Kelley Lynch's Email To IRS, FBI, DOJ & FTB Re. Cohen & Kory's Fraudulent Misrepresentations & Perjured Testimony

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:53 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>

IRS, FBI, DOJ, and FTB,

I've sent Korn excerpts from the trial transcript.  It is outrageous that a government lawyer would lie to jurors and advise them that an employee would have the information IRS requires the employer to provide on form 1099.  IRS is not in possession of that information either.  I can assure you that I am not interested in communicating with Cohen.  The mere notion is absurd and insane.  These are highly legitimate tax, legal, corporate, and accounting matters.  I would like a formal opinion on Cohen's testimony that I have no need to request information - particularly given the fact that IRS, State of Kentucky, and FTB continue to advise me to contact Cohen re. these matters.  

All the best,

Kelley

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Jeffrey,

Here are the excerpts of the trial transcript that fraudulently misrepresent IRS and other tax matters.  Streeter lied:  an employee does not have the information IRS requires an employer to provide.  It does not matter if Cohen doesn't know what a 1099 or K-1 are.  Anyone can google that information and he has representatives who should know what these documents.

The K-1s I am referring to relate to both LC Investments, LLC and Traditional Holdings, LLC.  I would like to know how your client plans to relate to the phantom income shifted to me but not distributed.  I am not a partner on LCI but LCI transmitted K-1s to IRS and State of Kentucky.  Those K-1s show $0 income for 2004 and 2005.  They completely undermine the fraudulent expense ledger.  

Leonard Cohen's tax refund, which has been challenged as fraud with both IRS and FTB, has nothing whatsoever to do with the 1099 he is obligated to provide me or the K-1s from LCI that should be rescinded.  The refunds have nothing to do with the K-1s transmitted, with tax returns, to IRS re. TH.  

Leonard Cohen's loans and expenditures total approximately $6.6 million.  Please review the Annuity Agreement that I am once again attaching herewith.  Cohen's loans were to be repaid within 3 years with interest.  How are those loans being handled?  These are all issues raised in documents you filed in response to my Motion to Vacate.  They are entirely legitimate business, tax, and accounting matters.  

The IRS does not have a holding with respect to the default judgment.  Cohen obtained the fraudulent refund from IRS in December 2005.  That was nearly six months prior to entry of default.  I was not served Cohen's lawsuit and have provided you with three declarations from people who visited me in August 2005.  I didn't resemble the individual described in the proof of service and no one in my home did.  

IRS views me as a partner on numerous entities.  What mistake did Westin rectify with respect to Traditional Holdings?  

I don't think I have to be formidably intelligent to request IRS required form 1099 or ask that Cohen rescind the LCI K-1s or explain why he refuses to do so.  The evidence I have proves I have an ownership interest in TH, BMT, and Old Ideas, LLC.  I was never a partner in LCI so I cannot imagine why your client refuses to address that issue.  IRS, State of Kentucky, and FTB have repeatedly advised me to contact your client re. these matters.  

I did not fail to file my returns as your client testified.  I am being willfully prevented from doing so.  The expense ledger is not an accounting.  It is a meaningless list of numbers that fails to address my ownership interest in these entities.  

I am not interested in your client.  I do not want to see him.  That's why I refused to meet with him - including at my lawyers' office,.  I do not want to attend his concert and find that type of accusation absurd.  I, my family, and others have been relentlessly harassed over this situation.  

I think it's outrageous that I have to file a lawsuit to obtain IRS required, and other information, I need.  I would also like to point out that your client's lawyer prepared the corporate tax returns.  I didn't choose Richard Westin.  Cohen met with and hired Greenberg.  Greenberg referred Westin to Cohen with respect to the first Sony deal.

I also believe you should review Cohen's declaration in the CAK deal.  It's not hearsay and he signed it and submitted it to a Court.  It proves that he was actively involved in these deals, controlled them, and knew precisely what his royalty income was.  A fabricated narrative will not change that fact.

I would appreciate the courtesy of a response.  On another note, I have confirmed that I received information from the Boulder Court that the restraining order is NOT domestic violence.  I personally believe that your client should take responsibility for the fraudulent registration with LA Superior Court.  Cohen and I were never in an intimate dating relationship and I am convinced he filed this in the manner in which he did to head off allegations re. sexual harassment and indecent exposure.

Kelley Lynch

PD:  And, in fact, you had actually taken money from that account to buy homes, correct?

Cohen:  Yes, I had.

PD:  You took money from that account to buy a house for your son, correct?

Cohen:  That’s correct.

PD:  To buy a house for your girlfriend, correct?

Cohen:  Yes.

PD:  Okay.  So you – it’s fair to say that you did take money from that account?

Cohen:  That’s correct, yes.

PD:  You were aware enough about that account to know that you could take money from that account?

Cohen:  That’s correct.  RT 288

She mentions every so often the tax statements is merely a ruse … Let’s talk a little bit about Ms. Lynch’s need for the tax form or tax return – The evidence will show that Ms. Lynch was Mr. Cohen’s business manager.  The evidence will show that Mr. Lynch – Mr. Cohen has no clue as to what a W-2 form is, a 1099 is, a K-1 form.  The evidence will show that Ms. Lynch is the one that had all of that information, knew all that information.  Mr. Cohen did not have it, does not have it and does not understand what it means.  Okay.  RT 43

Streeter:  And do you also recall discussion about K-1, criminal K-1?

Cohen:    Yes, that was a constant theme.

Streeter:   Do you know what a K-1 is, Mr. Cohen?

Cohen:  Well, I didn’t until I asked.

Streeter:  Who did you ask?

Cohen:  I asked my attorney.  RT 82

Streeter:  There is mention of the K-1.  The People ask you about some other documents.  Do you know what a W-2 is? 

Cohen:  W-2?  No, I don’t.

Streeter:  How about a 1099?

Cohen:  A 1099, yes, is issued by an employer to an employee.  RT 83

Streeter:  If there was any mention in that specific email about K-1 forms?

Cohen:  Yes, there are.  RT 88

PD:  Who handled your corporate books …

Cohen:  Who was handling it?

PD:  Who handled your corporate accounting, your corporate books?

Cohen:  A number of people handled it under the direction of my – of my lawyer.  RT 279

PD:  Do you know what a K-1 is?

Cohen:  I have a perfect – a sense of what it is, but I wouldn’t be able to teach it.  RT 280

PD:  And so it would be fair to say that there was tax information that was requested by Ms. Lynch, correct?

Cohen:  Hidden in the volume of the emails there was a request for tax information which Ms. Lynch already had.  RT 281

PD:  There were requests in those emails for tax information, correct?

Cohen:  Yes, Sir.  RT 281

PD:  Did you ever bring that attention to whoever handled your taxes?

Cohen:  Yes, Sir. And it was determined by two courts of this country and the IRS that – It was determined, Sir, that I had no tax responsibility in record to Ms. Lynch.  RT 281-282

Cohen:  Two courts had given me a default – or one court had given me a default judgment; the other court affirmed that default judgment.  But, more significantly, the IRS accepted the results of that default judgment and awarded me a tax refund, so Ms. Lynch had no cause to ask me for any taxation information.  The forensic report on which the default judgments were made were very specific and Ms. Lynch has read them.  That is the forensic report that Ms. Lynch has been asking for.  The only problem is she doesn’t like the results.  RT 282

PD:  You had a company called Traditional Holdings, correct?

Cohen:  Correct.

PD:  Now, this company, you created this company before you sold copyrights to Sony, correct?

Cohen:  I don’t know.

PD:  Do you know why you created this company?

Cohen:  No, not really.

PD:  So you had no involvement with the creation of the company?

Cohen:  I wasn’t – it was – it was created in some – some tax purposes.  RT 286

Streeter:  The People asking more questions of the person in particular that was responsible for getting the default judgment in the holding of the IRS, which was Mr. Kory.  RT 290

PD:  And in those emails, there’s multiple times Ms. Lynch requested forensic accounting; isn’t that correct?

Kory:  Most of the time I saw, when I read them, you have to read those emails carefully, I didn’t see a request for forensic accounting.  What I saw is a request that we change the forensic accounting.  That we withdraw a K-1.  These are fairly sophisticated concepts.  RT 425-426

Kory:  As I read them, as I read them, I was reading a formidable, intelligent person with sophisticated tax knowledge who had the forensic accounting and the K-1s and all the tax information in her possession, and she was requesting that we somehow modify what we had reported.  RT 426