Date: Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:07 AM
Subject: Fwd: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Leonard Cohen's Operative Is Interested In Kelley Lynch's Appeals; Cohen's Attorneys of Record Should Simply Respond to the Appeals
To: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, Robert Kory <rkory@koryrice.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Fabian Paulmikell A <Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov>
Michelle Rice and Robert Kory,
You are the attorney's of record with respect to the four appeals before the Appellate Division. Stephen Gianelli has not entered a formal notice of appearance. Therefore, if you would like to discuss the appeals related to the fraudulent default judgment or fraudulent domestic violence order, hit reply all or abide by the legal process and respond to the appeal briefs when they are filed. The appeal before the 9th Circuit does not involve you. It involves the theft of $1 million from Traditional Holdings, LLC and fraud upon the Tax Court.
The records re. the four appeals have been designated. Tax Court will submit the documents filed there to the 9th Circuit. Only an arrogant idiot would assume that one cannot designate a record. As for the researching and writing of the appeal briefs, please just concern yourself with your own work. Your lies, fraud, perjury, and misconduct have worked to date and the appellate division appears to rubber stamp most appeals so you may prevail there. However, that will not be the end of this situation. The appeals in all matters are going to the U.S. Supreme Court. I have as good a shot as anyone before that Court. And, the due process issues are mind boggling. So is the manner in which self-represented litigants are taken advantage of and treated. Furthermore, a legal default judgment is not a judgment that involves THEFT.
For the record, I do NOT believe that Gianelli is not Cohen's operative. I know how the man functions. I am convinced that Gianelli is an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team who may also be moonlighting for the Spector prosecution. I am not alone in this belief. Feel free to lie to yourselves and all courts about this fact.
In the meantime, this conduct should cease and desist.
Kelley Lynch
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:59 AM
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:59 AM
Subject: River Deep - Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen: Leonard Cohen's Operative Is Interested In Kelley Lynch's Appeals; Cohen's Attorneys of Record Should Simply Respond to the Appeals
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
1. I am not "Leonard Cohen's operative";
2. I am not "interested in" your four pending appeals;
3. There is an old Irish expression the gist of which is "there is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip" - in your case meaning that BEFORE Cohen will be required to "respond" to your three appeals pending in the CA/2 and BEFORE the IRS will be required to "respond" to your pending appeal in the 9th Circuit, you will be required to survive the potential dismissal of those appeals by failing to perfect them through the filing of the necessary record on appeal in each such case and then by filing FOUR opening briefs on appeal (one in each pending appeal) that comply with the applicable rules on appeal. A huge "IF" - since most pro se appeals are DISMISSED long before the respondent or apealee is required to file his or her brief on appeal.
4. Even if you do manage to perfect each of your appeals, there is ZERO CHANCE that anyone is even mildly anxious about a reversal, since each appeal is utterly and completely without merit.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10
