Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Kelley Lynch Continues To Be Criminally Harassed Over Leonard Cohen, IRS Tax Matters, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:00 AM
Subject: Fwd: Fw:
To: "kevin.prins" <>, "irs.commissioner" <>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, sedelman <>, JFeuer <>,

Kevin Prins,

The man who has stalked, harassed, and intimidated me, my family, and friends, for approximately 5 years now is writing me about K-1s and other federal tax matters related to Leonard Cohen.

Why don't you answer his question?  I didn't realize Steven Gianelli represented the IRS or these entities.  I am aware that he has relentlessly targeted me since speaking with Michelle Rice in May 2009.  I have discussed this with LAPD, LAPD TMU, LASD, FBI, and others.  He works in tandem with Cohen fan, Susanne [Walsh who frequently copies in Michelle] Rice, and he and Phil Spector's former assistant, Michelle Blaine, targeted my email accounts and blogs.

You prepared the fraudulent expense ledger.  It is contradicted by ALL corporate records, agreements, and the federal tax returns.  Why does the ledger indicate that I received income from LCI while the 2003, 2004, and 2005 K-1s indicate $0 income?  This is irreconcilable.  

Why doesn't the fraudulent ledger address the income TH shifted to me that was not distributed or the income addressed on the corporate K-1 partnership documents transmitted to IRS for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003.

The fraudulent default judgment does not address federal tax matters and LA Superior Court has no jurisdiction over me, the entities inserted into the default, or federal tax matters.  Why they are hearing federal tax matters is for reasons I cannot understand.

Leonard Cohen refuses to provide me with IRS required form 1099.  The IRS does not require me to subpoena that document - nor do they require me to explain why I am requesting it.  Cohen, City Attorney, Kory, and others, lied to jurors that i am in receipt of this information.  The City Attorney went so far as to explain that I had this information in my possession.  That's not how a 1099 works.  The employer provides that information to the employee.  There are penalties for failing to provide one.

I am attempting to address very serious tax matters with IRS and FTB.  I owe no taxes, my taxes are paid, Cohen and others have lied to IRS about that fact (with no access to my tax returns), and I lost two businesses in 2004 and 2005.  

While Gianelli continues to criminally harass me, I am in need of this information.  IRS, FTB and others are well aware of that fact.  Your ledger is fraudulent and that was used to support the default and obtain federal and state tax refunds.  Those refunds have now been challenged as fraud.  Leonard Cohen's lawsuit was retaliatory.  I went to the IRS on April 15, 2005 and spoke with the State of Kentucky before that.  It's also his defense to the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud.  

I didn't handle corporate, tax, financial, accounting, or investment matters and was very clear in emails to Cohen about that fact.  

Even though he has taken the position that he is the alter ego of these entities; engaged in self dealing; and fraudulent tax returns and information were evidently transmitted to IRS, FTB, etc. that does not resolve the issues I am legitimately addressing.  IRS, FTB, State of Kentucky continue to advise me to contact Cohen and the corporations for this information.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:26 AM
Subject: Fw:

Ms. Lynch,

You write (below):

“I am in receipt of an IRS transcript showing LCI advised IRS that I am a partner in LCI and had zero income for 2004 and 2005.”

I fail to see what else a form 1099 would do for you, other than confirming this information that you say you have now obtained directly from the IRS. Moreover, if you had no income for 2004 and 2005 from this entity, how would that impact your tax picture or prevent you from (belatedly) filing your 2004 and 2005 returns?

PS: Ms. Lynch, I am retired. I no longer practice law. As I believe you well know, I relocated to Crete, Greece in 2013.

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:55 AM
To: Jeffrey Korn <>, "irs.commissioner" <>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, moseszzz <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, sedelman <>, JFeuer <>, "kevin.prins" <>

I phoned IRS yesterday.  The issues I have recently raised with you have not been resolved.  Cohen has advised LA Superior Court that I have no ownership interest in these entities.  IRS continues to believe I do.  I've reviewed the K-1s with IRS and FTB.  They exist in their databases.  I am in receipt of an IRS transcript showing LCI advised IRS that I am a partner in LCI and had zero income for 2004 and 2005.  That information completely undermines the fraudulent expense ledger.

These issues were never litigated Jeffrey.  Nothing was.  I was not served Leonard Cohen's lawsuit and neither Cohen or his lawyer saw me in the summer of 2005.  Others did and I have provided you with their declarations since many people are now lying to Judge Hess.  

The federal tax matters have not been litigated, Jeffrey.  And, I would like to point out that IRS does not require me to sue someone in order to receive IRS required form 1099.  Cohen has not provided me that information for the year 2004.  The expense ledger is evidence of fraud, disregards corporate records, tax returns, stock shares, etc.  Has Cohen taken the position that fraudulent tax returns were transmitted to IRS?  Please refer to my emails where I confirm to Cohen that I do NOT handle IRS, accounting, or corporate matters.  Cohen's lawyers, business manager, and accountants did.

Stephen Gianelli continues to write and harass me.  He is now harassing me over Traditional Holdings, LLC.  Is the corporation located in Kentucky?  The address is Richard Westin's home address.  I do not see that Gianelli has been substituted for Westin, formally.  There is no reason for a Bay Area lawyer (who has targeted me, my family, and others since speaking to Michelle Rice in May 2009) to harass me over Leonard Cohen's tax problems and corporate matters.  I have spoken with LAPD, LAPD TMU, FBI, and others about this ongoing situation.

Kelley Lynch