Date: Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Cease and desist
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com
Mike Feuer,
I was just reviewing the co-conspirator's slanderous article he posted online and has been sending to third parties. He's interested in my sons, SWAT, Killer King, etc. Is he interested in Vivienne Swanigan? The Scribd squabble is fascinating and evidence of a blatant legal conspiracy. Let the criminal stalker argue that with Kory & Rice.
I was just reviewing the co-conspirator's slanderous article he posted online and has been sending to third parties. He's interested in my sons, SWAT, Killer King, etc. Is he interested in Vivienne Swanigan? The Scribd squabble is fascinating and evidence of a blatant legal conspiracy. Let the criminal stalker argue that with Kory & Rice.
Kelley Lynch
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Stephen Gianelli,I see your psychotic obsession with me continues and am aware of your insane Scribd squabble with Kory/Rice that is nothing other than a cover your ass operation.For the record, I didn't write you about a movie or book so I have no idea why you are writing and lying to me about that.Is your ex-client, Karina Von Watteville, thinking of suing me? That sounds just perfect since I don't know her and, after contacting Robert Kory, she was represented by you and the two of you defrauded Paulette Brandt of $6,700. You then began relentessly harassing Linda Carol. i'm sure LA Superior Court will appreciate the details of this situation so KVW should put her money where her mouth is. Is she still attempting to defraud Sam Menning's estate? I suppose you feel I cannot afford to subpoena LAPD's TMU. Linda Carol confirmed her statements about KVW for them. I think I can.I'm not interested in hearing about Jennifer Lindsey, Steve Lindsey, or Lorca Cohen from you or anyone else. I know them well and didn't realize you knew them at all.Cease and desist. That includes with respect to my appeals, the 9th Circuit Tax Court case, and my RICO suit. I have no idea what "rumors" you are talking about so perhaps you're hallucinating.Kelley LynchFrom: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:14 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>To answer your question, the only one I know of who is writing a Kelley Lynch book is me.I have not met Jennifer Lindsey or Lorca Cohen and Steve Lindsey has no involvement in my project.I am working with a lawyer who is a partner in the largest entertainment law firm in Los Angeles (who I have known since my undergraduate college days) to get it published and to market the screen and television rights.And, Ms. Lynch, you don’t know any lawyers except a few who have sued and/or prosecuted you on behalf of their clients – let alone a lawyer who told you I was working with Jennifer Lindsey and Lorca Cohen on a book project. Mommy Dearest.From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:30 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>BTW, since you want to engage in rumor this week in emails mentioning my name, here is what I heard today:You are about to get sued. Again.
