From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:43 PM
Subject:
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,
Gianelli is clearly a psycho. He has posted my email to the IRS Commissioner's Staff on his blog and has lied about me via form 3949a. I don't owe money to the IRS. In addition to that, the expense ledger is FRAUDULENT. Let me know if that's unclear. It's clear to everyone in reality. So is Cohen's tax fraud and pathetic lunatic who is obsessed with me.
Date: Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:43 PM
Subject:
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,
Gianelli is clearly a psycho. He has posted my email to the IRS Commissioner's Staff on his blog and has lied about me via form 3949a. I don't owe money to the IRS. In addition to that, the expense ledger is FRAUDULENT. Let me know if that's unclear. It's clear to everyone in reality. So is Cohen's tax fraud and pathetic lunatic who is obsessed with me.
He wants information about Streeter. He's commanding this information. The dangerously unstable lunatic thinks he's talking to me. How crazy is that?
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut said...- From: Kelley Lynch
Date: Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM
Subject: Fraudulent Expense Ledger
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field , ASKDOJ , "Kelly.Sopko" , "Doug.Davis" , Dennis
To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,
I also phoned Agent Tejeda/IRS to let him know that my agreement with Cohen was NOT 10% ever. See the W2s his accountants prepared. He had those accountants since he was a client of Marty Machat's. Our agreement - 15% dating back to 1988. We planned to do an accounting after the final deal closed. Cohen testified that he was examining it. In any event, that's additional fraud on the expense ledger.
All the best,
Kelley
+++
Ms. Lynch:
1. If you mean the Prins Declaration when you refer to "expense ledger" insofar as the 3949-A is concerned, it DOES NOT MATTER whether your deal with Cohen was 10% or 15%. All that matters from a tax fraud perspective is DID YOU DECLARE ALL OF THE DEPOSITS set forth in the Prins Dec. + attached account statements and copies of canclled checks or not? If not, that will result in tax evasion charges.I don't owe the IRS taxes AND the expense ledger is fraudulent in many ways. That matters. It's called perjury, etc. It was also transmitted to Agent Tejeda/IRS. I haven't evades taxes. Leonard Cohen has.
2. My 3949-A will not be processed or reviewed by Agent Tejeda. He cannot save you even if he wanted to.
3. It is cut and dried. Did you omit ANY of the $7M additional income. The nature of that income (agreed comission or otherwise) just does not matter.
Gianelli just fraudulently lies to the IRS. He has no evidenced to support this fraud because I don't owe any taxes.
4. If you want to test judgment, ask Agent Tejeda to phone you TODAY. He won't, not today, not ever.I've spoken to Agent Tejeda/IRS and so has one of my lawyers.March 20, 2013 at 3:48 PM - Comment deleted
- This comment has been removed by the author.March 20, 2013 at 4:21 PM
- Blogonaut said...
- KL writes to her attorney Francisco Suarez (yes, she shares her attorney-client communications with the universe):
"Streeter thinks an email to the FBI with a comment that it's ane (sic) example of the kind of insanity I'm dealing with here is a threat? No. She retaliated and I agree - it's criminal obstruction"
What retaliation, Ms. Lynch?
Specify exactly what Ms. Streeter did to you in retaliation?This man thinks he is talking to me and is commanding me around. As someone just wrote me, he's a psycho. My lawyer believes Streeter's actions compromised criminal obstruction of justice. I'll speak to my lawyer and NOT Gianelli who appears to be defending Sandra Jo Streeter. Her lies on the record. There's nothing she can do about that now.
In retaliation for what, exactly?
Obstruction of what?
What exactly did Ms. Streeter "obstruct".
I'll tell you what, none of the above.
This is just drama you have made up out of thin air.This is one of my lawyer's thoughts on her conduct.
If you violate a protective order you will be prosecuted and sentenced to jail.
If you send inappropriate communications to your prosecutor after you get out of jail, someone with a uniform may look into that.I personally called Detective Viramontes, discussed this with him, he advised me he would ask Streeter if the FBI threatens her (they're copied in on my emails), and asked him if he thinks she has serious psychiatric problems.
None of that is "retaliation".
You bend the bounds of lawful and appropriate behavior until it breaks and then when you elicit a logical response you scream that you are being "targeted" or "retaliated against" or that your victim is "obstructing justice" or "witness tampering".I was targeted by Streeter and as my lawyers have stated - so was the IRS. There's no IRS holding re. the default judgment. Streeter just lied at a sidebar.
It is all histrionic nonsense.March 20, 2013 at 4:23 PM
