Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: Implausible conspiracy theories
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, Fabian Paulmikell A <Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov>
Stephen Gianelli,
I have advised you to cease and desist. I didn't agree to any order based on fraud and perjury and was clear with the Court about that fact. The Colorado order was issued without findings. Cohen attempted to silence me and made a desperate flight into Colorado during his European tour - after threatening Ann Diamond over her article. Boulder Combined Court advised me, and others, that the permanent order expired on February 15, 2009. That is a very serious legal issue. Cohen then fraudulently registered the Colorado order as a "domestic violence order." That is a new order and I wasn't served or notified. This issue will be addressed in my RICO suits and I have asked DOJ and Senate Judiciary to investigate the VAWA funding fraud and use of fraud restraining orders to prevent me from requesting IRS required tax and corporate information (including K-1s, corporate accountings, etc.). City Attorney lied about federal tax matters and seemed focused on the criminal and illegal K-1s Cohen's wholly owned entity (LC Investments, LLC) transmitted to IRS showing $0 income and proving the fraud ledger is evidence of financial fraud. This information was transmitted to IRS and there is no litigation privilege with respect to the fraud tax refunds Cohen obtained.
Actually, the jurors wanted to hear from IRS. The judge prevented that but clearly they felt they were hearing a federal tax case related to Cohen. One juror relied on Streeter's lies about corporate assets. Leonard Cohen borrowed, or caused to be expended, approximately $6.7 million from his alleged "retirement" account. His lawyers, for his benefit, extinguished the annuity obligation on the 2003 returns so the fabricated lawsuit makes no sense in any event. It was merely Cohen's defense to the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud; retaliation for reporting his criminal tax fraud to IRS; and Cohen's way to confront Greenberg's allegations that Cohen and Kory engaged in extortion, criminal conspiracy, witness tampering, etc. You are now engaged in criminal witness tampering and the issues relate to Cohen and Spector. You worked with Michelle Blaine, who stole $1 million from Spector, to target my email accounts and blogs. You attempt to infiltrate, elicit information, interfere with matters (including the Tax Court matter), and witness tamper.
The Spector gun incident arose because the DA re-election campaign was an issue. David Mamet had publicly stated that he felt Spector was railroaded. There was most definitely a quid pro quo with the DA and Cohen. That's why Cohen was on the stand testifying about Spector and a gun. He now has three versions of his bullshit gun story about Phil Spector before LA Superior Court. The version he testified about contradicts the version Spector's prosecutors used in their motions in limine and - according to Mick Brown who reviewed the Grand Jury transcripts - with the Spector Grand Jury. The prosecutor elicited Cohen's testimony about Spector and a gun using an email to Dennis Riordan. Cohen wasn't copied on that and lied that he was. The prosecutor concealed the portion of the email thread to IRS Commissioner's Staff and about legitimate tax information. LAPD's report concluded that my alleged emails were generally requests for tax information. That report will be submitted to federal court.
These aren't conspiracies. They're facts. The only conspiracy issue here is the photograph you routinely sent me and then uploaded to the Tax Court evidence blog that was tampered with, altered, etc. That will now be addressed with Tax Court. You have advised me that you use TOR and no one could ever prove it was you. I disagree and will ask Tax Court to refer this matter to federal law enforcement for an investigation.
The prosecutors in the Spector case should be concerned that they could end up in prison for what they have done here. I think it's obvious that Phil Spector was set up using a fabricated narrative. What's impossible to believe is that you are not on someone's payroll, moonlighting for Spector's prosecutors, and representing Leonard Cohen's legal issues.
Do the names Annabelle Balle and Jim Blyth ring a bell? Looks like more insanity with respect to the online campaign to slander and discredit people; argue Spector's prosecutor's inane theories; and attack people who support Spector.
Cease and desist, criminal.
Kelley Lynch
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: Implausible conspiracy theories
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Implausible conspiracy theories
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Look, Ms. Lynch, the big picture re your criminal trial is that there was a restraining order THAT YOU AGREED TO that prevented you from contacting Leonard Cohen. You violated that order with voice messages and emails. There was no viable defense.
The entire IRS criminal division could have testified and it would have not made any difference.
The "gun incidents" came up at your trial because YOU sent emails on that subject to Cohen IN VIOLATION OF THE RESTRAINING ORDER and those (and other) emails and voice mails were all part of the evidence that you violated the order. That was the only significance. It did not matter whether your allegations were true or false. The only relevance was that you SENT THEM in VIOLATION OF THE ORDER.
But on the subject of your RICO suit, and your claim of "overlapping conspiracies", your contention that you were essentially framed on criminal charges because the prosecution was "afraid of the Phil Spector murder verdict being reversed" does not even make sense. Convicting you had NO EFFECT ON SPECTOR'S PENDING APPEAL. Acquitting you would have had NO EFFECT ON SPECTOR'S PENDING APPEAL. One had nothing to do with the other.
Therefore, your "conspiracy" theory is not only "implausible" it is IMPOSSIBLE.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=957198657665872&id=327647197287691&comment_id=1030624026990001¬if_t=like
Stephen Gianelli,Attempting to spin the situation re. my trial. The City Attorney, working with the DA, elicited information about Phil Spector and a gun. That was done by elicting perjured testimony from Cohen about an email I sent to Dennis Riordan. Cohen wasn't a recipient but lied when he testified that he was. I wasn't part of the Spector trial and have never said I had any role in the appeal. Nor did I say that Cohen did. Mick Brown, UK Telegraph, reviewed the Spector Grand Jury Testimony and said Cohen's testimony/statements were presented. I reviewed the prosecution's motions in the Spector case and they did indeed use a "prior bad act" gun story of Cohen's. That was contradicted by Cohen's testimony during my trial and further contradicted by Cohen's email to my alleged prosecutor who wrote about the Grand Jury but failed to provide my lawyers with Brady materials; the unsealed Grand Jury transcript.Thinking of the photograph you uploaded to my Tax Court Petition evidence blog again, Gianelli? I agree that there are people involved in this matter that resemble escapees from a criminal insane asylum. Did you create the monker "Anabelle Baile" as well? Suddenly, she wants to become my friend on Facebook? How coincidential. Sounds like your blog, Kelly Green (HATES Cutler), Mongochili, 14th Sheepdog.Tell your buddies, the only conspiracy here is the set up of Phil Spector and Cohen's criminal tax fraud, theft, etc. No tin foil hats needed. They're cut throats in suits.Cease and desist.
Kelley Lynch
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=957198657665872&id=327647197287691&comment_id=1030624026990001¬if_t=like
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:58 AM
Subject: Implausible conspiracy theories
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>Let's set aside the implausibility of the current City Attorney (let alone Leonard Cohen, Kory, or Rice) caring one way or the other about whether Phil Spector's prior appeal or current habeas proceding resulted in a new trial.There is no way in hell that the outcome of your 2012 criminal trial and/or related appeal could have affected the habreas peition filed in the Spector matter or the outcome of Spector's earlier direct appeal from his murder conviction. That is utterly impossible.Therefore, your attempt to link the two cases through an alleged "overpaping, ongoing conspiracy" is inherently implausible. You might as well allege that little green men beamed into court and tampered with the verdict that convicted you.If you can't see even that, you are indeed mentally ill.Sent from my BlackBerry 10smartphone.
