Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Kelley Lynch's Email to IRS, FBI, & DOJ Re. the Criminal Operative's Harassment Over Her Reply to Leonard Cohen's Entirely Fraudulent Appeal Brief

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:34 AM
Subject: Fwd: Reply brief
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

My public blog is not connected to any email account.  The Criminal Stalker is not "commenting" on anything.  He is lying and attempting to elicit information.  Was Judge Hess persuaded that Jane Doe was served?  Why?  Cohen and his lawyers argued that I was served but I didn't resemble the individual and I don't believe one exists.  Is that the "substantial evidence" LA Superior Court requires re. service of process, a never ending problem with that court?

I didn't waive jurisdictional issues and have not made a general appearance.  This was argued in my Opening Brief and the criminal is an ambulance chaser obsessed with me.  He of course continues to defend Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Michelle Rice, et al.  

I am most certainly filing a complaint in equity if this Court provides an adverse decision.  It is obscene that any court would permit someone to file one fraudulent and/or perjured legal document after another and provide no remedies for that whatsoever.  And, these pleadings have been transmitted to IRS and FTB, used to defraud the US Government and others, etc.  That situation is far from over.

My arguments re. standing were made before the Trial Court.  I also raised the fact that I was included on federal corporate tax returns as a partner.  That situation hasn't been resolved by Cohen filing fraudulent personal tax returns.  The argument is preposterous in the extreme.

Any adverse decision will be appealed to high courts.  I personally believe the US Supreme Court should hear this case.  The court has no jurisdiction over anything and that includes the corporations which are generally suspended and/or have no minimum ties to California.  The assets were not valued and the Court is not in a position to say otherwise because the fabricated expense ledger is not a corporate accounting.  That was and remains willful.  


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:58 PM
Subject: Reply brief
To: blind@gmail.com

I read the brief you posted on your public blog.