Monday, July 20, 2015

Stephen Gianelli's Involvement With Leonard Cohen, His Lawyers, Alan Jackson, Michelle Blaine, Gary & Louis Spector, Etc. Demands An Investigation

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Odds of obtaining Supreme Court review - the numbers
To: Stephen Gianelli <>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,


Gianelli's involvement with Alan Jackson, Leonard Cohen, Gary and Louis [Spector], Michelle Blaine, and the City Attorney warrants an investigation.  He is an ambulance chaser and perhaps he will help Gary and Louis Spector tie up Phillip's estate.  I wouldn't put anything past him.  The criminal targeted my sons for over six straight years.  He's also targeted my witnesses.  That's criminal witness tampering and everyone is clear about that fact.  This criminal doesn't care so the stakes are high, lows are lows, and there should be an investigated into any type of compensation for this criminal. I'm sure he knows off-shore tricks.  Leonard Cohen did - before I knew him.  Speak to Steven Machat.


On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Mr. Riordan,

Why was Gianelli working with Michelle Blaine?  The female Leonard Cohen - a bald faced liar and thief.


On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Hi Radar Online,

I would assume that's a future plan - to tie up Phil Spector's estate and blame Rachelle Spector somehow.  The criminal stalker should criminally harass Dennis Riordan over Phil Spector and stop contacting me, my sons, Paulette Brandt, etc.  Do you think this criminal moron is attempting to dissuade me?  He's as transparent as the day is long.  He sends me endless legal opinions defending Leonard Cohen and evidently found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson about me.  Then, Cooley aligned himself publicly with Cohen who proceeded to testify about Phil Spector and a gun - contradicting the version the DA used in motions in the Spector case and, according to Mick Brown, before the Grand Jury.  I'm attaching my letter to Alan Jackson from 2009 addressing my emails to the IRS.  Investigator William Frayeh, who Gianelli likes to copy on emails harassing me, worked on Phil Spector's case for the DA.  He told me that he felt Gianelli found a sympathetic ear with Alan Jackson.  

Gianelli's an ambulance chaser and appears to be involved with Gary and Louis Spector.  Also Ed Lozzi who evidently dated women with vicodin problems.  I've spoken to Lozzi for my book.  He's a maniac.  And a moron.  No one said corruption is intelligent.  Investigator Frayeh hand delivered the attached letter to former DA Steve Cooley, Alan Jackson, and Truc Do.  I've never received a response and they refused to investigate and prosecute the criminal negligence in my son's Whole Foods matter.  I don't think my tax documents are on the DA's website.  I think my prosecutor lied about me and federal tax matters. In fact, I know she did and so do many others.


On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Hi Mr. Riordan,

That's probably Gianeli's plan with Gary and Louis Spector.  Isn't he an ambulance chaser who worked on "estate" matter in Napa Valley?  I hope Phillip's will is videotaped.   You know the saying - where there's a will there's a relative.  It's just worth keeping in mind.  


On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:


Criminally harass Dennis Riordan over Phil Spector and the 9th circuit. You appear to be involved with Gary and Louis Spector.  What's your plan - do you intend to assist them in tying up Phillip's estate by arguing that Rachelle manipulated Phillip?  Wasn't that your argument in the Napa Valley matter where you targeted Chuck Morse, the attorney?  

Cease and desist, criminal.

Kelley Lynch

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Mr. Riordan,

Phillip does have the resources to argue his case before the U.S. Supreme Court. He should definitely investigate Gianelli's connections to Gary and Louis Spector.  Please keep in mind that this criminal stalker worked with Michelle Blaine to target my blogs and email accounts.  He also posts with Kelly Green of Darwin Exception fame from 2007 when she/it went on a rant about how much it hates Bruce Cutler.  Gianelli obviously attempts to infiltrate matters including Phil Spector's defense.  Everyone's onto him.  I'll be appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.  I stand as good a chance as anyone else but why is this criminal harassing me over this matter?  Obviously because he has motive.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:14 AM
Subject: Odds of obtaining Supreme Court review - the numbers
Cc: blind <>

Ms. Lynch,

The Supreme Court received an average of over 6,000 cert petitions annually. (2000-2004 Reports of the Director on the Judicial Business of the United States Courts ("Report"), Tables B-2, available at Some cases are left over from previous terms.) Although this represents a 30 percent increase over the petitions received in 1997, the acceptance rate has dropped from 2.5 percent in 1997 to 1.6 percent in 2004. (1997 Report, Table B-2; 2004 Report, Table B-2.) In the 2003/2004 term, the Court received 6,391 petitions and granted only 104 of them, of which only 28 involved private civil litigants. (2004 Report, Table B-2.) Thus, the odds of obtaining cert are tiny.

That’s 28 out of 6,000, or about 1%.

What is more NONE of thos 28 private litigants were pro se.

Those odds ASSUME you can successfully prosecute an appeal to the California Court of Appeal, craft a timely petition for review to the California Supreme Court and then come up with the estimated $2,000 required to print a rule complaint petition for review. (See here.)

One also keep in mind that you also vowed to appeal your criminal conviction beyond the Superior Court Appellate Department, but never did. In fact, you never even tried.

So you tell me, how likely is it that you will have your civil appeal  heard by the United States Supreme Court?