Date: Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:31 PM
Subject: Fwd: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov
IRS, FBI, and DOJ,
The Criminal is on a roll. I didn't bring this criminal into my matters. He heard from Kory & Rice in May 2009 and has harassed, stalked, terrorized, targeted, slandered, insulted, etc. me, my sons, elderly parents, sister and her husband, friends, Paulette Brandt, the Scientist and others. He works in tandem with Blaine, Walsh (Cohen's fan), and create monikers like Kelly Green, Mongochili, 14th Sheepdog, and 17th Shitzu. The man is a chronic, pathological liar who routinely lies to IRS, FBI, and DOJ.
The Criminal is on a roll. I didn't bring this criminal into my matters. He heard from Kory & Rice in May 2009 and has harassed, stalked, terrorized, targeted, slandered, insulted, etc. me, my sons, elderly parents, sister and her husband, friends, Paulette Brandt, the Scientist and others. He works in tandem with Blaine, Walsh (Cohen's fan), and create monikers like Kelly Green, Mongochili, 14th Sheepdog, and 17th Shitzu. The man is a chronic, pathological liar who routinely lies to IRS, FBI, and DOJ.
I filed my Notice of Appeal re. the Tax Court matter. I will wait to hear from the 9th Circuit - not this criminal.
Leonard Cohen prefers to be unopposed because his fraud, perjury, litigation misconduct, abusive tactics, theft, extortion, embezzlement, money laundering, libel, etc. works. The Canadian, who cannot live in Canada due to tax and residence problems, is proving that the system works beautifully for criminals willing to lie on the stand and under oath - particularly if you willfully fail to serve someone. I don't think that's a great achievement. The clown stalker is perfect for Cohen. I have no doubt he personally approves of his conduct. That's how Cohen operates.
In any event, the Notice of Appeal re. the 9th Circuit has now been filed. I've also uploaded my declaration signature page as I advised the Court that I would.
Kelley
| 12/29/2015 | DECLARATION SIGNATURE PAGE by Petr. Kelley Ann Lynch |
|
| View 2 | ||||||||||
| 12/29/2015 | PETITIONER KELLEY LYNCH'S NOTICE OF APPEAL (9TH CIRCUIT COURT) by Petr. Kelley Ann Lynch |
|
| View 2 |
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>Date: Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>Date: Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Ms. Lynch,
You brought me into your affairs through YOUR behaviors, and no amount of additional emails will ever change that.
You have lost and will continue to lose every single time you petition the court - through complaint, by way of defense, or on appeal. Because in the final analysis your positions are not only legally unsupported, they are factually unreasonable in a very obvious way.
You are utterly ridiculous.
As a result you lost today and not for the first time.
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:22 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
> To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
> To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>
>
>
> Not only am I right - and I wouldn't bother if I wasn't - several courts have lifted language right out of my emails to Lynch, including the "ticket to the tax court" quote today. Judge Hess adopted an entire paragraph from one of my emails to Lynch when he addressed her orally (per the transcript) at the June, 2015 second motion to set Cohen's J aside.
>
> She somehow believes my emails will prove she is being harassed, and THAT will win the day for her, so she attaches them to court filings. But all the courts see is my compelling reasoning and succinct, dispositive legal authorities cited chapter and verse by volume and page number.
>
> The order is appealable to the 9th circuit, but they will affirm in a three line "per curam" order.
>
> She always says she will appeal, and she always loses. Always.
>
> from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
> Original Message
> From: alan hootnick
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 13:42
> To: Stephen Gianelli
> Reply To: alan hootnick
> Subject: Re: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
>
> She says she will "appeal" the decision (where?)
>
> Time and time again you have been proved correct, but she is still beating her head against the wall. Another example of the blinding power of wishful thinking.
> ------------------------------
> On Tue, 12/29/15, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Subject: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
> To: "Kelley Lynch" <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
> Cc: BlindDistribution@gmail.com
> Date: Tuesday, December 29, 2015, 4:31 PM
>
The
> tax court DISMISSED your petition and motions to set aside
> Leonard Cohen's 2003 stipulated tax court
> disposition, as well as your three supplemental filings
> alleging "harassment" by me, and DISREGARDED your
> request to "refer Gianelli's tampering with my
> blog" for "criminal investigation" because -
> AS I TOLD YOU REPEATEDLY - the tax court has NO JURISDICTION
> over your ridiculous made-up bullshit.
> NOTABLY, the reasoning of the tax court was
> identical to my own, down to the VERY SAME cited case
> authorities. No notice of determination, no jurisdiction
> ("...it has been said that a notice of determination is
> the taxpayer's ticket to the tax court..."; no
> tickee, no shirtee...).
> See attached tax court opinion.
> CASE DISMISSED!
> Next up: Your "Federal Court RICCO suit that
> I strongly discouraged you from filing and which suit, if
> filed, will also be summarily dismissed for the reasons (and
> based on the extensive statutory and case authorities) I
> previously provided you with as well.
> Until then, I am going back to my perch on the
> beach... beautiful day here in the mid
> '70's...
>
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10
>
>
>
Ms. Lynch,
You brought me into your affairs through YOUR behaviors, and no amount of additional emails will ever change that.
You have lost and will continue to lose every single time you petition the court - through complaint, by way of defense, or on appeal. Because in the final analysis your positions are not only legally unsupported, they are factually unreasonable in a very obvious way.
You are utterly ridiculous.
As a result you lost today and not for the first time.
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stephen Gianelli,
> You have been relentlessly advised to cease and desist. Your harassment over this Tax Court matter, and all Cohen related matters, remains unconscionable. And, you continue to criminally harass Paulette Brandt who doesn't know Cohen. She met him once years ago, as Phillip's girlfriend, when Cohen visited Spector's home. She has provided declarations to various courts about the situation between me and Cohen so this is absolutely criminal witness tampering. You also assisted her former roommate, who I do not know, in defrauding Paulette Brandt of $6,700 by lying to Small Claims Court. Cohen is doing a very good job, as a Canadian, of proving that one way to prevail in U.S. Courts is through the use of extensive perjury, fraud, litigation misconduct, abusive tactics, theft, and failure to serve parties.
> Cease and desist.
> Kelley Lynch
> You have been relentlessly advised to cease and desist. Your harassment over this Tax Court matter, and all Cohen related matters, remains unconscionable. And, you continue to criminally harass Paulette Brandt who doesn't know Cohen. She met him once years ago, as Phillip's girlfriend, when Cohen visited Spector's home. She has provided declarations to various courts about the situation between me and Cohen so this is absolutely criminal witness tampering. You also assisted her former roommate, who I do not know, in defrauding Paulette Brandt of $6,700 by lying to Small Claims Court. Cohen is doing a very good job, as a Canadian, of proving that one way to prevail in U.S. Courts is through the use of extensive perjury, fraud, litigation misconduct, abusive tactics, theft, and failure to serve parties.
> Cease and desist.
> Kelley Lynch
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:22 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
> To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
> To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>
>
>
> Not only am I right - and I wouldn't bother if I wasn't - several courts have lifted language right out of my emails to Lynch, including the "ticket to the tax court" quote today. Judge Hess adopted an entire paragraph from one of my emails to Lynch when he addressed her orally (per the transcript) at the June, 2015 second motion to set Cohen's J aside.
>
> She somehow believes my emails will prove she is being harassed, and THAT will win the day for her, so she attaches them to court filings. But all the courts see is my compelling reasoning and succinct, dispositive legal authorities cited chapter and verse by volume and page number.
>
> The order is appealable to the 9th circuit, but they will affirm in a three line "per curam" order.
>
> She always says she will appeal, and she always loses. Always.
>
> from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
> Original Message
> From: alan hootnick
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 13:42
> To: Stephen Gianelli
> Reply To: alan hootnick
> Subject: Re: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
>
> She says she will "appeal" the decision (where?)
>
> Time and time again you have been proved correct, but she is still beating her head against the wall. Another example of the blinding power of wishful thinking.
> ------------------------------
> On Tue, 12/29/15, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Subject: Lynch Tax Court Petition - DISMISSED; all collateral claims of "harassment" IGNORED due to L-A-C-K of J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N; no criminal referral
> To: "Kelley Lynch" <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
> Cc: BlindDistribution@gmail.com
> Date: Tuesday, December 29, 2015, 4:31 PM
>
The
> tax court DISMISSED your petition and motions to set aside
> Leonard Cohen's 2003 stipulated tax court
> disposition, as well as your three supplemental filings
> alleging "harassment" by me, and DISREGARDED your
> request to "refer Gianelli's tampering with my
> blog" for "criminal investigation" because -
> AS I TOLD YOU REPEATEDLY - the tax court has NO JURISDICTION
> over your ridiculous made-up bullshit.
> NOTABLY, the reasoning of the tax court was
> identical to my own, down to the VERY SAME cited case
> authorities. No notice of determination, no jurisdiction
> ("...it has been said that a notice of determination is
> the taxpayer's ticket to the tax court..."; no
> tickee, no shirtee...).
> See attached tax court opinion.
> CASE DISMISSED!
> Next up: Your "Federal Court RICCO suit that
> I strongly discouraged you from filing and which suit, if
> filed, will also be summarily dismissed for the reasons (and
> based on the extensive statutory and case authorities) I
> previously provided you with as well.
> Until then, I am going back to my perch on the
> beach... beautiful day here in the mid
> '70's...
>
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10
>
>
>
