  Cohen hasn't transmitted the 1099 for the year 2004 to the IRS.  Why don't you explain this to me - why do I have K-1s that say I have $0 income from LC Investments, LLC when there is income listed on the fraud expense ledger.  Furthermore, how does Gianelli know what I've addressed on my tax returns?  Why is writing me - copying in Streeter - about a 1099?  That's a federal tax matter although although it's all over my trial transcript.  I've advised Trutanich that I don't want emails with Streeter copied in from a man criminally harassing me.  Why does Trutanich permit this conduvct?  I think the IRS should investigate that.  

All the best,

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:25 AM
Subject: 1099's may be obtained directly from the IRS also
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: "SandraJo.Streeter" <SandraJo.Streeter@lacity.org>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, susanne walsh <sanneka@esenet.dk>

Ms. Lynch,

If 1099's are what you were allegedly after from Cohen, you could ahve obtained those directly from the IRS as well:

http://www.irs.gov/irm/part11/irm_11-003-002.html

If you simply forgot how much of Cohen's money you deposited into your personal checking account and into the Kelley Lynch owned Stranger Management checking account it is all set forth in this declaration and attached 90+ pages of exhibits, including bank statements and canceled checks:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29620593/Cohen-vs-Kelley-Lynch-Prins-Dec

It is you that is the sham Ms. Lynch.

A jury did not believe you. You were about to lose your appeal, so you are trying now to dismiss it (after forcing the taxpayers to fund your record on appeal, your appellate attorney on appeal, and to fund an opposition appeal brief by prosecutors).

You did this (gave up at the last minute) just as you did at the Colorado protective order proceedings against you, so you could come back later and say it was all a “fraud”.

Does anyone buy that you believed you were going to WIN your appeal, and you nevertheless dismissed it because you feared "retaliation" from your prosecutor?

It is YOU that is being disingenuous, not anyone else.

And if, as you now say, the criminal case against you was a “fraud” procured through prosecutorial and judicial corruption and the CO restraining order “unenforceable” in CA, how can anyone believe that you will not violate it AGAIN?

We don’t.