Saturday, November 8, 2014
Kelley Lynch's Email To IRS Re. The Allegations That Leonard Cohen Committed Criminal Tax Fraud, Possible Fraudulent Tax Returns, & Other Legitimate Tax & Corporate Matters
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:15 PM
Subject: Re:
To: rwest0@gmx.com, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, police <police@cityofberkeley.info>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Sherab Posel <poselaw@gmail.com>, "steve@blottermusic.com" <steve@blottermusic.com>, "steve@radicalmusic.com" <steve@radicalmusic.com>
IRS,
Since I did not handle corporate, tax, accounting, financial, or investment matters, I cannot take a position with respect to the federal or state corporate tax returns. Leonard Cohen appears to have argued that the federal and state corporate tax returns for a number of entities are fraudulent. I have asked his representative to confirm this. It seems like a very [serious] matter potentially involving criminal conduct. I can now unequivocally state that I was fraudulently induced to enter into many agreements with Leonard Cohen and various corporations.
I believe the corporate books and records, and K-1 partnership information, related to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and Traditional Holdings, LLC are accurate. I believe the LCI K-1s are illegal and evidence of criminal conduct. Cohen's own declaration contradicts these K-1s and the K-1s contradict and prove fraud with respect to the fabricated and fraudulent financial ledger that willfully disregards corporate governance, federal and state tax returns, corporate accounting practices (that would address ownership interests, equity, liabilities, corporate distributions and shareholder loans - including Cohen's nearly $6.7 million in loans/expenditures re. TH that he is contractually obligated to repay with interest, approximating $4 million now), etc.
I do not know what to say about the TH phantom income shifted to me but not distributed.
It is my personal belief that not only is the judgment void and evidence of theft and fraud but the settlement agreement between Westin and Cohen is void.
Having said all of this, LA Superior Court has no jurisdiction to hear federal tax matters. Their illegal judgment essentially altered my federal tax returns with respect to ownership interests. My interests were not held in trust for Cohen. There is no trust. I am unaware of a LC Family Trust account with Greenberg. The only two trusts I know of that Greenberg invested for Cohen are the two charitable remainder trusts so assume that aspect of the "ledger" has to do with shenanigans.
People have gone to great lengths to destroy my life over this situation. Lindsey even involved himself with Cohen and Kory. The custody matter was clearly coordinated. I believe the same is true for SWAT. I cannot explain Killer King or the entirely fraudulent file. There are no legal merits to any of these matters. There are simply fabricated narratives and vicious tactics. Leonard Cohen retaliated with his law suit against me because I reported the allegations of his criminal tax fraud to IRS and other authorities. I suppose he feels his fraudulent Lifetime Movie narrative about an [allegedly & fictitious] disgruntled ex-lover, who contacted him for no legitimate reason, and evidently wants to attend his concert, explains away tax fraud, theft, witness tampering, extortion attempts, bribery, legal conspiracy, etc.
I would like to reiterate that Stephen Gianelli and Susanne Walsh's ongoing obsession with me, my sons, family members, friends, and others is gravely disturbing and alarming. That includes, but is not limited to, their writing the City Attorney and copying us in on those slanderous, harassing emails. I want nothing to do with that office and view it as a Criminal Enterprise per RICO.
All the best,
Kelley
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Richard Westin,
I have been attempting to determine what "mistake" you rectified with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC. Leonard Cohen appeared to testify that the "mistake" related to my ownership interest in that entity. I do not know how that would relate to my ownership interest in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.It is very clear that Leonard Cohen and his representatives feel very comfortable disregarding my requests for IRS required form 1099 for 2004; disregarding my request that Cohen rescind illegal K-1s (transmitted to State of Kentucky and IRS) indicating that I have an ownership in LCI and advising tax authorities that I received $0 income from that entity for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005; disregarding my requests asking that they explain the TH partnership K-1s (transmitted to IRS and others) for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003 indicating that i am partner in TH and received income for those years; disregarding my requests that they explain how they view the federal tax returns with respect to these entities and partnership documents provided to tax authorities re. my ownership; disregarding my request (including to you) to inspect all corporate books and records related to LC Productions, Inc., Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, and Old Ideas, LLC. I have made other requests as well. I have also asked if they are taking the position that fraudulent tax returns were prepared and transmitted to IRS, State of Kentucky, FTB, or other tax authorities. These are entirely legitimate legal, tax, financial, business and accounting matters.Leonard Cohen testified that he entered into a settlement agreement with you, related to the mistake that may involve Traditional Holdings, and publicly stated that you compensated him with substantial monies. I have no information about that matter and was wrongfully excluded from any and [all] settlement discussions and agreements.It is my firm belief, based on Cohen's actions, testimony, legal documents, and conduct, that I was fraudulently induced into entering into many agreements with Cohen and these corporate entities. Leonard Cohen engaged in willful tax evasion; he has acted negligently with respect to many matters - including his nearly $6.7 million loans/expenditures re TH corporate assets. He had and has a legally binding obligation to repay those loans/expenditures within 3 years at 6 percent interest. I have no idea who was supposed to create the loan documents. I was clear with Cohen - I do not handle corporate, tax, accounting, IRS, legal matters or loan documents. That was not my job.I personally believe the settlement agreement is illegal. I know the default judgment is because I was not served. I didn't resemble the individual. I have witnesses that attended the hearing where the judge appeared to argue Leonard Cohen's case. Leonard Cohen has obtained judgments, orders, and verdicts based on fraud and perjury.I am attempting to address federal tax and corporate. What mistake did you rectify? How can Leonard Cohen or his representatives willfully disregard all corporate books, records, stock shares, agreements, my Indemnity Agreement, the Annuity Agreement, other documents and information, and federal and state tax returns? The judgment is evidence of theft and there issues with the ongoing accumulation of fraudulent financial interest based on a fabricated fraudulent expense ledger. The ledger in no way resembles an actual accounting.I would appreciate your response. I believe I have been extremely diligent and have been "arrested" for, as LAPD noted in their report, requesting tax information. According to Detective Viramontes, Leonard Cohen was not comfortable with my requests for tax information. Cohen has used a fraudulently registered "domestic violence" order to prevent me from requesting and receiving IRS required documents and information and effecting serving on a corporate entity although that corporation advised IRS, via K-1s, that I have an ownership interest in the entity. Cohen also refuses to provide me with the back-up documentation necessary to prepare a proper accounting that addresses assets, liabilities, equity, and - all corporate distributions and shareholder loans. He has not explained why LCI and others (including himself) collected royalty income with respect to intellectual property assets owned by Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. The State of Kentucky advised me to place the non-revocable assignments in a safety deposit box and both Ken Cleveland and my former accountant, Dale Burgess, believe the assets are still in Blue Mist. Cohen's complaint confirms that nothing with respect to BMT or the assignments was unwound.There are formalities involved with dissolving or winding of corporate structures. Those are being willfully disregarded.Because of this situation, a Bay Area lawyer (Stephen Gianelli), Cohen's fan (Susanne Walsh), and possibly others, believe they have a right to criminally harass, stalk, intimidate, and threaten, me, my sons, sister, friends, and others. It is a highly coordinated campaign. These individuals are affiliated or aligned with Leonard Cohen. It's possible Gianelli found a "sympathetic ear" with Phil Spector's prosecutor about me. It's factual that Phil Spector's DA joined forces with Cohen and the City Attorney to target me, lie about me, falsely arrest and imprison me, retaliate against me. The stakes are evidently high. My sons lives have been destroyed over this situation.Leonard Cohen, as a Buddhist teacher of mine noted, is an incredibly aggressive, vengeful, and vindictive individual. He also appears to be a thief. See Steven Machat and Phil Spector. LA Superior Court has no right or authority to aid and abet theft. They have no jurisdiction over me or the corporations inserted into the default. I can assure you that there is no public policy favoring theft, fraud, perjury, concealment, obstruction of justice, prosecutorial misconduct, witness tampering, etc.The judgment is void and I believe the settlement agree is as well. Cohen refuses to provide me with a copy of that agreement or any details regarding the settlement negotiations.Kelley Lynch
Section 1668 of the Civil Code provides that “[a]ll contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt any one from responsibility for his own fraud, . . . whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the law.” This provision encompasses intentional and negligent misrepresentation. (Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co. (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 1463, 1471-1473.) Accordingly, as Witkin explains: “A party to a contract who has been guilty of fraud in its inducement cannot absolve himself or herself from the effects of his or her fraud by any stipulation in the contract, either that no representations have been made, or that any right that might be grounded upon them is waived. Such a stipulation or waiver will be ignored, and parol evidence of misrepresentations will be admitted, for the reason that fraud renders the whole agreement voidable, including the waiver provision.” (1 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th ed. 2005) Contracts, § 304, p. 330.)
Kelley Lynch's Email To Leonard Cohen's Personal Tax Lawyer Re. Legitimate & Serious Outstanding Federal Tax & Corporate Matters
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:47 PM
Subject:
To: rwest0@gmx.com, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, police <police@cityofberkeley.info>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Sherab Posel <poselaw@gmail.com>, "steve@blottermusic.com" <steve@blottermusic.com>, "steve@radicalmusic.com" <steve@radicalmusic.com>
Richard Westin,
I have been attempting to determine what "mistake" you rectified with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC. Leonard Cohen appeared to testify that the "mistake" related to my ownership interest in that entity. I do not know how that would relate to my ownership interest in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.
It is very clear that Leonard Cohen and his representatives feel very comfortable disregarding my requests for IRS required form 1099 for 2004; disregarding my request that Cohen rescind illegal K-1s (transmitted to State of Kentucky and IRS) indicating that I have an ownership in LCI and advising tax authorities that I received $0 income from that entity for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005; disregarding my requests asking that they explain the TH partnership K-1s (transmitted to IRS and others) for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003 indicating that i am partner in TH and received income for those years; disregarding my requests that they explain how they view the federal tax returns with respect to these entities and partnership documents provided to tax authorities re. my ownership; disregarding my request (including to you) to inspect all corporate books and records related to LC Productions, Inc., Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, and Old Ideas, LLC. I have made other requests as well. I have also asked if they are taking the position that fraudulent tax returns were prepared and transmitted to IRS, State of Kentucky, FTB, or other tax authorities. These are entirely legitimate legal, tax, financial, business and accounting matters.
Leonard Cohen testified that he entered into a settlement agreement with you, related to the mistake that may involve Traditional Holdings, and publicly stated that you compensated him with substantial monies. I have no information about that matter and was wrongfully excluded from any and [all] settlement discussions and agreements.
It is my firm belief, based on Cohen's actions, testimony, legal documents, and conduct, that I was fraudulently induced into entering into many agreements with Cohen and these corporate entities. Leonard Cohen engaged in willful tax evasion; he has acted negligently with respect to many matters - including his nearly $6.7 million loans/expenditures re TH corporate assets. He had and has a legally binding obligation to repay those loans/expenditures within 3 years at 6 percent interest. I have no idea who was supposed to create the loan documents. I was clear with Cohen - I do not handle corporate, tax, accounting, IRS, legal matters or loan documents. That was not my job.
I personally believe the settlement agreement is illegal. I know the default judgment is because I was not served. I didn't resemble the individual. I have witnesses that attended the hearing where the judge appeared to argue Leonard Cohen's case. Leonard Cohen has obtained judgments, orders, and verdicts based on fraud and perjury.
I am attempting to address federal tax and corporate. What mistake did you rectify? How can Leonard Cohen or his representatives willfully disregard all corporate books, records, stock shares, agreements, my Indemnity Agreement, the Annuity Agreement, other documents and information, and federal and state tax returns? The judgment is evidence of theft and there issues with the ongoing accumulation of fraudulent financial interest based on a fabricated fraudulent expense ledger. The ledger in no way resembles an actual accounting.
I would appreciate your response. I believe I have been extremely diligent and have been "arrested" for, as LAPD noted in their report, requesting tax information. According to Detective Viramontes, Leonard Cohen was not comfortable with my requests for tax information. Cohen has used a fraudulently registered "domestic violence" order to prevent me from requesting and receiving IRS required documents and information and effecting serving on a corporate entity although that corporation advised IRS, via K-1s, that I have an ownership interest in the entity. Cohen also refuses to provide me with the back-up documentation necessary to prepare a proper accounting that addresses assets, liabilities, equity, and - all corporate distributions and shareholder loans. He has not explained why LCI and others (including himself) collected royalty income with respect to intellectual property assets owned by Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. The State of Kentucky advised me to place the non-revocable assignments in a safety deposit box and both Ken Cleveland and my former accountant, Dale Burgess, believe the assets are still in Blue Mist. Cohen's complaint confirms that nothing with respect to BMT or the assignments was unwound.
There are formalities involved with dissolving or winding of corporate structures. Those are being willfully disregarded.
Because of this situation, a Bay Area lawyer (Stephen Gianelli), Cohen's fan (Susanne Walsh), and possibly others, believe they have a right to criminally harass, stalk, intimidate, and threaten, me, my sons, sister, friends, and others. It is a highly coordinated campaign. These individuals are affiliated or aligned with Leonard Cohen. It's possible Gianelli found a "sympathetic ear" with Phil Spector's prosecutor about me. It's factual that Phil Spector's DA joined forces with Cohen and the City Attorney to target me, lie about me, falsely arrest and imprison me, retaliate against me. The stakes are evidently high. My sons lives have been destroyed over this situation.
Leonard Cohen, as a Buddhist teacher of mine noted, is an incredibly aggressive, vengeful, and vindictive individual. He also appears to be a thief. See Steven Machat and Phil Spector. LA Superior Court has no right or authority to aid and abet theft. They have no jurisdiction over me or the corporations inserted into the default. I can assure you that there is no public policy favoring theft, fraud, perjury, concealment, obstruction of justice, prosecutorial misconduct, witness tampering, etc.
The judgment is void and I believe the settlement agree is as well. Cohen refuses to provide me with a copy of that agreement or any details regarding the settlement negotiations.
Kelley Lynch
Section 1668 of the Civil Code provides that “[a]ll contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt any one from responsibility for his own fraud, . . . whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the law.” This provision encompasses intentional and negligent misrepresentation. (Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co. (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 1463, 1471-1473.) Accordingly, as Witkin explains: “A party to a contract who has been guilty of fraud in its inducement cannot absolve himself or herself from the effects of his or her fraud by any stipulation in the contract, either that no representations have been made, or that any right that might be grounded upon them is waived. Such a stipulation or waiver will be ignored, and parol evidence of misrepresentations will be admitted, for the reason that fraud renders the whole agreement voidable, including the waiver provision.” (1 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th ed. 2005) Contracts, § 304, p. 330.)
Kelley Lynch Requests Formal IRS Opinion Re. Leonard Cohen's Fraudulent Judgement & The Illegal Interest
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 2:07 PM
Subject:
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, police <police@cityofberkeley.info>
Hello IRS,
The illegal post-judgment interest continues to accrue. I would like a formal IRS opinion on the illegal interest Freeman granted Cohen and which continues to accrue. The illegal judgment is evidence of theft and fraud. It is based on perjured testimony, statements, and fraudulent misrepresentations - as well as accounting, financial, and corporate fraud. When can a Court legally aid and abet theft and then apply financial interest to a fraudulent default while willfully disregarding corporate records, ownership interests, etc.
Leonard Cohen's photograph appears next to the Fraud Section.
All the best,
Kelley
1571. Fraud is either actual or constructive. 1572. Actual fraud, within the meaning of this Chapter, consists in any of the following acts, committed by a party to the contract, or with his connivance, with intent to deceive another party thereto, or to induce him to enter into the contract: 1. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true; 2. The positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it, of that which is not true, though he believes it to be true; 3. The suppression of that which is true, by one having knowledge or belief of the fact; 4. A promise made without any intention of performing it; or, 5. Any other act fitted to deceive. 1573. Constructive fraud consists: 1. In any breach of duty which, without an actually fraudulent intent, gains an advantage to the person in fault, or any one claiming under him, by misleading another to his prejudice, or to the prejudice of any one claiming under him; or, 2. In any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent, without respect to actual fraud. 1574. Actual fraud is always a question of fact.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
SECTION 685.010-685.110
SECTION 685.010-685.110
685.010. (a) Interest accrues at the rate of 10 percent per annum on the principal amount of a money judgment remaining unsatisfied. (b) The Legislature reserves the right to change the rate of interest provided in subdivision (a) at any time to a rate of less than 10 percent per annum, regardless of the date of entry of the judgment or the date any obligation upon which the judgment is based was incurred. A change in the rate of interest may be made applicable only to the interest that accrues after the operative date of the statute that changes the rate. 685.020. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), interest commences to accrue on a money judgment on the date of entry of the judgment. (b) Unless the judgment otherwise provides, if a money judgment is payable in installments, interest commences to accrue as to each installment on the date the installment becomes due. 685.030. (a) If a money judgment is satisfied in full pursuant to a writ under this title, interest ceases to accrue on the judgment: (1) If the proceeds of collection are paid in a lump sum, on the date of levy. (2) If the money judgment is satisfied pursuant to an earnings withholding order, on the date and in the manner provided in Section 706.024 or Section 706.028. (3) In any other case, on the date the proceeds of sale or collection are actually received by the levying officer. (b) If a money judgment is satisfied in full other than pursuant to a writ under this title, interest ceases to accrue on the date the judgment is satisfied in full. (c) If a money judgment is partially satisfied pursuant to a writ under this title or is otherwise partially satisfied, interest ceases to accrue as to the part satisfied on the date the part is satisfied. (d) For the purposes of subdivisions (b) and (c), the date a money judgment is satisfied in full or in part is the earliest of the following times: (1) The date satisfaction is actually received by the judgment creditor. (2) The date satisfaction is tendered to the judgment creditor or deposited in court for the judgment creditor. (3) The date of any other performance that has the effect of satisfaction. (e) The clerk of a court may enter in the Register of Actions a writ of execution on a money judgment as returned wholly satisfied when the judgment amount, as specified on the writ, is fully collected and only an interest deficit of no more than ten dollars ($10) exists, due to automation of the continual daily interest accrual calculation. 685.040. The judgment creditor is entitled to the reasonable and necessary costs of enforcing a judgment. Attorney's fees incurred in enforcing a judgment are not included in costs collectible under this title unless otherwise provided by law. Attorney's fees incurred in enforcing a judgment are included as costs collectible under this title if the underlying judgment includes an award of attorney's fees to the judgment creditor pursuant to subparagraph (A) of paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 1033.5. 685.050. (a) If a writ is issued pursuant to this title to enforce a judgment, the costs and interest to be satisfied in a levy under the writ are the following: (1) The statutory fee for issuance of the writ. (2) The amount of interest that has accrued from the date of entry or renewal of the judgment to the date of issuance of the writ, as adjusted for partial satisfactions, if the judgment creditor has filed an affidavit with the court clerk stating such amount. (3) The amount of interest that accrues on the principal amount of the judgment remaining unsatisfied from the date of issuance of the writ until the date interest ceases to accrue. (4) The levying officer's statutory costs for performing the duties under the writ. (b) In a levy under the writ, the levying officer shall do all of the following: (1) Collect the amount of costs and interest entered on the writ pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (a). (2) Compute and collect the amount of additional interest required to be collected by paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) by reference to the daily interest entered on the writ. If amounts collected periodically do not fully satisfy the money judgment, the levying officer shall adjust the amount of daily interest to reflect the partial satisfactions, and make later collections by reference to the adjusted amount of daily interest. (3) Determine and collect the amount of additional costs pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a). 685.070. (a) The judgment creditor may claim under this section the following costs of enforcing a judgment: (1) Statutory fees for preparing and issuing, and recording and indexing, an abstract of judgment or a certified copy of a judgment. (2) Statutory fees for filing a notice of judgment lien on personal property. (3) Statutory fees for issuing a writ for the enforcement of the judgment to the extent that the fees are not satisfied pursuant to Section 685.050. (4) Statutory costs of the levying officer for performing the duties under a writ to the extent that the costs are not satisfied pursuant to Section 685.050 and the statutory fee of the levying officer for performing the duties under the Wage Garnishment Law to the extent that the fee has not been satisfied pursuant to the wage garnishment. (5) Costs incurred in connection with any proceeding under Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 708.010) of Division 2 that have been approved as to amount, reasonableness, and necessity by the judge or referee conducting the proceeding. (6) Attorney's fees, if allowed by Section 685.040. (b) Before the judgment is fully satisfied but not later than two years after the costs have been incurred, the judgment creditor claiming costs under this section shall file a memorandum of costs with the court clerk and serve a copy on the judgment debtor. Service shall be made personally or by mail. The memorandum of costs shall be executed under oath by a person who has knowledge of the facts and shall state that to the person's best knowledge and belief the costs are correct, are reasonable and necessary, and have not been satisfied. (c) Within 10 days after the memorandum of costs is served on the judgment debtor, the judgment debtor may apply to the court on noticed motion to have the costs taxed by the court. The notice of motion shall be served on the judgment creditor. Service shall be made personally or by mail. The court shall make an order allowing or disallowing the costs to the extent justified under the circumstances of the case. (d) If no motion to tax costs is made within the time provided in subdivision (c), the costs claimed in the memorandum are allowed. (e) If a memorandum of costs for the costs specified in subdivision (a) is filed at the same time as an application for a writ of execution, these statutory costs not already allowed by the court in an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) in the aggregate may be included in the amount specified in the writ of execution, subject to subsequent disallowance as ordered by the court pursuant to a motion to tax if filed by the debtor. The memorandum of costs shall contain the following statement: "The fees sought under this memorandum may be disallowed by a court upon a motion to tax filed by the debtor notwithstanding the fees having been included in the writ of execution." The inclusion of the above costs in the writ of execution or the pendency of the motion to tax on these costs shall not be cause for the clerk of the court to delay issuing the writ of execution or for the levying officer to delay enforcing the writ of execution. (f) Section 1013, extending the time within which a right may be exercised or an act may be done, applies to this section. 685.080. (a) The judgment creditor may claim costs authorized by Section 685.040 by noticed motion. The motion shall be made before the judgment is satisfied in full, but not later than two years after the costs have been incurred. The costs claimed under this section may include, but are not limited to, costs that may be claimed under Section 685.070 and costs incurred but not approved by the court or referee in a proceeding under Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 708.010) of Division 2. (b) The notice of motion shall describe the costs claimed, shall state their amount, and shall be supported by an affidavit of a person who has knowledge of the facts stating that to the person's best knowledge and belief the costs are correct, are reasonable and necessary, and have not been satisfied. The notice of motion shall be served on the judgment debtor. Service shall be made personally or by mail. (c) The court shall make an order allowing or disallowing the costs to the extent justified under the circumstances of the case. 685.090. (a) Costs are added to and become a part of the judgment: (1) Upon the filing of an order allowing the costs pursuant to this chapter. (2) If a memorandum of costs is filed pursuant to Section 685.070 and no motion to tax is made, upon the expiration of the time for making the motion. (3) As specified in Section 685.095. (b) The costs added to the judgment pursuant to this section are included in the principal amount of the judgment remaining unsatisfied. (c) If a writ or earnings withholding order is outstanding at the time the costs are added to the judgment pursuant to this section, the levying officer shall add the amount of those costs to the amount to be collected pursuant to the writ or earnings withholding order if the levying officer receives either of the following before the writ or earnings withholding order is returned: (1) A certified copy of the court order allowing the costs. (2) A certificate from the clerk of the court that the costs have been added to the judgment where the costs have been added to the judgment after a memorandum of costs has been filed pursuant to Section 685.070 and no motion to tax has been made within the time allowed for making the motion. (d) The levying officer shall include the costs described in subdivision (c) in the amount of the sale or collection distributed to the judgment creditor only if the levying officer receives the certified copy of the court order or the clerk's certificate before the distribution is made. 685.095. When a writ is served by a levying officer or registered process server, the costs for that service, as determined pursuant to Section 1033.5, shall be added to and become part of the judgment. 685.100. (a) Except as otherwise provided by law: (1) As a prerequisite to the performance by the levying officer of a duty under this title, the judgment creditor shall deposit a sum of money with the levying officer sufficient to pay the costs of performing the duty. (2) As a prerequisite to the taking of property into custody by the levying officer, whether by keeper or otherwise, the judgment creditor shall deposit with the levying officer a sum of money sufficient to pay the costs of taking the property and keeping it safely for a period not to exceed 15 days. If continuation of the custody of the property is required, the levying officer shall, from time to time, demand orally or in writing that the judgment creditor deposit additional amounts to cover estimated costs for periods not to exceed 30 days each. A written demand may be mailed or delivered to the judgment creditor. The judgment creditor has not less than three business days after receipt of the demand within which to comply with the demand. If the amount demanded is not paid within the time specified in the oral or written demand, the levying officer shall release the property. (b) The levying officer is not liable for failure to take or hold property unless the judgment creditor has complied with the provisions of this section. 685.110. Nothing in this chapter affects the law relating to prejudgment interest.
Kelley Lynch's Letter to Phil Spector Prosecutor Alan Jackson Re. The Issues She Was Attempting To Address With The DA's Office
January 16, 2010
September 21, 2009
Alan Jackson
District Attorney’sOffice
County of Los
Angeles
210Temple Street
Suite 18000
Los Angeles , California
District Attorney’s
210
Suite 18000
Re: Kelley Lynch vs. the District Attorney of Los Angeles
Alan Jackson:
I am in receipt of your email dated
September 9, 2009 demanding that I remove you from my “recipients list.” My
emails, as I have repeatedly stated, document the destruction of my life, the
destruction of my children and parent’s lives, the targeting of my family,
etc., due solely to the fact that I was told Leonard Norman Cohen committed
criminal tax fraud and reported that to the IRS and others.
I can assure you that all matters
involving Cohen and myself are IRS matters and there is no need to “convert”
anything into a tax matter. I would not be in an adversarial position with
Cohen had I not reported his tax fraud and, instead, accepted 50% community
property or whatever “bribes” I was being offered – presumably to lie and say
Cohen was defrauded by his advisers. He
does address his “massive tax hit” in the interview he gave Brian Johnson for
MacLean’s Magazine in Canada
I am absolutely convinced that
Cohen’s tax fraud relates to the Phil Spector murder trial. I refused to cave
into extremely vicious coercive tactics – such as Ray Charles Lindsey’s custody
matter that was coordinated with the SWAT incident of May 25, 2005 and my being
dragged to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. I mailed Detective Silva documents including relevant portions of the Killer
King file. That file relates to Kelly
Annette Lynch. Nearly every detail in
the file is falsified – excluding my street address and Steven Clark Lindsey’s
cell phone number. The conversation
“Erma Oppenhein” alleged had with my son, as recounted in her report, is a
lie. I have repeatedly attempted to
determine why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector – by
LAPD. This seems to upset your
office. It clearly upsets Marko who has
threatened me and instructed me to tell the FBI in Denver
THE ONLY SOUND FROM THE WALLS NOW IS-"COUNT TIME"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Leonard Cohen’s lawyer, Robert Kory, submitted a
Declaration filed in my minor son’s alleged custody matter but he does not know
my son. He did, however, note that he and Cohen did not want to be “identified”
as the individuals encouraging Steven Clark Lindsey to take Ray away from me. My minor son accompanied me to Kory’s office
sometime in the spring of 2005. I
documented the conversation my minor son witnessed for Boies Schiller and others
at the time. Kory and I discussed the
allegations raised that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud, used me as an
unwitting pawn, and exposed me to that tax fraud. We also discussed the missing State of Kentucky Alhambra
I am absolutely convinced that I was taken to
Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector in an attempt to prevent me from
testifying against Cohen in any IRS matter - whether it is currently “pending”
or not or an attempt to undermine my credibility as a witness. Many parties were well aware of my
conversation with Agent Betzer/IRS on April 15, 2005. It seemed to concern Norman Posel of Boies
Schiller who later wrote me that Cohen and/or Kory were going to destroy me
and/or my children. I mailed that email
from Boies Schiller to the Denver FBI with other evidence of matters I believe
crossed state borders and related to the accusations that Cohen committed criminal
tax fraud. I do not know how would
anyone, other than the IRS, would know what is or or is not a pending matter?
The IRS seems to have a policy that does not include revealing pending
matters. The IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Agent Sopko
of the U.S. Treasury Department are copied in on my public emails. These emails document the destruction of my
life since reporting the allegations regarding Cohen to the IRS and
others. I am not convinced the IRS
Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and/or
the Treasury Department are engaged in a major prank and feel it would be
prudent to assume that there may very well be serious issues at hand. I
discussed this with Investigator William Frayeh of your office. He didn’t seem to think these federal
agencies were engaged in a prank either.
As you should know, I also reported the allegations relating to Cohen to
the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Major Fraud Unit. I spoke to Jeff Jonas in that office about my
Complaint. I was then threatened by
Brian Bennett. I view a threat to
“report” me in connection with a Complaint filed with your Major Fraud Unit as
a very serious matter. In fact, I view
it as witness tampering.
I intend to litigate these issues
once I receive the Opinion Letters I have requested from the IRS and State of
Kentucky with respect to the entities related to Cohen and my “instant legal
matters.” I am also waiting to hear the
results of an investigation into the SWAT incident, the Killer King incident,
and so forth. Once I have this
information I intend to file lawsuits addressing everything my children, family
and I have been dealing with since approximately 2004. At the
very heart of my lawsuit will be the fact that my life was destroyed due to the
fact that I am a friend of Phil Spector’s, was dragged into his murder trial,
told by Investigator John Thompson of your office that I was probably a witness
in Phil Spector’s murder trial, and had the audacity to report Cohen’s tax
fraud to the IRS and State of
Kentucky. It is my opinion that the
District Attorney office needs to keep Leonard Norman Cohen credible. He does, after all, appear in your Motion in
Limine and Mick Brown/UK Telegraph wrote me that he was in possession of the
grand jury transcripts and advised me that Cohen testified against Phil Spector
in his grand jury. Cohen personally told
me and Steve Cron, and then confirmed this for me after his interview with the
detectives I met, that his comments about Phil Spector over the years were good
rock ‘n roll stories. Here’s one example
of Cohen’s rock ‘n roll stories about Phil Spector. Was Leonard Cohen actually biting into a
revolver in a hamburger and can he prove that Phil Spector put that revolver in
his hamburger and forced him to bite into it?
That sounds preposterous. For the
record, Leonard Cohen didn’t produce Death of A Ladies’ Man with Phil
Spector. Phil Spector produced that
album and Cohen did not like the way Mr. Spector handled his vocals. He personally calls the record “grotesque”
and has, from what I could tell, held a grudge against Mr. Spector since
1977. The hamburger incident seems to
relate to the incident you raised in your Motion in Limine in Phil Spector’s
matter and yet it has not been addressed.
I cannot imagine why you wouldn’t want to address the totality of circumstances
and intentionally overlook what Cohen discussed with the detectives and other
comments that are readily available on the internet. Cohen, from my perspective, is a calculated
fraud and a pathological liar.
Leonard Cohen
My first album came out in,
I think it was 1967, and I worked with John Hammond Senior and John Simon on
that record, subsequently with Bob Johnson. My most bizarre experience with a
producer was with Phil Spector, with whom I worked in 1977 or 78, and we
produced that grotesque album called Death of a Ladies' Man.
Don't Go Home With Your Hard-On
Leonard Cohen
That happened at a very
curious time in my life because I was at a very low point, my family was
breaking up, I was living in Los Angeles which was a foreign city to me, and
I'd lost control, as I say, of my family, of my work, and my life, and it was a
very very dark period … so you were slipping over bullets, and you were biting
into revolvers in your hamburger.
Not only do I believe Cohen
committed tax fraud with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC
Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, possibly Old Ideas, LLC,
personally and in connection with other entities, I believe he may have a
lifelong history of tax fraud in the United
States and Canada Canada Canada ,
advised me that there was no good news with respect to Cohen’s residence (and
attendant tax problems) in Canada
Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told
is criminal, appears to follow him from adviser to adviser. He also has a
pattern of blaming advisers and stealing from them. I provided Boies Schiller
(who I permitted to review a great deal of evidence relating to the Leonard
Cohen Tax Fraud Matter) with Marty Machat’s letter to Irving Trust transmitting
a $30,000.00 final payment for his and Bob Johnston’s respective 15% shares of
Stranger Music, Inc. Unfortunately, when Cohen sold Leonard Cohen Stranger
Music, Inc. and Bad Monk Publishing Company (a d/b/a of Cohen’s) to Sony he did
not inform me that he was selling Mr. Machat and Mr. Johnston’s shares. I do
not know what he personally advised Sony and/or his advisers with respect to
this matter. I believe the IRS
Commissioner’s Staff should review that sale and, specifically, look into why
Cohen and Westin were concerned about issues relating to the assignments of
copyrights into Bad Monk Publishing. I also believe the IRS Commissioner’s
Staff should look into the failed C.A.K. bond deal (that apparently concerned
Robert Kory) and the formation of Cohen’s two charitable remainder trusts. Ed
Dean, Cohen’s lawyer, was concerned about personal service contracts being
assigned to these trusts and other legal issues relating to the assignments. Kory
emailed me on May 24, 2005 that the IRS would demand answers to questions,
relating to Cohen’s taxes, going back many years. I was told by Steve Blanq of
Hochman, Rettig that Richard Westin, Cohen’s tax lawyer, made the IRS nervous
with his evasiveness. I can understand why. He made me nervous – particularly
when he wrote that Neal Greenberg was going to screw me over and he would stand
up for me. I have no idea what that means but intend to find out. Steve Blanq also emailed me and asked if I
was being blamed for Richard Westin’s actions?
I am being blamed for the actions of Leonard Cohen, Neal Greenberg and
Richard Westin who were wrapped in attorney/client privilege – essentially
leaving me in the dark. I also want the
IRS to investigate why Robert Kory personally told me that I have a cause of
action against every one of Cohen’s advisers.
Fortunately, Westin confirmed – via email – that Traditional Holdings,
LLC was a “real entity” (although I personally believe it is a “sham”) and the
annuity obligation was real. Unfortunately, Westin – on behalf of Cohen -
had already extinguished the annuity obligation from the tax return in 2003. He
extinguished the promissory note on the 2002 tax returns and did not report the
Sony sale on the 2001 tax returns. He used two separate tax identification
numbers which was probably done intentionally to deceive the IRS. Westin also
confirmed – via email – that he only represented Leonard Norman Cohen. Truer
words have rarely been spoken. My
advisers informed me that the annuity and promissory note were
extinguished. They advised me that the
income from the Sony sale was not reported on the tax returns. Leonard Cohen is well aware that he signed an
Indemnity Agreement relating to my involvement with Traditional Holdings,
LLC. I did not understand the structure
and I did not understand how one invested in anything using a promissory note
and therefore requested an Indemnity Agreement.
I believe it will be difficult for Cohen to address the corporate
documents, minutes signed by him, documents signed by him and notarized. Cohen personally responded to CAK’s lawsuit
against him and in his Declaration acknowledges the income related to royalties
on intellectual property, etc. Is Cohen
going to take the legal position that he is functionally illiterate?
My advisers, DiMascio & Berardo
and Dale Burgess, confirmed that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and
“exposed” me to that fraud. In our last meeting, inexplicably, DiMascio &
Berardo wanted to figure in a “settlement” amount for my exposure to Cohen’s
fraud. In our first meeting, however,
they advised me that once fraud is brought to one’s attention no deals can be
made and explained that I had two choices: report the tax fraud to the IRS
and/or amend the tax returns. Reporting
tax fraud to the IRS turned out to be incredibly dangerous for me and my family
but I did not trust anyone to amend the returns. I felt a better course of action would be to
report what I was told to the IRS, the State of Kentucky
DiMascio & Berardo seemed to
understand that similar penalties and interest were accumulating with respect
to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and LC Investments, LLC. Dale Burgess, my
former accountant advised me that there was fraud on three entities and both he
and Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s former accountant, believe the intellectual property
is still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. or should be. I own 15% of that intellectual property –
wherever it has gone - and have repeatedly requested a complete and proper
forensic accounting with all assets on the table. I would like the IRS Commissioner’s Staff’s
Opinion on that issue and others. Due to
the extreme lengths Cohen has gone to silence me I have now concluded that the
IRS will be forced to undertake the complete and proper forensic accounting I
have attempted to request since approximately 2004. Agent
Betzer, a Collection Agent with the IRS, also believed I owned 15% of Blue Mist
Touring Company, Inc. and 99.5% Traditional Holdings, LLC. He advised me to go
get what was rightfully mine and appeared to be an exceptionally helpful and
brilliant man. Agent Betzer understood
that I paid approximately $165,000.00 in taxes on a company that Cohen has
ultimately attempted to prove I did not own.
I did not pay taxes on that entity because I was making a charitable
donation to the IRS on Cohen’s behalf. I
believed I owned it and I believed there might be something suspect about that
entity and the promissory note – which is why I demanded and received an
“Indemnity Agreement” from Cohen. For these reasons, one might imagine, the IRS
Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation
and Agent Kelly Sopko of the U.S. Treasury Department are copied on my emails.
DiMascio & Berardo were
apparently impressed with and/or intimidated by the fact that Cohen was
represented by former District Attorney Ira Reiner and perhaps this is why they
encouraged me to participate in what I believe would have been an illegal deal,
illegal meditation, and possibly insurance fraud. Ira Reiner was brought in, according to Kory,
to handle the mediation because Kory does not understand litigation. I would like to point out that Dale Burgess
asked me to confirm for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury
Department that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud and confirmed
that he would answer a subpoena and testify to the fact that I was offered 50%
community property by Cohen – presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his
advisers. DiMascio & Berardo told me
Cohen wanted me to say his advisers defrauded him. That is not what I witnessed. Cohen, Greenberg and Westin are the three
parties that set up these structures and demanded that the sale of intellectual
property be handled as stock sales. In
fact, that is the precise reason for Greenberg introducing Richard Westin to
Leonard Cohen – to structure the first stock sale. That ultimately led to an IRS audit of
Cohen’s donation of stock to the Mt. Baldy Abbot’s Fund which I personally
believe the IRS should revisit. I also
think the IRS should look into why Cohen received 1099s from Sony for $1
million and $7 million, respectively, which were then turned into $0
1099s. The IRS also audited the deposit
Cohen claimed as a loan on his tax returns – after consulting Westin about
this. I think there was a reason that
this $1 million was treated as a loan rather than a deposit. There are also other issues that the IRS
might want to look into with respect to that deposit involving recoupments if I
recall correctly.
The IRS Commissioner’s Staff and Department of Justice are referenced in the subject line of the email you responded to and it seems odd that you would permit yourself to be copied in on so many emails from odzerchenma@gmail.com and twiggy.ahmadinejad@gmail.com (and other email accounts) and only now ask me to “immediately” remove you. I have asked you to explain why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. My email accounts and Blogs, I might add, have been targeted by Michelle Blaine (who confirmed this publicly and thanked Blogonaut for his assistance in targeting them), Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, and others – including someone who posts as “Bird.” That is the “crowd” you are apparently associate with which is unconscionable – given what has gone on and what is going on with those Blogs.
What has gone on with these Blogs –
particularly with respect to Gianelli-Blogonaut’s Law Blog, from my perspective,
is an attempt to sabotage a Denver FBI investigation. I brought this to the attention of the Denver
FBI. Gianelli-Blogonaut has a signature
from what I can tell – sabotage. That is
precisely why I believe he communicated with Leonard Cohen’s legal representatives,
contacted Investigator Frayeh in your office about HIS off-the-cuff remark that
Pat Dixon is good looking, contacted Agent Sopko/Treasury Department in an
attempt to determine if I was “spamming” Agent Sopko who is now being referred
to by Gianelli-Blogonaut as my “pet” agent which is outrageous, contacted Agent
Wynar of the Oakand FBI in an attempt to determine (I suppose) if I was
spamming Agent Sopko (he must not have trusted Agent Sopko), has targeted both
of my children and refused to cease communicating with my older son, has
received a private email from my minor son, contacted the custody lawyer
representing my minor son’s father and offered to provide a Declaration about
me athough he doesn’t know me, may have been involved in providing Boulder PD
with an email dictated by my older son’s father, and is all over my instant
legal matters. Gianelli-Blogonaut
clearly likes to play high stake games and may want to lay off the white
wine. He also contacted Bruce Cutler in
what I view as an attempt to determine if Mr. Cutler still represents Phil
Spector. That was discussed. Bruce Cutler confirmed that his office sent
me a fax and received my faxes.
Gianelli-Blogonaut is very interested in my sex life. He publicly alleged that I have sexual
fantasies about Pat Dixon. That is
preposterous. He publicly wrote that Pat
Dixon “fears for his life” because I
quoted the lyrics to Eminem’s live version of “Puke” and made a reference to
Larry Fidler’s remarks about what he does or does not wear under his robes.
Investigator William Frayeh, of your
office, felt Gianelli might have found a sympathetic ear – yours. That is truly appalling and I absolutely
believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of
Invetigation, Treasury Department, DEA, Immigration, Phil Spector and his legal
team should investigate what is going on here and what has gone on. Stephen Gianelli has, from my perspective,
lied to Special Agent Wynar of Oakland FBI. He had the audacity, from what
Belark-Gianelli-Blogonaut advised me, to go to the FBI with allegations that I
am spamming Agent Kelly Sopko of the United States Treasury Department as I
have just stated. It would seem that Gianelli now has the FBI investigating the
Treasury. Given the fact that Agent
Sopko was able to call me, fly into see me in Santa Ana, California, and email
me Agent Tejeda’s information (IRS-Fraud Unit-Los Angeles), one can safely
assume that she personally can determine whether or not I am spamming her and
advise me to stop. I remain unconvinced,
as has been publicly posited on public Blogs, that Agent Sopko’s email to me
was innocent and/or benign. I would not
characterize it in that manner. Agent
Sopko advised me to take the accusations that Leonard Cohen committed criminal
tax fraud to Agent Tejeda/IRS and advised me to provide Agent Tejeda/IRS with
the evidence she, her partner, and I discussed.
This evidence has now been used to publicly threaten my older son who is
absolutely a witness to much of what has unfolded. Please see comments from Phawker.com
enclosed.
Gianelli is apparently extremely
eager to determine what’s on Bruce Cutler’s mind and has name-dropped Mr.
Cutler ad nauseum. In fact, he advised
me that Bruce Cutler and Pat Dixon had a conversation about me which is quite
startling. I do not know Pat Dixon and
would like the IRS and FBI to investigate why I was being discussed. One thing that should be on Bruce Cutler’s
mind is the fact that Nat McBride, an acquaintance of Nicole Spector’s,
received a “death threat” from one Brian Peterson (bpeterson999@yahoo) and
received at least one email from someone purporting to be Bruce Cutler. I,
naturally, have been accused of sending that email. I can assure you that I
would not criminally impersonate Bruce Cutler and have now reported those
threats and the criminal impersonation of Mr. Cutler to the Department of
Justice and Interpol. Nat McBride
resides in the U.K.
Gianelli phoned Investigator Frayeh
to determine, from what I can tell, if William Frayeh thinks Prosecutor/Judge
Pat Dixon is “good looking.” Please keep in mind that this is a murder trial.
Gianelli/Blogonaut is all over this story and his role seems sinister –
particularly given the fact that Blogonaut publicly stated (and emailed me)
that “it” had been in contact with Cohen’s advisers on three separate
occasions, was communicating with people who knew me in Los Angeles, and
offered to put me in touch with Cohen who is apparently willing to help me. All
I have to do in order to get my life and children back is lie. I have captured
much of the activity on Blaine’s Blog, Blogonaut’s Blog, the Hartford Courant’s
website, my own Blogs, and so forth because I thought some of the slander and
malicious allegations might ultimately be pulled down which is precisely what
has occurred. I have forwarded the captured Blog content to Doron Weinberg,
Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Department of Justice, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Agent Sopko of the U.S. Treasury and others. Lying seems to be the name of the game. I
refused to lie in any mediation with Cohen and I refuse to lie the IRS in
connection with any defense alleging that Cohen was defrauded by his
advisers. The idea of Cohen being
defrauded by his advisers is laughable. His disdain for “ordinary income taxes”
may be unprecedented. He had similarly disdainful views of gift taxes. His estate planning lawyer, Reeve Chudd, emailed me that he was not an
“alchemist” when Cohen attempted to donate his body of work to the Toronto
Library in exchange for a United
States Denver
I would strongly suggest that you
review the police reports of Cohen’s interview with the detectives Steve Cron
and I met at his house. He either lied to them or, if Mick Brown was accurate
when he advised me that Cohen testified before Phil Spector’s grand jury,
perjured himself. That would seem to raise issues having to do with obstruction
of justice as well. The detectives I met seemed professional so perhaps they
too will be confused about Cohen’s testimony before the grand jury – or,
possibly, that you referred to an incident between Cohen and Phil Spector in
the Motion In Limine. For the record, Cohen advised me that he confirmed – for
the detectives – that his comments, over the years about Phil Spector, were
good rock ‘n roll comments which is precisely what he told me over the course
of 20 years. He also told me that he did not like his vocals and felt
humiliated that Phillip did not want to mix the album – putting him in the
position of being forced to telegram Phillip. Phillip told me he received hate
mail from all 8 of Cohen’s fans and found working with Cohen depressing. I can
assure you that I found working with Cohen unbelievably depressing. Cohen
certainly did not mind his daughter, Lorca Cohen, accompanying me to visit Phil
Spector one night at the Bel Air Hotel. In fact, he seemed rather delighted and
intrigued. That is precisely how he felt when he heard that I was having dinner
with Phillip in Beverly Hills
I also reported Cohen’s tax fraud
and the fact that he has defrauded me of millions to the District Attorney’s
Major Fraud Unit. Please speak to Jeff Jonas about this Complaint. He may be
the same Jeff Jonas whose name appears in your office’s Internal Memorandum
relating to King Drew and questioning the credibility of coroner Luis Pena.
Apparently my Complaint to your Major Fraud Unit was problematic for the
District Attorney as it resulted in Brian Bennett threatening to report me to
someone. To whom I cannot say. I can say this though - I spoke to Brian Bennett
about the fact that I filed the Complaint with your Major Fraud Unit. I also
spoke to Brian Bennett about the fact that I felt Cohen was attempting to
blackmail me and the fact that I thought he perjured himself and should be
arrested.
Why have I been emailing you and
Truc Do and leaving messages for various people at the District Attorney’s
Office? I can assure you this is not “harassment.” Your office dragged me into
the Phil Spector murder trial – not I. On May 25, 2005, I was held hostage by a
S.W.A.T. Team comprised of Los Angeles Police Department and Inglewood Police
Department. Sergeant Joe ___________/LAPD, who monitored my only visit with Ray
Charles Lindsey since May 25, 2005, told me Beverly Hills Police Department may
have been present as well. I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil
Spector, and ultimately determined that the entire King Drew file was
falsified. In fact, the individual in that file is apparently one Kelly Annette
Lynch who would have been 19 at the time. Rutger and I did not spontaneously
manifest on this planet at the same moment in time – which is basically what
would have needed to occur were Kelly Annette Lynch actually his mother. She
is, however, the woman that seems to have lost custody of my son Ray Charles
Lindsey. The bizarre part of the King Drew report is that my address is
correct. My name, however, is spelled incorrectly and on one page alone the
following details are false and/or wrong: the social security number, my place
of birth, date of birth, religion, and the insurance number. I was born in Pennsylvania
A custody matter was obviously
coordinated with my “visit” to Killer King and Steven Clark Lindsey’s cell
phone number appears in the attendant falsified police report. For the record,
the actual conversation Rutger had with “Erma Oppenhein” after the S.W.A.T.
incident was limited to two questions: Is your Mother on any medication and are
you ok? His answers: Yes, heart medication and yes, he was ok. Steven Clark
Lindsey is my younger son’s father and, after inserting himself into the
Leonard Norman Cohen Tax Fraud Matter, filed Robert Kory’s Declaration in that
matter. My son, Rutger, was asked to go in and sign over/transfer/sell my
former house to Cohen/Kory – by Lindsey – while I was en route to Killer King.
I would like to point out that there is no signature permitting anyone to treat
me at King Drew and Steven Clark Lindsey had no legal right, whatsoever, to
speak to any doctor or medical provider on my behalf. His lawyer, Daniel A. Bergman,
apparently faxed Superfon’s Declaration to her while I was being taken to King
Drew. When I have the money I intend to obtain a complete copy of the custody
file – including transcripts of hearings – and will turn that over to the IRS
Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and –
most definitely - Phil Spector. For now, I am living in a homeless shelter in Houston
I have brought the fraudulent use of
someone else’s social security number (in the King Drew file and in the
so-called “police report”) to the attention of the Social Security
Administration, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent
Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, the FTC, the Postal Inspector Phil Spector
and his legal team, and others. The Social Security Administration advised me
to file a criminal complaint with the Houston Police Department after I
discussed, with a representative, the fact that Cohen issued illegal K1s using
my Social Security number and with respect to the number that appears in the
King Drew file. Apparently it is also identity theft. This might be a good time
to note that Leonard Norman Cohen seems to have attempted to change the address
where I received my mail (at my home) sometime in 2004/2005 to his address on
Tremaine. I filed a Complaint with the Postal Inspector about this matter which
I assume is “mail fraud” and gave the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and others the
details.
I advised Agent Sopko and her
partner, in our meeting, that I believe the custody matter arose from Cohen’s
tax fraud – that I was told is criminal and relates to the Phil Spector murder
trial that I definitely view as a set up. I have provided the IRS
Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector, and others, with Robert Kory and Betsy
Superfon’s Declarations that were filed in the custody matter. I intend to
provide them with a transcript of the “ex parte hearing” as well. Ray Charles
Lindsey, my son, “witnessed” a conversation between me and Kory about 1)
Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal; 2) the missing state tax
returns; 3) my intellectual property that appears to have been stolen (see Blue
Mist Touring Company, Inc. and evidence I filed in Boulder, Colorado with my
Motion to Quash Cohen’s fraudulent restraining order – meant to silence me and
prevent me from contacting Kory with respect to 1099s, illegal K1s issued me by
LC Investments, LLC, my intellectual property, a complete and proper forensic
accounting, etc. – all of which is an “IRS matter”); and, 4) their threats. I
would like to point out that I discussed Cohen and Kory’s threats to put me in
jail with Agent Sopko and her partner. Agent Sopko asked me how “they” intended
to do that. I have no idea and would have demanded a jury trial in any event.
At this point, I would like to underscore this fact: I did not enter an
appearance in Cohen’s bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials attached because
I believe it is an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and/or criminal
conduct – an attempt to obstruct justice. The financial “ledger” attached
thereto is fraudulent. Please see Dale Burgess’ fax to DiMascio & Berardo
(also filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado) setting forth – after
meeting with Kevin Prins/Moss Adam’s (Cohen’s accountant) – the tremendous
amount of missing back-up documentation (including asset valuations).
Leonard Norman Cohen has gone to
extraordinary lengths to silence me and has noted, for the news media, the
massive tax hit he will take in connection with his creative tax planning. In
other words, Cohen has publicly stated his motive. Cohen and Kory were going to
“destroy” me and my children and I can assure you that when you are talking
about destroying children you are not speaking legally. I mailed Norman Posel’s
email (from Boies Schiller) regarding one of these threats to the FBI in Denver Kentucky
After receiving your email I phoned
Investigator William Frayeh. It seems inconceivably bizarre that Stephen
Gianelli/Blogonaut would know what you wrote me. They were not copied in on
that email. I tend to doubt “it” reads minds, has a crystal ball, or hacked
into your email account. I have previously spoken with Investigator Frayeh
regarding the Phil Spector murder trial. As you, no doubt, are aware Detective
Brian Bennett came by my former house to interview me after the District
Attorney received an anonymous call (from a woman) in connection with Phil
Spector and my friendship. Phil Spector and I have known one another for
approximately 25-years and I believe it is safe to say that we are dear
friends. I worked for Mr. Spector, as an intern, in 1988 and 1989 (and at times
thereafter) after Marty Machat’s death in 1988 and have remained friends with
Mr. Spector and the Mother of his children, Janis Zavala Spector. Investigator
John Thompson told me I was probably a witness in that matter when I met with him
and Detective Silva in Santa Ana ,
California
Based upon what has unfolded it is
nearly impossible for me to believe that you feel I am “spamming” you – as
Gianelli stated. Apparently you and Gianelli/Blogonaut have this in common and,
I suspect, you are or were communicating with Gianelli and Blogonaut. That
seems like a very reasonable conclusion. It is shocking, however, given the
attempts Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark-Blaine, and others, have gone (on
Blogonaut’s Blog, mControl’s Blog, the Hartford Courant’s site and elsewhere)
to undermine my credibility through slander, malicious gossip, libel,
defamation, bald-faced lies, etc. Of course, it is impossible to undermine someone
based on lies that must now be proven – as fact – in a court of law. I have
brought these Blogs to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the
Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury Department, Agent Wynar-FBI
Oakland, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, Ron Burkle, Robert
MacMillan, Lee Kanon Alpert, Bruce Cutler, Esquire, Kyabje Thinley Norbu,
Karmapa, Sharmapa, Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche, and others. I am convinced that
Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark, Blaine, - and, of course, you and others - have
attempted to obstruct justice and have engaged in witness tampering, witness
retaliation, witness intimidation, harassment, stalking, and a coordinated
campaign of cyber-terrorism clearly designed to silence and undermine my
credibility. Gianelli/Blogonaut “have” also lied to the FBI in Oakland
Needless to say, this is an
outrageous, outlandish, and unconscionable situation that has exposed Phil
Spector, me, our families, and others, to the whims of possibly unstable people
and vigilantism. I am absolutely convinced that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff,
the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, the DEA, the
Social Security Administration and Immigration should look into the role – if
any – the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office played in having me dragged to
Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and falsifying the file. It is my
opinion that there was a two-fold reason for taking me to King Drew: 1) to
determine what, if anything, I knew about Phil Spector and guns. Officer
Maurice Hampton/LAPD and Erma Oppenhein/SMART questioned me about this en route
to Killer King; and, 2) to prevent me from successfully reporting Cohen’s tax
fraud to the IRS and serving as a credible witness.
I informed Agent Bill Betzer/IRS on
April 15, 2005 that I believed I had been exposed to tax fraud and he advised
me to bring the fraud into the IRS with a lawyer. Agent Betzer then advised me
to call the IRS Fraud Hotline – which I did. Ultimately, I contacted the IRS
via its website – reporting the tax fraud – and called the IRS in Washington , D.C. Boulder , Colorado
Investigator Frayeh advised me to
stop emailing you. I have stopped. I am, however, transmitting this letter to
you via email. Investigator Frayeh also suggested that I ignore Blogonaut,
Gianelli, and Belark. They have since removed the slanderous and vile articles
and comments on their Blog but the lie disguised as an article (written by Joff
Belark) remains and I would like to determine who released my so-called
“booking” photograph to Belark in connection with some of the insanity I dealt
with in Boulder , Colorado Dixon
Eminem's Live Version of "Puke." Judge Pat Dixon evidently believes Eminem's lyrics about "dry humping" were directed at him. He feared for his life over this lyric - according to Stalker "Stephen Gianelli."
Blogonaut publicly announced that
Pat Dixon actually fears for his life because I informed government, law
enforcement, and the news media – via my public emails documenting the
destruction of my life – that every time I think of “Dixon
Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark targeted
my son Rutger as well and sent him vicious and malicious emails (such as “Ding
Dong the Witch Is Dead”) and – for reasons I cannot imagine – forward Douglas
Penick’s dictated response to Boulder Police Department. Boulder Police
Department is all over this story. After attempting to leave “Officer Maurice
Hampton” a message with “Officer Garrin – LAPD” – some time ago – Officer
Storbeck of Boulder Police Department rolled into Deneuve Construction (with
the Police Chief’s secretary) to determine if I was dangerous to myself or
others. He was armed and clearly far more dangerous than I. The Denver FBI
instructed me to contact the Boulder District Attorney’s Office and the
Attorney General of Colorado. To date, I have heard nothing from either with
respect to their investigations into this deadly serious matter. Rutger has
witnessed a tremendous amount of insanity during this ordeal and was actually
asked by Steven Clark Lindsey (immediately following the S.W.A.T. incident) to
go in to Cohen/Kory’s office and sign over/transfer/sell my house to Cohen
and/or Kory. He also had his fingers ripped off in a meat grinder incident at
Whole Foods. OSHA felt there might be criminal negligence on the part of Whole
Foods and thought the District Attorney could look into that. Perhaps the phone
messages I left regarding that “incident” were misconstrued as “harassment” by
Pat Dixon. The targeting of children is inconceivably brutal and I personally
believe Steve Cooley and you are involved. No one on earth can convince me
otherwise. I also believe the slander, etc. on Blogonaut’s Blog was timed to coincide
with the Phil Spector appeal and the Clarkson civil suit. In any event, I view
Rutger as a witness and am convinced that Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark (and
others) have engaged in witness retaliation, witness intimidation, and worse,
with respect to my son. Since Lindsey emailed me that Cohen/Kory were
encouraging him to take Ray away from me (after the conversation he witnessed)
it is clear that he too is the victim of witness retaliation and intimidation.
The entire custody matter appears to be nothing other than an attempt to coerce
me into a deal with Cohen and an attempt to obstruct justice.
Blogonaut publicly noted that
he/Gianelli made an “educated guess” about the content of your email to me. I
find that absurd. Blogonaut noted that you contacted its Blog with respect to
my extremely public emails. Investigator William Frayeh, who will receive a
copy of this letter, said he would look into this situation. I will, of course,
copy in the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly
Sopko – the Treasury Department, Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg and
Dennis Riordan. Irrational hardly begins to describe the following comment
posted on Blogonaut’s Blog with respect to your email to me. It begins
shamelessly with “Uh.” That sets the tone. Blogonaut then publicly declares
that the Department of Justice is on my “spam list” although I don’t believe I
have spammed anyone – least of all the Department of Justice. I don’t know if I
received a “substantive communication” from you but the reason I was focused on
Blogonaut’s Blog is due to the fact that I thought you, the District Attorney
of Los Angeles, and possibly the Clarkson family or their lawyers, might
somehow be associated with and/or communicating with this Blog. Leonard Cohen’s
advisers were and Blogonaut has publicly noted that. Nothing about you, as Phil
Spector’s “prosecutor,” can be viewed as “simply nothing more than” anything.
You are communicating with a Blog that is dead set on maligning me – based
entirely on lies.
Why did Blogonaut have to point out, to you, that it would “endeavor” when it hit “reply all” (to my emails). Endeavor means “to attempt” or “to make an effort.” That makes absolutely no sense – whatsoever – in this context and Blogonaut/Gianelli, I might point out, is a lawyer and a liar. This is blatant legal maneuvering at its most shameless. There was no “educated guess” about your email to me.
You wrote Blogonaut [Stephen Gianelli] and I confirmed what you said in your email to me. This did not send me into a tizzy. It confirmed my worst suspicions. It did generate emails to “high places” – to quote Blogonaut/Gianelli in all his arrogant glory: the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others. It also prompted a phone call, by me, to Agent Wynar/Special Agent FBI who has apparently been asked – by Blogonaut/Gianelli – to investigate whether or not I am “spamming” the Treasury. In conclusion, I would like to point out something that I feel strongly about – that is not only frivolous, probably criminal, it is a waste of resources that the FBI could better spend on things like protecting our citizens from terrorism. I do not like phoning Agent Wynar, or the FBI inDenver
Why did Blogonaut have to point out, to you, that it would “endeavor” when it hit “reply all” (to my emails). Endeavor means “to attempt” or “to make an effort.” That makes absolutely no sense – whatsoever – in this context and Blogonaut/Gianelli, I might point out, is a lawyer and a liar. This is blatant legal maneuvering at its most shameless. There was no “educated guess” about your email to me.
You wrote Blogonaut [Stephen Gianelli] and I confirmed what you said in your email to me. This did not send me into a tizzy. It confirmed my worst suspicions. It did generate emails to “high places” – to quote Blogonaut/Gianelli in all his arrogant glory: the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, and others. It also prompted a phone call, by me, to Agent Wynar/Special Agent FBI who has apparently been asked – by Blogonaut/Gianelli – to investigate whether or not I am “spamming” the Treasury. In conclusion, I would like to point out something that I feel strongly about – that is not only frivolous, probably criminal, it is a waste of resources that the FBI could better spend on things like protecting our citizens from terrorism. I do not like phoning Agent Wynar, or the FBI in
Blogonaut said...
Uh, the reason that we knew that Alan Jackson's email to KL, that KL was
touting to the DOJ (and her usual spam list) as a substantive communication
from the Spector prosecutor was simply nothing more that a request to drop him
from the cc list--was that we received the same request from Mr. Jackson
yesterday, we pointed out that the only one that could do this was Lynch—but we
said that we would endeavor when we hit “reply-all” to one of Lynch's emails to
make sure he was not copied with our reply.
No, we cannot read minds; it was an educated guess—and a correct one at that—sending KL into a tizzy, and generating a half dozen emails to “high places” (cc to this blog).
No, we cannot read minds; it was an educated guess—and a correct one at that—sending KL into a tizzy, and generating a half dozen emails to “high places” (cc to this blog).
For the record, Phil Spector and I
had dinner and drinks after the Lana Clarkson incident and I asked him – point
blank – if he shot Clarkson. He told me that he did not. Rather, Clarkson was
apparently dancing around in his foyer singing “Da Doo Run Run” prior to
shooting herself. This “theory” is supported by forensic science and the expert
opinions of Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, Dr. Werner Spitz, and Dr. James
Pex. To assume that these men would conspire to lie and destroy their careers
is blatantly ridiculous. Furthermore, I know Mr. Spector, believe he is
absolutely innocent, and will continue to stand by him come hell or high water.
That is what friends do. They do not betray people, sell stories to the news
media, and fabricate or revise the past for their own suspect reasons and/or
motives.
I await your response to this
question: why are my emails documenting the destruction of my life spam and did
Pat Dixon personally authorize Blogonaut/Gianelli to publicly state that he
feared for his life when I quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke?”
Sincerely,
/s/ Kelley Lynch
Enclosures
Excerpt from citipages.com:
An Open Letter From Phil Spector To
A Good Friend.
Sunday July 26th
Sunday July 26th
Steven,
I had no voice the day I was
sentenced in court on May 30th 2009 due to throat papalomas I had removed
3-days earlier on the 27th.of May. It left me with no voice. I was indeed very
upset because when I was asked to address the court, I could not speak for I
had no voice. What I wanted to say follows: Be it known that I, Phillip Spector
had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the death of Lana Clarkson. And
irrefutable science and five of the greatest, most famous forensic scientists
all swore under oath that Ms. Clarkson died of a self inflicted gun shot wound,
a suicide. They swore by irrefutable science. And while juries and judges lie
and make mistakes, science and DNA do not. When their scientific findings and
words were ignored is a mystery to me, and hopefully will not be ignored by the
appellate court. And I shall return.
But let it also be known that there
IS a murderer in the court room and it is NOT Phil Spector, it is Alan Jackson.
During the trial he murdered the truth, ,he murdered the constitution, he
murdered the law, and he murdered my reputation, and he should not go
unpunished for his dastardly deeds. He used his five little “groupies” women,
one of whom recently overdosed and died from drugs, and could not be here to
testify to slander and lie about me, and victimize me so that he could get his
conviction without any scientific proof whatsoever. That’s because he had none.
He lied and cheated and double crossed that before along with his cohort Truc
Doe whenever they got to it, yes my friends, HE is the real murderer. But, what
goes around comes around. And the appellate court will see through his
chicanery and smoke and mirrors, and false law and overturn my conviction, and
then I will be back stronger than ever, a free man as I should be. Until then,
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
Steven, I would like this published
verbatim from the beginning of this letter to the end. And tell Chris Paven to
also put it on my website.
Thanks, Phillip
See also:
Bill Pavelic's allegations that he,
Dr. Henry Lee and Dr. Michael Baden were set up in the Phil Spector matter by
LAPD's Robbery-Homicide Unit in retaliation for the OJ trial. That's
frightening.
guiltyofincompetence.com/lapd-hunt-for-dr-henry-lee-dr-michael-baden-b-pavelic-t99.html
cyberterroristwatch.blogspot.com
And, of course, do look for Dr.
Henry Lee's email statement to the Los Angeles Times. He sets the record
straight about the absolutely insane bogus obstruction of justice nonsense.
Amazing that Robert Shapiro's employees are all over that story - particularly
as he accepted $1 million from Phil Spector and apparently did very little
work. I would like to know the State Bar's position on those legal fees.
Kelley Lynch
marko says:
THE ONLY SOUND FROM THE WALLS NOW
IS-"COUNT TIME"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let's here what "sound"
the Appellate Court makes. They've just determined that there's prosecutorial
and judicial misconduct in the Roman Polanski matter and we seem to have the
"usual suspects" involved in that matter as well. Perhaps they will
conclude, as they did with Polanski, that an investigation needs to happen.
Thats why I contacted the Department of Justice, Internal Revenue Service,
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Treasury Department, Immigration, Drug
Enforcement Agency, and others. People might want to pay attention to the fact
that intelligent people who hear what has gone on here are wondering if the
prosecutor has been arrested yet.
I hope this isn't the Denver FBI's
"boyfriend" Marko. I passed on Marko's message: Merry Christmas to
the Denver FBI. My colleague rightly concluded that this sounded like something
the Sopranos would say prior to riddling a car with bullets. In other words,
Marko sounded like a member of an "organized crime" family.
Unfortunately, that would be the Los Angeles District Attorney's office.
I've asked Phil Spector to join me
in a lawsuit against the Los Angeles District Attorney's office so I tend to
doubt we've heard the last from Mr. Spector. And, there is a "civil
suit." That should be fascinating.
Kelley Lynch
P.S. Merry Christmas Marko! I see
right through all of you.
P.S. I've asked the IRS to
investigate the $1 million retainer Robert Shapiro took from Phil Spector and
deposited into his personal account. See Phil Spector's complaint against
Robert Shapiro - who apparently gave the prosecution a year to set Phil Spector
up. This shocks the conscience. Maybe the Denver FBI's intimidated by Marko and
the thug crowd at Los Angeles District Attorney's office but we're not. Kelley
Lynch
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)