Monday, November 9, 2015

Which Version of Leonard Cohen's Good Rock 'n Roll Gun Story About Phil Spector Does Dennis Riordan Believe? Three Are Before LA Superior Court Now!

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: Your blog posted, mass emailed correspondence to Truc Do dated Sunday, November 8, 2015
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,

Hi Mr. Riordan,

Do you think it was an automatic or semi-automatic?  Held to the chest or head?  Does the real bullshit version of Cohen's story about Phillip involve wine or a cross bow?  These details are not clear.   One thing is clear - I am dealing with chronic liars with motive.  They all belong in bed together in prison.


On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Phil Spector could die in prison an innocent man.  Clearly, this is not ancient history and Cohen only publicly contradicted the DA's version in 2012.  I thought Do, who is clever with rhetoric, might want to explain which of Cohen's three bullshit gun stories about PS (before LA Superior Court) she and her pals believe.  I think reasonable people will and do conclude that Leonard Cohen is a liar.  However, LA Confidential doesn't want to prosecute him because they are all evidently in bed together.  And that's precisely where they all belong.


NOTE:  Kelley Lynch did not harass anyone at LA District Attorney's Office.  She is wondering, however, if there was a quid pro quo with that office, their decision not to prosecute Leonard Cohen, and his testimony about Phil Spector during their re-election campaign.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <>
Date: Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:19 AM
Subject: Your blog posted, mass emailed correspondence to Truc Do dated Sunday, November 8, 2015

Ms. Lynch,

Do you really believe that after all of your email harassment of the Los Angeles County District Attorney Major Crimes Unit from 2007 through the present that a former prosecutor from that office – who is now a partner with one of the most prestigious law firms in the world – will either buy into your “I  am writing a book” nonsense or waste any energy on you beyond asking the IT department at her firm to block your email address then hitting “delete”?

Or are you using Ms. Do as a foil to speak rhetorically to a wider audience (e.g., the numerous email cc’s and the readers of your Google indexed blog)?

Either way, you are referencing (and attempting to re-write) ancient history.

Stephen R. Gianelli
Crete, Greece