From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:31 AM
Subject: Appeal - Oral Arguments
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Dating relationship. Respondent's Brief states - page 1:
According to Cohen, but disputed by appellant, they also had a brief intimate relationship. (RT 49,320)
In
the sentencing documents, prosecutor Streeter (page 2-3_ writes: In
addition, "victim"would be described pursuant to Family Code 6211(c) as
someone "with whom the defendant is having or had had a dating or
engagement relationship." Penal Code 1203.097 is applicable for
sentencing purposes.
Therefore, the City Attorney absolutely took the position that
Cohen and I had a dating relationship. The testimony regarding this
matter is perjured and Cohen acknowledged changing his story while
testifying - regardless of his pathetic excuse. He testified honestly
at the March 23rd hearing - we had a purely business relationship
although we did have a friendship. This is a very relevant point as
Cohen registered the civil harassment order (Boulder) that I requested
as a domestic violence order in California on May 25, 2011.
I'll make other notes and send you one document re. relevant issues later today.
All the best,
Kelley
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:31 AM
Subject: Appeal - Oral Arguments
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Francisco,
There are a number of issues in the Respondent's Brief that I believe should be addressed in oral arguments. Kelley
