From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 17, 2013 at 6:25 PM
Subject: Kelley Lynch vs. Leonard Cohen
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Hello IRS Commissioner's Staff,
The IRS makes an appearance in Leonard Cohen's biography by Sylvie Simmons. Here's the lovely chapter entitled "Taxes, Children, Los Pussy." Leonard Cohen did not unknowingly sign away the rights to "Suzanne" and the other two songs. I was involved in the negotiations to buy these songs back. There is no such evidence. Steven Machat doesn't believe it either and Machat & Machat was involved in the original deal with Cohen's then managers. As Steven said, when Cohen wants to break a contract, he just accuses someone of ripping him off.
Cohen's lawyers (evidently Kory and Rice who took the stand
and lied, including with respect to the IRS which seemed unwise at best)
were concerned about the charitable trusts and retirement account.
Obviously. Leonard Cohen had no money to repay his loans? Well, he had
just received $1 million from Dear Heather; went through with the
mutli-million lithograph deal I was negotiating; was touring (and it was a
contractual obligation); and makes it up as he goes along. Let me quote
Simmons about the IRS:The IRS makes an appearance in Leonard Cohen's biography by Sylvie Simmons. Here's the lovely chapter entitled "Taxes, Children, Los Pussy." Leonard Cohen did not unknowingly sign away the rights to "Suzanne" and the other two songs. I was involved in the negotiations to buy these songs back. There is no such evidence. Steven Machat doesn't believe it either and Machat & Machat was involved in the original deal with Cohen's then managers. As Steven said, when Cohen wants to break a contract, he just accuses someone of ripping him off.
I think the IRS can figure out that Leonard Cohen personally wasted/spent approximately $7.1 million re. TH - and that would include Neal Greenberg's deranged fees. He hired him. I couldn't stand him and met with City National Bank and other investors (and can prove this) because I thought they were safer investors. I am aware that the charitable remainder trusts are huge issues for Leonard Cohen. In fact, I think Sylvie Simmons has actually set forth Cohen's motive.
Leonard Cohen's personal actions - including the use of these sham entities - is the cause for the dissipated assets. He just doesn't like it. Leonard Cohen does not like the consequences of his own actions unless they serve his need. That's why there are so many lies on the transcript with respect to my alleged trial that was nothing more than an attempt to sabotage me and the IRS and showcase Leonard Cohen's good rock and roll stories about Phil Spector and a gun. Unfortunately, Cohen now has three highly embellished versions of his Phil Spector gun story before LA Superior Court and I tend to doubt Phil Spector will drop that issue. There mere notion is absurd, particularly as Cohen's testimony at my trial is in direct contradiction to the version Spector prosecutors used in their motions (readily available on LA Superior Court's website) and - according to Mick Brown (who has seen the Grand Jury Transcripts) in statements presented to the Grand Jury. Cohen and the prosecutor simply decided to conceal the fact that Mick Brown brought this information to my attention. How wise - lying about a situation that involves a very well connected music industry journalist who was kind enough to confirm this for my public defenders and to provide me with more information since my release - including as recent as March 2013. This, of course, is newly discovered evidence. Mick Brown has no theories on why Leonard Cohen has so many different versions of his good rock and roll story about Phil Spector - or why Cohen would lie about this situation. I do. I see right through Leonard Cohen who likes to present himself as the victim. It works nicely for his adoring journalist fans - but not for people who think critically, like the facts, understand that evidence has been concealed, and know what motive means.
Unfortunately, Leonard Cohen's own declaration in the CAK deal, Greg McBowman, Arthur Indursky, and others, can prove that Cohen wanted these sales - demanded these deals, demanded stock deals. The stock deals limited who would purchase these assets to essentially one company: Sony.
The most fascinating aspect of this chapter - Kory consulted Ira Reiner. I never told Kory "Hell will freeze over before you find out what happened to the money. It was my money." This man is a bald faced liar and the IRS should prosecute him and Rice. That is my personal opinion.
The City Attorney has lied during the trial and in their Reply Brief. Nothing can change that now. They have lied about me, the IRS, assets of TH, a tax form I do not have (which Streeter advised the jurors I do), and many things. They are now clearly covering for Cohen. That is their problem.
There's no ancient history here. Leonard Cohen - with the City Attorney and District Attorney - targeted me in 2012. I am appealing. The judge accepted the Writ. I am moving legally against Leonard Cohen. And, LA Superior Court has exposed me to abject insanity on many fronts. That includes Judge Robert Vanderet who should be investigated for his role in this matter; the situation with Agent Tejeda/IRS; etc. You know, over the IRS "thing" to quote Vanderet. And then there's Vanderet's insanity with respect to Phil Spector. I tried to explain why Cohen was testifying about Phillip to an investigator last night and it just simply doesn't make any sense. In any event, he asked me if I had evidence that I went to the IRS. The answer is yes - including Agent Sopko's email which - together with the IRS Commissioner's Staff's email to me in 2005 - is the only evidence that relates to anything that involves the IRS or Treasury. Robert Kory's bullshit fictional narrative attempting ot defend Leonard Cohen to Agent Tejeda/IRS is proof of nothing with the IRS. Neither is the fraud refund. That has now been challenged as fraud - as have the illegal K-1s. Cohen's clear what a K-1 is and Kory understands I asked that they withdraw them. They refuse to do so. I still am not in receipt of Leonard Cohen's 1099 for the year 2004. He has provided these to me previously. See his tax returns. The man perjured himself when he said I handled IRS filings. See all his tax records.
All the best,
Kelley
http://books.google.com/books?
--
In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.
--
In
order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements
that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an
affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax,
and (3) willfulness.
