Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email To Leonard Cohen's Lawyer Confirming That Motion & Request For Judicial Notice Were Filed & Attached


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:45 PM
Subject: Case No. BC338322 - Motion for Terminating Sanctions & Request for Judicial Notice
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "Perusse, Bernie (Montreal Gazette)" <bperusse@thegazette.canwest.com>
Cc: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>


Jeffrey,

Pursuant to your suggestion of the other day, I enclose herewith the Motion for Terminating Sanctions, Motion Exhibits, three exhibits related to my declaration, Proposed Order, and Request for Judicial Notice.  

Paulette Brandt will send you a separate email confirming your receipt of these documents.  She is listed on the proof of service.  

I have not attached most exhibits referred to in my declaration and will begin scanning them now.  I will also scan the conformed cover sheet for both the motion and request for judicial notice as well as signature pages for all documents.  Additionally, Paulette Brandt's declaration has a handwritten final paragraph which she approved as she was with me at Los Angeles Superior Court.  These exhibits should be fully scanned later tonight.

I have enclosed, for your reference an exhibit index (which I placed behind the notice of motion/memorandum, Volume Covers (a total of four volumes were filed with the Court but we removed the first cover and simply left the Notice of Motion per the Court's instructions).  All declarations were properly signed this time.

The hearing is scheduled for June 23, 2015.  I have brought Gianelli and Walsh's ongoing harassment to the attention of Judge Hess.  That would include with respect to my witnesses.  Paulette Brandt is a witness and has provided me with numerous declarations.

Until Judge Hess rules in this matter, I will continue to address all legal issues that Gianelli writes me about with you, the attorney of record in this case, as he has not entered a formal notice of appearance in this case.  It does seem as though he is moonlighting but that doesn't explain Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh.  I have also addressed these harassing emails (and witness intimidation/tampering) in the Proposed Order.

Finally, I included the documents you filed with Judge Hess without requesting judicial notice in my Request for Judicial Notice.

If you have a copy of a formal agreement with me (and any Cohen representative) relating to service by email (for which there are more formal rules when an individual is pro per), please email that to me.  I agreed to no such request and no such request was made.  Finally, I am appalled that your co-counsel, Michelle Rice, would provide the District Court in Colorado with incorrect contact information for me.  She doesn't know me; does not represent me; had no authority to provide the court with any information; and I did not enter an appearance due to concerns about an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and obstruct justice.  I brought these concerns to the attention of Judge Lewis Babcock.  These tactics are unconscionable.

I noticed, while at Court, that you flied something on January 28, 2014.  I was not served that document and was not here at the time.  


Kelley Lynch

Kelley Lynch's Email To Leonard Cohen's Lawyer Re. Motion


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:30 AM
Subject: Fwd: No hearing date, no "motion", no "federal lawsuit" - not now, not ever.
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org


Jeffrey,

You may phone Brenda in Judge Hess' department and confirm the hearing date scheduled for June 23, 2015.  Paulette has had car troubles and just picked her car up last night.  We will file this motion today, drop a copy off for Agent Tejeda (as I've advised Judge Hess in the document), and serve you.  I have also asked Judge Hess to order you to advise Gianelli and Walsh to cease and desist harassing me over this case and Leonard Cohen matters.  We shall see what unfolds.  I didn't argue against the "drunken slut" accusations because that matter is not before Judge Hess.  Paulette Brandt is also being slandered and she, Investigator Frayeh, and "Swanigan" were copied on this email.  It's actually irrelevant what Hess does.  I want to see how much fraud and perjury is acceptable before LA Superior Court before filing a federal lawsuit.  The federal tax matters have not been adjudicated.  I've also asked Hess to clarify the judgment and explain how it subverts IRS reporting and filing requirements.  Also, whether it is retroactive and, if so, to what date.

If Cohen wants to argue that the tax returns filed are fraudulent, I find that rather mind boggling.  Westin worked for him and I had nothing whatsoever to do with tax matters, accounting, corporate matters, legal documents, loan documents, etc.  See the February 2002 email thread between me, Cohen, and Westin.  Transaction fees were not at issue at that time.  Cohen had authorized them, and signed the authorization himself, immediately following the close of the deal.  Does Leonard Cohen think he's entitled to an extinguished annuity obligation, loans totaling approximately $6.7 million, and another $4.7 million in payments?  That's not the agreement, Jeffrey.  I am aware that Cohen has benefited from his wrongdoing.  

If there are any more shenanigans, I will file another motion, ask for a hearing, and have Hess order that all communications are handled through the Court.  There's no lawsuit here, Jeffrey.  Just tactics.  That would include the outrageous situation whereby Rice gave the wrong information to the District Court in Colorado about me.  She had no authority to do so and I didn't enter an appearance.  I advised Judge Babcock that I viewed the lawsuit as an attempt to obstruct justice and cover up criminal tax fraud.  I've asked Hess to remove Rice from this case as she is conflicted and now serves as a lawyer and paid witness.  You can read the documents later tonight.



Kelley Lynch



---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:37 AM
Subject: No hearing date, no "motion", no "federal lawsuit" - not now, not ever.
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: PAULETTEBRANDT8@gmail.com, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov

Ms. Lynch,

You even lied about reserving a date for the “motion”. Nothing is currently calendared for the 23rd or any other date in BC338322. Obviously, you would rather email and blog about your “motions” and “federal lawsuit” than actually file something that would then be ADJUDICATED at some point, resulting in yet another LOSS.  

For the record, this is what you have been doing for ten years, and therefore exactly what I expected.

Monday, March 16, 2015

Kelley's Email To IRS Re. Moonlighting Stalker's Comments About The Information Provided To The District Court In Colorado, Etc.


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:40 PM
Subject: Fwd:
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org


Hi IRS,

Reviewing Michelle Rice's January 4, 2014 declaration (attached to Cohen's January 2014 Opposition doc - declarations were replete with perjured statements).  It appears that Rice, who has made partner targeting and lying about me, informed the Court that I was pro per and advised them to send my mail to Phil Spector.  Rice wanted a California address and I was clear that I resided in Colorado and no longer had a California address.  Phil Spector no longer used that P.O.Box and the Court appears (based on the documents I've downloaded from PACER) to have continued to send my mail to my former Brentwood address.  Who is Rice to advise a court anything about me?  I do not know this woman.  I advised the Colorado Court NOTHING having to do with my self-representation, address, or my email account (that was targeted by Gianelli and Blaine, I might note).  I spoke to Judge Babcock personally.  I advised him that, due to my concerns about obstruction of justice and an attempt to cover up Cohen's criminal tax fraud, I would not participate in this lawsuit.  Furthermore, Boies Schiller was convinced Cohen's position as alter ego would help prove that he personally engaged in criminal tax fraud.

Phil Spector's wife is none of Gianelli's business.  Neither are my contacts with Phil Spector.  Gianelli is clearly moonlighting for Spector's prosecution, aligned with Blaine and others, and assisting with Cohen's defense although he has not entered a formal entry of appearance.  He also engages in criminal witness tampering, witness intimidation, slanders me, offers legal opinions, and is on someone's payroll.

He's obsessed with me, my family and friends, and blog.  All matters he raises relate to Cohen, IRS, and Phil Spector.  Gianelli's not making any points to me so I'm missing no point - including the criminal tactics used against me.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:05 AM
Subject:
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

As usual you miss the point.

First, it makes absolutely no sense that an attorney for another party would – out of the blue – inform the Colorado district court in the Agile litigation that your mailing address was C/O Phil Spector at his Pasadena office address. And the court would not list you as pro se – at that address – unless you so notified the court.

But more to the point is the fact that your “dear friend” Phil Spector simply sent all of your mail back to the sender as “undeliverable”.

Setting aside the fact that you don’t even have his wife’s contact information, and have not even tried to visit Spector in the last six years of his incarceration.

Kelley Lynch's Email To CIA, NSA & FSB Re. The Moonlighting Stalker/Amateur Agent Provocateur


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:29 AM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch's email to the FBI and Dept of Justice dated Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org


CIA, NSA, and FSB,

The amateur agent provocateur/infiltrator is obsessed with my blog and continues to write me on Truth Sentinel.  

Cohen's lawyer evidently gave the Colorado Court Phil Spector's address.  She knew I didn't live in California and it is merely
evidence of further abusive litigation tactics.  

Gary Spector has aligned himself (and I've studied the online cyber-campaign) with Michelle Blaine and Gianelli.  It is truly appalling.  Phil Spector has a wonderful relationship with Nicole who testified on his behalf.  These three men appear to be opportunists.  Their conduct is unconscionable.  I didn't impute financial motive.  I said Gary Spector, having trashed his father online, probably thinks he should be in Phillip's Last Will and Testament.  I've noticed that Gary Spector and his brothers are relatively obsessed with Rachelle Spector who has been demonized using the same 3rd grade girl "drunken slut' argument.

I don't need to create an impression that I am close with Phil Spector.  He is one of my dearest friends.  Paulette is extremely close with Phil Spector.  However, Gianelli (who may be moonlighting for Cooley and Alan Jackson while aligned with Cohen) doesn't know us so it's none of his business.

This man's obsession with me and my family is obscene.  

I wouldn't attend Phil Spector's railroading if you paid me.  Paulette did and was extremely upset and felt the judge had pre-determined that Phillip was guilty.  PS introduced her, and they had lunch, as one of the most important people in his life.

Gianelli was on Pacer again.  Maybe he received a bonus.  This man is a criminal who belongs in prison.  I can assure you that he's talking to himself.  I don't care if he copies GOD in on his emails trashing me.  

All the best,
Kelley

P.S.  I don't need Phillip to file a federal lawsuit.  They have fee waivers.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:18 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch's email to the FBI and Dept of Justice dated Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: blind <distribution@gmail.com>
Ms. Lynch,

I have no idea what Gary Spector’s relationship was or is with Phillip Spector, but whatever that relationship is Gary Spector is Phillip Spector’s son, which trumps your attenuated relationship with Mr. Spector as a former employee hands down.

Moreover, to my previous observations (that you did not attend a single day of either of Mr. Spector’s two trials to show support, even though you were not working at the time, and have not been to see your alleged “dear friend” him once in the six years that he has been behind bars) I would add the following:

The district court docket in the Agile litigation reflects that you gave your address as:

“C/o Phil Spector
Phil Spector International
686 South Arroyo Parkway
Penthouse Suite
Pasadena, CA 91105”

THE MOONLIGHTING STALKER HAS LIED.  THE COURT ACTUALLY SENT MY MAIL TO MY FORMER HOME IN BRENTWOOD.  I HAVE THE EVIDENCE CONFIRMING THIS.  COHEN'S LAWYER PROVIDED THE COURT WITH SPECTOR'S ADDRESS KNOWING I DIDN'T LIVE IN CALIFORNIA.  AN OBVIOUS TACTIC.  SPECTOR NO LONGER USED THIS P.O. BOX BUT GIANELLI WILL LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING.

But the record also reflects that every time the court sent you a notice to that address, Phillip Spector REFUSED TO ACCEPT DELIVERY on your behalf. See the following docket entries:

à08/28/2006
119 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 116 Receipt Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp2, ) (Entered: 08/29/2006)
09/08/2006
120 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 118 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp2, ) (Entered: 09/08/2006)
11/17/2006
128 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 126 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 11/17/2006)
11/27/2006
130 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 129 Order, Addressed to Kelly Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 11/27/2006)
12/18/2006
138 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 131 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 12/19/2006)
01/04/2007
141 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 137 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 01/04/2007)
01/23/2007
143 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 140 Order on Motion for Leave Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (rlp, ) (Entered: 01/23/2007)
02/06/2007
145 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 144 ORDER Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (dln, ) (Entered: 02/06/2007)
05/22/2007
156 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 151 Order, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (mrs, ) (Entered: 05/22/2007)
05/25/2007
157 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 154 Order, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (gms, ) (Entered: 05/25/2007)
05/29/2007
158 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 155 Order on Motion to Stay Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (gms, ) (Entered: 05/29/2007)
06/21/2007
166 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 165 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (mrs, ) (Entered: 06/21/2007)
07/02/2007
171 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 168 Order Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (mrs, ) (Entered: 07/02/2007)
04/02/2008
183 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 182 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 04/02/2008)
05/21/2008
198 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 193 Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
06/06/2008
206 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 200 Order, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 06/06/2008)
06/09/2008
207 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 179 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (pap, ) (Entered: 06/09/2008)
06/09/2008
208 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 189 Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (pap, ) (Entered: 06/09/2008)
06/09/2008
209 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 177 Order on Motion for Order, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (pap, ) (Entered: 06/09/2008)
06/21/2008
211 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 204 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 06/23/2008)
à07/01/2008
212 
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 205 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Addressed to Kelley Lynch. (sah, ) (Entered: 07/01/2008)

See Greenberg & Associates, Inc. et al v. Cohen et al, Civil Docket for #: 1:05-cv-01233-LTB, available on-line through PACER.

Clearly, you have always wanted to convey the impression that you were close to Phillip Spector, but – obviously, your behavior (including your failure to attend his trial or visit him in jail) and in this instance his behavior in returning your mail as undeliverable, tells a far different story.

Moreover, you have a lot of nerve imputing a financial motive to Phillip Spector’s son Gary, in view of your attempts to sell the idea of Phil Spector on essentially funding your desired lawsuit against the City of Los Angles and Leonard Cohen by among other things Spector loaning you his “legal team”.  Moreover, Gary Spector has not exactly been sucking up to his father as one would expect a son seeking to protect his expectation of an inheritance would – unlike you, who panders to Phil Spector at every opportunity. Which opportunities are limited, because Spector will never see you, and you don’t even have his wife’s email address – because if you did you would not need to pester Spector’s appellate counsel with your incessant personal emails. Not that she would let you anywhere near her husband now or ever.

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email To FBI Re. Gary Spector Who The Moonlighting Stalker Copied In On A Harassing Email Lying To FBI, Etc.



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM
Subject: Re:
To: gpspector@comcast.net, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org


FBI,

I've been clear with Gary Spector.  I don't want to see or hear from these criminals.  Evidently lying to federal agencies is now a game.  People can be arrested for that, right?  


Kelley

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Mr. Riordan,


I've studied the internet.  I know what's going on.  I see Gianelli and Blaine's M.O.  Escobar's also.  Evidently you have to be a moron to be against Phil Spector.  That's a constant theme.  I want Gary Spector to understand that I don't want to see his email address.  I think what he and his brothers have done to Phil Spector is a disgrace.  They never called him when I worked for him.  Paulette said they were not close with him at all.  Suddenly, they are opportunists.  I'll bet they want to be in Phillip's Will.  Where there's a Will there's a relative.  This is the sleaziest situation I have ever seen.  Decent people do not believe this unconscionable situation.


Kelley

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Gary Spector,

I want to be clear about something.  I don't want to be copied in on emails with you.  I've seen you online.  I know you're aligned with Gianelli, Blaine, etc.  It's revolting.  Your father didn't have to shoot a prostitute for sex.  He doesn't behave like that anyway.  Paulette Brandt and I know and so does Janis even if you cannot stand her.  

I've also seen your brother's comments on Escobar's site.  Let me assure you that everyone is [NOT] an idiot.  Gianelli is a criminal. 

Leonard Cohen committed criminal tax fraud.  If you have any questions, contact Agent Luis Tejeda, head of fraud/IRS Los Angeles.  I see Gianelli's playing games with IRS, FBI, DOJ, etc.  I think they should arrest him and many people.  That includes Steve Cooley.  I'm not impressed with corrupt District Attorney's.  They're a dime a dozen.


Kelley Lynch

Kelley Lynch's Email To FBI Re. Lana Clarkson, Baby Doll Gibson & The Railroading Of Phil Spector


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 2:57 PM
Subject: 
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org


Hello FBI,

The Moonlighting Stalker appears desperate.  

I think FBI should review any potential video footage of Lana Clarkson in a training video dancing around with a gun in her mouth.  That would probably have Cooley, Jackson, et al. gravely concerned,  FBI is not prohibited from talking to Baby Doll Gibson either.  That was just Judge Larry Fidler's bizarre ruling where he demanded that Phil Spector take the stand if Gibson testified.  That is a disturbing issue.

All the best,
Kelley

PHIL SPECTOR RESOLVES EMBEZZLEMENT CASE AGAINST MICHELLE BLAINE

 by Jason Gregory

PHIL SPECTOR RESOLVES EMBEZZLEMENT CASE

He’s awarded a huge settlement…

US music producer Phil Spector has settled an embezzlement claim which will see him rewarded $900,000 in damages.
The producer is currently on trial in the US on suspicion of murdering b-movie star, Lana Clarkson, in 2003.
Spector said that his former assistant Michelle Blaine had removed $425,000 from his pension and had failed to repay a $635,000 loan.
Ms Blaine had claimed that the pension funds were going towards a film to help boost the 66 year old producer’s image, and that the loan was a gift. She has also dropped a counter-claim of sexual harassment as part of the deal.
Spector has famously worked with artists including The Beatles and Cher.
http://www.yasni.info/ext.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gigwise.com%2Freviews%2F27617%2Fphil-spector-resolves-embezzlement-case&name=Michelle+Blaine&showads=1&lc=en-gb&lg=en&rg=gb&rip=us