Leonard Cohen Appears To Think Sexual Harassment Is An Intimate Experience

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: Appeal - Oral Arguments
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

To the IRS and FBI,

You will find a witness who says Cohen and I were in a dating relationship when hell freezes over.  He was in NYC - when he says we had a relationship - approximately once or twice and throwing me up against the wall at the Royalton, shoving your tongue down my throat and hand down my pants, is NOT intimate.  The next day, he came to Marty''s office and apologized so I didn't give it a second thought.

All the best,
Kelley

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Francisco,

There are a number of issues in the Respondent's Brief that I believe should be addressed in oral arguments.

Dating relationship.  Respondent's Brief states - page 1:

According to Cohen, but disputed by appellant, they also had a brief intimate relationship.  (RT 49,320)

In the sentencing documents, prosecutor Streeter (page 2-3_ writes:  In addition, "victim"would be described pursuant to Family Code 6211(c) as someone "with whom the defendant is having or had had a dating or engagement relationship."  Penal Code 1203.097 is applicable for sentencing purposes. 

Therefore, the City Attorney absolutely took the position that Cohen and I had a dating relationship.  The testimony regarding this  matter is perjured and Cohen acknowledged changing his story while testifying - regardless of his pathetic excuse.  He testified honestly at the March 23rd hearing - we had a purely business relationship although we did have a friendship.  This is a very relevant point as Cohen registered the civil harassment order (Boulder) that I requested as a domestic violence order in California on May 25, 2011.

I'll make other notes and send you one document re. relevant issues later today. 

All the best,
Kelley

Leonard Cohen & The City Attorney Of Los Angeles' Absurd Lie About Cohen & My Being In A Dating Relationship - More Perjury

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:31 AM
Subject: Appeal - Oral Arguments
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

Francisco,

There are a number of issues in the Respondent's Brief that I believe should be addressed in oral arguments.

Dating relationship.  Respondent's Brief states - page 1:

According to Cohen, but disputed by appellant, they also had a brief intimate relationship.  (RT 49,320)

In the sentencing documents, prosecutor Streeter (page 2-3_ writes:  In addition, "victim"would be described pursuant to Family Code 6211(c) as someone "with whom the defendant is having or had had a dating or engagement relationship."  Penal Code 1203.097 is applicable for sentencing purposes. 

Therefore, the City Attorney absolutely took the position that Cohen and I had a dating relationship.  The testimony regarding this  matter is perjured and Cohen acknowledged changing his story while testifying - regardless of his pathetic excuse.  He testified honestly at the March 23rd hearing - we had a purely business relationship although we did have a friendship.  This is a very relevant point as Cohen registered the civil harassment order (Boulder) that I requested as a domestic violence order in California on May 25, 2011.

I'll make other notes and send you one document re. relevant issues later today. 

All the best,
Kelley

Unfortunately For The Liars With Motive - I Had No Opportunity To Read & Review The Contents Of The IRS Binder & This Matter Will Go To The U.S. Supreme Court - As Well As Others - If Necessary

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM
Subject:
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>

To the FBI,

Unfortunately, I didn't have an opportunity to review the newly discovered evidence because the bailiff refused to let me take papers out of the courtroom, no one visited me in jail, and my lawyers never discussed the evidence with me.  I didn't have a chance to review any of it until my release when I requested my file. 

All the best,
Kelley

“Newly discovered evidence” is strictly defined by Penal Code section 119a (6). If you discovered the IRS binder (as you claim) DURING the trial, it is not – by statutory definition – new evidence. It is cut and dried; there is no grey area.

Kelley's Email To The FBI Re. Gianelli - Who Is Now Impersonating A Dog - And The Ongoing Criminal Harassment

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:57 PM
Subject: Fwd: "Newly discovered evidence" is defined by statute to exclude that which you admit discovering during trial
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>

Good Evening Washington FBI,

A man who views himself as a DOG continues to criminally harass me.  I did have a long conversation with the Oakland FBI about Stephen Gianelli.  This man is totally out of control, as I explained to the Duty Agent who was going to speak to Agent Wynar,  Gianelli is amused.  This is a game.  He is a dangerously unstable and sick individual.  This activity definitely appears to be coordinated and it is shocking that the prosecutor would permit a man criminally harassing me to continue to copy her in on so many emails but, perhaps, par for the course.  I have invited NO ONE to criminally harass me over my Blog and comments have been disabled due to the insane people who targeted me on Phawker and elsewhere on the internet. 

Why is a man writing to me as a DOG about newly discovered evidence.  I am represented by an attorney and Gianelli knows this because he relentlessly contacted attorney who refused to communicate with him.  We have discussed Gianelli's activity numerous times.  Of course the evidence in the IRS binder was newly discovered during trial.  I have no access to Cohen's persronal information regarding the IRS - AFTER we parted ways due to the fact that I refused to meet with  him and his lawyers, hand over the corporate books and records, unravel their handiwork, and he understood I was going to the IRS.   The judge intentionally suppressed Agent Tejeda/IRS, permitted in an unconscionable amount of irrelevant and immaterial evidence and testimony, and it is a very disturbing situation. 

In any event, Gianelli continues to criminally harass me and NO it is not a free country and you cannot simply criminally harass someone who has advised you to CEASE AND DESIST countless times.  My sister's lawyer advised him to CEASE AND DESIST and he also refused.  The man is unstoppable and completely out of control.  Who would want an out of control madman with probable motive targeting them, their family, and so many people in their life.  He's quite confident.  Emboldened.  He's aligned with Leonard Cohen and may have found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson, per Investigator Frayeh who told me he would investigate the matter and then hand delivered my letter to Alan Jackson (a great deal of which set forth issues re. Gianelli), Steve Cooley, and Truc Do.  What a nasty group of stark raving lunatics.  You would literally have to visit hell to ordinarily run into maniacs like this and that is most definitely my personal opinion.  I have never seen people like this. 

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:24 PM
Subject: "Newly discovered evidence" is defined by statute to exclude that which you admit discovering during trial
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

“Newly discovered evidence” is strictly defined by Penal Code section 119a (6). If you discovered the IRS binder (as you claim) DURING the trial, it is not – by statutory definition – new evidence. It is cut and dried; there is no grey area.

What is the Dogster's interest in all of this?

If you put your legal affairs on the internet for all to see/read, you invite comment.

NOTE:  LA Superior Court put my legal affairs on the internet.  

And it’s a free country; we (unlike you) are not fettered by a protective order of any kind, and therefore free to write whom we wish.

--The Dogster

Kelley Attorney Notes Re. Leonard Cohen's Stalinesque Show Trial, The IRS, Tax Fraud, The Role Of His Lawyers, The City Attorney, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM
Subject: Robert Kory - Possibility Of Being Implicated In Criminal Activity
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

To the IRS and FBI,

Here is what it says in my attorney notes re. Kory and his being implicated in criminal activity.

By destroying Ms. Lynch's credibility, you prevent her from serving as a credible witness regarding Mr. Cohen's affairs.

By destroying her credibility, you also sought to prevent her from being a credible witness against you for soliciting her participation in this conspiracy  to defraud Mr. Greenberg and Mr. Westin and their respective insurance companies.

Possibility you would be implicated in criminal conduct if any of Ms. Lynch's allegations against Mr. Cohen were true.

Possible you would be subjected to civil liability as well.

I have one point to make now - WHAT was the City Attorney doing here?

All the best,
Kelley

Stephen Gianelli - Aligned With Leonard Cohen, Defending Prosecutor Streeter & Alan Jackson, Criminally Harassing Me With The City Attorney Copied In - Is Focused On The IRS Binder Now

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:01 PM
Subject: Fwd: NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE, by definition, is evidence discovered AFTER the trial is over
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

Hello FBI,

I did have a relatively long discussion with the Oakland FBI last Friday about the ongoing criminal harassment with respect to me, people in my lives (including my family), and Stephen Gianelli.  He has been relentlessly advised to cease and desist and the fact that he copied prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter in on many emails criminally harassing me is shocking. 

Gianelli continues to write me about IRS matters which includes the IRS binder.  The binder was not known to the defense before the trial although Streeter evidently met with Kory two weeks prior to handing over the binder.  The evidence was newly discovered.  The information was concealed, from my perspective, and we acted in a timely manner.  Streeter handed the PD the binder on April 9th and we immediately issued a subpoena to Agent Tejeda/IRS.  Kory had to insist that he was a witness.  That is absurd.  Does he run the City Attorney's office.  Well, it does make one wonder about Hollywood celebrities, their lawyers, and the relationship with the City Attorney's office.  I guess they run them.  Why does this interest Gianelli?  He's not involved in the case.  Simply aligned with Leonard Cohen and may have found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson, per Investigator Frayeh who seemed to view him as a SHADY CHARACTER.  Perhaps the Duty Agent at the FBI I spoke with wants a shady character targeting him, his children, elderly parents, etc. but I do NOT.  It is an outrage and the man should be arrested. 

This man thinks he's talking to me?  There's no proof of service attached to he California order.  My lawyer's clear as are many many people in reality.  I wasn't served or notified and discussed this with LAPD's TMU the other day.  They asked about any letter or email notification.  None exists.  There was no evidentiary hearing and I didn't wave one.  The judge told me she would be distressed if she were me.  Meanwhile, Cohen's lawyers lied about Judge Enichen and Judge Babcock on the witness stand.  I guess the judges are used to it.  Enichen didn't hold Cohen liable for his perjury.  Neither did Vanderet.  And there was a confession in his courtroom.  Pathetic.

Gianelli needs to be arrested.  PERIOD.  The City Attorney, as the investigator in the article I forwarded you said, needs to be investigated. 

All the best,
Kelley

NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE. That evidence which, after diligent search for it, was not discovered until after the trial of a cause.

 

There can be NO diligent search for Leonard Cohen's refund.  The IRS does NOT divulge other people's personal tax information.  

 

The “IRS” binder was known to the defense before or during the trial.

 The IRS binder was NOT known to the defense before trial but it was probably known by the prosecutor when she met with Kory two weeks before handing it to my lawyers on April 9, 2012.  

Therefore, by definition, it is not “new evidence”.

There's new evidence even if the judge wants to lie about it.  And it involves perjury on the part of prosecution witnesses, false statements by the prosecutor, lies about the IRS refund and an IRS holding, etc.  

Second, as far as a "proof of service" not being appended to the 2008 Colorado Order, there is something far better: A written acknowledgment of receipt, signed by you in open court at the hearing where the order was issued.

No proof of service was attached to the new California order which was wrongfully registered as a domestic violence order.  

 

Third, as far as your "right" to an evidentiary hearing, you asked the Court on the record to stop the hearing and to simply issue the permanent injunction, which was done - but only after the judge repeatedly admonished you on the record of the consequences of same, including that if you ever violated the order you could receive up to 18 months in jail. For each violation.

These people can't stop lying about Judge Enichen.  In any event, I didn't waive an evidentiary hearing and there wasn't one. 

The IRS Binder, Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Judge Rorbert Vanderet, The City Attorney, Prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter, & More LA Insanity

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM
Subject: IRS Binder
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,

I am looking through my attorney client notes which you really should review.  With respect to the binder, these are the notes:

Robert Kory provided this binder on 4/19/12 to Ms. Streeter and apparently insisted that he needed to testify.  The notes also indicate that Robert Kory has engaged in criminal conduct and could be prosecuted for that as well.  The key question in these notes is this - Kory is attorney.  He understands what discovery is but failed to provide it earlier and choose to turn it over in the middle of the trial.  It contains letters Kory wrote to the IRS proving absolutely nothing.  In any event, I have no evidence proving that Streeter didn't receive or become aware of the IRS binder when she met with Kory.  That sounds highly unlikely.  This case now reminds me of Taylor v. Illinois with the prosecution engaging in concealment of evidence and a witness that the judge felt ultimately disqualified Agent Tejeda/IRS as a a witness.  Maybe their alleged budget woes cause them to conduct themselves in unconscionable ways - wasting taxpayer dollars, eliciting perjured testimony, concealing exculpatory evidence, and other absolutely psychotic tactics since I'm sitting here with the email Streeter continues to conceal with respect to Phil Spector and another version of Leonard Cohen's highly embellished gun story. 

All the best,

Kelley