Public Interest, Public Figures, First Amendment, and some celebrity gossip - because, why not?
Showing posts with label MK Ultra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MK Ultra. Show all posts
Friday, May 23, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: The Leonard Cohen Files — Shell Companies, Tax Schemes, MK Ultra Mind Control, a Mata Hari Seductress Fiction, and the Whistleblower Who Knew Too Much
They called him the prophet of longing. A monk-poet in a fedora who murmured eternal truths over flamenco guitar. But behind Leonard Cohen’s mythic persona lies a web of shell corporations, weaponized legal filings and courts, perjured and fraudulent documents, a forged trust, and a whistleblower war that’s about to erupt on the federal stage.
At the center of the unraveling? Kelley Lynch — not just Cohen’s longtime personal manager, but a business partner and co-owner of multiple entities that comprised the Cohen financial empire now being weaponized against her. And the only person who has the documentation to blow it all up.
Grand Illusions Investigations has reviewed Lynch’s Addendum to Declaration: Evidentiary Presentation of Fraud, Perjury & Misrepresentations, a damning exposé submitted to the IRS, DOJ, and FBI, and set to be filed in U.S. District Court. We’ve also reviewed hundreds of pages of legal filings, whistleblower communications, federal tax disclosures, probate documents, and sworn declarations submitted across multiple jurisdictions.
What it reveals isn’t theory. It’s a meticulously documented blueprint for a multimillion-dollar tax fraud and judicial obstruction scheme—built on celebrity fan fiction, falsified court records, and a devastating abuse of federal processes.
The Myth of the Monk: To the public, Cohen was a figure of saintly detachment. But the tax architecture surrounding his fortune told another story: Cohen orchestrated a lattice of entities—Traditional Holdings, LLC, Blue Mist Touring Co., Inc., Old Ideas, LLC, and Old Ideas Legacy, LLC. These vehicles held publishing income, touring revenue, literary rights, and licensing deals. Internal documents, including correspondence between Cohen and his legal and tax advisors, confirm these entities were structured with the intent to defer taxes and obscure true ownership. The entities were treated like shell corporations, the IP assets bounced around like a game of three card monte, and fraudulent tax returns were filed—or not filed at all in the case of BMT and TH, which have no federal filings from 2004 to the present.
Cohen’s tax fraud followed him from the 1970s, when he maintained offshore accounts to conceal global income from the IRS, through the 1980s, where the IRS challenged his use of multiple Social Security numbers, and into the 1997 and 2001 Sony-related IP transactions—structured as unnecessarily complex stock deals to avoid triggering taxable events.
As Lynch's forensic filings to the IRS show, Cohen failed to report the proceeds of a multimillion-dollar stock sale through Sony, unilaterally extinguished a deferred annuity obligation, disguised more than $6.7 million in income as "shareholder loans" from Traditional Holdings, and misappropriated millions from other entities. When Lynch objected to these moves, she was publicly smeared, and driven into legal exile.
Lynch hired a CPA in September 2004 who discovered fraud on Cohen-related entity filings with the IRS. She then hired tax litigators. Cohen, meanwhile, was attempting to privately force her to meet with him and Richard Westin—his personal corporate and tax lawyer—to unravel their corporate and tax shenanigans. She refused.
From approximately October 2004 through May 2005, as Cohen realized he had failed in his attempts to coerce Lynch and understood she had already gone to the IRS, he hired PR firms to publicly defame her. During this period, Cohen and Robert Kory offered Lynch millions that she was rightfully owed, but conditioned the payment on her cooperation in targeting every one of Cohen’s former representatives for cash. They wanted her to submit perjured or false testimony in secret mediations, civil and other litigation, and to commit perjury in statements to the IRS and other tax authorities. Lynch refused. She knew they were blatantly lying about numerous individuals—including the Grubman Indursky firm, Greg McBowman—and falsely claiming that Neal Greenberg and Richard Westin solely created the tax structures and corporate entities. In truth, Cohen himself designed these mechanisms, instructed his representatives, and repeatedly told Lynch and others he disdained "ordinary income taxes," instead demanding capital gains treatment for transactions that were never structured accordingly.
The IRS Binder: Fiction as Strategy: At the heart of Leonard Cohen’s defense was not an audit trail or financial transparency, but a narrative device—a glossy, curated “IRS Binder” created by his legal team at Kory & Rice LLP. Far from a legitimate submission of financial records, this dossier functioned as a calculated piece of misdirection. It relied on a fraudulent 2005 co-mingled default judgment, perjured declarations, a bogus forensic "report" spreadsheet that co-mingled entity assets, and statements from Robert Kory falsely claiming Kelley Lynch had access to all necessary tax information. Cohen’s team coupled these materials with a media blitz, strategically aligning with biographer Sylvie Simmons and compliant journalists to reinforce the myth of Cohen as a betrayed monk rather than a manipulator of corporate structures. The Binder presented fiction as fact—weaponizing narrative to discredit Lynch’s whistleblower complaints and obscure the real story of tax avoidance, misallocated income, and obstruction. This wasn’t audit material. It was a screenplay.
The narrative: Lynch, a seductive Mata Hari, hypnotized Cohen using MK style mind control tactics while he lived in monastic exile, misappropriated his "retirement" fortune, and pursued him across the country. The truth? Lynch had reported Cohen to the IRS, complete with a tax opinion from her former legal and accounting representatives, laying out Cohen's civil and criminal tax fraud.
MK Ultra & Mata Hari: In perhaps the most outrageous twist, the IRS Binder also invoked MK Ultra mind control tactics. Cohen had previously claimed that he was a participant in such experiments during his time at McGill University—when in fact, he merely took a psychology course. Yet Cohen’s team told federal authorities that Cohen similarly had been psychologically destabilized by his fictitious Mata Hari—casting him as too spiritual to manage his tax and financial affairs.
This “MK Ultra” fiction was matched by another: that Kelley Lynch was not only a seductress, but a type of Mata Hari agent who lured Cohen into transferring millions while cloaked in Buddhist mysticism. These absurdities, submitted to federal agencies, helped shift scrutiny from Cohen’s unfiled returns to Lynch’s whistleblower complaints—further proving the retaliatory use of narrative fiction as legal defense.
Weaponized Misogyny, Biographical Disinformation: At the heart of the cover story lies a biographical smear. Sylvie Simmons' book, I’m Your Man, repeats the Cohen camp’s defamatory tropes: that Lynch was a mentally unstable former lover who inspired Cohen’s late-career "redemption." The book omits Lynch’s ownership interests, tax submissions, and Cohen's own financial directives and transactions. Instead, Simmons relies heavily on interviews with Cohen's lawyers, lovers, and insiders—failing to consult legal filings, IRS disclosures, or Lynch herself. At no time was Kelley Lynch Leonard Cohen's lover or mistress.
From the Maclean’s article to Rolling Stone, unscrupulous journalists regurgitated Cohen's fan fiction defense: the monk betrayed by a temptress. The goal was clear: destroy Kelley Lynch’s credibility, sabotage IRS scrutiny, and convert Cohen's civil and criminal liability into literary tragedy. Cohen’s team parlayed this myth into legal and financial advantage, all while journalists and biographers gained commercially and professionally from pushing a sanctified, sanitized Cohen narrative.
After Cohen: Estate Fraud and Federal Exposure: Following Cohen’s death, the machinery didn’t stop. It metastasized. Robert Kory used a forged trust document—as admitted under oath by Cohen’s children—to assume control of Cohen’s estate. This enabled the:
• Sale of Cohen’s IP catalog to Hipgnosis for $50 million
• Concealment of Lynch’s co-ownership in TH, BMT and OI
• Creation of Old Ideas Legacy, LLC to bury unreported assets
• Omission of $48 million in IP from the federal estate tax returns, as revealed in estate and probate filings before Los Angeles Superior Court
Retaliation and the State as Enforcer: As Lynch continued pressing for tax documentation, the LAPD and LA City Attorney entered the frame. Their contributions:
• Sham criminal prosecution of Lynch for emailing IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other authorities
• Misuse of restraining orders to suppress whistleblower disclosures and request federal tax information
• A SWAT raid and attempted psychiatric commitment initiated after reporting the tax fraud
• Continued public defamation of Lynch.
The source of this retaliatory action? LA Government Actors, Cohen’s IRS Binder, and the fabricated tax fraud defense narrative. A tool of obstruction, not transparency.
Next Stop Federal Court: Lynch has submitted formal complaints to the IRS Whistleblower Office, IRS, FBI, DOJ, and the U.S. Tax Court, and is preparing a comprehensive federal complaint for filing in U.S. District Court. Her filings are supported by a trove of documentation: corporate bylaws, CPA reviews, tax correspondence, sworn depositions, and probate records—including Kory's use of a forged trust document following Cohen's death, through which he reassigned Cohen's fraudulent default judgment to himself as trustee, in order to roll back entities not covered by the judgment and pursue the Hipgnosis deal. Lynch has submitted signed entity resolutions, proof of forged trust instruments (Reeve Chudd's deposition confirming he altered Cohen's trust documents following his death), and direct evidence of the unauthorized use of her Social Security number, along with communications with federal authorities. This is not speculation. It is a case file. And it’s coming to court
This case isn’t about Leonard Cohen’s music. It’s about how celebrity and fabricated media narratives were used to discredit a federal whistleblower, suppress evidence, and obstruct justice. Kelley Lynch seeks transparency, tax documents, and judicial accountability. The evidence she’s now putting before federal courts is not poetic. It appears to be criminal. And it may be the reckoning the Cohen estate never saw coming.
Disclaimer: The article and accompanying illustrations present Kelley Lynch as a "haute couture Buddhist" hipster character in an imaginative and stylized portrayal. This depiction reflects an artistic and surreal interpretation inspired by the complex legal disputes and public narratives that followed her split from Leonard Cohen. The choice to portray Lynch adorned in jewels and sophisticated attire references Cohen's statements after their parting, where he attributed her alleged “downfall” to extravagant spending on items like jewelry, shoes, and haute couture—a narrative Lynch firmly disputes. The artistic representation, while not intended as a literal portrayal, emphasizes the intensity and multifaceted nature of her legal claims, offering a metaphorical view into the high-stakes drama of her experience. This stylized depiction serves to underscore the layers of conflict, public perception, and personal resilience inherent in her story.
Copyright © 2024 Kelley Lynch. Unauthorized reproduction of this article or artwork is strictly prohibited.
Wednesday, December 11, 2024
Sanitizing Leonard Cohen’s Legacy: IRS Binder, Misogyny, and the Weaponization of Legal Systems Against Kelley Lynch
In a legal drama steeped in jurisdictional overreach, misrepresentation, and misogyny, Leonard Cohen’s legal team, with the backing of the Los Angeles City Attorney, orchestrated a calculated effort to protect Cohen’s legacy while vilifying Kelley Lynch, his former personal manager. Artwork - City Attorney prosecutors humorously wearing oversized "IRS shoes" to symbolize their jurisdictional overreach.
At the center of this operation were several questionable tactics: the use of an “IRS Binder” to shield Cohen from allegations of tax fraud, the weaponization of fraudulent domestic violence restraining orders to discredit Lynch, and the targeting of her communications with Phil Spector’s legal team. The saga also unearthed a trove of Cohen’s “good rock and roll stories,” which reveal a tangled web of contradictions, tall tales, and strategic diversions.
The IRS Binder: A Shield for Cohen, A Weapon Against Lynch
The mysterious “IRS Binder,” introduced by the City Attorney as evidence, was portrayed as proof that Lynch was in possession of Cohen’s tax documents, including 1099s and K-1s, and that her allegations of tax fraud were a mere “ruse.”
However, regardless of the prosecutor's lies about federal tax matters, the binder’s contents suggest otherwise:
• Correspondence from Cohen’s attorney, Robert Kory, defending Cohen’s alleged fraudulent tax refunds.
• IRS confirmations of tax refunds that Lynch has long argued were based on false pretenses.
• Fraudulent declarations and fabricated evidence submitted to the IRS to bolster Cohen’s claims.
The binder appeared less a legitimate piece of evidence and more a tool to discredit Lynch while sanitizing Cohen’s financial and aggressive tax dealings.
TMU Report: Lies, Misogyny, and Misdirection
The LAPD’s Threat Management Unit (TMU) report on Lynch began with a false claim that she and Cohen had a “sexual relationship” in the mid-1980s in New York City. Lynch has categorically denied this, clarifying instead that Cohen sexually assaulted her at the Royalton Hotel when she delivered documents for his attorney, Marty Machat.
The TMU’s narrative further relied on Cohen’s fraudulent default judgment, amplifying false claims that Lynch misappropriated funds while disregarding corporate structures that managed Cohen’s assets. TMU’s targeting of Lynch’s communications with Phil Spector’s legal team added a bizarre layer to the proceedings, as Spector had no connection to Cohen’s tax or financial issues.
Cohen’s Contradictory Testimony: Phil Spector and “Good Rock and Roll Stories” - Leonard Cohen’s testimony during Lynch’s legal proceedings included a sensationalized account of one of his "good rock and roll gun stories," implicating Phil Spector. This testimony contradicted Cohen’s own statements to Lynch, as she noted in an email to Dennis Riordan, Phil Spector’s appellate attorney. Cohen had repeatedly told Lynch, during countless interviews with journalists, that Spector had never held a gun on him.
Cohen’s testimony also stood in direct conflict with the narrative used by the District Attorney’s office against Spector, as outlined in a motion in limine and potentially during the Grand Jury proceedings according to Mick Brown. Journalist Mick Brown of the UK Telegraph contacted Lynch to explore these discrepancies, seeking to interview her about Cohen’s conflicting accounts and their potential implications for Spector’s case.
The Tall Tales of Leonard Cohen - Cohen’s “good rock ‘n roll stories” weren’t limited to Spector. He regaled audiences and journalists alike with fantastical stories, blurring the line between reality and myth:
• CIA and MK Ultra: Cohen claimed tangential connections to the CIA’s controversial mind-control experiments.
• Bay of Pigs and Missile Strikes: He wove tales of near-death experiences during geopolitical crises.
• Cuban Military Adventures: Cohen described a 14-year-old Cuban military officer training a gun on him, only to be embraced by Castro’s forces, who thought he looked like Che Guevara.
• Cold War Reconnaissance: Cohen recounted being mistaken for CIA reconnaissance, an assumption that allegedly ended in camaraderie with Cuban soldiers.
These stories, though entertaining, reveal Cohen’s penchant for dramatizing and reinventing his past—a tendency that has extended to his legal narratives. He recalled his excitement during the Bay of Pigs invasion, comparing himself to Upton Sinclair on an important mission. Cohen wrote to publisher Jack McClelland, ostensibly
to thank him for his first literary contract, ironically adding as a post script to the letter: “Just think how well the book will sell if I’m hit in an air-raid. What great publicity! Don’t tell me you haven’t been considering it. Hopelessly Hollywood.” Cohen understood his “good rock ‘n roll stories” sold books, records, and tours.
Phil Spector: A Convenient Diversion
Cohen’s attempts to link Lynch to Phil Spector served to further discredit her. The City Attorney targeted Lynch’s communications with Spector’s legal team, framing them as part of a broader, baseless narrative. This misdirection distracted from the substantive issues of Cohen’s financial misconduct and the systemic harassment Lynch endured.
Misrepresentation of Family Ties and Coordinated Harassment
The TMU report also included bizarre inaccuracies about many of Kelley Lynch’s communications. For example, it claimed her sister worked for a “billboard company” when she was, in fact, employed by Billboard magazine. This misrepresentation appears tied to a harassment campaign led by Stephen Gianelli, a Bay Area lawyer associated with Cohen’s legal team. Gianelli’s actions, which extended to Lynch’s family, exemplify the coordinated effort to intimidate and silence her. The communications, primarily sent to IRS, FBI, and DOJ (documenting the decades long stalking & harassment operation), were used as the basis for the proceedings and thoroughly distorted and taken out of context.
A Federal Matter Turned Local Weapon
The City Attorney’s involvement in federal tax issues—matters under the exclusive jurisdiction of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division (IRS-CI)—raises serious questions about jurisdiction and intent. By leveraging the fraudulent default judgment and Cohen’s narratives, the City Attorney overstepped their authority, turning local resources into a shield for Cohen and a weapon against Lynch. Artwork - City Attorney attempts to sabotage IRS and discredit Kelley Lynch.
The Bigger Picture: Misogyny, Misdirection, and Power
Kelley Lynch’s battle against Leonard Cohen, the City Attorney, and the LAPD’s TMU exposes systemic issues in the misuse of legal systems to protect powerful men. From the IRS Binder and fraudulent default judgment to Cohen’s contradictory testimony and fantastical stories, the tactics employed reflect a broader culture of misogyny and misdirection.
Weaponized Lies: Leonard Cohen’s IRS Binder, Misogynistic Narratives, and a Legal System Turned Against Kelley Lynch
In a legal saga marked by fabricated evidence, jurisdictional overreach, and systemic misogyny, Leonard Cohen’s legal team, the Los Angeles City Attorney, and the District Attorney’s office worked in concert to vilify Kelley Lynch, his former personal manager. From the use of a dubious “IRS Binder” to the targeting of her communications with federal agencies and the framing of legitimate actions as harassment, the campaign against Lynch exposes how legal systems can be manipulated to silence whistleblowers and protect powerful figures.
The IRS Binder: A Misleading Shield
Central to the City Attorney’s case was the so-called “IRS Binder,” falsely presented as evidence that Lynch was in possession of Cohen’s tax documents, including 1099s and K-1s, and that her allegations of tax fraud were baseless. However, the binder appeared to serve as a shield for Cohen rather than legitimate evidence. It included:
• Correspondence from Cohen’s attorney, Robert Kory, defending Cohen’s alleged tax fraud.
• IRS confirmations of refunds Lynch claims were obtained under false pretenses using her social security number which is identify theft. IRS has provided her with an Identity Theft PIN.
• Fabricated evidence and perjured declarations submitted to the IRS to bolster Cohen’s defense.
Rather than proving wrongdoing on Lynch’s part, the binder was weaponized to sanitize Cohen’s financial dealings and discredit Lynch’s whistleblowing. Artwork - Los Angeles City Attorney wields an oversized IRS Binder as a shield.
Hostile Cross-Examination: Redefining Harassment
During Lynch’s trial, the City Attorney’s prosecutor, who exhibited hostility and aggression throughout the proceedings, went so far as to redefine Lynch’s legitimate actions as harassment. While cross-examining Lynch, the prosecutor blatantly lied and distorted the facts: Artwork - LA City Attorney prosecutor gushing over Leonard Cohen on the witness stand.
• Requests for Tax Information: When Lynch asked, “Are you saying my requests for tax information are harassment?” the prosecutor replied, “Yes.” This response ignored Lynch’s legal right to request tax documentation, especially given her allegations of financial misconduct.
• Cease-and-Desist Letters: Lynch’s letters to Cohen, advising him to stop spreading falsehoods—such as the claim that she “fucked Oliver Stone,” a phrase the prosecutor used—were also framed as harassment. Cohen’s baseless allegation, confirmed by Lynch’s son’s father as part of a scheme orchestrated by Cohen and Kory, had no factual basis. Oliver Stone himself has publicly denied any romantic relationship with Lynch, and Lynch has vehemently reinforced this truth.
• Emails to Federal Agencies: The prosecutor singled out Lynch’s emails to the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury, labeling them harassment. These communications detailed Lynch’s legitimate concerns about Cohen’s tax fraud and financial misconduct, as well as the tactics used against her, making the prosecutor’s argument both legally and factually unfounded.
This approach sought to discredit Lynch’s actions, mischaracterizing her as irrational and vindictive rather than addressing the substantive issues she raised.
Altered Testimony and Fabricated Evidence
Lynch’s trial was further marred by manipulated evidence and testimony:
• SWAT Incident and Altered Records: Cohen testified about a SWAT incident, despite having no personal knowledge of the event. Lynch asserts that her call to Cohen to discuss Traditional Holdings, LLC, and the homes he purchased for Anjani Thomas and Adam Cohen, was removed from the transcripts. Emails and voicemails introduced as evidence by the City Attorney and LAPD TMU were altered, and Cohen testified he worked with a sound engineer, clearly to distort her voice and the context of her communications.
• Fraudulent Narratives: The City Attorney relied on the fraudulent default judgment Cohen obtained against Lynch, disregarding corporate governance and falsely claiming Lynch misappropriated funds when in fact Cohen misappropriated tens of millions from the business entities.
The District Attorney’s Alignment: A Coordinated Targeting
The City Attorney’s targeting of Lynch was aligned with the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office, which was prosecuting Phil Spector at the time. Lynch had written to Deputy District Attorney Alan Jackson, raising concerns about Cohen’s tax fraud after filing a complaint with the DA’s Major Fraud Unit about Cohen’s misappropriation of millions.
Stephen Gianelli, a Bay Area lawyer connected to Cohen’s legal team, confirmed that Jackson had contacted him regarding Lynch. Investigator William Frayeh of the DA’s office later stated that Gianelli likely found “a sympathetic ear” in Jackson, further suggesting a coordinated effort to silence Lynch while shielding Cohen.
The Broader Campaign of Harassment
Lynch’s ordeal extended beyond the courtroom:
• Stephen Gianelli’s Role: Gianelli orchestrated a “Stalking and Harassment Operation” targeting Lynch and her family as well as nearly everyone in her life.
• Phil Spector as a Smokescreen: Cohen’s testimony included one of his “good rock and roll gun stories” about Spector, which contradicted his own previous versions of this incident as well as statements Cohen made that Spector had never pointed a gun at him. Lynch’s connection to Spector became another avenue for prosecutors to discredit her, despite having no relevance to Cohen’s tax fraud or financial misconduct.
A Legal System Turned Against Whistleblowers
This case illustrates the troubling misuse of legal systems to protect powerful figures and discredit whistleblowers:
• Misuse of Jurisdiction: Federal tax matters fall under the IRS Criminal Investigation Division (IRS-CI), yet the City Attorney overstepped their authority by prosecuting Lynch for raising concerns about Cohen’s tax fraud.
• Fabrication of Harassment: Legitimate requests for tax information, cease-and-desist letters, and whistleblowing communications were all mischaracterized as harassment to delegitimize Lynch’s claims.
• Systemic Misogyny: The framing of Lynch as a scorned woman rather than addressing the substantive financial and legal issues highlights a broader culture of misogyny.
The Bigger Picture: Power, Lies, and Misogyny
From the IRS Binder and altered testimony to the coordinated efforts of the City Attorney and District Attorney, the campaign against Kelley Lynch underscores how legal narratives can be weaponized against whistleblowers. As Lynch continues her fight for justice, her case exposes the systemic abuse of power and the complicity of local authorities in protecting the legacy of Leonard Cohen while vilifying those who dare to challenge him.
The question remains: Will the truth about Cohen’s financial misconduct, the harassment campaign, and the misuse of legal systems to silence Lynch finally come to light? Only an unwavering commitment to justice and accountability will ensure that it does.
Disclaimer: The article and accompanying illustrations present Kelley Lynch as a "haute couture Buddhist" hipster character in an imaginative and stylized portrayal. This depiction reflects an artistic and surreal interpretation inspired by the complex legal disputes and public narratives that followed her split from Leonard Cohen. The choice to portray Lynch adorned in jewels and sophisticated attire references Cohen's statements after their parting, where he attributed her alleged “downfall” to extravagant spending on items like jewelry, shoes, and haute couture—a narrative Lynch firmly disputes. The artistic representation, while not intended as a literal portrayal, emphasizes the intensity and multifaceted nature of her legal claims, offering a metaphorical view into the high-stakes drama of her experience. This stylized depiction serves to underscore the layers of conflict, public perception, and personal resilience inherent in her story.
Copyright © 2024 Kelley Lynch. Unauthorized reproduction of this article or artwork is strictly prohibited. Photo - Jill, His Holiness Kusum Lingpa, and Kelley
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)