Deconstructing My Creepy, Frightening, Obsessed Stalker - Stephen Gianelli - Who Is Aligned With Leonard Cohen And Doesn't Like My Hair Style, Etc. - He May Also Have Found A Sympathetic Ear With Phil Spector Prosecutor Alan Jackson: Welcome To Sleazy LA Confidential, Folks
"EMBEZZLING FORMER LEONARD COHEN MANAGER FILES APPEAL FROM HARASSMENT CONVICTION"
21 Comments -
For the record, and I will publish this on my Blog, I have spoken to the Appellate Division. A Motion to Strike this Opening Brief is being filed - as is a Motion to replace the attorney whose efforts I appreciate. I think if someone is representing me, the Brief should be coherent and the lawyer should understand the difference between the City Attorney and District Attorney who are clearly in cohoots here. Furthermore, my Writ of Habeas Corpus will ask that the City Attorney's office be removed and replaced with a Special Prosecutor due to the situation with respect to Phil Spector and her obvious alignment with the DA's office. The three Leonard Cohen versions of the Phil Spector gun story will be addressed. The Grand Jury Legal Adviser (who does not know how Cohen's statements were presented to the Grand Jury, without a witness testifying) advised me to contact Phil Spector's attorney about the situation. I did. His name is Dennis Riordan. Judge Fidler's clerk, Wendy, advised me to write the DA and copy in Judge Fidler.
Leonard Cohen has stolen millions from me and the IRS has been provided with an abundance of evidence. Cohen's fraudulent refund from the IRS in no way closed the case re. the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud. I met with Agent Sopko, and her partner, over a year after he received that refund and after that reported Cohen's tax fraud to Agent Luis Tejeda who will be properly addressed on appeal. Cohen perjured himself. He obtains judgments, orders, and verdicts via fraud, perjury, lies, and concealment. These appear to be his religious beliefs.
I have reconfirmed, for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury, that I continue to maintain that you should be prosecuted for criminal harassment, stalking, witness intimidation, witness tampering, etc.
I have advised the court and Viramontes/LAPD that you attempted to entrap me into violating the restraining order - with the prosecutor Streeter and Cohen's lying lawyer, Rice, copied in and that will be addressed in my Writ.
I am filing a Motion to Vacate Cohen's fraudulent and retaliatory lawsuit and have a criminal attorney ready to review it. Assume I'm bluffing.
Kelley Lynch
We respond to her latest blog post at once denouncing our editor's views of her Opening Brief posted here as "pathetic" and vowing to "strike" the brief and "replace" her court appointed counsel for filing an "incoherent" brief:
It is truly fascinating that this obsessed loud mouth who thinks he's actually a lawyer cannot figure out why Leonard Cohen's three versions of his Phil Spector gun stories are problematic for LA Superior Court. Two of them appear in my trial and the prosecutor concealed the version Cohen emailed her about. A third appears in Phil Spector's trial. So, this big mouth slanderous cyber-terrorist has no idea why two perjured versions of Cohen's Phil Spector gun stories might be a serious matter. Well, the Grand Jury Legal Adviser and Judge Fidler's clerk, Wendy, both had a sense that the situation was quite serious. Not my creepy stalker who has motive.
Amusing perhaps, but quite absurd.
If you feel you have been denied effective assistance of counsel on appeal under Anders v. State of California 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and seek to replace your court appointed appellate counsel, you can file a Marsden motion (People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118), but you must demonstrate that there are good and arguably meritorious issues that could have been raised in your appeal but were not.
In any event, the distinction between the Los Angeles County City Attorney and the Los Angeles County District Attorney is quite irrelevant to the effectiveness of your court appointed appellate counsel or the outcome of your appeal, because the murder prosecution of Phillip Spector is utterly independent of, and irrelevant to, your criminal trial and your criminal appeal.
(4) Was issued after the respondent was given reasonable notice and had an opportunity to be heard before the tribunal issued the order or … in a manner consistent with the rights of the respondent to due process.”