Showing posts with label Blogonaut's Law Blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blogonaut's Law Blog. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Obsessed Phil Spector Blogger - Jihad Gianelli's "Disclaimer" May Serve No Purpose

I believe Jihad Gianelli is concealing the true purpose of his Blog. His last "article" posted on or around May 2, 2011 is a list of 9/11 victims. Prior to that he has a "Happy Easter" notice with no comments; an "article" about a woman who injured herself clapping with no comments; and - of course - an article on Phil Spector with 180 comments:

SPECTOR ORAL ARGUMENTS TODAY: JUSTICE ALDRICH APPEARS HOSTILE TO SPECTOR APPEAL, KLINE SYMPATHETIC, KITCHING AN ENIGMA


180 comments:

Excerpted comments:

Anonymous said...

Honestly I don't think this appellate court wanted to take away from the DA's office their first celebrity murder conviction.

I do believe that the California Supreme court will overturn it.

Aloha said...

What overwhelming evidence of guilt? Where? There isn't any. That was the response the AG representative gave, I believe it was to Justice Klein, in response to a question about the 5 women who testified.

Anonymous said...

According to the Linda Deutche report who has been pretty fair to Spector, Riordan will ask the Supreme Court to review on June 13. Unfortunately the sharks are circling as the civil case is coming to head in January 2012 and I would expect a 10 million plus judgement. Even if the Supreme Court were to review the case it will take years to wind its way through. The thing about the 2nd districts ruling that was so telling was how swift the opinion was rendered and how many times Riordan opposed giving the AG more time to answer. Not very smart. Hopefully they learn and be very humbled if the Supreme court agrees to hear the case.


http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2011/04/spector-oral-arguments-today-justice.html

N.J. Supreme Court says blogger not protected from revealing her sources

Published: Wednesday, June 08, 2011, 9:00 AM Updated: Wednesday, June 08, 2011, 6:12 PM

TRENTON —New Jersey’s legal protections allowing journalists to keep their sources secret do not apply to those who post to online message boards, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.

The court, clarifying an area of law that has not kept up with advances on the internet, said bloggers must have some connection to "news media" to invoke New Jersey’s shield law protecting journalists from revealing their confidential sources.

"To ensure that the privilege does not apply to every self-appointed newsperson, the legislature requires that other means of disseminating news be ‘similar’ to traditional news sources to qualify for the law’s coverage," Chief Justice Stuart Rabner wrote for the 5-0 court. "We do not find that online message boards are similar to the types of news entities listed in the statute ..."

The long-awaited decision, which included arguments from media groups and the state ACLU, overturned part of an appellate court ruling that would have established stricter criteria for journalists to qualify for the protection.

"This is just a beginning to this conversation," said Bruce Rosen, a Florham Park attorney representing the New Jersey Press Association. "This conversation is going to go on for years, but it’s a good place to start."

Courts have already ruled people can be sued for comments they post on message boards, but this case addressed what protections "nontraditional" media have in an era when newspapers, magazines, television and radio are no longer the only sources of news.

The ruling was made in the case of a blogger from Washington State who posted alleged defamatory statements about a Marlboro-based software company.

In comments she posted to a message board about an online security breach, Shellee Hale claimed Too Much Media LLC’s owners had threatened her sources and failed to report the breach because they profited from the stolen email addresses. TMM, which helps online adult entertainment companies track sales, sued for defamation and Hale sought protection of shield law.

A former Microsoft employee and a private investigator, Hale argued she was preparing an article for her website, Pornafia.com, about the infiltration of pornography on the internet when she posted her comments about TMM in 2008.

TMM argued Hale is not a journalist and fabricated the purpose of her website to seek the protection.

A Superior Court judge in Monmouth County ruled in 2009 that the protection did not apply to Hale. An appellate panel later that year upheld that decision but also set very specific criteria for journalists to qualify for the protection.

But the Supreme Court — to the delight of a group of media outlets invited into the arguments — shot down the appeals court’s criteria. It said the test is whether there is a connection to news media, if the purpose of the report is to gather or disseminate news and if the information was obtained during professional newsgathering activities.

In her case, Hale insisted Pornafia was a legitimate medium. But the court noted she never launched the news magazine portion of the website. The court also noted her alleged defamatory statements appeared exclusively on the message board, which the court said was one step removed from the electronic equivalent of a letter to the editor in a newspaper.

TMM attorney Joel Kreizman of Ocean Township welcomed the decision because he said the lawsuit can finally proceed.

"We’ve been stuck on this issue for over two years. This case normally would have gone to trial by now. We’re almost basically starting from scratch," he said.

Hale’s attorney, Jeffrey Pollock of Princeton, said he will ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling that the decision applies retroactively to his client.

He said the decision narrows the scope of people who qualify for the protection to keep sources confidential, a sentiment echoed by the Heartland Institute, a Chicago-based policy research group.

"Putting aside the wisdom of shield laws, they should not exist to protect only certain classes of Americans a court defines as ‘journalists.’ Freedom of the press is not truly free if the definition of ‘press’ is left up to the whim of a judge," said Jim Lakely, co-director of the institute’s Center on the Digital Economy.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/nj_supreme_court_rules_blogger_1.html

Gianelli - Cohen, Jackson, et al's Henchman - Cohen Cancelled The Concert In Cambodia With Some Lame Excuse


June 18, 2010

Dear Ms. Lynch:

On June 17, 2010, you posted on your blog a letter to the Cambodian Red Cross protesting what you believed to be entertainer Leonard Cohen’s intention to give a charity concert there to benefit the Cambodian people on the BOGUS grounds that (according to you, without any evidence, and despite the denial of the alleged “victim”) Cohen allegedly molested his daughter in Greece in 1979.
Actually, if Cohen wants to press this issue I will absolutely subpoena Freda Gutman. Ann Diamond has already confirmed that Freda Gutman advised her that Lorca Cohen publicly informed her classmates at Concordia that her father molested her.

You posted your letter under a post heading additionallyfalsely implying that Cohen, who has a lifetime history of charitable giving, is simply giving the benefit to obtain a tax deduction.
Well, since I did work as Cohen’s personal manager for approximately 17 years I do happen to know this lying con artist fraud and thief. His obsession with stock deals, avoidance of ordinary income tax, avoidance of gift tax, and his deranged insistence that his donation of his body of work to the University of Toronto in exchange for a U.S. tax credit does lead me to wonder if his charitable concert has a tax deduction attached to it. Cohen is one of the greediest men I’ve ever met on this earth. Furthermore, one charitable gesture every few years is really not particularly impressive.

In response we wrote to the same Red Cross official you did, pointing out that it has been proven in a court of law that you were fired as Cohen’s manager in 2004 for embezzling millions from him, that Cohen has a $7.3 million 2006 judgment against you related to your theft, that you have a history of psychiatric hospitalizations, that you have restraining orders against you and in Cohen’s favor in California and Colorado, and that you have six (6) outstanding bench warrants for your arrest issued by the Los Angeles courts.
It would be hard for Gianelli to “point out” anything about me and Cohen since he didn’t know me or Cohen when I refused to meet with Cohen and Westin to unravel their deranged tax planning, corporate structures, etc. Cohen’s the THIEF and the fraud default judgment and wrongful conversion of my property to him is evidence of that. It is also evidence of his attempts to cover up and conceal his criminal tax fraud. I don’t have a history of psychiatric problems and the doctors that I saw were clear about that. Law enforcement appears to have a vested interest in the outcome of Cohen’s criminal tax fraud matter and appears to have wanted the opportunity to interrogate me in a controlled environment about Phil Spector en route to Killer King. Perhaps that’s where Cohen and law enforcement had their meeting of minds. See evidence that Cohen, Lindsey, Kory, and Superfon conspired to have me falsely arrested; Robert Kory’s declaration in my minor son’s custody matter that is evidence of criminal witness tampering on the part of Cohen and Kory; and the evidence Daniel Scheid wrote me about – he told me he has evidence that Cohen and Kory engaged in criminal witness tampering and also has evidence against Lindsey and Superfon.
Three of the bench warrants are clearly evidence of fraud at LA Superior Court. One relates to the UD matter that I was unaware of. I wasn’t served that lawsuit either. Therefore, the judges in four matters before LA Superior Court don’t have jurisdiction which is really quite shocking but seems to be par for the course. I intend to litigate the three garbage, unlawful, and unconstitutional misdemeanor citations with Santa Monica and SMPD. City Attorney Marsha Moutrie should understand that and she should have been able to read the 9th Circuit Court’s decision but Santa Monica thinks it’s above the law and their police department absolutely targeted me and criminally harasses people. They also advised me that they were playing a game and understood that I knew Phil Spector.

We also wrote directly to you in blunt terms pointing out that charity donated services are not tax deductible so this could not have been the entertainer’s motive, as well as the fact that Cohen has a long history of charitable giving.
Cohen’s charitable donation of stock to Mt. Baldy was audited by the IRS and should be revisited by the IRS since his accountant, Ken Cleveland, thought it was a miracle that it flew with the IRS. The IRS really was beginning to audit quite a lot of Cohen’s deranged tax planning, stock deals, and corporate entities. Since K1s Cohen personally received in the amounts of $1 million and $7 million from Sony. They miraculously transformed into $0 1099s. Only Cohen benefitted from that activity. Cohen seems to have a long history of criminal tax fraud and tax evasion in the U.S. There’s apparently no good news in Canada which explains why Canada’s national treasure can’t live in Canada. The IRS, according to Cohen, doesn’t ask where you paid taxes the prior year while Canada Revenue does.

The bottom line is this: Setting aside the morally reprehensible nature of your attempt to derail a benefit concert for needy, third world people based on false, malicious and untrue allegations of pedophilia—and that you have made those very same preposterous, false and untrue allegations against this blog—once you take a controversial stand regarding a public figure and post it on the internet you are quite literally inviting public comment and controversy. In other words, you then become fair game for criticism.
I have been clear – any adult male stranger who attempts to lure a minor into privately communicating with him should be viewed as a potential sexual predator. To say otherwise is preposterous. Malicious lies and slander is NOT criticism.

In subsequent posts on your blog you repeat the false allegation that we are working for Leonard Cohen (we are not now, nor have we ever been so affiliated) as well as the reckless and maliciously motivated FALSE AND MANUFACTURED accusation that Cohen is a pedophile.
I didn’t manufacture Freda Gutman’s remarks to Ann Diamond about Lorca Cohen’s public declaration at Concordia that her father molested her. I also didn’t manufacture Cohen’s comments to me that he had sex with his 15-year old nanny and asked me to contact Van Penick about the statutes of limitations with respect to that in Canada. There apparently aren’t any statutes of limitations.

We again remind you that you have also falsely accused this blog and its editor of serious crimes, transparently to get even with us for banning you from Blogonaut Law Blog and also to retaliate against our constitutionally privileged communications about your controversial public statements regarding public figures Phil Spector, Leonard Coehn, Alan Jackson, and others, and that those false allegations have included the undersigned allegedly being a member of a notorious pedophile organization—again with zero evidence to back the allegation up; Just your malicious desire to damage someone’s reputation by stating the worst accusation possible in our culture.
Apparently Gianelli (who is NOT a “blog”) doesn’t think criminal witness tampering, criminal harassment, intimidation tactics, threats, blackmail/extortion, cyber-bullying, malicious lies and slander, etc. are serious crimes. Gianelli also doesn’t view lying to the FBI as a serious crime. I haven’t made any controversial public statements regarding Phil Spector. I have said that I had dinner with Phil Spector after the Clarkson incident at his house. At that time, Phil Spector advised me that Clarkson was dancing around in his foyer, waving a gun, and shot herself. That’s precisely what five major forensic experts concluded. Leoanrd Cohen and Alan Jackson’s actions are most definitely controversial. In fact, controversy seems to be the name of their game. They have similar tactics – malicious lies, slander, targeting innocent people, character assassination, bullying people, lying, attempting to intimidate people, etc. Any adult male stranger who attempts to lure a minor into privately communicating with him (via the internet and by email) should be viewed as a potential sexual predator. Many people have advised me that they view Gianelli as a dangerously unstable lunatic and feel he is sadistically obsessed with me.

In other words you have a years-long demonstrated pattern of reaching into thin air to trash those that displease you with the made-up accusations you believe will cause the targets of your anger and displeasure the maximum pain and reputation damage.
Cohen didn’t “displease” me. He committed criminal tax fraud and I reported that to the IRS and provided them with evidence. I also reported it to the State of Kentucky, California State Franchise Tax Board, and the District Attorney’s aptly named Major Fraud Unit. Cohen is a lying con artist fraud and thief who maliciously slandered me, targeted my family, and stole from me. He is a maniac.

Of course, it is also quite ironic that you—who has spent the last 5 years and the last 14 months, respectively, serially accusing Leonard Cohen and this blog of criminality—have not only an extensive arrest record as well as six (6) outstanding WARRANTS FOR YOUR ARREST issued by different Los Angeles superior Court judges in six different matters.
Hardly an “extensive arrest record” but I have asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury to investigate all activity with respect to me and law enforcement. I have also asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury to investigate Cohen’s lawsuit against me and the custody matter – as well as Greenberg’s companion lawsuit in Colorado. Very clever of Cohen to forget to name Greenberg to his fraud lawsuit against me while sneaking in two companies not named in his lawsuit (and clearly not under Freeman’s jurisdiction) into what I believe is a highly illegal default judgment and evidence of criminal conduct. Cohen has no qualms, apparently, engaging in criminal conduct – see illegal and criminal K1s that were transmitted to the IRS and State of Kentucky. The man lies as easily as he breathes. He must really impress these judges who appear to bend over backwards for lying celebrity frauds.

You, and the persons whom you attempt to sway with your false allegations, would do well to keep in mind that neither Leonard Cohen, nor the undersigned, nor anyone else that you have accused (and there have been many) have ever been prosecuted for any crime, and that it is you—and only you—who has suffered multiple civil judgments, restraining orders, psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, has embezzled millions, and also has warrants out for her arrest.
Who are the persons I’m attempting to sway? The IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Dennis Riordan? Should they keep in mind that Cohen hasn’t been prosecuted for a crime. Perhaps the IRS is aware of this and perhaps they sent agents from the Treasury to meet with me because they have a probable prosecution of Leonard Cohen pending. Perhaps that’s why I’ve heard from the FBI on more than one occasion. I’ve asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury to investigate the hospitalizations – including the one where the IRS shows up in the medical records which is precisely why I called Agent Bill Betzer from the nurse’s station. This was discussed with the Treasury agents – as was the custody matter which clearly relates to Cohen’s criminal tax fraud matter and Phil Spector’s matter. I am assuming that the DA had the power and motive to have me dragged to Killer King but have asked the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury to investigate that.
You are the one wanted by Los Angeles Police on six bench warrants; not Cohen and not this blog; and you are the one who has been proven to have embezzled millions of dollars; who has a motive to lie and a demonstrated propensity to lie; who has been frequently arrested; and who has a history of involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations.
Really? I’m wanted by LAPD? Do they now have a wanted poster out? A default judgment PROVES nothing except for the fact that Cohen used that to commit THEFT, wrongful conversion, fraud, etc. I have no propensity to lie. Gianelli, however, clearly has MOTIVE and that should absolutely be investigated together with what I view as his engagement in extremely serious criminal conduct.

Add to that resume yesterday's demonstrated willingness to deprive an entire country of needy people charity aid to serve your own sick agenda of getting revenge against your crime victim.
Give me a break. Leonard Cohen is a common criminal.
Your arrest and (hopefully) subsequent psychiatric treatment could not come soon enough for us.
What arrest (hopefully)? LAPD knows how to contact me. Cohen has a history of very serious psychiatric problems. He has a history of drug addiction and abuse – as well as problems with alcohol. He is a calculated fraud and liar. He has a history of THEFT with respect to his advisers. He is a dangerously unstable fraud. When people see through this lying thug criminal he targets them … that includes Phil Spector. Cohen’s sick agenda with respect to Phil Spector SHOCKS the conscience. I believe he waited in ambush after Phil Spector refused to finish his album or work with him. Cohen was humiliated (according to him) that he had to telegraph Phil Spector in an attempt to have him finish the album. Phil Spector found working with Cohen miserable. I know for a fact that working with Cohen is a miserable experience. He’s a control freak, lying con artist, and one of the greediest men I’ve ever met in my life. He uses his money to buy people’s silence and friendship. The man’s PATHETIC. He hires high paid liars to destroy innocent people’s lives and targets children. One must wonder why the detectives I met at Cohen’s house think it’s acceptable that his good rock ‘n roll comments ended up as testimony in the Phil Spector matter. They seemed professional to me. Cohen apparently thought using the Phil Spector matter would help him save his proverbial ass and cover up his criminal tax fraud, etc. The man has a criminal mind. He has no remorse. He is obsessed with himself. He’s a revolting excuse for a man.


Very truly yours,

Blogonaut Law Blog
POSTED BY BLOGONAUT AT 3:15 PM

8 COMMENTS:

Anonymous said...
Pure white trash C is threatening Walsh again after sending her yet another blowhard e-mail. Then e-mails her again. Walsh will send that to Michelle Rice who the lying kelley is claiming: Is Playing With The Big Boys - And Attempting To Intimidate And Threaten My Sons, Etc. - Make No Mistakes About This Thug..

What big boys would they be? the ones in your dirty underwear?
Who would want this nasty vile thug writing to their sons?

LAPD, your sons, Michelle..etc. can see you.
Can LAPD see me and my sons? They should be focused on Cohen, Kory, Rice, and the cyber-terrorists and bullies who have decided to engage in an organized campaign of criminal harassment, witness tampering, threats, intimidation tactics, etc.

mongochili
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

LEGAL NOTICE

Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 230(c)(1) neither Blogonaut nor its editor are responsible for any content authored by third parties, including but not limited to posted comments.
blogspot hit counter

BLOGONAUT FEATURES

QUESTIONS? NEWS TIPS? CONTACT BLOGONAUT:


UPDATED 03.21.13

Here is Robert Kory’s mass email reply:
First please accept my personal apologies for my failure to foresee the disasters that led to cancellation of the Cambodian concert. Second, I am planning to make a statement on the forum, but I am waiting to sort out all the damage.
In the interim, here is the simple explanation. The local promoter is inexperienced, and failed to account properly for the cost in presenting the concert in such a remote location. The technical hallmark of a Leonard Cohen concert on this tour is its sound; we do not compromise the standards, and we have a very detailed technical rider that we send to every promoter prior to signing a contract as to the technical requirements. Many less advanced countries do not have the equipment which must be shipped in by freight. Even in the famous Israel concert last year, we had to ship in truckloads of equipment from Germany. In the case of Phnom Penh, we verified, through an independent European tour manager living in Thailand, that the required equipment existed in SE Asia and could be shipped in. Over the course of the last few months, I relied on AEGLive in London to monitor progress along with our our crew. AEGLive is responsible for all promotion contracts and for verifying the financial integrity of all local promoters. About four weeks ago, I became concerned that our crew was not getting answers from the local promoter about equipment arrivals, load in schedules, etc, Ticket sales were not great, but were adequate. When I finally pressed the issue on equipment, however, it became clear that the local promoter had not anticipated either the full cost of renting equipment and not any cost of freight. Equipment production costs alone rose to over $500,000. That cost is not feasible for a 2,000 person concert, The venue only holds 3,500. In addition to the equipment production costs, you have to add air charter, security, hotels, etc for 40 people. Total show costs would reach over $800,000. In short the concert would have been a financial disaster even if every ticket were sold; there would not only be no money for charity, but the local promoter would be bankrupt and we would no doubt have incurred great travel and hotel expense for which we would not be reimbursed.
What took so long for me to discover these matters? The local promoter was less than forthcoming, and AEGLive became so emotionally committed to seeing the historic concert happen that they failed in their oversight duties. This is a very rare error of judgment. I was the final line of defense in unearthing the facts, and when I smelled a problem, I pushed until I got answers, as I am not just a manager, but a lawyer. So my due diligence efforts included personally calling the local promoter every hour for several days while I was in New Zealand and sending increasingly forceful and compelling emails demanding the truth whatever the truth might be. In AEG’s defense, the local promoter stopped returning AEG’s calls, probably as panic set in as the local promoter realized that the concert meeting our technical standards was not financially feasible.
The success of our tour over the past two and one-half years may lead some fans to believe that the whole enterprise is or has been easy to manage and coordinate. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Managing and promoting a tour of this magnitude and quality is extraordinarily difficult because we absolutely never compromise quality. Some artists would say, “go ahead, rent the cheap local equipment, too bad if the audience can’t hear, they can’t hear in most concerts anyway.” That approach is anathema to us. Leonard has given me the honor and the privilege to manage a tour of unprecedented quality. Between ourselves, we call it “the no compromise tour.” That has been our premise from day one, and I take some satisfaction that the whole crew has adopted a standard of excellence. That means we turn down many offers. In retrospect, we should have declined the Phnom Penh offer.
I deeply regret the inconvenience our “no compromise” attitude has had on your plans. I can only console myself with the knowledge that I would have been even more horrified to walk the stadium and hear muddled sound that made it impossible to hear the music and lyrics.
We remain committed to playing Asia; I have explored many avenues; our technical rider is a deterrent to many Asian promoters who know their business; nevertheless, Leonard plans to tour next year after the release of his new record. I will continue to try to organize a tour in Asia.
Please let us know if there is any way we can assist you in seeing one of the remaining concerts in Australia or North America. Tickets will be our gift.
By the way, we are making a donation to charity in Cambodia from revenues earned in Australia because we told the Cambodian public that a charitable donation would be made. That donation will come directly from my pocket and from Leonard’s.
Kind regards,
Robert
Robert Kory
RK Management, LLC
9300 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 200
Beverly Hills,CA 90212
(t) 310-285-1620 ext 601
(f) 310-278-7641
http://1heckofaguy.com/2010/11/10/robert-kory-on-cambodian-concert-cancellation-and-plans-for-2011-leonard-cohen-tour/

Monday, May 23, 2011

What Happens When Government Uses Bloggers As Their Mouthpieces & Vehicles For Their High Profile Celebrity Sport Trials

Full Court Coverage

What happens when defense counsel and ordinary citizens blog about high-profile trials?

Posted Jan 1, 2008 3:04 PM CDT
By Stephanie Francis Ward

Some say Los Angeles prosecutor Alan Jackson has movie-star looks. Others compare him to a game-show host. But the most unusual characterization of the man who prosecuted music producer Phil Spector on murder charges likened him to a bulldog named Chance in the 1993 Disney movie Homeward Bound. “Of course, AJ is much smarter and more cautious than Chance, but overall personalities seem to fit,” wrote Betsy Ross in Trials & Tribulations, her blog that focused on the Spector prosecution.

A semiretired massage therapist who lives in the Los Angeles suburb of Sherman Oaks, Betsy Ross (yes, that’s her real name) regularly at­tended Spector’s trial in the 2003 killing of B-movie actress Lana Clarkson. She was one of at least three nonjournalists who blogged about the trial regularly, but the only one to merit a mention in Dominick Dunne’s column in Vanity Fair.

“I was trying to bring my readers into the courtroom with me,” says Ross, who blogs under the handle “Sprocket.” Her observations took a decidedly pro-prosecution lean. And Ross’ writing style often includes details and descriptions that would probably not be included in mainstream press coverage.

The case ended in a mistrial on Sept. 26, but Ross continues to write about Spector on her blog, and she plans to cover his retrial.

The Spector trial—which ended in a hung jury—is Ross’ second. Her first was the murder trial of actor Robert Blake, who in 2005 was acquitted of murdering his wife, Bonnie Lee Bakley. Also a fan of true crime message boards, Ross posted her observations about Blake’s trial on the boards. Later, after copying and pasting significant blocks of text, she started Trials & Tribulations; she now posts links to her blog on various message boards.

(Los Angeles district attorney’s office spokeswoman Sandi Gibbons said the office would not comment on Trials & Tribulations because of the pending retrial.)

...

Read the entire article:

http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/full_court_coverage/


Saturday, March 26, 2011

Cohen, An Alleged Buddhist, Aligns Himself With Gianelli-Blogonaut Who Absolutely Slanders Shamarpa

Blogonaut

We don't make this stuff up—really

THE 14TH SHEEPDOG SPEAKS
His Holiness The 14th Sheepdog during his early training
Allow us to introduce ourselves.

We are The 14th Sheepdog, Popo Je-tsun Jigme Kunchen Ngodup Thokmay Wangdue.

What does that mean? If you don’t speak Tibetan, you don’t want to know.

Suffice it to say that there is a new sheriff in town.

Oh, by the way, don’t mess with the Jangbu-Blogoaut, through whom we channel our all-knowing wisdom.

Your cooperation in this matter would be most appreciated.

Cordially yours,

--The 14th Sheepdog

PS: This includes you, Kelley Lynch
PPS: Tick, tock baby.
[For background click here, browse comments]
Posted by Blogonaut at 2:21 PM

30 comments:

Blogonaut said...
You honor us wise one.
April 21, 2010 3:38 PM
The 14th Sheepdog said...
The honor is all ours, Blogonaut.
April 21, 2010 3:53 PM
Steely Dan said...
His dogma makes a lot of sense, actually :).
April 21, 2010 4:18 PM
Anonymous said...
That’s no doggerel Dan
April 21, 2010 4:35 PM
The other Sharmapa said...
I never work with dogs or kids…
April 21, 2010 4:38 PM
Anonymous said...
Doggone it Steely Dan, there you go with another pun.
April 21, 2010 4:51 PM
Steely Dan said...
Every dog has his day, Anon.
April 21, 2010 5:39 PM
Anonymous said...
Oh no, now you've done it. I spat my coffee out all over my computer .

Awesome post Blogo.

mongochili
April 22, 2010 5:10 AM
Sgt. Major Dickerson said...
That is humor. I recognize that.
April 22, 2010 6:44 AM
The 14th Sheepdog said...
It’s not easy being a deity trapped in a dog’s body you know!

Besides, dog’s have feelings and souls too.

See here:

http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2007/11/even-weirder-pet-stories-dept-man-weds.html http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2007/11/even-weirder-pet-stories-dept-man-weds.html

And we are often the victims of domestic violence:

http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/10/vegas-attorney-fired-gun-after-choking.html

But why does Kelley Lynch HATE us so much?
April 22, 2010 11:03 AM
Blogonaut said...
LynchMail™ alert:

Kelley Lynch wrote:

Hello The 14th Sharmapa,

Blogonaut is now referring to you as a "Sheep Dog." He is dangerously unstable. Please keep in mind that Cohen was Joshu Sasaki Roshi's emissary to the 16th Gyalwa Karmapa. This attack on you works well for "Mick Brown," naturally.

Please continue to say prayers for my family. These people are obviously stark raving lunatics. I will, of course, address the slander relating to you in my Motion to Vacate and Complaint against Blogonaut. It's shameless, pathetic, and outrageous. Sounds like "pure Cohen" from my perspective.

The "honor" is apparently all Blogonaut's.


Thank you.


Love,
Kelley


cc: Phil Spector and Dennis Riordan, Esquire
April 22, 2010 1:19 PM
The 14th Sheepdog said...
What have you against deity-Sheepdogs, Ms. Lynch?
April 22, 2010 1:29 PM
Sydney said...
BWAHAHAHAH!!! Damn, I spit coffee on my monitor again. Now you all have to stop this. Geeez, I go out of town overnight and I return to 38 messages to catch up on. I think before I read anything on this blog again, I will carefully remove all liquids from the area so I can stop spitting on my screen. The 14th Sheepdog - LMAO - that's the best one I've seen yet. Perhaps the 14th Sheepdog would like to make the acquaintance of the 7th Great Dane in my presence. Perhaps we can get all our Sherpas together for a spiritual awakening - think tent revival!! We could invite the Sharmapa, but I doubt the Chinese would let him come. Thank you all for the laughs. Keep them coming. Kelley is getting a bit boring repeating the same lies over and over again. LONG LIVE THE 14TH SHEEPDOG. LONG LIVE THE 7TH GREAT DANE.
April 22, 2010 1:44 PM
Blogonaut said...
We have got LynchMail™!!!!

From: Kelley Lynch odzerchenma3@gmail.com

To:

wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
jthompson@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aol.com,
dale@pikelley.com

CC: irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>,
ASKDOJ ,
Washington Field ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Dennis ,
"Edelman, Scott A." ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,

rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
"Lee K. Alpert" ,
Thaye Dorje <17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com>,
"YesheRimpoche@aol.com" ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,

Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
"attorney. general" ,

attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,

"Hank, Larry" ,
"John Hall, Chief of Police" ,
"m.j. smith" ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
a ,
Troy Anderson ,

"Hoffman, Rand" ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,

harriet.ryan@latimes.com,
"U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission" ,
"THOM WEIDLICH, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,

in.session.coldwater@hotmail.com,
entertainment@huffingtonpost.com,
National Enquirer ,
thom.mrozek@usdoj.gov,
greta@foxnews.com,

hardball@msnbc.com,
Paul Huebl ,
scoop@huffingtonpost.com,
ireport@cnn.com,

zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
Larry Rohter ,
mayor@lacity.org,
nancygrace@cnn.com,
newstips@kpcc.org,
nhueso@hollywoodreporter.com,

opr@irs.gov,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,
"Perusse, Bernie (Montreal Gazette)" ,
rena.golden@cnn.com,
takiffj@phillynews.com,
woodwardb@washpost.com,

Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Joff Belark ,
Dan Bergman ,
legal-support@google.com

Date: Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM

RE: LET'S THROW A PARTY AND INVITE BRUCE CUTER


Hi Sharmapa,


Blogonaut continues to trash you. This is where it has ended up. I get dragged into Phillip's deranged trials and you end up being trashed. Both of my children have been
relentlessly attacked by Blogonaut. Bruce Cutler called Donna Clarkson a money grubber. Five experts testified that she shot herself and Gianelli himself has said all five
would not lie. You have to question Donna Clarkson's motive. And you have to look at the trash on the internet. The top two contenders for the most vile are Michelle Blaine and Sprocket - who is apparently Donna Clarkson's mouthpiece. That tells me all I need to know about Donna Clarkson. Also, they are cyber-terrorists and bullies.


Blogonaut is not responsible for the email of mine he posted. That means he's responsible for everything he's posted about me. He has to call Bruce Cutler to the witness stand to testify to what Blogoat has attributed to him.


In any event, Roman Polanski has now replaced me as the featured article. The Appeal's Court said n investigation was urgent, seemed disturbed by the DA, and is playing
hot potatoe (sic). I will have to write Roman Polanski a thank you note for shifting Blogonaut's obsession away from me for a moment.

It's pure California, pure Los Angeles. It's the favorite past time. They are never held accountable for their actions or so they think.

Please do a puja. I'll continue to document the slander about you.

This Blog and the comments will absolutely be addressed in my Motion to Vacate and Complaint against Gianelli. He has you in his sights - he's now raised "Mick Brown" as an issue. I think he's out of his league. In fact, I think they all are.


Thank you.


Love,
Kelley
April 23, 2010 11:30 AM
Blogonaut said...
NOTE: Phil Spector and his legal team have been advised that I would like Bruce Cutler to take the stand with respect to these allegations. I would also like Bruce Cutler to address his views on why a man who would slander the Sharmapa; infer that his dog shits/pukes religious ceremonies on carpets, has a right to be using Mr. Cutler to defend himself. The notion is absurd and preposterous.
Dear Kelley:

We think, Ms. Lynch that we will call you to the stand pursuant to Evidence Code Section 776(a) to establish that you left 10-15 extended voice messages PER DAY on Bruce Cutler's office voice mail system during a TWO YEAR time period. We will also testify to our conversation with Bruce Cutler to that effect—as well as the fact that he told us that he viewed you as the worst kind of “telephone stalker”—not for the truth of the matter, but rather to negate the essential element of malice. (See California Evidence Code Section 1250 (a) (1).) [Don’t try to tell us how to get evidence admitted at trial; We are quite sure that YOU are out of YOUR “league” in a California courtroom. ]

PS: To The 14th Sheepdog:

Please DO NOT do another “puja”; our maid is still trying to clean the living room carpet after your last "puja"--you naughty little dog you.

Love,

Blogonaut
April 23, 2010 12:39 PM
The 14th Sheepdog said...
Blogonaut,

I made a puja on your carpet.

So frikin SUE me….

I may be a deity by I am also a Sheepdog…

Duh!
April 23, 2010 1:56 PM
Blogonaut said...
Hello Rinpoche and Rinpoche,

Please take a look at this pig's Blog posting about Sharmapa and Tibetan Buddhism. His dog is going to take a "shit" apparently and that's a "puja."

This man is a dangerously unstable pig who judges apparently fawn over.

Please say prayers. Bruce Cutler is going to defend this deranged pig? I see.


Love,
Kelley
April 23, 2010 4:32 PM
The 14th Sheepdog said...
Grow up, Lynch.

If you want to make an omelet you have to break a few eggs.

My pujas are a little messy at times sure, but who said anything about the inappropriate, scatological references you are making now.

Please take your potty mouth to another venue.
April 23, 2010 4:39 PM
Blogonaut said...
More Lynchmail....[We have 15 new one's in our inbox this morning--many too offensiive to post]:

From:

Kelley Lynch

To:

odzerchenma3, wfrayeh, jthompson, billpavelic, *IRS.Commissioner, ASKDOJ...

Date:

11:33 pm

Subj:

Re: CEASE AND DESIST

Hi Mr. Riordan,

I'm really starting to get the Cohen-Blogonauti connection.

Dear Kelley:

There is NO "connection" between this blog, its editor, and Leonard Conen, Alan Jackson, MIchelle Blaine, Sprocket, or ANY other person, blog, attorney, or entity--except in your own very desturbed mind.

--Blogonaut
April 24, 2010 8:53 AM
Blogonaut said...
Another LynchMail™ dispatch from the
”mom of the year”:

Hi Rutger,


Blogonaut’s DOG is shitting on Buddhism and the Sharmapa now. We're in good company. Cohen liked to look at people defecating on one another. Nasty stuff. Your brother should recall this - I came home and talked to him about the nasty things "someone" showed me on the internet that day.


Love,
Mother

Dear Kelley Ann:

The only one who has ever mentioned “Shitting” or “defecating” in reference to ANYONE is YOU .

BTW, nice email to your son mom—cc—of course—to the IRS, the press, and your usual spam victims, including us.
April 24, 2010 10:39 AM
Blogonaut said...
And the 24/7 LynchMail™ onslaught continues, with this (one of many) emails today):

From: Kelley Lynch gesargyalpo@gmail.com


To: wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
jthompson@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com

cc"*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>,
ASKDOJ ,
Washington Field ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Dennis ,
"Edelman, Scott A." ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,

rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
"Lee K. Alpert" ,
Thaye Dorje <17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com>,
"YesheRimpoche@aol.com" ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,

Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
"attorney. general" ,
attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,

stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
"Hank, Larry" ,
"John Hall, Chief of Police" ,
"m.j. smith" ,

moseszzz@mztv.com,
a ,
Troy Anderson ,
"Hoffman, Rand" ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Duane ,

Mick Brown ,
harriet.ryan@latimes.com,
"U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission" ,
"THOM WEIDLICH, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,

in.session.coldwater@hotmail.com,
entertainment@huffingtonpost.com,

National Enquirer ,
thom.mrozek@usdoj.gov,
greta@foxnews.com,
hardball@msnbc.com,

Paul Huebl ,
scoop@huffingtonpost.com,
ireport@cnn.com,

zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
Larry Rohter ,
mayor@lacity.org,
nancygrace@cnn.com,

newstips@kpcc.org,
nhueso@hollywoodreporter.com,
opr@irs.gov,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,

"Perusse, Bernie (Montreal Gazette)" ,
rena.golden@cnn.com,
takiffj@phillynews.com,
woodwardb@washpost.com,

Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Joff Belark ,
Dan Bergman ,
legal-support@google.com

Date: Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:05 AM

Re: CEASE AND DESIST


Blogonaut,


In response to your Open Letter responding to my note to my son (who advised you to CEASE and DESIST and informed you that he felt you THREATENED him): I think you're a PIG. […]People believe you're part of Cohen's legal team.

Kelley Lynch

Dear Kelley:

This was no “note” to your son that you sent us; it was a mass distributed written communiqué curiously emailed to your son Rutger (whom you live with—therefore rendering emails to him a little silly to begin with) and copied to the IRS, the FBI, the National Enquirer, and dozens of others on your spam list.

In fact, you have copied EVERY email that you have sent to two sons to this office (as well as your huge spam distribution list that includes the IRS).

We think it plain and beyond disputing that it is YOU and only you that has attempted to embroil your children and family in your own unique brand of over-the-top, manufactured drama.

Last, the only emails that Rutger sent to us were quite respectful, did not assert that we had “threatened” him, and instead apologized for your distressing conduct that he is quite powerless to control and wishes you would stop. And, of course, Rutger does not copy his emails to the IRS, the FBI, the National Enquirer and dozens of others; YOU are the only one who does that.

The only person that BOTH of your son’s have asked to “cease and desist” is YOU.
Bald faced lie about both of my sons.

”People” think that I am a part of Leonard Cohen’s legal team? The only person demented enough to think that is YOU.

If you don’t want us to post and comment on your vile, nutty emails, don’t send them.

--Blogonaut
April 24, 2010 3:17 PM
Blogonaut said...
More LynchMail™:

From: Kelley Lynch
toKelley Lynch ,
wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov,
jthompson@da.lacounty.gov,
billpavelic@aim.com

CC: irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>,
ASKDOJ ,
Washington Field ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
Dennis ,
"Edelman, Scott A." ,
KDoran@gibsondunn.com,

rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
"Lee K. Alpert" ,
Thaye Dorje <17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com>,
"YesheRimpoche@aol.com" ,
OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL ,
MEDIA RELATIONS PIO ,
chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org,

Teresa Low ,
PIU ,
governor@governor.ca.gov,
Governor.ritter@state.co.us,
"attorney. general" ,

attorney.general@ag.ky.gov,
stan.garnett@gmail.com,
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov,
becknerm ,
"Hank, Larry" ,

"John Hall, Chief of Police" ,
"m.j. smith" ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,

a ,
Troy Anderson ,
"Hoffman, Rand" ,
wennermedia@gmail.com,
Duane ,
Mick Brown ,

harriet.ryan@latimes.com,
"U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission" ,
"THOM WEIDLICH, BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM:" ,
lwieseltier@tnr.com,
in.session.coldwater@hotmail.com,
entertainment@huffingtonpost.com,

National Enquirer ,
thom.mrozek@usdoj.gov,
greta@foxnews.com,
hardball@msnbc.com,
Paul Huebl ,

scoop@huffingtonpost.com,
ireport@cnn.com,
zia.modabber@kattenlaw.com,
Larry Rohter ,
mayor@lacity.org,

nancygrace@cnn.com,
newstips@kpcc.org,
nhueso@hollywoodreporter.com,
opr@irs.gov,
pbronstein@sfchronicle.com,

"Perusse, Bernie (Montreal Gazette)" ,
rena.golden@cnn.com,
takiffj@phillynews.com,
woodwardb@washpost.com,

Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Joff Belark ,
Dan Bergman ,
legal-support@google.com

Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 3:43 PM

subjectRe: CEASE AND DESIST BLOGONAUT - YOU ARE A DERANGED LIAR WHO IS OBSESSED WITH ME AND MY FAMILY

Detract your statements. Stop maliciously slandering me. Do not continue to harass my family. I view that as witness tampering.

There is no connection between your blog, its editor, and Leonard Cohen, Alan Jackson, Michelle Blaine, Sprocket, or ANY other person?

That’s what you say. I already know that you’re a pathological liar. That’s why my Mother and I view as dangerously unstable. This could also be why my Mother is concerned that you are your fellow cyber-terrorists could push my younger son into committing suicide. I know that’s a game for you. It’s deadly serious for me.

Dear Kelley:

Your own words have made our point more eloquently that we ever could.

There is nothing to “detract” (ha!). “Deadly”, “terrorist”, “witness tampering”!

You don’t exaggerate much do you?

All the best,

Blogonaut
April 24, 2010 4:34 PM
Sydney said...
Lynch, the only one in all of God's creation who may be "pushing your young son into committing suicide" is YOU. Face facts. Do yourself and your sons a BIG favor and disappear somewhere, never to be seen or heard from again. The Antarctic would be nice - I hear it warms up somewhat this time of year. Or how about Iceland? There's a volcano up there behaving just like you do. Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock...
April 24, 2010 7:00 PM
Blogonaut said...
More LynchMail™:

From: Kelley Lynch odzerchenma3@gmail.com

To: Blogonaut Law-Blog ,
Dennis ,
irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>,
ASKDOJ ,

Washington Field ,
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov,
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com,
Robert MacMillan ,
moseszzz@mztv.com,
Dan Bergman

CC Thaye Dorje <17thgyalwakarmapa@gmail.com>,
Jewel of Activity ,
"YesheRimpoche@aol.com" ,
info@kibi-edu.org

Sun, Apr 25, 2010

Blogonaut,

I don't have a drinking problem or anything wrong with my liver. It's called - malicious slander. Are you working for Donna Clarkson? Perhaps an investigator could find that out for certain. I am not immoral because Lana Clarkson shot herself at Phil Spector's. Sorry. You yourself have said that all five major experts would not lie on the witness stand. Your Blog doesn't really seem to favor Phil Spector.

I don't have an alcohol-sloshed brain but I am wondering if you are on drugs. If [redacted] thinks I'm drinking that's because his father's a pathological liar who likes to destroy his children. His lawyer is also a pathological liar who probably should start thinking about "Robert Kory's" declaration in [redacted] custody matter. "God," does deranged Kelly Green hate to think what my brain is like? Then why is she/he/it so obsessed with me? Is it Alan Jackson? Donna Clarkson? Michelle Blaine? - all rolled into one. I thought Scott Rabb's article nailed Blaine nicely. Was she projectile vomiting also?

This is malicious slander. Unfortunately, for your deranged posters and yourself it's also a bald-faced lie. I can't wait to meet the judge in the matter that will involve you. If he/she is impressed, I will ask them to recuse themselves and seek immediate psychiatric attention. Quote me. I don't worship at the church of the injustice system where people lie and prevail and get paid to destroy people's lives. The State Bar crowd apparently worships there.

Kelley Lynch

Dear Kelley:

We refer you to our legal analysis of blog owner immunity for the comments authored and posted by third parties:

http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2010/04/blog-owner-immunity-and-anti-slap.html

We are not responsible for any content published on this blog not authored by Blogonaut.

In addition, the Clarkson family is represented by upper tier personal injury lawyers in Los Angeles and NOT anyone affiliated with this blog.

Finally, you can hardly blame people like kellygreen or Sydney for following your internet histrionics closely; when you write the IRS asking that someone be investigated, prosecuted and incarcerated that is a vicious act that tends to leave a lasting impression in the minds of people of ordinary sensibility. We do NOT endorse their content, however. We have our own opinions, as to you.

--Blogonaut
April 25, 2010 9:34 AM
Blogonaut said...
Dear Dummy:

I guess you don't know jack about Budist politics either.

No, the Karmapa Controversy does not relate to a "national security issue with India". Rather, it refers to the controversy surrounding the recognition of the Seventeenth Karmapa, the head of the Karma Kagyu sect of Tibetan Buddhism.

Two candidates have been put forward:

Ogyen Trinley Dorje (also spelled Urgyen Trinley Dorje) and Trinley Thaye Dorje

Both have already been enthroned as 17th Karmapa, and both independently have been performing ceremonial duties in the role of a Karmapa.

This controversy has existed since the death of the 16th Karmpa in 1981.

WE did not bring this issue up--you did. WE did not bring up the 14th Shamarpa's unseemly tiff with Mick Brown in 2005 3in part over an alleged $24,000 contribution--you did.

Nor have we conflated the two issues.
April 29, 2010 8:37 AM
Blogonaut said...
PS Dummy:

Shamar Rinpoche a/k/a The 14th Sharmapa, along with a MINORITY of monasteries and lamas, has not accepted Urgyen Trinley as Karmapa.

That is (we think) what you alluded to when you wrote to Shamar Rinpoche (copy to the IRS and the national media of course) and said “hopefully Blogonaut will not weigh in on the Karmapa controversy.”—thus raising the issue with us in the first instance.

Perhaps our very own 14th Sheepdog will have something to say about this later.

In the meantime, Shamar Rinpoche has you to thank for raising both the Karmapa controversy and the Mick Brown tiff with this blog.
April 29, 2010 8:52 AM
Anonymous said...
Tsk. Sigh. Why'd you have to ban her. It was just getting realllllly interesting. Agent Starling? Honestly.
-Ellie
April 29, 2010 1:54 PM
Blogonaut said...
Trust me on this Ellie--there is more of this freak show to come.

We just won't be quoting her emails any longer.
April 30, 2010 12:32 PM
Blogonaut said...
WHO IS THE LIAR?

We did not say that the Boies Schiller law firm tried to coerce Kelley Lynch into a settlement with Leonard Cohen, and that Boies Schiller used her (even to the point of one of their partners professing love for her and saying he wanted to marry her) SHE DID:

See document entitled “Motion to Quash”, scroll down to “AFFIDAVIT, Draft 3, September 30, 2008”—paragraph 14 posted by Kelley Lynch here:

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=253306120&blogId=436987525

“Boies Schiller began searching for law firms to represent me and ultimately sent me to Zia Modabber and James Mercer – who, in turn, sent me to Bert Deixler and Terry Bird. A conflict check was apparently run by the Pillsbury Firm and I was told by Norman Posel of Boies Schiller that John Cove, managing partner for Boies Schiller in Oakland, personally made these recommendations. It is my belief that BOIES SCHILLER SENT ME TO THESE LAW FIRMS IN AN ATTEMPT TO COERCE ME INTO MAKING AN ILLEGAL DEAL WITH COHEN – which would have ultimately benefited their client, Neal Greenberg, the Agile Group, etc. NORMAN POSEL, A STUDENT OF HIS HOLINESS KUSUM LINGPA, WAS ASKED – BY HIS HOLINESS – TO PROTECT ME. INSTEAD, POSEL USED ME TO ASSIST HIS CLIENT – GOING SO FAR AS TO PRETEND HE WAS IN LOVE WITH ME AND WANTED TO MARRY ME. I fedex'd three boxes of documents to Boies Schiller for review. Some of those documents ended up being used in legal documents filed by the Agile Group – including a transcript of my conversation with Agent Bill Betzer of the IRS. I FOUND THIS UNCONSCIONABLE AS GREENBERG, POSEL, AND OTHERS, HAD USED ME TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND THEN ATTEMPTED TO BLAME ME FOR THEIR ACTIONS OR THE ACTIONS OF OTHERS. In the latest round of legal insanity, Greenberg, Posel, and others, are attempting to take cover behind me and have brought my young son's "custody matter" up as a legal issue. I feel this is an attempt for Greenberg to assume my actual and factual position. Greenberg's lawsuit in Colorado appears, to me, to have been planned out in conjunction with the suit Cohen fraudulently filed against me in Los Angeles. Westin was a defendant in that suit as well but I feel the allegations against him are true.”

(Capitalization added for emphasis.)

We are not “lying” Ms. Lynch, YOU are the prevaricator.
Jihad Gianelli and the cyber-terrorists are definitely lying.
May 4, 2010 8:08 AM
Blogonaut said...
RE: Default judgment WAS NOT based on a “preliminary analysis”

The Complaint, at paragraph 3, does allege that a “preliminary analysis” shows that Lynch had siphoned off at least $5,000,000 more than she was entitled to, and that when confronted she admitted that she had taken “millions” because she had “gotten in over her head”.
No forensic accounting was done. The assets were not valued. I never admitted that I had taken anything. Cohen, as always, is not only a thief who has stolen from me, Phil Spector, Marty Machat, Steven Machat, and possibly Bob Johnston, he is also a bald-faced liar who should stick to fiction. I never said I had "gotten in over" my head or anything else. The preliminary analysis is evidence of fraud and my personal management fee is NOT the only thing to be taken into consideration. Furthermore, regardless of where Cohen deposited the various streams of royalty income - I was entitled to a 15% commission. Naturally, the thief is attempting to steal back my hard-earned commissions. He cannot stop himself. He cannot stop lying. He cannot properly compensate people. He evidently cannot stop stealing. And his tax fraud has clearly caught up with him. I have brought it to the attention of a Canadian government Minister as well.

However, fast forward to the DEFINITIVE analysis performed by forensic accountant Kevin L. Prins, as reflected in his declaration filed in support of the default judgment on May 9, 2006, which shows that the amounts that Kelley Lynch paid herself in excess of the 15% management fee to which she was entitled was far in excess of $5,000,000--$7,159,413 to be exact.
As Cohen knows, and this was attached to my Motion to Quash in Boulder, my accountant met with Kevin Prins (who appears to have committed fraud and perjured himself in his declaration) and Prins advised him that he did not have the back-up documentation re. all the entities to do a forensic accounting. This is a ledger and fraudulent. I didn't pay myself in excess of anything and my 15% management fee is NOT the only thing that needs to be addressed. Cohen's lawyer already confirmed for mine that I am entitled to a 15% personal management fee and own 15% of all intellectual property. The $5 million is a bogus amount Cohen requested from the Court. Evidently the balance of that is damages disguised as interest. The prayed for amount was NOT reduced by the amount Richard Westin (who only represented Cohen) paid as part of his settlement in this amount. The entire lawsuit is fraud; the lies are inconceivable; and no one understands who would like like this in legal documents when the IRS is in possession of evidence and all facts point to this - I was used horrendously; I consistently attempted to determine what was going on; Cohen was wrapped in attorney/client privilege with HIS tax lawyer and HIS financial adviser; etc.

This DEFINITIVE ANALYSIS finished SEVEN MONTHS AFTER THE COMPLAINT WAS FILED is based on canceled checks and account statements and proves that Lynch took checks made out to Leonard Cohen and deposited them in her own accounts (personal account and Stranger Management) to the tune of $229,500; transferred funds from accounts in Cohen’s name to the tune of $3,968,899; and transferred funds from Traditional Holdings (a Cohen owned entity) in excess of her agreed $20,000 a year + % to the tune of $2,961,014. Total $7,159,413 EXACTLY AND DEFINITIVELY.
Traditional Holdings was not Cohen's entity. The corporate books and records prove that. Blue Mist Touring was not Cohen's entity. The corporate books and records prove that. The agreed amount, per TH, was $20,000 per month and $20,000 per year. See management agreement prepared by Cohen's tax lawyer - for his sole benefit. There were other distributions as well - per the corporate books and records. Cohen should review the Indemnity Agreement he had his lawyer prepare on my behalf. Cohen refuses to repay the millions in loans he took from TH which caused his lawyer and financial adviser to conclude that his level of borrowing from TH was "dangerous" to the structure. Cohen cannot "sneak" two entities into a default judgment that are not parties to a lawsuit. I wasn't served. The proof of service is clearly fraudulent. The judge has no jurisdiction over me either. He now has jurisdiction over THEFT, wrongful conversion, fraud, intentional torts, the illegal altering of my federal tax returns, what I believe is a criminal cover up and obstruction of justice, etc.

The prejudgment interest on these siphoned finds totaled $2,341,345.
I view this as damages disguised as interest - which would be illegal.

The total loss to Leonard Cohen as a result of the funds wrongly siphoned from Cohen over a number of years was (with prejudgment interest) a whopping $9,500,758. (See Prins Dec., Summary, page 10, paragraph 30, http://www.scribd.com/doc/29620593/Cohen-vs-Kelley-Lynch-Prins-Dec.)
I have asked the IRS Commissioner's Staff to undertake the complete forensic accounting. As they, the FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and Phil Spector's attorney Dennis Riordan, just saw - Cohen's lawyers threatened me (again) with arrest over this information and other information I need for my federal tax returns which must be amended for the years 2001-2010. Prins ledger should be slam dunked into the trash can and the proper forensic accounting should include a valuation of all assets; a valuation of all assignments dating back to 1967; etc. Cohen has also stolen Steven Machat's 15% share of intellectual property. He has stolen Phil Spector's master tapes and sold them to Sony. He appears to be on a crime spree that is taking place in broad daylight.

Therefore, Kelley Lynch has won the minor point about the phrase “preliminary analysis” being in the Complaint (we don’t know why the Adobe word search failed to find it), but has lost the argument.
Jihad Gianelli appears to be representing Leonard Cohen.

Which brings us to the question of why—if Cohen established $7,159,413 in actual damages, was the award of actual damages by the trial court limited to $5,000,000 at the time the default judgment was entered on May 9, 2009?
Cohen didn't establish anything. He committed fraud upon the court and his perjury is inconceivable.

The answer is simple and straightforward: When entering a default judgment, the court is limited to the amount of the damages prayed for in the complaint. This is because a complaint that only seeks (for example) $15,000 might not motivate a defendant to appear and defend the case, so from a notice/due process standpoint, it is not fair to enter a default judgment for more.
Well then, I wonder why the court didn't reduce the prayed for damages by the settlement amount Richard Westin paid Leonard Cohen. Being served a lawsuit and being made aware of hearing dates, etc., might have served to motivate me to appear in court - although, as I have said, I do not participate in fraud and will not participate in what I view as a cover up of criminal tax fraud ... that includes "ILLEGAL MEDIATIONS."

See Code of Civ. Pro. Sec. 585; see also e.g., Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 826 [“the Courts of Appeal have consistently read the code to mean that a default judgment greater than the amount specifically demanded is void as beyond the court's jurisdiction”] and Traci & Marx Co. v. Legal Options, Inc. (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 155, 160.)

In this case the prayer of the Complaint sought $5,000,0000 damages for Kelley Lynch’s siphoning of funds, so the trial court “reduced” the compensatory damages being sought, and which were proved up by the Prins Declaration ($7,159,413 ) to a round $5,000,000—the dollar figure stated in the prayer of the complaint.

In other words, Kelley Lynch benefited from what a layperson would call a “technicality” in the law, limiting the damages awarded by the court in a default hearing to the amount of actual damages requested in the prayer.
I benefited from nothing. I turned down Cohen's offer of 50% community property; etc.

Therefore, we have also answered the question of why, if Cohen was seeking $7,159,413 ($9,500,758 with prejudgment interest) the trial court reduced the default judgment to $5,000,000 ($7,300,000 with prejudgment interest).

Class dismissed.
Hopefully, certain federal agencies can find a way to put this stark raving lunatic who appears to work for Leonard Cohen and may have found a sympathetic ear in Alan Jackson (Phil Spector's prosecutor) in prison.


May 5, 2010 8:04 AM

LEGAL NOTICE

Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Section 230(c)(1) neither Blogonaut nor its editor are responsible for any content authored by third parties, including but not limited to posted comments.

Sure. Tell it to your dog.

Questions? News Tips? Contact Blogonaut: