I was not served the complaint in Leonard Cohen’s retaliatory lawsuit. The proof of service is perjured. I had no female co-occupant named Jane Doe. I was not served or notified of the default judgment. I was homeless in Santa Monica and Cohen was well aware of this. He addresses this in his perjured declaration in the Boulder matter. He was carefully monitoring me which is really quite sickening. In fact, a man named Peter/Jacob Falconey came to my former home in Brentwood, advised me he was an FBI agent who worked with the Salvation Army, and I later heard that he was sent by Betsy Superfon to figure out what the IRS was doing re. Cohen and what was going on with respect to Phil Spector and Bruce Cutler. The man followed me in Santa Monica and monitored me there. I filed a report with SMPD about one incident. This man told me that Rutger’s life was the battlefield and Cohen emailed me - violating the restraining order - stating that he saw Rutger copied in on the emails. When I talk tax fraud, Cohen targets my children or elderly parents.
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
PD: So you know that a default judgment means that Ms. Lynch didn’t actually participate in that litigation, correct?:
Cohen: Yes, that’s what it means.
PD: And that means that Ms. Lynch didn’t give her version of what happened to the court, correct?
Cohen: She neglected to give her version.
PD: I’m not asking if she -- I’m asking if she actually did give her version.
Cohen: A default judgment implies that -- that only one version is given.
PD: And so that version was yours, correct? RT 297
Cohen: That version was upheld by the court, yes, sir.
PD: I’m not asking about the court. I’m asking if that version was yours.
Cohen: It was mine on the basis of a forensic accounting.
PD: But it was your version, correct?
Cohen: Yes, Sir.
PD: And that judgment was made in her absence, correct?
Cohen: Correct. RT 298
Kelley Lynch Direct:
Public Defender: Now, we also heard evidence about a default judgment in 2005. Are you familiar with that?
Lynch: Yes, I am.
PD: Now, did you ever receive any summons regarding that lawsuit?
Lynch: I was never served with a lawsuit. RT 468
PD: Did you ever get the complain in that case?
Lynch: No. I read the complaint when it was put online in April 2010 and I was astounded at the allegations. RT 469
stephengianelli
Kelley Lynch Cross:
Streeter: And so the last address that anybody knows that you had in Los Angeles around that time was on Mandeville Road, correct?
Lynch: Apart from my email address, yes, which everyone has.
Streeter: You did live on Mandeville Road?
Lynch: The last address people would have had in LA would be 1614 Ocean in Santa Monica …
Streeter: But prior to that, that other address that you had was on Mandeville Road, right?
Lynch: Until I lost my house in 2005, yes.
Streeter: Now, as far as the timing of when you lost your house, right now, as it stands, the only signal we have that is for you, right, Ms. Lynch?
Lynch: I don’t understand the question at all.
Streeter: Well, the information about when you did and did not lose your house, the only person that’s testified to that right now, as it stands right now, Ms. Lynch is you?
Lynch: Are you asking me -- are you telling me I’m the only person that testified that I lost my house?
Court: You don’t have to answer it. RT 485
Streeter: And look at the proof of service.
Lynch: Right RT 487
Streeter: And on the proof of service, which is about the fourth page, it lists as the address --
Lynch: 2648 Mandeville Canyon Road, and I told you I don’t know if I filed a forwarding address. RT 487.
Kelley Lynch Redirect:
Public Defender: Ms. Streeter also mentioned this judgment that she showed you during her cross-examination … Did you ever get this on or about May 15, 2006?
Lynch: I couldn’t have. I was homeless. RT 525
PD: Anywhere on this paper that she gave you that stated that you actually received this document?
Lynch: No, there’s not. RT 525
