Sunday, June 28, 2015

The Criminal Stalker & His Ongoing Rotten Logic, Lies, & Defense of the Indefensible

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch email dated Sunday June 28, 2015 12:18 PM re Karina Von Watteville
To: Stephen Gianelli <>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>

Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Rather nauseating Trial Brief.  It looks like there are lots of lies.  Gianelli continues to criminally harass me.  

He's been advised to cease and desist.  The man is a criminal.

All the best,

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Stephen Gianelli,

I have received numerous criminally harassing emails from you this morning with Karina Von Watteville copied in.  

These issues can be addressed before LA Superior Court.  Perhaps LAPD's TMU would like to explain the ongoing criminal harassment, stalking, threats, intimidation tactics, slander, insults, etc. with respect to numerous Los Angeles residents.  That is their area of expertise.  That would include the targeting of both of my sons for six straight years or more - including my younger son as a minor.  Please review his declaration.  LAPD's TMU can also explain their understanding of obstruction of justice vis a vis their report and Leonard Cohen.  T

Ray Lawrence has nothing to do with this matter.  We didn't have an agreement as to when he would be repaid and this in writing from Ray Lawrence himself.  On the other hand, Von Watteville had an agreement to repay Paulette when she received her lump sum social security check.  The two of you committed fraud upon the Small Claims Court.  LA Superior Court is quite clear that "fraud upon the court" is irrelevant.  Service of process is irrelevant.  

Robert Kory will be deposed.  I do understand the mindset however.  Leonard Cohen, is a wealthy celebrity, just sends lawyers to court to say whatever serves his self-serving purposes.

It is entirely relevant that you, a Bay Area lawyer (who argues Spector prosecution theories online; worked with Michelle Blaine to target my blogs and email accounts; and argue Leonard Cohen's legal positions) heard from Michelle Rice, Kory Rice, in May 2009 and relentlessly targeted me, my sons, sister, ex husbands, friends, family members, and colleagues.  That would include, but is not limited to, my elderly parents, Paulette Brandt, the Scientist, Dan Meade, Palden Ronge, and Clea Surkhang.  You have engaged in what appears to be egregious criminal witness tampering and intimidation.  This will be brought to the Court's attention when I move to have you disqualified for bias and motive, retaliation, and other criminal conduct.

You don't know me and have no idea what evidence I have.  I libeled no one.  And, I will remind you that you do not have a litigation privilege with respect to your slander, defamation, libel, or conduct.

I also believe KVW is a vexatious litigant.  The attached Trial Brief, that indicates she used a man's credit card after his death, is quite revolting.  Linda Carol is the individual who prepared and approved her declaration on May 22, 2015.  

I am aware that IMA Yachts discovered your slanderous blog.  Make no mistake about that.

I said, and I repeat, that I will subpoena ICE's Chief Trial Counsel to explain what deportable offenses are.  Having said that, KVW is the individual who was ranting about Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, and ICE - in front of Paulette Brandt and two mediators.  I took the mediator's name down.  She advised me to bring this situation to the attention of the court.

I have nothing to do with the imbecilic wanted poster and find it questionable that KVW has 50 friends.  

Judges and jurors are obviously impressed with liars.  Leonard Cohen even perjured himself on the witness stand, and confessed to changing his testimony.  Barry Bonds is not the only person in California who should be charged with perjury and I would assume he agrees since his actions related to a vague question.

I am filing evidence of the extensive harassment with my Opposition to Cohen's retaliatory Sanctions Motion.  The judgment is void for lack of service.  Therefore, any decision non Judge Hess' part is void and res judicata and laches do not attach.  Furthermore, this is an utter abuse of taxpayer resources and implicates a very serious public policy re. government waste.  Addressing egregious fraud upon the court is not harassment unless you're a liar with motive.

I didn't fabricate declarations and you, Cohen, and his legal team are all chronic liars.  I have the limited powers of attorney and intend to address that false accusation (an ongoing tactic) in my federal RICO suit against Leonard Cohen, et al.

I am advising you to cease and desist.  Many people have but you're above the law, right Gianelli?  You cannot be deported from Greece?  You can lie about federal tax matters, target witnesses, slander people relentlessly, etc. with impunity.  That tells me you are a lying lawyer and State Bar Member.

Kelley Lynch
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:33 AM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch email dated Sunday June 28, 2015 12:18 PM re Karina Von Watteville
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: Karina Von Watteville <>,

Ms. Lynch,

To prove “fraud” it would have to be established that Ms. Von Watteville made a promise, upon which Ms. Brandt relied, and that when made (before she moved in) Ms. Von Watteville never intended to keep her promise. Moreover, successfully asserting the 2-year statute of limitations in court as a defense to a small claims suit is not “fraud”. Non-payment of rent is not “fraud”. (If it was, you would be in jail for stiffing Ray Lawrence on 9-month’s rent that you were still promising him in emails through April.)

You will never depose  Robert Kory for two reasons. First, his motion to quash the deposition subpoena would be granted in a heartbeat because he has no relevant evidence to give. Second, as a practical matter, fee waivers do not include discovery costs like deposition reporters (who are independent contractors) and you cannot afford $325 for the court reporter’s per diem (which is her fee for showing up for the deposition) + a room fee + $4.00 to $4.50 PER PAGE of the original transcript. (A full day of deposition questions with four breaks and an hour and a half for lunch works out to about 325 pages in my experience.)  do the math, to depose Kory it will cost you out of pocket $325 (per diem charge) + $1,300 for the transcript, a total of $1,625.00 to take on deposition (if you can get the court reporter to host at her office at no additional charge). That is cash in advance, because you are pro see on a fee waiver, and deposition reporters like to get paid.  In addition, each non-party witness you subpoena to a deposition is entitled to a statutory witness fee of $35 PLUS 20 cents a mile for the  distance traveled  BOTH WAYS – unless you are seeking to depose a government employee and then the witness fee is $275.

Which reminds me, if you want to subpoena any police officers or other government employees to trial, you will need to pay to the relevant employing agency $275 per witness at the time of service of the subpoena, fee waiver or no fee waiver. (Civil cases have different rules that criminal cases.)

You may think that you know something about legal procedure but you are in way over your head.

And you don’t have $50 to your name, let alone the scratch to take a deposition.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

Date: Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:58 PM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch email dated Sunday, June 28, 2015 12:39 AM re Karina Von Watteville
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: Karina Von Watteville <>,

Ms. Lynch,

I have contacted a great many people “since hearing from Kelley Lynch in April of 2009” as well, but that does not establish a causal link between hearing from you and everything I have done since, nor does it make Kelley Lynch responsible for my correspondence. One has nothing to do with the other. It is likewise true regarding “hearing from Michelle Rice” in 2009”.

How Ms. Von Watteville conducts her libel trial will be up to her – but any attempt by you to introduce hearsay testimony at trial would properly be subject to a motion in laminae barring you from calling such witnesses to the stand (thank you for the head’s up) or a contemporaneous objection on “hearsay” grounds under Evidence Code section 1200, since TMU does not have admissible, first hand evidence of the truth of the “prostitution” claim.

Moreover, whether or not Linda Carol repeated her false allegations to TMU is NOT a defense that to the civil charge that KELLEY LYNCH falsely published the accusation in mass emails and on her blog that Ms. Von Watteville is a prostitute, nor is it a defense that Linda Carole originally told YOU that.

If you REPEATED or republished the accusation and you cannot prove that it is true with ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE then you are libel. (Frommoethelydo v. Fire Ins. Exhange (1986) 42 Cal.3d 208, 217 [“A false statement is not less libelous because it is the repetition of rumor or gossip or of statements or allegations that others have made concerning the matter.”];  Ray v. Citizen-News Co. (1936) 14 Cal.App.2d 6, 8-9.)  In fact, EACH REPETITION of a defamatory statement may be considered a separate publication and, therefore, a separate cause of action even if the source is identified. (Di Giorgio Corp. v. Valley Labor Citizen (1968) 260 Cal.App.2d 268.)

Your problems (of many) include that your publication of this falsehood continued after you publicly admitted in writing that you did not believe anything Linda Carol says (because she hallucinates, and has psychiatric issues), you stated it in several occasions in an angry manner (showing an intent to harm Von Watteville), you repeated the accusation to ICE (which supports an inference that you viciously tried to have her deported), and also includes your pattern of publishing malicious falsehoods to use others in mass emails and in blog posts after you become angry with them (examples, your former supervisor at IMA Yachts, your former employer Jim Goudezari, and many others).

In addition, you also participated in circulating the attached libelous flier to business and people in Ms. Von Watteville’s neighborhood, which is in itself actionable libel. Ms. Von Watteville and her friend retrieved over 50 fliers from various people and they can identify Kelley Lynch at trial.

Finally, judges and juries tend to not believe you, and this is going to drag Paulette Brandt and Linda Carol down with you – you will all be defendants at the same table sitting right next to each other in front of the jury for the entire trial.

As for your threat to file “these emails” in the sanctions motion case, the only issues framed by the sanctions motion relate to whether or not your 2015 motion to reconsider was objectively frivolous (factually or legally) and whether or not it was filed in bad faith (i.e. to harass) and if so what the proper remedy under CCP § 128.7 should be.

Lodging third party emails with Judge Hess in opposition to the 9/3 motion that have zero to do with proving or disproving the objective merit of your motion, whether you fabricated declarations, and whether you filed it to harass and will only reinforce the patent lack of merit and harassing nature of every court filing you are responsible for.

Good luck with the sanctions motion and with Ms. Von Watteville’s libel suit.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

From: Kelley Lynch []
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 12:39 AM
To: *IRS.Commisioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; Mike Feuer; mayor.garcetti; Opla-pd-los-occ; Kelly.Sopko; Whistleblower; Attacheottawa
Cc: Stephen Gianelli

Mike Feuer and Mayor Garcetti,

I have been clear that Gianelli should stop criminally harassing me over Leonard Cohen, IRS matters, Phil Spector, Karina Von Watteville,etc.  I was clear that he should file the suit on her behalf and stop harassing me.  LAPD's TMU will be subpoenaed re. Linda Carol's confirmation of information in her declaration.  I will also demand discovery related to Von Watteville's communications with Robert Kory following her receipt of Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter and the Small Claims matter itself.  

This man belongs in prison for his conduct and that includes criminally harassing my sons, sister, friends, family members, and others, for over six straight years.  As many people have noted, he is a dangerous psychopath and deranged.

I have copied the Criminal Stalker, Stephen Gianelli, on this email so all parties are clear.  Many LA residents have been criminally harassed by this Stalker since he heard from Cohen's lawyer, Michelle Rice, in May 2009.  

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:15 PM
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: Paulette Brandt <>, Linda Carol International Hollywood Star <>, Karina Von Watteville <>

As you can see, Paulette and Linda, Kelley Lynch is REQUESTING that you all 3 get sued.

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

It's fine with me.  The criminal should file the lawsuit.  I'll subpoena LAPD's TMU.  I'm going to prepare documents showing the issues I am being harassed over in response to Cohen's harassment Sanctions Motion.  Also declarations from a variety of people.


On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
Stephen Gianelli,

File the lawsuit.  LAPD's TMU will be on the witness stand re. this declaration and Linda Carol's confirmation of information for them.  This information is Linda Carol's and she approved it on May 22, 2015.  I think I will file these harassing emails in the Sanctions Motion case to show Judge Hess that I am being criminally harassed and KVW called Robert Kory after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter.

Cease and desist, criminal.

Kelley Lynch