From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:40 PM
Subject: Stephen Gianelli
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
To the IRS and FBI,
Date: Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:40 PM
Subject: Stephen Gianelli
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
To the IRS and FBI,
I phoned Agent Tejeda to advise him that Stephen Gianelli has filed a fraudulent form 3949a form with respect to me. Clearly, it was retaliatory. I also advised Agent Tejeda that Investigator William Frayeh/DA's office thought Gianelli may have found a sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson about me. He's also aligned with Leonard Cohen. I read Agent Tejeda Gianelli's absolutely outrageous comments and explained the type of analysis Gianelli thinks the IRS will be doing. I don't owe the IRS taxes and explained to Agent Tejeda that Gianelli is now publicly addressing why Cohen doesn't have to provide me with a 1099 for the year 2004 which is a lie. I owe no taxes in that year either - I have huge losses. I also happen to have a huge theft loss with respect to my share of intellectual property of Cohen's (dating back to 1967) that is worth millions. And, I lost my greeting
card company in 2005.
I believe Gianelli should be charged, arrested, and prosecuted for his role here. I have been very clear about that fact.
All the best,
Kelley
NOTE: I asked Agent Tejeda how - according to Cohen's retaliatory lawsuit - he paid $500,000 in taxes on the $1 million income deposit on the TH deal Cohen personally received in 1999 when he did NOT pay that with TH assets so something is wrong. Why would Leonard Cohen accept $1 million in personal ordinary income and then pay his taxes from TH? The entire scenario demands an investigation. I also asked Agent Tejeda - what's the amount? The ever changing figure - $5 million, $7 million, Adam Cohen's house in my column, income from LCI but $0 K-1s, etc. I also explained that Gianelli/Blogonaut has no access to my tax information and therefore simply lied to the IRS. Agent Tejeda is already in receipt of this information. See the IRS binder. I wonder what Agent Tejeda thinks is going on with the illegal K-1s from LC Investments, LLC noting $0 income for 2004. Why did I receive a K-1 from LCI in 2005 when I quit working for Cohen in 2004?
- Blogonaut said...
- In response to all of this, Lynch is now going on (again) about how Cohen allegedly wronged her, how Cohen is allegedly guilty of tax fraud.
To which I reply:
If Ms. Lynch failed to report 100% of the $7M in money flowing into her personal checking and Stranger Management business checking account from 1998 to 2004 over and above her agreed compensation as reflected in the Prins Dec. + bank record exhibits I appended to an IRS Form 3049-A Information Referral and then transmitted to the IRS, Fresno, CA on October 24, 2012 via US mail (per IRS written instructions), she is going to be indicted for tax evasion.
Whether or not Leonard Cohen is a bad person, owes her millions, or also committed tax fraud, if any, is completely irrelevant to that simple equation.
If the income was deposited in her accounts and was not declared on her returns for each year in question, it is prima facie tax evasion. Perjury too if she filed a return omitting any of that income for any relevant tax year. Failure to file if no return was filed (as she admits was the case for 2004).
Whether or not the additional $7M was embezzled or well deserved compensation is irrelevant to that equation.
Lynch's theory that "Jihad Gianelli", Jackson, Cohen, Streeter, Blain, Sprocket, LAPD, the LA DA, Rice, Kory, Lindsey, Santa Monica PD, and many others are all conspiring and out to get her is irrelevant to that equation.
Lynch just does not get it.
We could care less whether Cohen is or is not prosecuted for tax fraud.
All we care about is that Kelley Lynch IS.March 16, 2013 at 12:57 PM