From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Subject: Phil Spector
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
Hi Francisco,
Do you think the DA''s investigator was simply hanging out and lunching with Cohen while he testified about Phil Spector - for no reason? It certainly looked like a legal conspiracy. My trial counsel told me Streeter was attempting to sabotage the IRS and me and the DA didn't want the Spector verdict overturned. The DA elected not to prosecute Cohen. Is it a quid pro quo? It certainly seems that way.
Blogonaut said...
Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Subject: Phil Spector
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
Hi Francisco,
Do you think the DA''s investigator was simply hanging out and lunching with Cohen while he testified about Phil Spector - for no reason? It certainly looked like a legal conspiracy. My trial counsel told me Streeter was attempting to sabotage the IRS and me and the DA didn't want the Spector verdict overturned. The DA elected not to prosecute Cohen. Is it a quid pro quo? It certainly seems that way.
All the best,
Kelley
KL has posted on her blog a letter to her court appointed appellate lawyer Francisco Suarez, stating in part:
“I want to appeal this to the California Supreme Court if necessary.”
If we understand her correctly, Kelley Lynch believes that her criminal conviction reulted from perjured testimony, prosecutorial misconduct in the form of “lies” told by Sandra Jo Streeter, and a “conspiracy” between the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, Cohen, and the City Attorney (as evinced by Cohen luching with a DA investigator during the trial), but she wants to abandon her appeal from the criminal conviction.
See here:
http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.
Instead of apealing her alleged corruptly obtained conviction, though, she now wishes to appeal the Appellate Department’s denial of her abandonment/request to dismiss her apeal on the merits all the way to the California Supreme Court if necessary?
Huh?!
NEWSFLASH for Ms. Lynch and her procerurally challanged court appointed counsel: The denial of your bid to dismiss your appeal is a NONAPPEALABLE ORDER. That means it cannot be appealed, not to the Court of Appeal, not to the California Supreme Court.
“I want to appeal this to the California Supreme Court if necessary.”
If we understand her correctly, Kelley Lynch believes that her criminal conviction reulted from perjured testimony, prosecutorial misconduct in the form of “lies” told by Sandra Jo Streeter, and a “conspiracy” between the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, Cohen, and the City Attorney (as evinced by Cohen luching with a DA investigator during the trial), but she wants to abandon her appeal from the criminal conviction.
See here:
http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.
Instead of apealing her alleged corruptly obtained conviction, though, she now wishes to appeal the Appellate Department’s denial of her abandonment/request to dismiss her apeal on the merits all the way to the California Supreme Court if necessary?
Huh?!
NEWSFLASH for Ms. Lynch and her procerurally challanged court appointed counsel: The denial of your bid to dismiss your appeal is a NONAPPEALABLE ORDER. That means it cannot be appealed, not to the Court of Appeal, not to the California Supreme Court.
