From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:32 PM
Subject: Refund
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:32 PM
Subject: Refund
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,
This testimony always shocks me. The IRS binder proves that the refund was confirmed in December 2005. That was based on fraudulent allegations and the concealment of corporate books, records, etc. I have, as advised by the IRS recently, filed fraud form 3949a with respect to both the fraudulent refund and the illegal K-1s. The IRS has no holding with respect to the default judgment. Kory was very careful to put the IRS binder together, complete with his letters to Agent Tejeda/IRS advising him that Agent Sopko's email to me was a game changer. Streeter had that binder; handed it to my public defenders on April 9th; and we immediately issued a subpoena to Agent Tejeda. The court lied when it said I was aware of this information previously. How would I know about Cohen's refund? I haven't seen the man in over seven years and people cannot simply obtain other people's tax information. I am asking Francisco to address this insane and extremely disturbing perjury in the motion/writ we're filing.
All the best,
Kelley
Leonard Cohen Cross:
Public Defender; You said that you were unfamiliar with what a K-1 was, correct?:
Cohen: Yes, sir.
PD: Okay. Now, do you know what a K-1 is now?
Cohen: I have a perfect -- a sense of what it is, but I wouldn’t be able to teach it.
PD: And is it fair to say that you’ve gotten emails through the years referencing a K-1?
Cohen: That’s correct. RT 280
PD: Now, since you’ve been receiving emails requesting tax information, have you called these people to say can you get me this tax information? RT 280
PD: And so it would be fair to say that there was tax information that was requested by Ms. Lynch, correct?
Cohen: Hidden in the volume of the emails there was a request for tax information which Ms. Lynch already had. RT 281
PD: There were requests in those emails for tax information, correct?
Cohen: Yes, sir. RT 281
Did you ever bring that attention to whoever handled your taxes?
Cohen: Yes, sir. And it was determined by two courts of this country and the IRS that -- RT 281
Cohen: It was determined, sir, that I had no tax responsibility in regard to Ms. Lynch. The two courts had decided that money had been taken from me … Two courts had given me a default -- or one court had given me a default judgment; the other court affirmed that default judgment. But, more significantly, the IRS accepted the results of that default judgment and awarded me a tax refund, so Ms. Lynch has no cause to ask me for any taxation information. The forensic report on which the default judgments were made were very specific and Ms. Lynch has read them. That is the forensic report that Ms. Lynch has been asking for. The only problem is she doesn’t like the results.
PD: Do you remember what my question was? RT 282
Public Defender; You said that you were unfamiliar with what a K-1 was, correct?:
Cohen: Yes, sir.
PD: Okay. Now, do you know what a K-1 is now?
Cohen: I have a perfect -- a sense of what it is, but I wouldn’t be able to teach it.
PD: And is it fair to say that you’ve gotten emails through the years referencing a K-1?
Cohen: That’s correct. RT 280
PD: Now, since you’ve been receiving emails requesting tax information, have you called these people to say can you get me this tax information? RT 280
PD: And so it would be fair to say that there was tax information that was requested by Ms. Lynch, correct?
Cohen: Hidden in the volume of the emails there was a request for tax information which Ms. Lynch already had. RT 281
PD: There were requests in those emails for tax information, correct?
Cohen: Yes, sir. RT 281
Did you ever bring that attention to whoever handled your taxes?
Cohen: Yes, sir. And it was determined by two courts of this country and the IRS that -- RT 281
Cohen: It was determined, sir, that I had no tax responsibility in regard to Ms. Lynch. The two courts had decided that money had been taken from me … Two courts had given me a default -- or one court had given me a default judgment; the other court affirmed that default judgment. But, more significantly, the IRS accepted the results of that default judgment and awarded me a tax refund, so Ms. Lynch has no cause to ask me for any taxation information. The forensic report on which the default judgments were made were very specific and Ms. Lynch has read them. That is the forensic report that Ms. Lynch has been asking for. The only problem is she doesn’t like the results.
PD: Do you remember what my question was? RT 282
