Kelley Lynch's Email to Alan Hootnick Re. the Domestic Violence/VAWA Funding Fraud, Leonard Cohen's Tax Fraud & Phil Spector's Case

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 6:41 AM
Subject: Fwd: Your emails and blog posts dated Saturday, December 5, 2015
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com

Alan Hootnick,

Gianelli evidently thinks you are interested in his harassing, slanderous emails to and/or about me.

My public defenders spoke with the jurors and I was advised that one felt there was a jury plant. I have brought that to the attention of IRS, FBI, and DOJ and - as you know - there are very serious allegations (and probable evidence) of juror misconduct in the Phil Spector case.  My lawyer absolutely advised me that City Attorney attempted to sabotage IRS; discredit me; and the DA didn't want the Spector verdict overturned.  And, my appellate attorney wrote that he viewed my trial as an IRS tax fraud case (related to Cohen) and should be investigated as such by IRS.  IRS should speak to them directly.  However, Gianelli has confirmed that he contacted my public defender and attempted to violate my attorney/client privilege with them.  He wanted information about what my witnesses confirmed for this particular lawyer.  Maybe my public defender was "humoring" Gianelli.  That seems like a wiser conclusion.

My appellate attorney did WRITE that my trial was an "IRS tax fraud case" that should be investigated by IRS.  I am sitting here with his letter which mentions "Gianelli" who criminally harassed him for well over a year.  I shared the letter with IRS, FBI, and DOJ.

I waived no rights at any proceeding in Colorado.  The fraudulent order was issued without findings.  It has now been fraudulently registered in California as a domestic violence order although Cohen and I were never in a dating relationship.  He perjured himself over this issue; confessed to perjury on the witness stand; and the City Atorney's attempts to rehabilitate him were farcical and obscene.  She didn't bother asking him why he testified that I never "stole" from him.  There is absolutely VAWA funding fraud and I have asked DOJ and Senate Judiciary to investigate that and audit the City and County.  

I can assure you that this is not about personal grievances.  In any event, I'll send you a copy of my RICO Complaints once they're filed.  And they will address the over-lapping "legal conspiracies" that involve Phil Spector, his set up, Leonard Cohen, his tax fraud, and federal tax matters.  

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:41 PM
Subject: Your emails and blog posts dated Saturday, December 5, 2015
To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com
Cc: ahootnick@yahoo.com

Ms. Lynch,

1. You write: “My lawyers spoke to the jurors.  My lawyer felt there may have been a "jury plant" and that is a very serious issue.  My lawyer advised me:  City Attorney is attempting to sabotage IRS; discredit me; and DA doesn't want the Spector verdict overturned.  My appellate attorney wrote that my trial was an IRS tax fraud case (related to Cohen) and should be investigated as such by IRS.”

One of your trial defenders told me that they were “humoring” you throughout the trial because it was the only way to get through it. There is zero evidence of a “jury plant” and if such existed, your defenders would have included that evidence in their motion for a new trial that the judge denied before you were sentenced.

There is no possibility that prosecuting you for misdemeanor or any) offenses held the logical potential to “sabotage”  the IRS. There is no logical scenario under which prosecuting you in 2012 could have had any effect on Phil Spector’s then pending direct appeal from his 2009 murder conviction.

If your appellate attorney Francisco Suarez really did say that your 2012 misdemeanor trial was a “IRS tax fraud case” (which I doubt) a. it is odd that he did not include that assertion in your opening brief on appeal he drafted and filed and b. he is more of an idiot than I thought previously.

2. You write: “I waived no objections whatsoever [when I asked the Colorado court court to simply enter the restraining order against me].”

Your words and actions at the Colorado hearing did not have the legal effect that you think. The court informed you that you had the right to an evidentiary hearing as a precondition of issuing a permanent restraining order (also called a “protection order”) against you. Several minutes into that hearing you requested the court to simply issue the order. The court admonished you that the order would be permanent, that you would be prohibited from contacting Leonard Cohen, and that if you violated it, you could be sentenced to serve 18-months in jail per violation. The could then asked you with the above in mind do you still wish the court to dispense with the hearing and issue the order. You said “yes please”. The court issued the order. You thanked her. The totality of your words and actions at the hearing, including asking for the order to issue, had the legal effect of waiving any objections to the permanent restraining order no matter what your uninformed opinion may be at this point. This is due process 101. It’s not rocket science.

3. You also write: “[The Colorado] order will be addressed in my RICO suit.  The fraud DMV order will be addressed as well.  DOJ and Senate Judiciary should engage in an extensive audit of VAWA funds in Los Angeles and LA Superior Court's attempt to extort domestic violence fines from me.”

Apparently, this RICO suit you keep threatening to file will be your magnum opus – an omnibus legal filing addressing your every legal grievance against Cohen, Kory, Rice, and the City and County of LA, including your long running allegations of “overlapping conspiracies concerning the Phil Spector murder prosecution” and your criminal matter as well as the civil judgment against you.

Apparently, you are determined to proceed with that filing despite the chapter and verse legal authorities I transmitted to you demonstrating that any such lawsuit will have a half-life of all of a month before it is dismissed by the district court.

You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink.

The best of luck to you.

Stephen Gianelli

Crete, Greece